ANZJSurg.com
Key words
radiation cystitis, ileal conduit, vesicovaginostomy.
Correspondence
Dr John Samuel Banerji, Department of Urology,
Christian Medical College, Vellore 632004, India.
Email: johnsbanerji@cmcvellore.ac.in
J. S. Banerji MS, MCh, DNB; A. Devasia
MS, MCh, FRCS(Ed); N. S. Kekre MS, DNB;
N. Chacko MS, MCh, FRCS.
Accepted for publication 21 September 2014.
doi: 10.1111/ans.12898
Abstract
Background: To study the magnitude of radiation cystitis following radiation therapy
for carcinoma cervix, and propose an algorithm to decide on early diversion, with or
without vesicovaginostomy.
Methods: Women who developed radiation cystitis following radiotherapy for carcinoma cervix from January 1998 to December 2011 were included in this retrospective
study. Electronic hospital records were analysed to document the presence of radiation
cystitis. All women who developed evidence of radiation-induced cystitis, according to
the common toxicity and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria, were included
in the study. We looked at transfusion requirements, number of hospital admissions,
quality of life and cost involved. Chi-square tests were done where applicable. SPSS
version 16 was used for analysis.
Results: Of the 902 patients who received radiation for carcinoma cervix in the
13-year period, 62 (6.87%) developed grade 3/4 cystitis. Twenty-eight of them underwent ileal conduit diversion, with 18 undergoing concomitant vesicovaginostomy.
When compared with the patients who did not have diversion, the transfusion requirements, number of hospital admissions and quality of life had a statistically significant
difference. Cost analysis of early diversion too showed a marginal benefit with early
diversion. The limitation of the study was that it was retrospective in nature.
Conclusion: In radiation cystitis, multiple hospital admissions and consequential
increase in cost is the norm. In severe disease, early diversion is a prudent, costeffective approach with good quality of life and early return to normal activity.
Introduction
Radiation therapy is an important armamentarium in the treatment of
pelvic malignancies. However, the bladder and the rectum do often
get inadvertently irradiated, especially in the pre-intensitymodulated radiation therapy era.
Radiation cystitis has a significant morbidity, requiring recurrent
hospital admissions. Added to this is the burden of recurrent transfusions, with its attendant risk of blood-borne infections. Although
modalities like alum instillation and hyperbaric oxygen have been
used, long-term efficacy data is lacking.
Carcinoma cervix being predominantly a disease of the lower
socio-economic group, economics begins to further dictate management protocols. As there were no recommended guidelines, we
embarked on this retrospective study to determine if we could formulate a management protocol for severe radiation cystitis.
2014 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons
Methodology
This was a retrospective study spanning from January 1998 to
December 2011, with approval of the institutional review board.
Electronic data review of patients who received radiotherapy for
carcinoma cervix was obtained.
All patients who had symptoms suggestive of radiation cystitis
according to the common toxicity criteria viz. burning micturition,
increased frequency, haematuria, incontinence, renal failure were
initially evaluated. They were then categorized according to the
ANZ J Surg (2014)
Banerji et al.
Results
The total number of patients who developed radiation cystitis in the
13-year period was 184. Of these, 62 developed severe cystitis
(Table 1). Two patients died because of sepsis and one had a bladder
perforation, peritonitis and multi-organ dysfunction.
902
184
122
62
3
2
Table 2 Comparison of patients who were managed conservatively (group A) with those who underwent diversion (group B)
Mean group A (n = 34)
Range
Range
Age of onset
3470 years
3270
2 units (SD-1.22)
03 units
37 units
1.2 (SD-1.62)
13
5.2 (SD-1.45)
28
51 Gy (SD-1.44)
5054.4 Gy
53.2 Gy (SD-1.25)
5253.2 Gy
610 years
412 years
3 (n = 24)
5.2 (n = 28)
P-value
0.08
CI 1.9646 to 4.0354
t = 5.7959
SE Diff 0.17
<0.0001
CI 2.8702 to 4.3298
t = 9.8676
SE Diff 0.365
<0.0001
CI 3.2109 to 4.7891
t = 10.1397
SE Diff 0.394
0.09
0.0027
CI 0.5425 to 2.4575
t = 3.1337
SE Diff 0.479
0.06
Discussion
Radiation proctitis
Pre-renal azotemia
Hydroureteronephrosis
DVT/SVC obstruction
Group A (n = 34)
Group B (n = 28)
8
1
0
0
6
3
5
1
Follow-up
Follow-up was available for all the women in group B, and 25 of the
34 women in group A. The mean follow-up was 23.2 months (range:
1568 months) in group A and 13.2 months in group B (range: 620
months).
Quality of life changes were difficult to assess, and as there were
no previously used models to study the same, we used the Patients
Global Impression of Change scale. This was a simple tool, using a
telephonic question asked to patients, whether they felt any change
in their symptoms after treatment.
