INTRODUCTION
Performance appraisal is a formal, structured system of measuring and
evaluating an employees job ,related behavior and outcomes to discover how and why
the employee is presently performing on the job and how the employee can perform
more effectively in the future ,so that the employee, organization and society all benefit.
Performance appraisal is a process of summarizing, assessing and developing the
work performance of an employee. In order to be effective and constructive, the
performance manager should make every effort to obtain as much objective information
about the employees performance as possible.
Performance appraisal is a review and discussion of an employees performance
of assigned duties and responsibilities based on results obtained by the employee in their
job, not on the employees personality characteristics .personality should be considered
only when it relates to performance of assigned duties and responsibilities. It is a
structured formal interaction between a subordinate and supervisor, that usually takes the
form of a periodic interview(annual or semiannual),in which the work performance of
the subordinate is examined and discussed ,with a view to identifying weakness and
strengths as well as opportunities for improvement and skills development.
In many organizations but not all appraisal results are used, either directly or
indirectly, to help determine reward outcomes that is the appraisal results are used to
identify the better performing employee who should get the majority of available merit
pay increases, bonuses and promotions. By the same token, appraisal results are used to
identify poorer performers, who may require some form of counseling, or in extreme
cases, demotion, dismissal or decreases in pay.
Employee performance appraisals are considered necessary in order to provide
information about performance rankings. This information assists in making decisions
regarding salary fixation, promotion, confirmation, transfer and demotion. Apart from
this information, employee performance appraisals provide feedback information about
VCR Institute of Management Studies
Page 1
Performance Appraisal
the level of achievement and behavior of employees. This information helps to assess the
performance of the employees, rectify performance deficiencies, and set new standards
of work required, Employee performance appraisals pay a crucial role in providing
information that helps to counsel employees. The information helps to identify in
employees regarding skill and knowledge, determine training developmental needs,
recommended means for employee growth, and give suggestions for correcting
placement. Furthermore, employee performance appraisals avoid grievances and
punitive activities.
Performance appraisals aim at building and maintaining a satisfactory level of
performance. They also aim at contributing to employee growth and improvement
through training and management development programs. One of its purposes is to help
the superiors have a good understanding about their subordinates. They also play a major
role in guiding employees tom job changes with the help of constant raking. Another
objective of employee performance and to facilitate fair and equitable compensation
based on performance and to facilitate testing validating selection tests. It also provides
information for taking decisions concerning layoff and retrenchment and suggesting
change in employee behavior if required. Organizations have to decide the content to be
appraised before the program is accepted. Normally, the content to be appraised is
determined on the basis of job analysis. The content to be appraised may vary with the
purpose of appraisal, and position of employees.
Properly conducted performance appraisals let employees know how well they
are perforating and also considerably influence the employee's future level of effort and
task direction. Performance appraisal is an organized description of an employee's jobrelevant strengths and weaknesses. Appraisals are mostly arranged periodically
according to specific plan. By focusing the attention on performance, performance
appraisals go to the heart of personnel management and reflect the management's
interests in the progress of the employees. Performance appraisals may be conducted
once in every 6 months or once in year. The basic idea of the appraisals is to evaluate the
performance of the employee, giving him a feedback. Identify areas where improvement
Page 2
Performance Appraisal
is required so that training can be provided. Give incentives and bonus to encourage
employee etc.
TRADITIONAL METHOD:
Traditional method of performance appraisal has been used by companies for
very long time a common feature of this method is they are really relatively simple and
involve appraisal by one senior.
2. Confidential report:
This method is very popular in government department to appraise IAS officers
and other high level officials. In this method the senior or the boss writes a report about
the junior giving him details about the performance about the employee. The +ve and -ve
traits, responsibilities handled on the job and recommendations for future incentives or
promotions. The report is kept highly confidential and access to the report is limited.
Page 3
Performance Appraisal
4. Ranking method:
In this method ranks are given to employees based on their performance. There
are different methods of ranking employees
I. simple ranking method
II. Alternate ranking method
III. Paired comparison method
I. simple ranking method:
Ranking methods compare one employee to another, resulting in an
ordering of employees in relation to one another. Rankings often result in overall
assessments of employees, rather than in specific judgments about a number of
job components.
Straight ranking requires an evaluator to order a group of employees from
best to worst overall or from most effective to least effective in terms of a certain
criterion. specified egg. If we have to rank 10 best employees we start with first
best employee and give him the first rank this followed by the 2nd best and so on
until all 10 have been given ranks.
II.
III.
Page 4
Performance Appraisal
In this method each and every person is the group, the department or team is
compared with every other
comparison is made on certain criteria and finally ranks are given . this method is
superior because it compares each person on certain qualities and provides a
ranking on the basis.
6. Narrated essay:
In this method the senior or the boss is supposed to write a narrative essay
describing the qualities of his junior.
He may describe the employees strength and weakness, analytical abilities etc.
The narrative essay ends with a recommendation for future promotion or future
incentives.
MODERN METHODS:
Modern methods of appraisal are being increasingly used by companies. Now
days one of the striving feature that appraisal involves is, the opinion of many people
about employee and in some cases psychological test are used to analyze the ability of
employee.
These methods are as follows
Role analysis:
VCR Institute of Management Studies
Page 5
Performance Appraisal
In this method of appraisals the person who is being apprised is called the
focal point and the members of his group who are appraising him are called role
set members.
Assessment centers:
Assessment centers (Ac) are places where the employee's are assessed on
certain qualities talents and skills which they posses. This method is used for
selection as well as for appraisal. The people who attend assessment centers are
given management games, psychological test, puzzles , questionnaires about
different management related situations etc. based on their performance in these
test an games appraisal is done.
Management objective:
In this method all members of the department starting from the target
goals to be achieved, plan for achieving these goals and work together to
achieve them. The senior in the department get an opportunity to observe their
junior-group efforts, communication skills, knowledge levels, interest level etc.
based on this appraisal is done.
Psychological testing:
In this method clinically approved psychological test are conducted to
identify and appraise the employee. A feedback is given to the employee and
areas of improvement are identified.
