wastewater treatment, electricity, and transportation (e.g. roads, bridges, tunnels, ports and
airports), among other facilities. One focus will be on innovative approaches to funding,
financing, constructing, operating, and maintaining physical infrastructure. This includes
analysis of various forms of public-private partnerships, or PPPs. Another focus will be on the
regulation of private infrastructure provision, such as controlling market power in the pricing of
services, ensuring proper asset maintenance and high service quality. The course will include
theoretical approaches to infrastructure policy and detailed case studies, and will have a global
perspective.
Course structure: There are three main elements to this course: (i) in-class lectures; (ii) guest
speakers; and (iii) student group presentations. There are two main aspects of the lecture material:
(i) discussion of the basic economic concepts underlying infrastructure policy; (ii) application of
those theories to the infrastructure underlying specific network industries.
Learning Objectives: The objective of this course is to understand the main policy challenges
facing the delivery of physical infrastructure. Those include natural monopoly, asset specificity,
irreversible investment, and hold-up problems. Students will learn how public policies can be
used to help address those problems. Students will learn about alternative approaches to funding
physical infrastructure, and how innovative financing can help address infrastructure delivery
problems once it is funded. Students will also learn about new approaches to operating and
maintaining infrastructure, and how technology can be used to improve infrastructure delivery.
The course encourages critical thinking within a systems context and attempt to integrate
principles from engineering, planning, municipal finance and economics, the social, policy, and
decision sciences, and risk management.
Learning Outcomes: Students can expect to obtain the following specific learning outcomes from
taking this course:
Outcome 1: Students will acquire an enhanced understanding of the unique set of policy problems
that face the delivery of physical infrastructure.
Outcome 2: Students will better appreciate how policy can be used creatively to address many of
those problems.
Outcome 3: Students will have a better understanding of the infrastructure policy problems facing
countries around the world, as well as the similarities and differences in the problems faced.
Textbooks: The main textbook for this course will be Jose Gomez-Ibanez, 2003. Regulating
Infrastructure: Monopoly, Contracts, and Discretion (Cambridge: Harvard University
Press). This book will be used in conjunction addition to a variety of readings. This book is
available in the bookstore and on Amazon. Copies will be placed on reserve in Mann
Library.
We will regularly examine current issues related to infrastructure policy as discussed in popular
publications. Particularly relevant sources include the Wall Street Journal, the Financial Times,
business section of the New York Times, and The Economist, among others. I am grateful to students
who point out articles that are of particular interest, or are otherwise relevant for the subjects we are
studying.
2
Blackboard: Please be sure to sign up for and check Blackboard frequently for announcements,
lecture slides, problems sets, and other information. I will utilize the Announcements function
regularly, and will only email students with particularly important information. All PowerPoint
slides will be posted on Blackboard.
Class Meetings and Format: The class format includes lectures assisted by both PowerPoint and
Blackboard, in-class discussions, occasional use of the document camera to display recent
newspaper reports and essays, and student in-class discussion. Because we are a relatively small
group, attendance at all class meetings is critical.
Academic Integrity: Fairness to your fellow students requires that late homework and unexcused
absences from exams result in a loss of points. Each student in this course is expected to abide by
the Cornell University Code of Academic Integrity. Although discussion of problem set questions is
permitted, any work submitted by a student in the course for academic credit will be the students
own work. If there are any questions about the code, see: http://www.cornell.edu/University
Faculty/docs/main.html.
Prerequisites: This course will rely on fundamental economic concepts to analyze government
intervention in economic activity. It will also examine papers that analyze infrastructure policy
empirically. Students should thus have taken principles of economics and basic statistics; the more
they have been exposed to those subjects the better.
Grading: Fairness in grading is a high priority. I will ensure that examination and homework
questions accurately test the material from the class discussions and the readings. Class grades will
be based on:
(1) Four problem sets, collectively constituting 10 percent of the final grade
(2) Class attendance and participation (including written guest speaker questions) constituting 10
percent of the final grade
(3) Two in-class prelim examinations, each constituting 20 percent of the final grade
(4) A comprehensive final exam, constituting 25 percent of the final grade
(5) A group project resulting in a 20 to 25 page term paper analyzing a particular infrastructure
policy problem (with in-class presentation), constituting 15 percent of the final grade
Fairness dictates that any appeal of grades result in re-grading of the entire exam or problem set in
question, rather than only a specific question. Requests for re-grading must be submitted in writing
within one week of the works return. You will receive a response in writing.
