e-NBA
Logout
Part B
2.1 Definition and Validation of Course Outcomes and Programme Outcomes (30)
2.1.1 List the Course Outcomes(COs) and Programme Outcomes (POs) (2)
Institute Marks
(List the course outcomes of the courses in programme curriculum and programme outcomes of the programme under
accreditation)
2.00
Edit Answer
Program Outcomes
POs describe what students are expected to know or be able to do by the time of graduation from the program. Program Outcomes
are established as per the process described in 2.1.3. The Program Outcomes of UG in Computer Science and Engineering are :
1. Prepares graduates to contribute to the Computer Science and Information Technology Profession and Society
2. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of Computer Science and Engineering solutions in global and societal
context
3. Ability to apply knowledge of Mathematics, Science, Computing, Engineering and Management to Evaluate, Model and
Implement Computing Solutions suitably considering issues such as Economic, Environmental, Social and Ethical
4. Understand and articulate Professional, Ethical, Legal, Security and Social Issues and Responsibilities
5. Act and Communicate effectively in Collaborative Work Environment with Peers, Customers, Authorities and Society
6. Ability for Continuous Learning and apply state of the art Tools and Technologies in Software Development to be a Skilled
Employable Professional
7. An ability to function effectively in multidisciplinary teams to accomplish a Common Goal
8. Eligible for higher studies in Management, Engineering or Science in any National or International Institution /University , Civil
and Engineering Services of Government of India, Eligible to be Employed in IT, ITES of public, Private or Government
Engineering /non engineering domain or Research
9. Has the right composition of Knowledge, Skill, Leadership and Managerial Ability to be an Entrepreneur.
Table 2.1.1.
COURSE
Course Outcomes
COURSE OUTCOMES
CO1: Implement Stack, Queue and list to manage the memory using
Static and Dynamic allocations.
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
1/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
CO2: Interpret and compute asymptotic notations of an algorithm to
BCS201- Data Structures and
Algorithms
CO2: Analyze generic data type for the data type independent
Programming
BMA213- Discrete
Mathematics
geometry.
and Multimedia
BEC231- Electron Devices and CO5: Develop and compare the comparison-based search algorithms
Circuits
trees
CO4: Identify, Model, Solve and Develop code for real life problems like
shortest path and MST using graph theory.
CO5: Develop and Compare the Comparison-Based Search Algorithms
and Sorting Algorithms.
CO6: Identify appropriate Data Structure and Algorithm for a given
contextual problem and develop in C++.
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
2/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
BCS202- Database
Management System
Intelligence
CO3: Guide
manner.
Laboratory
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
3/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
CO4: Understand the functions Microprocessors and Compilers.
CO5: Able to design Assembler, Loader and Linker
MatLab
BCS321- Operating
Systems Laboratory
microprocessor.
CO2:Understand the implementation searching and sorting using
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
4/52
4/17/2014
BEC341- Microprocessor
and Peripheral Interfacing
Laboratory
e-NBA
CO2:Understand the implementation searching and sorting using
8085/8086
CO3:Implement the interfacing of microprocessor with Stepper Motor,
Keyboard, LED, Traffic Control System and 7-segment LED Display
BCS302- Computer
Networks
BEC304- Fundamentals of
Digital Signal Processing
Programming Laboratory
Stack
CO4: Recognize the features of Client/Server systems and programs, with
a view to be able to implement simple systems in this model.
CO5: Analyse, Develop and Implement the Client and Server of a simple
program over a transport layer.
CO6: Evaluate the Advantages and Disadvantages of the alternative
technologies for networking as they have evolved in the recent years.
BCS326-Value added
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
5/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
Training Programme /
Three Tier Application
Project
interaction overview diagrams working out the exact time constraints for
Design
routines.
Warehousing
BCS409- Information
Storage Management
storage
CO3: Learn and implement with various data structures
CO4: Understands the concepts of term clustering and Information
Visualization
CO5: Knowledge in various storage security systems.
BMG431- Entrepreneurship
Development
Responsibilities of Business.
CO6: Demonstrate the Ability to use Business Tools.
CO7: Demonstrate the Ability to apply knowledge of business concepts
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
6/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
and functions in an integrated manner.
CO8: Demonstrate the ability to Manage People, Processes, and
Resources within a diverse organization.
CO9: Demonstrate the ability to apply Knowledge of key leadership
concepts in an integrated manner.
CO10: Demonstrate the ability to Identify and Evaluate business
opportunities and trends.
CO11: Demonstrate the ability to identify Potential Start-Up models and
Resources given Trends and Opportunities.
CO1: Able to Tune the databases for different Data base Applications
BCSE11- Database Tuning
BCSE12- Advanced
Knowledge Management
BCSE13- Infometrics
BCSE14- Enterprise
Application Integration
and Management
CO3: Understand the scripting language and create web page using
them.
