Umar Hamzah
Professor, School of Environmental Science and Natural Resources, Faculty of
Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi,
Selangor, Malaysia
umar@ukm.edu.my
ABSTRACT
The gravity method involves measuring the Earths gravitational field at specific locations
influenced by differences in density of sub-surface rocks. It has found numerous applications in
engineering, environmental and geothermal studies especially in locating voids, faults, buried
stream valleys, water tables and geothermal heat sources. A total of 753 gravity data acquired
from the northwestern part of the United Kingdom by the British Geological Society were used in
this study with the aims of studying the major structural patterns within the Cheshire basin. The
data were processed and analysed with the aid of Oasis Montaj software to determine the fault
trends within the entire sedimentary basin. The Bouguer gravity map shows positive anomaly in
the northwestern part of the study area indicating the presence of high density sedimentary rocks
while negative anomaly observed in the southern part corresponds to low density sediments. The
regional and residual isostatic maps derived from different cut-off wavelengths reflect changes in
anomalies corresponding to different types of sedimentary rocks such as mudstone, sandstone
and limestone. The major faults patterns in Cheshire basin were clearly observed from the
Bouguer gravity total horizontal derivative map. Most of the major faults observed in the south of
study area are trending in NW-SE and NE-SW directions. The N-S trend minor faults are found
in the west and east, while the E-W trends were dominant in the north and south of the study
area. The limestone basement depth of about 3736m was estimated from the 2D-modeled cross
section developed along the E-W border.
INTRODUCTION
Gravity method is a non-destructive geophysical technique that has been widely used to
measure the earths gravitational field at specific locations on the earths surface due to the
difference in subsurface density values. This method works when the buried targets have densities
very much different as compared to the host material. The gravity technique has successfully
- 4381 -
4382
delineated the Nash dome in coastal Texas which was considered the first geophysical oil and gas
discovery (LaFehr, 1980; Nabighian et al. 2005). Its application was also considered as fruitful in
both mineral (Hoover et al. 1991; Dransfield 2007) and oil exploration (Badmus et al. 2011) in
terms of its ability in determining the thickness of overburden material overlying the bedrock or
the volume of any sedimentary deposit. This method is also popularly used in exploring the
geological faults (Gao & Song 2006), buried ancient stream valleys (Lyatsky & Dietrich 1998),
cavities (Hajian et al. 2012), geothermal deposits (Mariita 2010) and changing of subsidence
levels in sinkholes development (Rybakov et al. 2001).
The purpose of this study is to produce improved gravity anomaly map by using the Oasis
Montaj software which enable applications of isostatic regional and residual filtering as well as
the total horizontal derivative filtering applied to the gravity data. The resulting anomaly maps
were then used in the interpretations of faults trend and tectonic system of the subsurface
geological formations in the study area. The 2D inversed model was generated to estimate the
depth and thickness of the subsurface geology overlying the bedrock. The study area covered 50
km x 20 km and located in the northern part of Cheshire Basin, North West of United Kingdom.
A total of 753 gravity data measured along 1.6 x 1.6 km each were obtained from the British
Geological Society (BGS) for used in this study.
4383
Geologically, Cheshire Basin (Figure 1), Carlisle Basin and Irish Sea Basin are located in
North-Western England. McLean (1978) observed that the Cheshire Basin and East Irish Sea
Basin formed part of NW-SE trending Clyde Belt of Triassic troughs extending from the
Highland Boundary Fault to the Cheshire Basin. Figure 2 shows the geological map of the study
area indicating the Cheshire Basin which generally lies within a NNW-SSE trending PermoTriassic rift that extends from the Wassex Basin to the Scottish Inner Hebrides. This half-graben
is bordered on the east by the Wem-Red Rock fault system, which has depth to Permo-Triassic
base at 3500 m (Chadwick and Evans, 1995). Colter and Barr (1975) found that the Triassic
succession thins out by depositional onlap at the western margin. In the early 1970s, several oil
companies conducted seismic surveys across this area and discovered that the seismic sections
had problems in defining the base of Permo-Triassic sediment. Therefore, Lamb et al. (1983)
stated that the assumption of no flat-lying Coal Measures in the Permo-Trias layer was uncertain.