Group projects will be discussed in more detail in separate handouts. The group projects should
apply some of the key concepts discussed in the course to an infrastructure policy issue of the
students choosing. They should incorporate several of the following concepts (which we will
discuss) into its analysis:
Careful attention to how infrastructure policy affects economic efficiency (i.e. the size of
the pie). Does the project or policy in question increase overall social welfare? Does the
discounted social value of the benefits exceed the costs?
Careful attention to how the policy affects equity, or universal access to critical
infrastructure services, such as transportation and clean water
3
Sept.
Curriculum
Reading Due
Work Due
Tu. 26
Syllabus
Th. 28
Tu. 2
Th. 4
Tu. 9
Th. 11
Tu. 16
Th. 18
Tu. 23
Th. 2
Tu. 7
Th. 9
Tu. 14
Th. 16
Th. 25
Tu. 30
Oct.
Tu. 21
Th. 23
Tu. 28
Th. 30
P; G&N, ODOT
E, RRG, W
DT
Manville
Readings, S
BF
Memo #1 Due
Lectures 1 to 8
BF
JGI Ch. 9
JGI Ch. 8, Ch.
11
TBA
Nov.
Tu. 4
PRELIM EXAM #2
Th. 6
Tu. 11
Th. 13
Tu. 18
Dec.
Th. 20
Tu. 25
Tu 2
Th. 4
TBA
Lectures 9 to 16,
guest speaker
material
TBA
TBA
TBA
speaker
All Associated Readings
TBA
TBA
TBA
TBA
All lectures,
presentations,
and guest
speaker material
RRG= R. Richard Geddes, 2011. The Road to Renewal: Private Investment in U.S. Transportation
Infrastructure (Washington, DC: AEI Press).
JGI= Jose Gomez-Ibanez, 2003. Regulating Infrastructure: Monopoly, Contracts, and Discretion
(Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
P = Poole, Robert, Ten Reasons Why Per-Mile Tolling is a Better User Fee than Fuel Taxes,
(available at: http://reason.org/files/why_tolling_is_better_than_fuel_taxes.pdf).
VVH = W. Kip Viscusi, John M. Vernon and Joseph E. Harrington, 2005. Economics of Regulation
and Antitrust, 4th edition (Cambridge: MIT Press).
G&N= Geddes, R. R., Nentchev, D. N., 2013. Road Pricing and Asset Publication: A New
Approach to Revitalizing U.S. Infrastructure, AEI Policy Brief, Washington, DC: American
Enterprise Institute (December 2013, available at: http://www.aei.org/files/2013/12/10/road-pricing-and-asset-publicization_12592596596.pdf, accessed August 4, 2014).
E= The Economist, Investing in Infrastructure: The Trillion-Dollar Gap, May 22, 201 (available
at: http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21599358-how-get-more-worlds-savings-paynew-roads-airports-and-electricity).
W = Winston, Clifford, 2014. How the Private Sector Can Improve Public Transportation
Infrastructure, Reserve Bank of Australia, Conference Volume, pp. 163-87.
S = Shoup, Donald C., 2011. The High Cost of Free Parking (Chicago: American Planning
Association).
Examples of topics for Term Papers:
Students may choose any topic for their term papers that fits within the broad rubric of this class.
Topics can be taken from the Gomez-Ibanez book, the Geddes book, or from current policy
issues. Some examples of infrastructure policy issues that could be addressed in term papers
include:
Value-for-money analysis: what are its benefits and shortcomings? Is there a better
replacement?
Water PPPs around the world: how successful; good versus bad models?
Paris and private participation in water? What is the nature of the fight?
Londons Heathrow airport noise problem tradable noise permit? Application of the
Coase Theorem?
Reporting on the issue of infrastructure resilience. What does this man and what are its
policy implications?
History of private roads in the U.S. (including wooden plank roads; see work by Klein &
Majewski)
Seattle boring machine disaster (i.e. Bertha; its stuck!); who should bear this risk?
Road pricing/tolling: overview of the Oregon Road Pricing Program
Policy issues in parking: pricing spaces and PPPs (e.g. Chicago Parking Meters PPP)
What are the best ways to gain public support for system-wide road pricing?
High-speed rail in the USA/abroad: how feasible; how to address the policy challenges
(new Florida line)?
How can we better incorporate technology into physical infrastructure?
What policy challenges do emerging technologies (such as driverless cars) present?
How to PPPs operate in the provision of stand-alone (i.e. non-network) social
infrastructure, including schools, prisons, and hospitals?
What policy challenges do emerging business models that use technology present (such
as Uber versus Lyft) present?
US adjustment to the new Panama Canal expansion? Are East Coast Ports ready?