Page 6
Performance Appraisal
7. 360* appraisal:
In this method of appraisal and all around approach is adopted. Feedback about
the employee is taken from the employee himself, his superiors, his juniors , his
collegiums, customers he deal with , the financial institutions and other people he deals
with etc. based on all these observations an appraisal is made and feedback is given this
is one of the most popular methods.
Process of performance appraisal followed by different companies is different.
3. Measuring performance:
The performance of the employee is now measure by the HR department; the
different methods can be used to measure the performance.
Page 7
Performance Appraisal
category of performance the employee falls into i.e. excellent, very good, good,
satisfactory etc.
5. Discussing result:
The results obtained by the employee after performance appraisal are informed or
conveyed to him by the HR department. A feedback is given to the employee
asking him to change certain aspects of his performance and improve them.
6. Collective action:
The employee is given a chance or opportunity to improve himself in the areas
specified by the HR department.The HR department constantly receives or keeps
a check on the employee's performance and notes down improvements in
performance.
Importance of performance:
Performance appraisal is defined as the systematic description of employee's job
relevant, strength, weakness.
Page 8
Performance Appraisal
INDUSTRY PROFILE
Background of mango industry
The lack of mango market development globally opens a large untapped
opportunity for India to make an organized entry in the fresh a mango and mango pulp
market .India is well positioned to capitalize on this opportunity with a large national
production of mangos, including leading varieties like Alphansa. India has the potential
to create a long-term global market position and to capitalize on the fast growth of
mango as a preferred ingredient for the natural package food industry.
Additionally, mango is a preferred fresh fruit within the Indian domestic
market, as well as globally. Mango is in strong demand within the worldwide retail
sector. The total market value of Indian mango and mango pulp represents 25% of the
value of agriculture and processed food products exported by India. Moreover, the
consumption growth for mangoes in the United States and Europe has average 10-15%
per year during the last the last 5 years. Collectively , these factors indicates a strong
opportunity to position Indian mango and mango products to meet a growing
Page 9
Performance Appraisal
international demand .India is the worlds largest supplier of mangoes, having an annual
production of 10.5 million metric tons in 2003.
This accounts for 41% of the estimated worldwide mango production of 25.56
million metric tons in 2003. Despite this large mango production, India is a minor
exporter of mango and mango products at this time. During the five-year period from
1998-2002, exports of fresh mangoes from India averaged approximately 42.4 thousand
metric tons, or only about 0.4% of mango production during this time frame. Data from
1995 indicated that India exported 37.7 thousand metric tons mango pulp.
Data from 2001 indicated that India exported 3.2 thousand metric tons of mango
juice, but also imported 2.2 thousand metric tons of mango juice. Collectively, these
observations indicate that, despite being by far the worlds largest mango producer, India
exports less than 1% of its mango crop as fresh mangoes or processed mango products.
These observations with mango are consistent with aggregate data available on Indian
fruit and vegetable exports.
One barrier to efficient development of the Indian mango industry is an
exceedingly complex supply chain. Within the value chain, a number of buyers and other
aggregators operate at local minds and APMC to assemble larger lots from the many
small producers in any given region. Associated with this inefficient aggregation process
is the application of numerous commissions as fresh agricultural products trade hands.
Numerous stakeholders in India have expressed concern that this overly complex value
chain is a hindrance to effective marketing of Indian mangoes and mango products.
A recent report from the Indian ministry of food processing industries further
details the overly complex supply chain and its contribution to costs and post-harvest
losses. This report concludes that it is imperative to streamline the mango supply chain
in order to reduce wastage.
World scenario:
Page 10
Performance Appraisal
India scenario:
Mango is grown almost in all the states of India. Uttar Pradesh tops the list of
mango producing states. Other major producing states are Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra,
Karnataka, Bihar and Gujarat. Rest of the states has quite less production. An increasing
trend has been observed in world mango production averaging 22 million metric tons per
year. Worldwide production is mostly concentrated in Asia, accounting for 75% followed
by south and Northern America with about 10% share. Area under cultivation and
production trends of mangoes in India during 1 and 2. Major producing states are Andhra
Pradesh, utter Pradesh, and West Bengal. Other states where mangoes are grown include
Madhya Pradesh, Kerala, Haryana, Punjab etc.
Page 11
Performance Appraisal
Page 12
Performance Appraisal
Page 13
Performance Appraisal
mangoes are harvested, quickly transported to the fruit processing plant, inspected and
washed. Selected high quality fruits go to the controlled ripening chambers; fully ripened
mango fruits sure then washed, blanched, pulped, deseeded, centrifuged, homogenized,
concentrated when required, thermally processed and aseptically filled maintaining
sterility. The preparation process includes cutting, destining, refining and packing. In
case of aseptic product the pulp is sterilized and packed in aseptic bags.The process
ensures that the natural flavor and aroma of the fruity is retained in the final product.
Mango pulp/concentrates is perfectly suited for conversion to juices, nectars, drinks,
jams, fruit cheeses and various other kinds of beverages. It can also be used in pudding,
bakery fillings, and fruit meals for children and flavor for food industry, and also to
make the most delicious ice creams, yoghurt and confectionery. India is also a major
export to mango pulp in the world. The country has exported 1, 50, 499, 07 MT of
mango pulp to the world for the worth of rs.620.80 cores during the year 2011-12.
Page 14
Performance Appraisal
preferences. The predominant mango varieties grown in India make this product unique
in country and abroad.
After demonstrated success in developing in strengthening the market
development of mangoes, PFID India liaisons can easily adapt this approach to the
further development of other fruit and vegetable products in India.
