Available at http://www.aijmr.net
ISSN : 2320 236X
Quality Impact Factor : 5.573
ORIGINAL PAPER
METHODOLOGY
Descriptive design was adopted for the study. The universe of the study was the
workmen of the manufacturing industries in SIPCOT, Cuddalore. Stratified random sampling
was used to select the sample. The sample size was 80 respondents. A self prepared
questionnaire was used for collecting data from the respondents. The data was analysed using the
statistical tools namely mean, standard deviation, percentage analysis, chi-square, ANOVA and
correlation.
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
Table 1: Demographic Variables
Variables
Age
Marital status
No. of family
members
No. of earning
members
Annual income (Rs.)
Place of living
Educational
qualification
Years of experience
Particulars
Below 30
31- 35
36 - 40
41 - 45
46 - 50
51 and above
Married
Unmarried
4 and below
5-6
7 and above
1
2
Below 100000
100001 - 200000
200001 - 300000
300001 and above
Village
Town
9th std and below
10th std passed
12th std passed
ITI passed
Diploma passed
5 and below
6 - 10
11 - 15
16 - 20
21 and above
Frequency
13
14
16
8
15
14
77
3
58
18
4
79
1
14
31
18
17
65
15
9
24
24
18
5
8
11
12
13
36
Percentage
16.2
17.5
20.0
10.0
18.8
17.5
96.2
3.8
72.5
22.5
5.0
98.8
1.2
17.5
38.8
22.5
21.2
81.2
18.8
11.2
30.0
30.0
22.5
6.2
10.0
13.8
15.0
16.2
45.0
Variables
Designation
No. of employees
Particulars
Operator
Fitter
Boiler operator
E.t.p operator
Electrical operator
Helper
Foreman
Turner
Others (Store, Lab chemist,
Receptionist)
62
120
160
300
315
No trade union
2
3
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Frequency
38
5
3
3
6
3
6
8
8
14
1
15
1
49
15
15
50
61
19
18
62
20
60
21
59
51
29
Percentage
47.5
6.2
3.8
3.8
7.5
3.8
7.5
10.0
10.0
17.5
1.2
18.8
1.2
61.2
18.8
18.8
62.5
76.2
23.8
22.5
77.5
25.0
75.0
26.2
73.8
63.8
36.2
Participated in
negotiations
Attended domestic
enquiry
Assisted delinquent
employee in the
domestic enquiry
The table 1 shows that 20 percent of the respondents belong to the age group between
36-40 years, 18.8 percent of them were between 46-50 years and 17.7 were above 51 years. More
are less, an equal percentage was found among the age distribution of the respondents. Majority
of the respondents was married and majority of the respondents family had below 4 members
and majority of their family had one earning member. The table also shows that 38.8 percent of
the respondents were earning an annual income between Rs.100001-200000, 22.5 percent were
earning between Rs.200001 -300000, 21.2 percent were earning above Rs.300000 and 17.5
percent were earning below Rs.100000. majority of the respondents were living in village. It
shows that 30 percent of them have completed their 10th STD, 30 percent of them have
completed their 12th STD, 22.5 percent of them have passed their ITI and 6.2 percent have
completed their diploma.
The study shows that 45 percent of the respondents had an experience above 21 years.
The study also shows that 61.2 percent of the respondents have stated that 315 employees were
working in their industry, 18.8 percent stated that 160 employees were working, 17.5 percent of
them stated that 62 employees were working in their industry.
The table shows that 62,5 percent of the respondents have stated that their industry had
3 trade unions, 18.8 percent of them stated that their industry had 2 trade unions and 18.8
percent stated that they do not have any trade unions in their industry. From the table it is clear
that 76.2 percent of them were members in trade unions and 22.5 percent of them were holding
Volume - II, Issue - IV April - 2014
positions in trade unions and 6.3 percent of them were holding a position as joint secretary. The
findings shows that 25 percent of the respondents have participated in the negotiations regarding
bonus, wage, etc and 26.2 percent of them have faced disciplinary problems and attended
disciplinary enquiry and 63.8 percent of them have helped their colleague in disciplinary enquiry.