As expected, in group A, we were able to get only 24/34 patients
to respond. The average score there was 3/7. In group B, all 28
patients responded, and the mean score was 5.2/7. Though this was
not statistically significant (P = 0.06), the ones who underwent
diversion were extremely satisfied with the resultant improvement in
quality of life.
We also tried to address cost issues. The average inpatient bills for
urinary diversion in the form of ileal conduit with or without
vesicovaginostomy was Rs 55 000 (US$1000).
Each admission with haematuria necessitating bladder washes
and transfusion costs were about Rs 15 000 (US$272.72).
With a mean admission rate of 5.2 in the group A patients, this
would add up to a cost of about Rs 78 000 (US$1418). Thus, it was
evident that early diversion would indeed be cost-effective in this
setting of severe grade radiation cystitis.
2014 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons
Pelvic radiation for carcinoma cervix has been a mainstay of treatment for decades. However, toxicity to the bowel and bladder do
occur, especially with escalating doses of radiation in excess of
60 Gy.1 The most acceptable theories for late manifestations of
radiation cystitis is the ischaemic theory wherein endarteritis caused
by radiation causes ischaemic changes to the urothelium and the
detrusor muscle leading to ulceration, scarring and fibrosis.24
A recent study from India noted that 11.2% of patients had toxicities of all grades, and 1.2% of patients had severe (grades 3/4)
toxicity to the bladder.5 Our patient population had a marginally
higher rate of severe cystitis (6.78%). This could be due to the fact
that we had a mixed, mobile population where in about 30% of our
population are from other states. As the initial inciting factor viz.
radiation would have been given elsewhere, the dosimetry schedules
probably varied at different centres. Hence, the higher rates of severe
cystitis as compared with the oft mentioned 13%.
The management of cystitis depends on the grade of cystitis.
Those with grade 1 and 2 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group)
cystitis generally are instructed about timed voiding. Vitamin E has
been used by many with varying results.
The severe grades are the more difficult to manage. A host of
different methods have been used, like argon plasma coagulation,
alum instillation, formalin instillation and even hyperbaric oxygen
therapy.
While alum and formalin have been around for a long time, there
are only a few studies to prove efficacy, with frequent instillations
necessary.
The use of formalin is not without danger of complications like
ureteral stenosis, fibrosis and bladder perforation. Studies show that
35% develop minor complications with as much as 105 developing
the severe complications with use of formalin.6
Alum irrigation, another common method used earlier6 was relegated to the background because of documentation of complications like neurological deterioration, anaemia and cardiomyopathy.7
Banerji et al.
Conclusion
In radiation-induced cystitis, multiple admissions necessitating
transfusions are the norm. Early diversion in a select group of
patients is a good, cost-effective option, with good quality of life,
and should be offered in the setting of severe radiation cystitis.
References
1. Pointreau Y, Atean I, Durdux C. Normal tissue tolerance to external
beam radiation therapy: bladder. Cancer Radiother. 2010; 14: 3638.
2. Pavlidakey PG, MacLennan GT. Radiation cystitis. J. Urol. 2009; 182:
11723.
3. Marks LB, Carroll PR, Dugan TC et al. The response of the urinary
bladder, urethra and ureter to radiation and chemotherapy. Int. J. Radiat.
Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1995; 31: 125780.
4. Crew JP, Jephcott CR, Reynard JM. Radiation-induced haemorrhagic
cystitis. Eur. Urol. 2001; 40: 11123.
5. Saibishkumar EP, Patel FD, Sharma SC. Evaluation of late toxicities of
patients with carcinoma of the cervix treated with radical radiotherapy:
an audit from India. Clin. Oncol. (R. Coll. Radiol.) 2006; 18: 307.
6. Donahue LA, Frank IN. Intravesical formalin for hemorrhagic cystitis:
analysis of therapy. J. Urol. 1989; 141: 80912.
7. Seear MD, Dimmick JE, Rogers PC. Acute aluminium toxicity after
continuous intravesical alum irrigation for haemorrhagic cystitis.
Urology 1990; 36: 3534.
8. Wines MP, Lynch WD. A new minimally invasive technique for treating
radiation cystitis: the argon-beam coagulator. BJU Int. 2006; 98: 6102.
9. Del Pizzo JJ, Chew BH, Jacobs SC, Sklar GN. Treatment of radiation
induced hemorrhagic cystitis with hyperbaric oxygen: long-term
followup. J. Urol. 1998; 160: 7313.
10. Adeyoju AB, Thornhill J, Lynch T, Grainer R, McDermott R, Butler
MR. The fate of the defunctionalized bladder following supravesical
urinary diversion. Br. J. Urol. 1996; 78: 803.
11. Kemp DR. The forgotten bladder after urinary diversion. Report of a
case of a sealed bladder. Br. J. Surg. 1966; 53: 2369.
12. Dretler SP. The occurrence of empyema cystis; management of the
bladder to be defunctionalized. J. Urol. 1972; 108: 824.
13. Fazili T, Bhat TR, Masood S, Palmer JH, Mufti GR. Fate of the leftover
bladder after supravesical urinary diversion for benign disease. J. Urol.
2006; 176: 6201.