Food processing:
Food processing involves any type of value addition to agricultural or
horticultural produce and also includes processes such as grading, sorting, and packaging
which enhance shelf life of food products. The food processing industry provides vital
linkages and synergies between industry and agriculture. The Food processing industry
sector in India is one of the largest in terms of production, consumption, export and
growth prospects. The government has accorded it a high priority , with a number of
fiscal relief's and incentives, to encourage commercialization and value addition to
agricultural produce, for minimizing pre/post harvests wastage, generating employment
and export growth. India's food processing sector covers a wide range of products fruited
and vegetables; meat and poultry; milk and milk products, alcoholic beverages, fisheries,
plantation, grain processing and other consumer product groups like confectionery,
chocolates and cocoa products Soya-based products, mineral water, high protein foods
etc.
Page 15
Performance Appraisal
COMPANY PROFILE
History of foods and inns ltd:
Incorporated in 1967 foods and inns (FIL) is engaged in the business of
processing food products and fruits. Its manufacturing facilities are located in Bombay
and Nasik. Sam Maek Shaw M C is the chairman of the company. FIL's export oriented
processed food and vegetable unit located in Nasik went on stream in Nov. 94. In 19941995, FIL commenced commercial production of its project for frozen mango pulp and
vegetables. Dravya finance Asim Exports international are 100% subsidiaries of FIL. It
is the first company in India to export egg powder and has obtained repeat orders for the
same. It has developed a new product for a soft drink company. It has also exported
leeches, a seasonal fruit. The company exports its products in industrial and consumer
packs to the UK, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Japan, Germany and west Asia. During
the year, the company sold its poultry Farm pvt ltd, to concentrate on its core business of
food processing.
The division combines people with vast experience in Agric-tar FIL Group's
credibility to justify its premier standing in the trading arena. The division was set up in
Page 16
Performance Appraisal
1967 and since then has handled a wide range of products- such as sesame seeds,
processed Fruits, Food grains, Aqua etc.
FIL began its fruit processing operations in early 70s. However fruit
processing operations have been given a special trust since the last season with an
emphasis on developing strategic partnerships across the value chain especially fruit
procurement and processing.FIL has established its presence as a reliable and
competitive exporter to coca cola, USA, Western Europe, Far East, and Middle East etc.
Year events in 1967- The Company was incorporated in on 11th October, as
a private limited company under the name of country inns pvt. Ltd. and was converted
into a public limited company from 24th November 1970. The company's objects is
manufactured egg powder, milk powder, fruit juice, and other food products, cattle feed
and to generally carry on the business of poultry. Shares subscribes for in cash by the
subscribe to the memorandum, directors and their friends.1968-on 31st December, the
name of the company was changed to food and inns pvt. Ltd. 1971-2, 50,000 shares
offered at par for public subscription through a prospectus in January 1971. 1978-6,850
shares forfeited shares reissued during 1987.1981 the company established a fruit
canning unit at bulbar in Gujarat state for the manufacture of canned fruits, pulps and
vegetables for exports as well as for domestic markets. 1985 The company undertook a
programmed to expand its poultry farm capacity from 45,000 birds to about 1,00,000
birds by converting from the present deep liters system and three homes were already
converted. 1986 six houses at the poultry farm at Pune were converted into Californian
cage system and steps were taken to convert four more houses on a similar basis. The
company acquired on a 5 years lease a canning factory at Killa Pardi in the Valsad
district of Gujarat and commercial production commenced at the factory. Finns canning
pvt.ltd. A 100% EOU set up for processing frozen vegetables and fruits, name was
changed to Finns frozen foods (India) Ltd. Dravya finance, Ltd. and Asim Exports
international, ltd. are subsidiaries of the company. 1989- Another two houses were
converted into Californian cage system. 1988- The entire poultry farm was converted
into Californian cage system with a wider accommodation for 90,000 layer birds against
36,000 birds in the past. 1989- The canning division developed two products namely,
VCR Institute of Management Studies
Page 17
Performance Appraisal
papaya in brine and papaya paste, which received good response in the Japanese
market.1990-5,25,000 bonus shares issued in prop. 1:1. 1992 - The Company entered
into the exports of goods such as Basmati rice, pickles, spices. 1995-The company
proposed to sell its poultry division on a going concern to m/s Bhairvanath poultry farm
pvt.ltd., so as to concentrate on its core business of food processing. The company
proposed to undertake expansion/ modernization of its chembur plant along with product
improvement development.
Page 18
Performance Appraisal
the Ratnagiri, valsad Nasik, Mysore, and Chittoor regions where we have our qualified
agronomists who check on the quality of raw materials received by us and assists farmer
in their horticultural program.
The company registered office is situated at Punjabwadi sion trombay road,
Denver, Mumbai with corporate office functioning at Queen's mansion, Fort, Mumbai,
supported by multifruit processing facilities in various locations of the country.FIl is a
strategically located its production areas, in and around the growing areas so that the best
pick of the season can be used for manufacturing products.
Board of directors:
Mr. Utsav Dupleix , a chartered accountant from U.K., looking after the routine
affairs of the company, is the brain and brawl for taking the company's turnover from
Rs.5 crores (USD1.1 MIO) to Rs.70 Crores(USD 16 MIO) giving the status of
government recognized EXPORT HOUSE.
With the backup of technical and managerial support staff, the state art
technology implementation, innovative R and D and Lab facilities, the doyen guidance
of Mr. Utsav coupled with the contribution of other directors; the company is poised for
a steady and continuous growth graph moving upwards in all parameters.
Market presence:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
European Union
United States of America
Canada
Australia
Middle east including Iran and North Africa
Page 19
Performance Appraisal
5. Farmers are not getting fair price, even if there is a rise in prices in global market
6. Mango pulp production reached 90,000 tons by 2011.
Facility:
FIL processing facility is located in Chattier, spread over an area of 15 acres.
This place has been earned marked to host integrated Food complex of international
standards. The facility currently has a tropical fruit puree concentrate processing plant
and the pack house for preparing the Fresh Fruits and vegetables.
Page 20
Performance Appraisal
Pack house:
FIL has a set up a fresh fruit and vegetable processing facility from grief,
Spain. Fresh fruits including mangoes, bananas are processed along with tropical
vegetables like okras, Egg, Lemon, Bitter gourd etc. The facility also holds repining
chambers, pre cooling chambers and cold storage to handle fresh fruits and vegetables.