Table 2: Perception on Elements of Disciplinary Proceedings
Elements
Particulars
Frequency
Percentage
Standing order
Strongly Agree
23
28.8
Agree
10
12.5
Neutral
22
27.5
Disagree
10
12.5
Strongly Disagree
15
18.8
Complaint
Strongly Agree
16
20.0
Agree
11
13.8
Neutral
23
28.8
Disagree
24
30.0
Strongly Disagree
6
7.5
Preliminary enquiry
Strongly Agree
17
21.2
Agree
18
22.5
Neutral
18
22.5
Disagree
16
20.0
Strongly Disagree
11
13.8
Charge sheet
Strongly Agree
15
18.8
Agree
23
28.8
Neutral
14
17.5
Disagree
25
31.2
Strongly Disagree
3
3.8
Elements
Particulars
Frequency
Percentage
Suspension pending
Strongly Agree
20
25.0
enquiry
Agree
16
20.0
Neutral
19
23.8
Disagree
16
20.0
Strongly Disagree
9
11.2
Appointment of
Strongly Agree
10
12.5
enquiry officer
Agree
24
30.0
Neutral
25
31.2
Disagree
19
23.8
Strongly Disagree
2
2.5
Representation of
Strongly Agree
26
32.5
parties
Agree
19
23.8
Neutral
15
18.8
Disagree
12
15.0
Strongly Disagree
8
10.0
Notice of enquiry
Strongly Agree
17
21.2
Agree
20
25.0
Neutral
14
17.5
Disagree
22
27.5
Strongly Disagree
7
8.8
Volume - II, Issue - IV April - 2014
Adjournment
Domestic enquiry
procedure
General
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
18
19
23
9
11
16
16
25
8
15
16
20
16
13
15
16
19
13
17
15
22.5
23.8
28.8
11.2
13.8
20.0
20.0
31.2
10.0
18.8
20.0
25.0
20.0
16.2
18.8
20.0
23.8
16.2
21.2
18.8
The table 2 depicts that 28.8 percent of the respondents strongly agree to the statements
towards the standing order and 27.5 percent of the respondents perception was neutral. The
finding shows that 30 percent of the respondents disagree to the statements towards complaint
and 28.8 percent of the respondents perception was neutral. The table shows that 22.5 percent
of the respondents agree to the statements towards preliminary enquiry and 22.5 percent of the
respondents perception was neutral. The table shows that 31.2 percent of the respondents
disagree to the statements towards charge sheet and 28.8 percent of the respondents agree
towards the same.
The table shows that 25 percent of the respondents agree to the statements towards
suspension pending enquiry and 23.8 percent of the respondents perception was neutral. The
table shows that 30 percent of the respondents agree to the statements towards appointment of
enquiry officer and 31.2 percent of the respondents perception was neutral. The finding shows
that 32.5 percent of the respondents strongly agree to the statements towards representation of
parties and 23.8 percent of the respondents agree towards the same.
The finding shows that 27.5 percent of the respondents disagree to the statements
towards notice of enquiry and 25 percent of the respondents agree towards the same. The
finding shows that 28.8 percent of the respondents perception towards adjournment was found
to be neutral and 23.8 percent of the respondents agree towards the same. The finding shows
that 31.2 percent of the respondents perception towards domestic enquiry was found to be
neutral and 20 percent of the respondents strongly agree towards the same. The findings depicts
that 25 percent of the respondents agree to the statements towards second show cause notice
and 20 percent of the respondents perception was neutral. The finding shows that 23.8 percent
of the respondents agree to the statements towards general proceedings and 21.2 percent of the
respondents disagree towards the same.