Reform of the Port Authority of NY & NJ, or indeed overview of the authority model
(see new report at: http://wagner.nyu.edu/rudincenter/wpcontent/uploads/2014/04/PortAuthorityFINAL_Web.pdf)
Reform of U.S. parking policy
http://www.transportation-finance.org/
International Project Finance Association: IPFA Events <Events@ipfa.org>
Government:
Federal Highway Administration, Office of Innovative Program Delivery:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/
Advocacy Groups:
Associate for the Improvement of American Infrastructure
http://aiai-infra.info/
Major Infrastructure Players (not exhaustive!):
Fluor
Cintra US
Clark Construction Group
ACS
Kiewit
Parsons Brinkerhoff
Skanska
Star America
AECOM
HNTB
Parsons Corporation
Iridium
Ferrovial
United Water
Abertis
Globalvia
Veolia Water
Sacyr Concessions
Ernst & Young
HDR Consult
Arup
CDM Smith
CH2M Hill
Meridiam Infrastructure
OHL Concessions
LifeSpan Technologies (http://lifespantechnologies.com/)
Major Law Firms:
8
Nossaman, LLP
Mayer Brown
Osler
Guest Speaker Short Bios:
Dr. Martha Gross
Senior Infrastructure Advisor, Arup
Martha is a senior infrastructure advisor at Arup for transportation megaprojects. Her work in
the firm's Transaction Advisory practice has advanced large public-private partnership initiatives
in both the planning and construction stages as lenders' technical advisor, translating between
technical and financial stakeholders for privately-financed tunnel and highway projects. In her
current role, she serves in senior commercial management for the New York State Thruway
Authority to deliver New York's $3 billion Tappan Zee Bridge replacement. Having started her
career as a hands-on field construction worker, she spent seven years in the heavy-civil
contracting industry developing large transportation projects along the east coast. She
subsequently earned an MBA and PhD in infrastructure finance and delivery, building on
previous degrees in civil engineering, and is a licensed civil engineer. With past experience as
adjunct teaching faculty, she continues to maintain close connections to academia and frequently
speaks and writes on infrastructure topics. Martha has a MBA, PhD-Civil Engineering from
Virginia Tech and a BS and MEng in Civil Engineering from Pennsylvania State University.
Martha also serves on the Advisory Council of the Cornell Program in Infrastructure Policy. See
more at: http://www.human.cornell.edu/pam/cpip/advisory_council.cfm#sthash.cEVkWl4Z.dpuf
Steve Greenberg
Managing General Partner, Fox Meadow Capital Partners
Steve is a senior finance professional with 20 years of experience in private equity,
infrastructure, mergers and acquisitions, and financing. He founded Fox Meadow Capital
Partners, a private equity investment and advisory firm, in 2007 and currently works on
infrastructure investments with some of the world's largest infrastructure funds. He also has
operating experience in electric power, cellular, landline communications, and various media
businesses. Mr. Greenberg has taught an advanced private equity course for Cornell's graduate
engineering and business schools since 2008. He received a BS from Cornell's College of
Engineering in 1989, an MBA from the Johnson Graduate School of Management in 1990 and a
JD from Stanford Law School in 1998. Steve also serves on the Advisory Council of the Cornell
Program in Infrastructure Policy. See more at:
http://www.human.cornell.edu/pam/cpip/advisory_council.cfm#sthash.cEVkWl4Z.dpuf
Thomas J. Madison, Jr.
Executive Director, New York State Thruway Authority
Tom Madison is the Executive Director of the 570-mile Thruway and the 524-mile Canal
System. As Executive Director, Mr. Madison oversees the day-to-day operations of the Authority
while directly reporting to a Board of Directors consisting of seven members appointed by the
Governor of New York State. Prior to joining the Authority/Corporation, Mr. Madison had held
a variety of executive positions in private industry including Vice President for STV Inc, of New
9
York City and President of Spectra Subsurface Imaging Group, LLC. Mr. Madison also held
high level positions with Federal and State government including Federal Highway
Administrator at the U.S. Department of Transportation, as well as Commissioner of the New
York State Department of Transportation where he oversaw the states vast transportation
network. Prior to his time at NYSDOT, Madison served as Deputy Secretary and principal
transportation advisor to Governor George E. Pataki of New York, where he provided executive
management to state transportation agencies and authorities. Madison was also the Director of
the New York State Bridge Authority, and had previously served as Chairman of the
Metropolitan Transportation Authoritys Capital Program Review Board. Mr. Madison is a 1988
graduate of the State University of New York at Geneseo, and has a Bachelor of Arts degree in
Political Science with a minor in International Relations.
10