Page 21
Performance Appraisal
To enable Fresh mango exports to countries like Japan and Korea FIL has
commissioned the VHT facility. This ensures eradiation of the fruit. FOOD AND INNS
(P) Ltd is the first private organization to set up this facility in the country.
Water management:
Water is an essential and precious natural resource. It is a nature's gift.
Without water there os no life on the earth. It is a important to teh fruit processing
industry as to the living being. But, Water is becoming scarce year by year due to
increase in its consumption in industries and agricultural sectors and Indiscriminate
use /wastage by human beings, therefore, it needs a integrated and scientific approach for
its management to use it so that undesirable wastage is avoided which helps us to save
water for correct utilization. But, Water is becoming scarce year by year due to increase
in its consumption in industries and agricultural sectors
Fruit washing:
The water is re-circulated after filtration up to it becomes dirty. This water is
chlorinated to control the contamination by continuous dosing of chlorine in the washing
tub.
Steam generation:
1. Water for boiler feeding is treated in water softener to reduce the hardness. The
steam condensate of evaporator is recycled to boiler to save water and and energy
as condensate will have high temperature.
VCR Institute of Management Studies
Page 22
Performance Appraisal
2. Steam condensate from other heating equipments and vapor condensate from
pulp concentration is collected in a tank to use in crate and floor cleaning.
3. Floor cleaning are cleaned by compressed water jet to conserve the water.
4. Treated effluent is used for civil construction and gardening.
5. Flow meters are installed on main line of water, which feed to processing to
sanitize the water.
6. Drinking water is passed through zero-b filter.
Waste management:
Our factory is equipped with aerobic effluent treatment plant of 250 kl
capacity. Effluent from all locations of water use is collected through inter connected
drains in ET plant. It is aerated here and transferred to settlement tank for sedimentation
of solid particles.
The treated effluent is sent to oxidation pond. From pond, water is used for
gardening and civil construction .the sludge is transferred to drying bed. The dried
sludge is used as manure in our garden. The main feature of our company is that no
effluent treated or untreated is released in public drains and therefore does not pose any
danger to surrounding environment and public.
Page 23
Performance Appraisal
Customer focus:
Loyalty and a strong relationship in business are built out of years of experience in
a particular industry; FIL experience in the business and its contacts with agents/
brokers, Blenders-Bottlers, end user, off-shore logistical service providers has made the
supply chain process extremely competitive. Given our renewed emphasis on this
product line we are strengthening relationships in key markets across the buyers
spectrum, understanding unique requirements and delivering value to select global
customers.
Page 24
Performance Appraisal
PRODUCT PROFILE
Fruit Products
Alphonso pulp
Totapuri pulp
Guava pulp
Products of Vegetables
FRUIT SEASONS
Page 25
Papaya pulp
Performance Appraisal
Apr
May
June
July
Aug
Sept
Oct Nov
Dec
Mango
Papaya
Guava
needs.
Technological advances.
Organizational complexity.
Human relations.
Organizational viability and transformation process.
Prevent obsolescence.
Helps to counsel the subordinate.
Prevent grievances and in disciplinary activities.
Help a company to fulfill in future personal needs.
Page 26
Performance Appraisal
Page 27
Performance Appraisal
Page 28
Performance Appraisal
Page 29
Performance Appraisal
REVIEW LITERATURE
A performance appraisal is a process of evaluating an
employee's performance of a job in terms of its requirement'.
- Dr.C.B.Mamoria
Performance appraisal has been considered as the most significant and indispensable
tool for the function it provides is highly useful in making decision regarding various
personal aspects.
One of the oldest, most wide speeded and control over areas of personnel
administration is performance appraisal. The systematic evaluation of individual's
performance appraisal on the job and potential for development. Through appraisal
organization evaluated the work of employees, communicate how they are doing and say
plans to help them develop. Through the appraisal process, leaders try to help
subordinates understand area of deficiency and strength, so that future can be improved.
During and after the First World War, the systematic performance
appraisal was quite prominent credit goes to Walter Dill Scott, for the systematic
performance appraisal technique of man to man rating system or merit rating. It was used
for evaluating military officers. Individual concerns also ordered this system during 1890
and 1940's for evaluating hourly paid worker.
However with the increase in training and management development programs
from 150's managements started adopting performance appraisal for personnel, the term
'merit rating' had been changed into employee appraisal or performance appraisal. This is
not a mere change in the term, a change in the term and a change in the scope of the
VCR Institute of Management Studies
Page 30
Performance Appraisal
activity as the emphasis merit rating was limited to personnel traits, where as
performance appraisal covers results, accomplishment and performance.
The appraisals of individuals in an employment has been labeled and
described by experts over the years in different ways common descriptions include
performance appraisal Merit rating, Behavioral assessment, Employee evaluation,
Personnel review, Progress report, Staff assignment, service rating and Fitness report.
Performance appraisal evaluation of personnel by their superior and others
also is familiar with their work performance in terms of its requirements.
Performance appraisal is a systematic evaluation of the individual in respect
of his or her performance on the job and his or her potential for development.
Page 31
Performance Appraisal
research, training, organizational design and change in the next decade, there is likely to
be a knowledge explosion in HRD.
Performance appraisal:
Performance appraisal of some type is practiced in most organizations all
over the world. A written assessment to the employee has not change to respond in still
common in most countries, particularly the developing countries. It is time that more
organizations begin to utilize the performance appraisal interview between the manager
and the subordinate is given the opportunity to or improves any defects in his or her
performance. An HRD oriented performance appraisal is used as a mechanism for
supervisor to:
1) Understand the difficulties of their subordinates and try to remove these difficulties.
2) Understand the strengths and weakness of their subordinates and help subordinates to
realize these.
3) Help the subordinate to accept more responsibilities and challenges.
4) Help subordinate to acquire new capabilities.
Page 32
Performance Appraisal
Page 33
Performance Appraisal
Page 34
Performance Appraisal
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
Halo effect:
Basing the entire appraised on the basis of on perceived positive quality,
feature or trait in an individual. He too sits late in the evening. So he must be working
hard.
