Background
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of
maternal mortality. All women who carry a pregnancy
beyond 20 weeks gestation are at risk for PPH and its
sequelae. Although maternal mortality rates have declined
greatly in the developed world, PPH remains a leading cause
of maternal mortality elsewhere.
Postpartum
hemorrhage. Maternal morbidity by subregion, 1995.
The direct pregnancy-related maternal mortality rate in
the United States is approximately 7-10 women per
100,000 live births. National statistics suggest that
approximately 8% of these deaths are caused by PPH. [1] In
industrialized countries, PPH usually ranks in the top 3
causes of maternal mortality, along with embolism and
hypertension. In the developing world, several countries
have maternal mortality rates in excess of 1000 women per
100,000 live births, and World Health Organization
statistics suggest that 25% of maternal deaths are due to
PPH, accounting for more than 100,000 maternal deaths per
year.[2] The most recent Practice Bulletin from the
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places
the estimate at 140,000 maternal deaths per year or 1
woman every 4 minutes.[3]
The rate of PPH increased from 1.5% in 1999 to 4.1% in
2009, and the rate of atonic PPH rose from 1% in 1999 to
3.4% in 2009. The risk of total PPH with a morbidly
adherent placenta was markedly higher.[4]
Problem
The definition of PPH is somewhat arbitrary and
problematic. PPH is defined as blood loss of more than 500
mL following vaginal delivery or more than 1000 mL
following cesarean delivery.[5] A loss of these amounts
within 24 hours of delivery is termed early or primary PPH,
whereas such losses are termed late or secondary PPH if
they occur 24 hours after delivery. This article focuses on
early PPH.
Estimates of blood loss at delivery are subjective and
generally inaccurate. Studies have suggested that
caregivers consistently underestimate actual blood loss.
Another proposal suggests using a 10% fall in hematocrit
value to define PPH, but this change is dependent on the
timing of the test and the amount of fluid resuscitation
given.[6] More importantly, the diagnosis would be
retrospective, perhaps useful for research but not so in
the clinical setting.
Another consideration is the differing capacities of
individual patients to cope with blood loss. A healthy woman
has a 30-50% increase in blood volume in a normal singleton
pregnancy and is much more tolerant of blood loss than a
PPH
mL
of
Control Relative
Rate, % Risk
500 14
95%
CI*
NNT 95%
CI
0.38
0.320.46
12
10-14
0.33
0.210.51
55
4291
Hemoglobin
9 g/dL
< 6.1
Blood
transfusion
Therapeutic
uterotonics
*CI:
0.4
0.290.55
27
2040
2.3
0.44
0.220.53
67
48111
17
0.2
0.170.25
6-8
Confidence
NNT:
Number
needed
interval
to
treat
Blood
Pressure
(systolic)
500-1000 Normal
mL
(1015%)
Symptoms
Signs
and Degree
Shock
Palpitations,
tachycardia,
dizziness
of
Compensated
1000Slight
fall Weakness,
1500 mL (80-100 mm tachycardia,
(15-25%) Hg)
sweating
Mild
1500Moderate
Restlessness,
2000 mL fall (70-80 pallor, oliguria
(25-35%) mm Hg)
Moderate
Imaging Studies
The onset of PPH is generally rapid. With proper diagnosis
and treatment, resolution usually occurs before further
laboratory work or imaging can be undertaken. In
experienced hands, bedside ultrasound may help reveal
clots or retained products; however, the treatment of PPH
includes manual exploration if bleeding persists. This
renders ultrasound redundant in the acute setting at a time
when treatment must not be delayed. Antenatal ultrasound
is indispensable for detecting high-risk patients with
predisposing factors for PPH, such as placenta previa, and
is becoming increasingly sensitive and specific in the
diagnosis of placenta accreta and its variants. Pelvic vessel
angiography is discussed in Treatment.
Diagnostic Procedures
PPH usually manifests with such rapidity that diagnostic
procedures are almost entirely limited to a physical
examination of the involved structures.
Blood transfusion
Order blood transfusions if blood loss is ongoing and
thought to be in excess of 2000 mL or if the patients
clinical status reflects developing shock despite aggressive
resuscitation. Data from various sources suggest that 1 in
16-40 women experiencing PPH requires a blood transfusion
if active third-stage management is used, whereas
approximately 1 in 9 requires a transfusion if expectant
management is used. Newer studies tend to have lower
transfusion rates than older studies.[8]
Whole blood is no longer available in most settings, and, for
many reasons, PRBCs are initially used with other blood
components and given only if indicated. Most medical units
have access to uncrossmatched O-type Rh-negative PRBCs
for catastrophic bleeding. In PPH, uncrossmatched ABOand Rh-compatible blood is usually available because a blood
group and antibody screen has already been performed.