Particulars
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Total
Mean =160.82
Frequency
17
17
16
16
14
80
Percentage
21.2
21.2
20.0
20.0
17.5
100.0
SD=26.06
The table 3 depicts that 21.2 percent of the respondents strongly agree, 21.2 percent of
the respondents agree, 20 percent of the respondents perception was neutral, 20 percent of the
respondents disagree and 17.5 percent of the respondents strongly disagree towards the
disciplinary proceedings
Table 4: Relationship between demographic variables and perception on Disciplinary
Proceedings
Variables
Age and opinion on Disciplinary
enquiry
Income and opinion on
Disciplinary enquiry
Education and opinion on
Disciplinary enquiry
Experience and opinion on
Disciplinary enquiry
Company and opinion on
Disciplinary enquiry
Business and opinion on
Disciplinary enquiry
Membership in union and
opinion on Disciplinary enquiry
Participation in negotiation and
opinion on Disciplinary enquiry
Attended enquiry and opinion
on Disciplinary enquiry
Helped in enquiry and opinion
on Disciplinary enquiry
Statistical tool
Correlation
Correlation
ANOVA
Correlation
ANOVA
Chi-square
ANOVA
ANOVA
ANOVA
ANOVA
Values
r = - 0.498
P<0.05
r = - 0.535
P<0.05
F = 1.587
P<0.05
r = -0.663
P<0.01
F = 183.061
P<0.01
2 = 83.690
P<0.01
F = 84.744
P<0.01
F = 4.407
P<0.05
F = 11.380
P<0.01
F = 65.527
P<0.01
Result
Significant
Significant
Not-Significant
Significant
Significant
Significant
Significant
Significant
Significant
Significant
The table 4 depicts that, there was a negative significant relationship between age of the
employees and opinion on the disciplinary proceedings at 0.05 level. It is inferred that higher the
age the opinion towards disciplinary proceedings was found to be poor and vice versa. There was
a negative significant relationship between income of the employee and opinion on the
disciplinary proceedings at 0.05 level. It is inferred that higher the income, the opinion towards
disciplinary proceedings was found to be poor and vice versa. There was no significant
difference in the employee perception on the disciplinary proceedings with respect to educational
qualification of the employee at 0.05 level. There was a negative significant relationship between
experience of the employees and opinion on the disciplinary proceedings at 0.05 level. It is
Volume - II, Issue - IV April - 2014
inferred that higher the years of experience, the opinion towards disciplinary proceedings was
found to be poor and vice versa.
There was a significant difference in employee perception on the disciplinary proceedings
among those who are a member in union and those who are not a member in union at 0.05 level.
The mean value shows that the employees who are not member in union had better positive
perception. There was a significant difference in the employee perception on the disciplinary
proceedings among the employees who have participated in negotiation and who had not
participated in negotiation at 0.05 level. The mean value shows that the employees who had not
participated in negotiations had better positive perception.
There was a significant difference in the employee perception on the disciplinary
proceedings among the employees who had attended enquires and who had not attended
enquires at 0.05 level. The mean value shows that the employees who had not attended enquiry
had better positive perception. There was a significant difference in the employee perception on
the disciplinary proceedings among the employees who had helped their colleagues in enquiry
and who had not helped at 0.05 level. The mean value shows that the employees who had not
helped their colleagues by participating in the enquiry had better positive perception.
CONCLUSION
The present study concludes that the overall perception of the employees towards the
disciplinary proceedings was found to be neutral. Although the overall perception was found to
be neutral, the demographic variables namely age, income, experience, membership in union,
participation in negotiation and enquiry had a significant influence on the perception of the
employees about the disciplinary proceedings that too in particular, the detailed analysis revealed
that the respondents who are in the higher age, income, service in the industry, the respondents
who are the office bearer of the union and participated in the negotiation pertaining to increase
in wages, bonus and other service conditions, the respondents who were delinquent employee in
the domestic enquiry and who were assisting the delinquent employee in the capacity of coemployee in the domestic enquiry had poor perception about the disciplinary proceedings being
practiced in the respective manufacturing industries.
REFERENCES
1. Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D.E. & Gilliland, S.W. (2007). The Management of
Organisational Justice. Academy of Management Perspectives. November, 34-48.
2. Gmez-Mejia, L.R., Balkin, D.B. & Cardy, R.L. (1995). Managing Human Resources.
Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.
3. Mary A. Owele (2007). Employees Perception of Disciplinary Procedures in the Kenya
Civil Service: A Case Study of Selected Ministries. Master of arts dissertation.
http://archive.uonbi.ac.ke/PHPExcel/EditAbstracts/Projects_List.php?s_STUDENT_
NAMES=mary+a.+owele
4. Van der Bank , Engelbrecht & Strmpher. Perceived Fairness of Disciplinary Procedures
in the Public Service Sector: An Exploratory Study. SA Journal of Human Resource
Management, Vol. 6 No. 2 pp. 1 8.
5. Werner, A. (2007). Organisational behaviour: a contemporary South African perspective.
Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
Volume - II, Issue - IV April - 2014