Born effect:
Basing the evaluation on the basis of one negative quality or feature perceived. He does
not shave regularly. He must be lazy at work too.
Central tendency:
Most appraisal forms required the rates it justifies if management is
outstanding or very poor. So rater may say to himself, Better rate most as average. So
that it do not have justify or clarify.
Page 35
Performance Appraisal
Developing upon the rater's own, value system, and or physical and mental
makeup at the line of appraisal, rate may be rated very strictly or very leniently. Such
rating usually does not carry any reference to aerial performance of the person.
Latest behavior:
Rating is influenced by the most recent behavior ignoring the commonly
demonstrated behaviors during the entire appraised period.
Allowing past performance to influence how present performance is evaluated.
The person who has done good work in the past is assured is to be okay at present.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Definition of research:
Any effort which is directed to study the strategy needed to identify the problem
and selecting of best solution for best results is known as "Research".
Research methodology:
A system of models, procedures and techniques used to find the results of a
research problem is called "Research methodology".
Exploratory
conclusive
Page 36
Performance Appraisal
Modeling
Algorithmic
The conclusive research design is again divided into 2 types they are
Experiment
Descriptive
The research design is used for the study is the Descriptive research design. In this
design structural information is used to gather information.
Survey:
It is mechanism by which the sampling unit of study is selected from the
sampling frame of the population.
Sample size
: 50
Sample point
Sources of data:
Primary data collection:
primary data collection are those, which are collected a fresh and for the first
time and thus happens to be original in character, questions and interviews methods were
VCR Institute of Management Studies
Page 37
Performance Appraisal
CHI-SQUARE TEST
Generally speaking, the chi-square test is a statistical test used to examine
differences with categorical variables. There are a number of features of the social world
we characterize through categorical variables - religion, political preference, etc. To
examine hypotheses using such variables, use the chi-square test.
Page 38
Performance Appraisal
Page 39
Performance Appraisal
TESTING INDEPENDENCE:
The other primary use of the chi-square test is to examine whether two variables
are independent or not. What does it mean to be independent, in this sense? It means that
the two factors are not related.
Typically in social science research, we're interested in finding factors that are
related - education and income, occupation and prestige, age and voting behavior. In this
case, the chi-square can be used to assess whether two variables are independent or not.
More generally, we say that variable Y is "not correlated with" or "independent
of" the variable X if more of one is not associated with more of another. If two
categorical variables are correlated their values tend to move together, either in the same
direction or in the opposite.
Establish Hypotheses
Calculate the expected value for each cell of the table
Calculate Chi-square statistic
Assess significance level
ESTABLISH HYPOTHESES:
It is important to keep in mind that the chi-square test only tests whether two
variables are independent. It cannot address questions of which is greater or less. Using
the chi-square test, we cannot evaluate directly the hypothesis that boys get in trouble
more than girls; rather, the test (strictly speaking) can only test whether the two variables
are independent or not.
Page 40
Performance Appraisal
The expected value for each cell of the table can be calculated using
the following formula:
For example, in the table comparing the percentage of boys and girls
in trouble, the expected count for the number of boys who got in trouble is:
Page 41
Performance Appraisal
DIMENSIONS
NO.OF RESPONDENTS
Fully Aware
VCR Institute of Management Studies
25
Page 42
PERCENTAGE
50%
Performance Appraisal
Partially Aware
10
20%
15
30%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 1
60
50
50
40
30
30
Percentage
20
20
10
0
Fully Aware
Partially Aware
Interpretation: From the above table, 70% of the respondents opined that the
performance appraisal system in the organization is based on objective setting and 30%
of the respondents opined that it is a combination of both formality and objective setting.
2. From how many years you are working with this organization?
DIMENSIONS
NO.OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
0-5 Years
15
30%
5-10Years
10
20%
Page 43
Performance Appraisal
10-15Years
20
40%
10%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 2
Percentage
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
40
30
20
Percentage
ye
ar
s
Ye
ar
s
M
or
e
th
an
15
10
-1
5
Ye
ar
s
510
05
Ye
ar
s
10
Interpretation: From the above table, 30%of respondents working for 0-5 years, 40%
working for 10-15 years and only 10%respondents are working more than 15 years.
DIMENSIONS
NO.OF RESPONDENTS
Qualitative
VCR Institute of Management Studies
15
Page 44
PERCENTAGE
30%
Performance Appraisal
Quantitative
0%
Both (a)and(b)
35
70%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 3
Percentage
80
70
70
60
50
Percentage
40
30
30
20
10
0
Qualitative
Interpretation:
0
Quantitative
Both(a)&(b)
From the above table, 30% of the respondents opined that the
performance appraisal system aspect is qualitative and the remaining 70% responded as
it is of both qualitative and quantitative.
Page 45
Performance Appraisal
(Oi -Ej)2
_________
Observed
Expected
S.No
Frequency(Oi)
frequency(Ej)
(Oi -Ej)
(Oi -Ej)2
Ej
15
16.6666
-1.6666
2.7775
1.6665
16.6666
-16.6666
277.7755
16.6665
35
16.6666
18.3334
3
Total
336.1135 20.1689
75.3374
Calculated value:75.3374
Degree of freedom: (n-1) = (3 - 1) = 2
The chi square value at 0.05% level of significance at degree 2 of freedom is:
Page 46
Performance Appraisal
DIMENSIONS
NO.OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Traditional method
30
60%
Modern method
10
20%
Both a and b
10
20%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 4
percentage
70
60
60
50
percentage
40
30
20
20
20
Modern method
10
0
Traditional method
Page 47
Performance Appraisal
Interpretation: From the above table, 60% of the respondents opined as Traditional
method,20% as Modern method and 20% as both Traditional and modern method of
evaluating the performance.