Have full crossmatched blood available for transfusion
within 30 minutes. Clinicians must be aware of the
capabilities of their blood bank regarding timing, type, and
amount of blood products available in emergencies. Good
communication with the blood transfusion service is
essential, and the nature of the emergency and the
potential amount of blood products required must be
stressed.
The goal is to rapidly transfuse 2-4 U of PRBCs to replace
lost oxygen-carrying capacity and to restore circulating
volume. Administer the blood transfusion through a set
with an integrated filter, and use a blood warmer if the
infusion rate (>100 mL/min) or the total volume infused is
high. A rapid infusion set with an integrated warmer or a
pressure cuff may be used to increase the infusion rate.
PRBCs are very viscous, reducing the infusion rate. This
problem may be overcome by adding 100 mL of NS to each
unit. Do not use LRS for this purpose because the calcium
contained in the solution may cause clotting.
The risks of transfusion are well known and are covered
elsewhere (eg, seeTransfusion Reactions or Transfusion
and Autotransfusion), but they include infection,
transfusion reaction, and development of atypical
antibodies. Several other complications may be noted in
large-volume transfusions. The risk of hypothermia is
minimized by the use of blood warmers. Dilutional
coagulopathy may be observed and is discussed below.
Hyperkalemia and acidosis related to the use of stored
blood are theoretical risks but are seldom clinically
important if perfusion of vital organs is maintained.
Monitor electrolyte and acid-base status if the situation is
Coagulopathy
Women experiencing PPH do not usually have a preexisting
disorder of hemostasis; however, initial blood work includes
a coagulation screen and platelet count. In previously
healthy women, dilutional coagulopathy is not usually
observed until approximately 80% of the original blood
volume has been replaced. Regularly monitor hemostatic
test results in all women who require a massive transfusion.
If findings are abnormal in conjunction with ongoing
bleeding or oozing from puncture sites, mucous surfaces, or
wounds, additional blood products are required. Infuse
fresh frozen plasma (FFP), beginning with 4 U and following
with additional units to normalize the coagulation test
findings. Many authorities recommend the addition of 1 U
of FFP for every 5 U of PRBCs for patients who require
continued transfusion.
Thrombocytopenia is likely after 1.5-2 times the blood
volume has been replaced. Keep the platelet count more
than 50 X 109/L by using platelet transfusion. Each unit of
platelets increases the platelet count by approximately 10
X 109/L. (Platelets are usually given in packs of 5-6 U.) If
bleeding is continuing and the platelet count is less than 50
X 109/L, administer 10-12 U initially. If surgical
intervention is necessary, maintain the platelet count at
more than 80-100 X 109/L. Platelet preparations contain
some RBCs, and the administration of anti-D immunoglobulin
(RhoGAM, WinRho) is recommended for Rh-negative women
after the crisis has passed.[34]
If coagulation test results are abnormal from the onset of
PPH, strongly consider an underlying cause (eg, abruptio
placenta, HELLP syndrome, fatty liver of pregnancy,
intrauterine fetal demise, amniotic fluid embolus,
septicemia, preexisting disorder). Take specific steps to
treat the underlying cause and the hemostatic abnormality.
DIC may also develop if shock has led to marked
hypoperfusion of tissues, causing damage and release of
tissue thromboplastins. In such cases, laboratory test
results reveal that the D-dimer levels are elevated and
fibrinogen levels are very low, with a prolonged thrombin
time. The management of DIC is identical to that for a
patient with dilutional coagulopathy. Restoration and
1.
2.
3.
Organization
Call
experienced
staff
(including
obstetrician and anesthetist).
2.
Alert the blood bank and hematologist.
3.
Designate a nurse to record vital signs,
urine output, and fluids and drugs administered.
4.
Place operating theater on standby.
Resuscitation
1.
lines.
Evaluation of response
1.
Monitor pulse, blood pressure, blood gas
status, and acid-base status, and consider
monitoring central venous pressure.
2.
Measure urine output using an indwelling
catheter.
3.
Order regular CBC counts and coagulation
tests to guide blood component therapy.
Summary