THEORY
Solution of inverse problem in finding acceptable geological models representing measured
gravity field variations is a complex task. Figure 3 shows one or several 3D layers model which
are defined in a bounded space. The inversion procedure requires no explicit matrix inversion
leads to a simple factorization of the forward problem in the frequency domain. The earlier 3D
methods divided the subsurface into a several vertical infinite depth prisms which can be
determined by least squares inversion in the space domain (Cordell and Henderson 1968; Gerard
4384
and Debeglia 1975; Chai and Hinze 1988). This method lies in speed and good convergence even
though it is limited to small data sets. The theoretical basis follows closely to several studies by
Parker (1973) for forward problem and Pilkington and Crossley (1986) for inverse problem.
4385
4386
g
2Gc)h
z
(7)
where g0 is the observed gravity value, gt is theoretical gravity value, g z is vertical gradient
gravity value (0.3086 mgal/m), G is gravity constant (6.67210-6 m2kg-1mgal), c is rock density
and h is station elevation above the datum. The density value used in this study is 2675 kg/m3 and
g is given in the equation (8) as written below;
g = 978.03185(1 + 0.005278895 sin2 + 0.000023462 sin4 )
(8)
4387
Total horizontal derivative (THD) function is used to enhance the linear features in the
gravity contour which reveal the presence of faults, dykes, and lineaments in the study area. This
operation measures basically the rate of change of gravity field in X and Y directions and creates
a resultant grid (Cordell, 1979). This has the effect of highlighting high gradient areas such as
might occur at faulted boundaries which is useful for delineating structural trends and the azimuth
specific horizontal derivative can also be calculated to further highlight any particular trends
(Cordell and Grauch, 1985).
Gravity modelling will be carried out in the final stage of gravity interpretation with the aims
of determining the density, depth and geometry of one or more subsurface bodies. The GM-SYS
modelling is an interactive software for 2D-modeling of geological cross sections perpendicularly
constructed to the strike of the body or structure. It also has the ability to calculate and display
gravity responses of any subsurface body. The method used to calculate the gravity responses of
any structure or subsurface body are based on the formulations given by Talwani et al. (1959),
Chakravarthi and Sundararajan (2005), and make use of algorithms described in Won and Bevis
(1978). The calculated gravity responses will be compared with the observed gravity anomaly and
the model dimensions will be adjusted so that the calculated gravity response of the model and the
observed anomaly are matched. The final model will be considered to represent the actual
subsurface body for the observed anomaly.
4388
4389
sedimentary basin above the basement in the study area. A band of high gravity values trending
from northwest to southeast is observed in the isostatic residual map. This high gravity zone is
sandwiched between lower gravity values in the north and south. This trend can be interpreted as
representing a possible anticlinal fold (F) with the crest located in the middle part of the study
area. The fold dips towards the north and south which is covered by thicker sediment.
4390
Figure 8: Total horizontal derivative map and the trend lines of potential faults.
Figure 9: Rose diagram indicating the major and minor trends of faults observed from THD map.
Major trends of faults are NW-SE and NE-SW.
Two cross sections along E-W were developed from the Bouguer anomaly map purposely
for 2D modeling (Figure 10 a, b). Models were estimated based on borehole and geological cross
section of the study area consisting mainly of sedimentary rocks. The top Triassic mudstone
density is assigned as 2.34 g/cm3 while the Permo-Triassic sandstone underlying it has a density
of 2.54 g/cm3. The highest density of 2.58 g/cm3 is assigned to the Lower Palaeozoic limestone
basement.
4391
(a)
(b)
Figure 10: The cross section of (a) Profile 1 and (b) Profile 2 based on 2D inverse modeling.