DIMENSIONS
NO.OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
35
70%
Ranking Method
10
20%
10%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 5(a)
Percentage
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
70
10
Pa
ire
d
Co
m
ar
is
on
M
et
ho
d
M
et
ho
d
Ra
nk
in
g
G
ra
ph
ic
Ra
tin
g
M
et
ho
d
20
Page 48
Percentage
Performance Appraisal
DIMENSIONS
NO.OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
35
70%
Management bi objective
10%
Productivity Measures
10
20%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 5(b)
Percentage
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
70
ea
su
re
s
Percentage
Pr
od
uc
tiv
ity
en
tb
io
bj
ec
tiv
e
M
an
ag
em
Ac
co
un
tin
g
Re
so
ur
ce
an
H
um
20
10
Page 49
Performance Appraisal
Interpretation: From the above table, 70% of the respondents opined as Human
resource accounting, 10%as Management by objectives and 20% as Productivity
Measures.
DIMENSIONS
NO.OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Quarterly
10%
Half yearly
25
50%
Annually
20
40%
0%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 6
Percentage
60
50
50
40
40
Percentage
30
20
10
10
0
Quarterly
Half yearly
Annually
Page 50
0 years
Once in two
Performance Appraisal
Interpretation: From the above table, 10% of the respondents opined as quarterly,
50%as half yearly and 40% as annually.
DIMENSIONS
NO.OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Yes
30
60%
No
20
40%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 7
Page 51
Performance Appraisal
Percentage
70
60
60
50
40
40
Percentage
30
20
10
0
Yes
No
Interpretation:-From the above table, 60% of the respondents opined that they are
informed before they are appraised and 40% as they are not informed before they are
appraising.
DIMENSION
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
To a great extent
30
60%
To some extent
20
40%
Not at all
0%
Total
50
100%
Page 52
Performance Appraisal
CHART: 8
percentage
70
60
60
50
40
40
percentage
30
20
10
0
to a great extent
to some extent
not 0
at all
Interpretation: From the above table, 60% of the respondents opined that the
satisfactory level of job is to be great extent, 40% as to some extent.
DIMENSION
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
For rewards
20
40%
10
20%
To set targets
15
30%
To review performance
10%
Page 53
Performance Appraisal
Total
50
100%
CHART: 9
percentage
40
30
20
an
ce
percentage
to
re
vi
ew
pe
rfo
rm
se
tt
ar
ge
ts
to
fo
rc
ar
ee
rp
la
nn
in
g
10
fo
rr
ew
ar
ds
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Interpretation: From the above table, 40% of the respondents opined that the
objective of performance appraisal system is for rewards, 20% as for career planning,
30% as to set targets, 10 as to review performance.
DIMENSIONS
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Yes
30
60%
No
20
40%
Page 54
Performance Appraisal
Total
50
100%
CHART: 10
percentage
70
60
60
50
40
40
percentage
30
20
10
0
yes
no
Interpretation: From the above table, 60% of the respondents opined that they
consider the past performance and 40% as they wont consider past performance.
DIMENSION
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
Page 55
PERCENTAGE
Performance Appraisal
35
70%
Promotion
15
30%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 11
percentage
80
70
70
60
50
percentage
40
30
30
20
10
0
salaries and rewards
promotion
Interpretation: From the above table, 70% of the respondents opined that they joined
for salaries and rewards, and 30% for promotion.
Page 56
Performance Appraisal
(Oi -Ej)2
_________
Observed
Expected
(Oi
(Oi
S.No
Frequency(Oi)
frequency(Ej)
-Ej)
-Ej)2
Ej
35
25
10
100
15
25
-10
100
Total
Calculated value: 8
Degree of freedom: (n-1) = (2 - 1) = 1
The chi square value at 0.05% level of significance at degree 1 of freedom is 3.8411.
Hence calculated value is more then table value.
Page 57
Performance Appraisal
DIMENSIONS
NO. O
PERCENTAGE
RESPONDENTS
Cost consciousness
10
20%
10
20%
Communication skills
20
40%
Urgeto excel
10%
10%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 12
Page 58
Performance Appraisal
percentage
40
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
20
20
10
10
st
re
ss
wo
rk
un
de
r
un
ic
at
io
n
ab
ilit
y
co
m
co
st
co
nc
io
us
ne
ss
sk
ills
percentage
Interpretation: From the above table 20% of the respondents opined that the criteria
have to be consider is cost consciousness, 20% as loyalty to the organization, 40% as
communication skills 10% as urge to excel, 10% as ability to work under stress.
DIMENSION
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Evaluation of employee
25
50%
Promotion of employees
10%
Job satisfaction of
10%
motivation
15
30%
Total
50
100%
employees
CHART: 13
VCR Institute of Management Studies
Page 59
Performance Appraisal
percentage
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
50
30
10
10
ot
iv
at
io
n
m
ev
al
ua
tio
no
fe
m
pl
oy
ee
pr
om
s
ot
io
n
of
em
jo
pl
b
oy
sa
ee
tis
s
fa
ct
io
n
of
em
pl
oy
ee
s
percentage
Interpretation: From the above table 50% of the respondents opined that the
performance appraisal is evaluation of employees, 10% as promotion of employees, 10%
as job satisfaction of employees 30% as motivation.
DIMENSION
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Merit
25
50%
Grading
15
30%
Other
10
20%
Total
50
100%
Page 60
Performance Appraisal
CHART: 14
percentage
60
50
50
40
percentage
30
30
20
20
10
0
merit
grading
other
Interpretation: From the above table 50% of the respondents opined that the
performance appraisal system in the organization is merit, 30% as grading, and 20% as
other.
DIMENSION
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Yes
40
80%
No
10
20%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 15
VCR Institute of Management Studies
Page 61
Performance Appraisal
percentage
5
4.4
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
percentage
2.4
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
yes
no
Interpretation: From the above table 80% of the respondents are opined that they
received increment in salary after performance appraisal, 20% not received.
Page 62
Performance Appraisal
=50/2=25
(Oi -Ej)2
_________
Observed
Expected
(Oi
(Oi
S.No
Frequency(Oi)
frequency(Ej)
-Ej)
-Ej)2
Ej
40
25
15
225
10
25
-15
225
Total
18
Calculated value:18
Degree of freedom: (n-1) = (2 - 1) = 1
The chi square value at 0.05% level of significance at degree 1 of freedom is 3.8411.
