DOI 10.1007/s00421-009-1134-2
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Introduction
Since 2009 the format of international judo competition has
been one 5-min period, which can be complemented by
extra time until one athlete scores or to the end of a new
3-min period. However, the incidence of extra time in high
level competition is lower than 2% of the total number of
matches (IJF website, http://www.ijf.org). The typical time
structure is 2030 s of activity with a 510-s interval (Van
Malderen et al. 2006; Castarlenas and Planas 1997;
Sikorski et al. 1987), during which the athletes spend most
of the time (51 11%) trying to perform a grip (Marcon
et al. 2007), resulting in a high physiological demand on
the upper body (Franchini et al. 2007; Thomas et al. 1989).
Thus, this format taxes both the aerobic and the anaerobic
systems. The anaerobic system provides the short, quick,
all-out bursts of maximal power during the match, while
the aerobic system contributes to the athletes ability to
sustain effort for the duration of the combat and to recover
during the brief periods of rest or reduced effort (Franchini
et al. 2003; Muramatsu et al. 1994). In a high level competition judokas perform 57 matches in the same day in
order to classify among the best five competitors, with a
minimal interval of 10 min between two consecutive
matches, although the typical time interval is around
15 min (Franchini et al. 2003).
For recovery periods of 1020 min some studies have
indicated that active recovery (AR) is better than passive
recovery (PR) for blood lactate removal (Greenwood et al.
2008; Siegler et al. 2006; McAinch et al. 2004; Gupta et al.
1996; Weltman and Regan 1983; Weltman et al. 1979).
However, the effect of AR on subsequent performance is
controversial when the interval between the first and the
second bout is 1020 min (Greenwood et al. 2008;
Monedero and Donne 2000; Watts et al. 2000; Thiriet et al.
123
Methods
Experimental design
Three studies were conducted to investigate the effects of
AR or PR after a judo match on subsequent performance.
The activity used to measure performance varied in its
ability to provide a valid measurement of work performed
and in its specificity to judo. Figure 1 presents a schematic
view of each study.
Basically, during the four upper body Wingate test,
power is calculated constantly, but the movement used
(arm cranking) is not specific to judo actions. In the special
Fig. 1 Schematic
representation of the study
design
123
Study 1 (n = 16)
Study 2 (n = 9)
Study 3 (n = 12)
Age (years)
21.9 4.1
22.1 1.8
21.3 2.3
77.1 5.2
74.1 11.8
82.5 15.8
176.6 9.7
177.0 10.3
179.2 10.1
Height (cm)
11.8 4.3
10.3 5.0
13.2 3.5
62.6 7.4
58.8 7.8
59.5 6.3
11.2 1.4
11.4 1.1
10.8 1.9
7.8 1.0
8.0 0.8
7.6 1.3
48.2 4.9
53.8 4.8
50.7 5.0
General procedures
Participants were required to refrain from exercise 24 h
prior to each trial and not to ingest any food 3 h prior the
test sessions. They were also instructed to replicate intake
for all trials. All subjects were familiarized with the procedures adopted and have performed the tests previously at
least once in other studies. The tests were conducted with a
minimal time interval of 24 h and a maximum of 2 weeks
between the first and last test session. All tests were conducted at the same time of day.
_ 2 peak and 4 mmol l-1 lactate threshold
Treadmill VO
intensity measurements
_ 2 peak test began with a 7-km h-1 speed, 1%
The VO
grade, with 1.4 km h-1 increment each minute to the
subjects exhaustion. Throughout the test, oxygen uptake
_ 2 was measured breath-by-breath with the telemetric
VO
system of a portable gas analyzer (K4b2, Cosmed, Rome,
Italy). In all cases the test stopped by participants inability
_ 2 peak was considered the
to continue (exhaustion). VO
_
highest VO2 measured during a 30-s time interval.
The protocol proposed by Heck et al. (1985) was used to
determine the 4 mmol l-1 lactate threshold (4LT). Blood
lactate during this and other tests was measured by using an
automated device (YSI 1500, Yellow Springs, OH, USA).
Warm up
Before each test (control or experimental sessions), participants warmed up at an intensity of 70% 4LT for 5 min,
followed by a 3-min rest before the test.
Wingate anaerobic tests
Judokas completed four bouts of the upper-body Wingate
test separated by 3-min recovery periods. Load was set at
4.9 N kg-1 of body weight. Peak power, mean power,
fatigue index, time to reach peak power, and total work
123
Results
Blood lactate and heart rate during recovery
In all studies blood lactate concentration before and peak
blood lactate after match one did not differ among experimental conditions (P [ 0.05).
In study 1, there was an interaction effect between
type of recovery and time of measurement (F = 7.69;
P \ 0.001) for blood lactate. Differences between recovery
types occurred at 9th (AR: 7.27 2.67 mmol l-1; PR:
8.79 2.74 mmol l-1; P \ 0.001), 12th (AR: 5.42
2.53 mmol l-1; PR: 7.39 2.23 mmol l-1; P \ 0.001)
and 15th min (AR: 4.46 2.27 mmol l-1; PR: 6.59
123
Discussion
The main findings of the present study were that lactate
disappearance was facilitated during AR compared to PR
in all three studies. However, subsequent performance was
not changed in studies 1 (four upper-body Wingate tests)
and 2 (special judo fitness test). On the other hand,
although the time structure and the number of actions
performed during match 2 did not differ across experimental conditions, the odds ratio of winning was increased
ten times when the athlete performed AR and his opponent
performed PR after match compared to the opposite condition (athlete performed PR and the opponent performed
AR after match 1). Thus, the performance difference across
procedures varied accordingly to the specificity of the task
employed (i.e., no difference in less specific tasks and a
significant improvement in the most specific task).
The lower blood lactate after matches 2 compared to
matches 1 in study three is different from those reported in
studies which more than one match was evaluated (Thomas
et al. 1990; Tumilty et al. 1986; Sikorski et al. 1987;
Condition
Wins on
match 1
Wins on
match 2
OR [CI95%]
PR 9 AR
PR 9 PR
3.24 [0.56;18.77]
0.189
AR 9 PR
10.50 [1.52;72.37]
0.017
AR 9 AR
3.24 [0.56;18.77]
0.189
123
123
References
Artioli GG, Gualano B, Coelho DF, Benatti FB, Gailey AW, Lancha
AH Jr (2007) Does sodium-bicarbonate ingestion improve
simulated judo performance. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab
17:206217
Baldari C, Videira M, Madeira F, Sergio J, Guidetti L (2004) Lactate
removal during active recovery related to the individual
anaerobic and ventilatory thresholds in soccer players. Eur J
Appl Physiol 93:224230
Belcastro AN, Bonen A (1975) Lactic acid removal rates during
controlled and uncontrolled recovery exercise. J Appl Physiol
39:932935
Bogdanis GC, Nevill ME, Boobis LH, Lakomy HKA (1996) Contribution of phosphocreatine and aerobic metabolism to energy
supply during repeated sprint exercise. J Appl Physiol 80:876884
123