The results of 2D modeling show the estimate depth to limestone basement of about 3736
m. Gale et al. (1984) reported that the basement depth based on Prees and Knutford boreholes
drilled within the Chesire basin were 3726 m and 2992 m respectively. Therefore the depth to
4392
basement based on 2D gravity modeling and drilling are quite similar. Interestingly, the 2D
modeling reveals the presence of a basinal sedimentary structure separating the PermoCarboniferous sandstone and mudstone and the Palaeozoic limestone basement. Based on
previous study, coal beds are found in the boarder of sandstone-limestone upper carboniferous
Millstone Grit.
CONCLUSIONS
Gravity anomaly maps were developed from the Oasis Montaj software. The difference in
Bouguer anomalies referred to difference in rock types and densities. The isostatic maps with
different cut-off wavelengths indicate changes in rock compositions in the study area. The THD
Bouguer gravity anomaly maps show NW-SE and NE-SW dominant fault trends. 2D modeling
across several profiles discovered the presence of a sedimentary basin structure and successfully
estimated the depth of limestone basement. Further study will be carried out in future by
integrating gravity, magnetic, seismic and borehole data for detail basin analysis.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors appreciate the British Geological Society (BGS) for providing the gravity data
and information needed for this study.
REFERENCES
1. Ade-Hall, J., Reynolds, P., Dagley, P., Musset, A., Hubbard, T., and Klitzsch, E. (1974)
Geophysical studies of North African Cenozoic volcanic area Haruj Assuad, Libya.
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 11: 998-1006.
2. Badmus, B. S., Sotona, N. K., and Krieger, M. (2011) Gravity support for hydrocarbon
Exploration at the prospect level. Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied
Sciences (JETEAS). Scholarlink Research Institute Journals. 2(1): 1-6. ISSN: 2141-7016.
3. Chadwick, R. A. & Evans, D. J. (1995) The timing and direction of Permo-Triassic extension
in southern Britain. In: Boldy, S. R. (ed.) Permian and Triassic Rifting in Northwest Europe.
Geological Society, London. Special Publications. 91:161-192.
4. Chai, Y and Hinzew, J. (1988) Gravity inversion of an interface above which the density
contrast varies exponentially with depth. Geophysics 53,837-846.
5. Chakravarthi, V., and Sundararajan, N. (2005) Gravity modeling of 21/2-D sedimentary basin
- a case of variable density contrast. Computers & Geosciences archive 31(7): 820-827.
6. Colter, V. S. and Barr, K. W. (1975) Recent developments in the geology of the Irish Sea and
Cheshire basin. Petroleum and the Continental Shelf of North West Europe, A.W. Woodland
(ed.), 1,61-73. Applied Science Publishers Ltd.
7. Cordell, L. (1979) Gravimetric expression on graben faulting in Santa Fe country and
Espanola basin, New Maxico: Guidebo. 30th Field conf. N. Mex. Geol. Soc. pp59-64.
8. Cordell, L. and Grauch, V. J. S. (1985) Mapping basement magnetisation zones from
aeromagnetic data in the San Juan basin, New Mexico. The utility of regional gravity and
maps. Society of exploration geophysics pp181-197
4393
4394
24. Nabighian, M. N., Ander, M. E., Grauch, V. J. S., Hansen, R. O., LaFehr, T. R., Li, Y.,
Pearson, W. C., Peirce, J. W., Philip, J. D., and Ruder, M. E. (2005) Historical development
of the gravity method in exploration. Geophysics 70(6):63-89.
25. Rybakov, M., V. Goldshmidt, L. Fleischer and Y. Yostein, (2001) Cave detection and 4-D
monitoring: A microgravity case history near the Dead Sea: The Leading Edge, 20: 896-90.
Gravity Method: Environmental and Engineering Applications.
26. Suleiman, I. S., Keller, G. R., & Suleiman, A. S. (1991) Gravity study of the Sirt Basin,
Libya. The Geology of Libya VI: 2461-2468.
27. Talwani, M., Worzel, J. L. & Landmisman, M. (1959) Rapid gravity computations for twodimensional bodies with application to the Mendocino Submarine Fracture zone. J. Geophy.
Res 64: 49-59.
28. Won, & Bevis. (1978) Computing the gravitational and magnetic anomalies due to a polygon:
algorithms and Fortran subroutines. Geophysics 52: 232-238.
2014 ejge