Hence calculated value is more then table value.
Page 63
Performance Appraisal
DIMENSION
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Yes
35
70%
No
15
30%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 16
percentage
80
70
70
60
50
percentage
40
30
30
20
10
0
yes
no
Interpretation: From the above table 70% of the respondents are opined that
performance appraisal help to provide an atmosphere where all are encouraged to share
one other burden, 30% opined as not help to provide an atmosphere.
Page 64
Performance Appraisal
DIMENSION
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Yes
40
80%
No
10
20%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 17
percentage
90
80
80
70
60
percentage
50
40
30
20
20
10
0
yes
no
Interpretation: From the above table 80% of the respondents are opined as the
performance appraisal helps people to set and achieve meaningful goals, 20% not
opined.
Page 65
Performance Appraisal
H1= Performance
Ho= Performance
A sample of respondents of for type is give expected respondent for each respondent
=50/2=25
(Oi -Ej)2
_________
Observed
Expected
(Oi
(Oi
S.No
Frequency(Oi)
frequency(Ej)
-Ej)
-Ej)2
Ej
40
25
15
225
10
25
-15
225
Total
18
Calculated value:18
Degree of freedom: (n-1) = (2 - 1) = 1
The chi square value at 0.05% level of significance at degree 1 of freedom is 3.8411.
VCR Institute of Management Studies
Page 66
Performance Appraisal
Ho rejected, Performance
DIMENSION
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Yes
30
60%
No
20
40%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 18
Page 67
Performance Appraisal
percentage
70
60
60
50
40
40
percentage
30
20
10
0
yes
no
Interpretation: From the above table 60% of the respondents are opined that the
performance appraisal give criteria in friendly and positive manner, 40% as not give
criteria.
DIMENSION
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Yes
40
80%
No
10
20%
Total
50
100%
Page 68
Performance Appraisal
CHART: 19
percentage
90
80
80
70
60
percentage
50
40
30
20
20
10
0
yes
no
Interpretation: From the above table 80% 0f the respondents opined that the
performance of employees improved after process of performance appraisal, 20% as not
improved.
Page 69
Performance Appraisal
A sample of respondents of for type is give expected respondent for each respondent
=50/2=25
(Oi -Ej)2
_________
Observed
Expected
(Oi
(Oi
S.No
Frequency(Oi)
frequency(Ej)
-Ej)
-Ej)2
Ej
40
25
15
225
10
25
-15
225
Total
18
Calculated value:18
Degree of freedom: (n-1) = (2 - 1) = 1
The chi square value at 0.05% level of significance at degree 1 of freedom is 3.8411.
Hence calculated value is more then table value.
Page 70
Performance Appraisal
DIMENSION
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Yes
25
50%
No
25
50%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 20
percentage
60
50
50
50
40
percentage
30
20
10
0
yes
no
Interpretation: From the above table 50% of the respondents opined that the
performance appraisal improves motivation and job satisfaction, 50% responded that the
performance appraisal do not improve motivation and job satisfaction.
Page 71
Performance Appraisal
DIMENSION
NO OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Yes
20
40%
No
30
60%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 21
percentage
70
60
60
50
percentage
40
30
20
10
0
yes
no
Interpretation: From the above table 40% of the respondents opined that the top
level management is partial in performance appraisal, 60% opined as top level
management is not partial.
VCR Institute of Management Studies
Page 72
Performance Appraisal
DIMENSION
NO.OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Yes
20
40%
No
30
60%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 22
percentage
70
60
60
50
40
40
percentage
30
20
10
0
yes
no
Page 73
Performance Appraisal
Interpretation: From the above table 40% of the respondents opined that the
performance appraisal helps to change behavior of employees, 60% opined as not helps
to change behavior of employees.
DIMENSION
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Yes
25
50%
No
25
50%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 23
Page 74
Performance Appraisal
percentage
60
50
50
50
40
percentage
30
20
10
0
yes
no
Interpretation: From the above table 50% opined that the 360 degree appraisal
process create a participative environment in the organization, 50% opined as not create
participative environment.
DIMENSION
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Yes
10
20%
No
40
80%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 24
VCR Institute of Management Studies
Page 75
Performance Appraisal
PERCENTAGE
90
80
80
70
60
PERCENTAGE
50
40
30
20
20
10
0
Yes
No
Interpretation: From the above table 10% of the respondents are opined as the
promotions are strictly based on performance appraisal process, 40% opined as
promotions are not strictly based on performance appraisal process.
DIMENSION
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
PERCENTAGE
Yes
30
60%
No
20
40%
Total
50
100%
CHART: 25
Page 76
Performance Appraisal
percentage
70
60
60
50
40
40
percentage
30
20
10
0
yes
no
Interpretation: From the above table 60% of the respondents are opined that the
leadership and interpersonal skills are developed after 360 degree performance appraisal,
40% opined as not developed.
FINDINGS
1) 50% of the employees aware of the performance appraisal system in the
organization.
2) 40% of the employees working with this organization for 10-15 years.
3) 70% of the employees aspects of the performance appraisal system is both the
qualitative and quantitative.
4) 60% of the employees expressed that the traditional method adopted by the
organization for evaluating the performance of the employees.
Page 77
Performance Appraisal
5) 70% of the employees expressed that the graphic rating method is been used by
the
organization in traditional method.
6) 70% of the employees expressed that human resource accounting is been used by
the organization in modern method.
7) 50% of the employees prefer that appraisal system should be held half yearly.
8) 60% of the employees expressed that they are informed before they are
appraised.
9) 60% of the respondents feel that they are satisfied with their present job.
10) 40% of the employees feel that the objective of performance appraisal is for
rewards.
11) 60% of the employees feel that past performance should be considered.
12) 70% of the employees expressed salaries and rewards made them to join in the
company.
13) 40% of the employees feel that communication skill have to be considering in
order improving existing appraisal.
14) 50% of the respondents expressed performance appraisal is evaluation of
employees.
15) 50% of the employees expressed that merit method performance appraisal is
implemented in the organization.
16) 80% of the employees expressed that they receive increment in their salary after
performance appraisal.
17) 70% of the employees feel that performance appraisal help to provide an
atmosphere where all are encouraged to share one other burden.
18) 80% of the employees feels that performance appraisal help to set and achieve
meaningful goals.
19) 60% the respondents expressed that performance appraisal give criteria in
friendly and positive manner.
20) 80% of the employees expressed that their performance improve after process of
performance appraisal.
21) 50% of the employees feel that performance appraisal improve motivation and
job satisfaction.
22) 60% of the employees expressed that the top level is not partial in performance
appraisal.
23) 60% of the employees feel that performance appraisal helps to change behavior
of employees.
24) 50% of the employees expressed 360 degree appraisal process creates a
participative environment in the organization.
VCR Institute of Management Studies
Page 78
Performance Appraisal
25) 80% of the respondents expressed that the promotions are not strictly based on
performance appraisal process.
26) 60% of the employees expressed that leadership and interpersonal skills
developed after 360 degree performance appraisal.
SUGGETIONS
The management must concentrate on training programs that create awareness to
the employees regarding performance appraisal.
The management should provide facilities and orientation to the employees work
in the organization for many years.
The management should also be including quantitative aspect of performance
appraisal.
The management should implement modern method for evaluating the
performance of the employees.
The organization should focus on the remaining methods in traditional method.
The management must use any one method in the modern methods for evaluate
Performance of the employees.
The management should evaluate the performance of employees quarterly once
in a year.
The management should take a step like not to inform the employees before they
are appraised.
The management must provide whole or part of performance appraisal
information to all the employees to make satisfaction of job.
VCR Institute of Management Studies
Page 79
Performance Appraisal
The management must select best objective of performance appraisal system for
the employees in order to set targets, career planning.
The management must focus on the past performance of the employees while
they are going for performance appraisal it gives recognition of the employees in
the organization.
The management must provide the promotion to the employees for stimulate
people to join in the company.
The management must focus on the criteria like cost consciousness, ability to
work under stress in order to improve the existing appraisal.
The management appraisal employees as it help the individual to improve their
potential and helps to perform well.
The management must follow on prefer other method to evaluate the
performance of the employees.
The management should increase the salary of all the employees to make the
performance standard better in future.
The management should implement performance appraisal to provide an
atmosphere totally among all the employees to share the burden of one individual
of other.
The management must concentrate on performance appraisal as it helps to set and
achieve meaningful goals.
The performance appraisal conducted by the organization has to be give criteria
in friendly and positive manner for all the employees.
The appraised employees performance standard improves after process of
performance appraisal to achieve future objective of the organization.
The management must concentrate on training and development programs to
improve the motivation and job satisfaction of the employees.
The top level management should not be partial in the performance appraisal
process.
The management must helps to change the behavior of the employees.
The management should create a participative environment in the organization by
the 360 degree appraisal process.
The management should promote employees based on the skills, abilities and the
working performance.
The top level people's leadership and interpersonal skills must be developed by
the 360 degree appraisal process.
Page 80
Performance Appraisal
CONCLUSION
From the above study I have concluded that performance appraisal system
play a vital role in the organization. Performance appraisal system will be effectively
only when the appraiser realizes that the appraisal is the basis through which an
organization functions effectively.
"A happy employee is a productive employee". Keeping this the appraisal
system is followed meticulously resulting in increasing organization performance.
Page 81
Performance Appraisal
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books:
P.Subba Rao Essentials of Human Reassures Management and Industrial Relations,
Himalaya publishing home, new delhi, 2010.
Aswathapa, Human Reassures and Personnel Management, Tata Mc Graw Hill, New
Delhi 2002.
Cascio, Managing Human Reassures , Tata Mc Graw Hill 2003.
L.m.prasad, Human Reassures Management Sultan and Sons 2007.
Website:
www.google.com
www.foodsandinns.com
Page 82
Performance Appraisal
QUESTIONNAIRES
Name
Age
Gender
Experience
Material statues
Qualification
Deportment
1. Are you sure aware of all the details of the performance Appraisal system in your
organization?
[ ]
Performance Appraisal
From how many years you are working with this organization?
(c) 10 to 15 years
(b) Quantitative
Combination of (a)and(b)
4.Which approach has been adopted by the organization for evaluating the Performance
of the employees?
(d)
......................
Quarterly
(c) Annually
yes
[ ]
[
(b)
Page 84
No
Performance Appraisal
8.
Not at all
9. Which of the following do you think are the objectives of your appraisal system?
[
(a)
For Rewards
(b)
No
(b) Promotions
(c)...........................................
12. What other criteria do you think have to be taken into consideration in order to
improved the existing appraisal system?
(d) Motivation
Page 85
Performance Appraisal
(b) Grading
(c) Other
15. Do you receive any increment in your salary after performance appraisal? [
(a) Yes
(b) No
16. Do you think that performance appraisal help to provide an atmosphere where all are
encouraged to share one another burden?
(a) Yes
(b) No
17. Do you think performance appraisal helps people set and achieve meaningful goals?
[
(a) Yes
(b) No
18. Do you think performance appraisal give constructive criticism in a friendly and
positive manner?
(a) Yes
(b) No
19. Do you think that performance of employees improve after process of performance
appraisal?
(a) Yes
(b) No
20. Do you think performance appraisal improves motivation and job satisfaction?
(a) Yes
(b) No
Page 86
Performance Appraisal
(a) Yes
(b) No
(b) No
23. Does the 360 degree appraisal process create a participative environment in the
organization?
(a) Yes
(b) No
24. Does the promotions are strictly based on performance appraisal process?
(a) Yes
(b) No
25. Do you think your leadership and interpersonal skills developed after 360 degree
performance appraisal?
(a) Yes
(b) No
Page 87