CO1: Able to Analyze, Tune Distributed and Object Oriented Databases.
Implement Data Mining Techniques.
CO2: Able to understand the background and knowledge of some
advanced topics in database that have become key techniques in modern
database theory and practices; typical topics are Distributed Concurrency
Control, Database Recovery, Query Optimization, Spatial Databases.
BCSE16- Advanced
Databases
Technologies.
CO3: Apply the concept learnt in this course to Optimize and Troubleshoot
High-Speed Network.
CO4: Demonstrate the Knowledge of Network Planning and Optimization.
CO5: Design and Configure Network that have Outcome Characteristics
needed to support a specified set of applications
CO1: Able to Design, Analyze and Implement TCP/IP Protocols.
CO2: Understand the fundamentals of TCP/IP networks layer.
CO3: Have the capability of Designing and Analyzing Data Transmission
and Implementation
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
7/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
activities within the TCP/IP design.
CO1: Able to Design, Analyze and Implement Routing Protocols for Ad hoc
networks.
BCSE23- Ad-Hoc Networks
CO2: Analyze the transport layer Security Issues and Design a New
Protocol
CO3: Hands-On Design, Implementation, of Wireless Ad hoc networks.
CO1: Able to understand 2G and 3G networking concepts.
BCSE24-3G Networking
Machine
symbolic assembler code into machine code and convert machine code
into symbolic assembler code.
CO5:Explain the basic operation JVM and JAVA Bytecode
CO1: Able to Create a Web Application using XML and web services.
CO2: Develop in-depth knowledge and understanding of XML, XSL, XSLT,
XPath, XML Schema, Web Service Protocols, Web Service Security
Protocols, Web Services Orchestration & Execution, Web Services
Services
Databases
CO3: Develop skills of creating documents using XML, XSL, XSLT and
XPath
CO4: Creating XML schemas and validating XML documents against them
CO5: Describing Web Services using WSDL and UDDI
CO1: Able to Design, Analyze and implement server applications in JAVA.
Deploy a Java web application to a server
Technologies
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
8/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
development of an application of advanced web technology for a case
study
CO1: Able to implement all types of Internet Protocols.
CO2: Create algorithms to solve introductory-level problems using Java
BCSE35- Network
architecture, and will become familiar with its main technologies including
ontology, ontology languages and query languages.
CO3: Learn how to apply such technologies to develop knowledge-based
models for business domains and applications.
CO1: Exposure in OOPs concepts and Java programming fundamentals.
CO2: Exposure in usage of Java in mobile applications.
CO3: Expertise in designing and developing different mobile applications
BCSE41- J2ME
Architecture
Development
CO2: Able to Design and Create a web service for mobile application
CO3: Able to Develop own mobile application.
CO1: Able to Design and Develop RTL and VERILOG codes.
BCSE51-
VLSI Technology
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
9/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
BCSE52- system modeling
using hardware
Description languages
transistor-level.
CO4: Layout a gate in CMOS VLSI technology.
CO5: Design a Network of Complex Gates with the ideal number of
stages which computes the function with minimum delay from a given
library.
CO6: Design and Layout Filter and RF circuits using VLSI.
CO1: Able to Design and Develop VLSI circuits using Automation tools.
CO2: Have the Ability to Synthesize Static and Dynamic Logic Cells
based on knowledge of MOS device Physics, Modeling, and Circuit
Topologies.
CO3: Be capable of Designing and Implementing combinational and
sequential CMOS digital circuits and optimize them with respect to
different constraints, such as area, delay, power, or reliability.
CO4: Be capable of implementing a complete design verification
process using computer-automated tools for Layout, Extraction,
Simulation, and Timing Analysis.
CO1: Design, Test and critically evaluate embedded solutions to real
world situations
CO2: Recognize the key features of embedded systems in terms of
computer hardware and be able to discuss their functions.
Design
assembler code.
CO4: Design, Test and critically evaluate embedded solutions to real
world situations using (embedded) computer systems interfaced to
digital hardware.
CO5: Able to design and develop Embedded circuits.
BCSE56- Microcontroller
Architecture & Design
Programming
animal life.
CO2: Understand the plant diversity techniques.
CO3: To acquire knowledge in Animal life cycle process.
CO1: Able to analyse, design and develop Biological data bases.
bases.
CO3: Create new data analysis for DNA processing.
Genetics
in biological application.
biology.
CO1: Able to develop open source programs.
BCSE64- Programming in PERL
BCSE66- Advanced Techniques CO1: Able to develop 3D applications using models and tools.
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
10/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
BCSE66- Advanced Techniques CO1: Able to develop 3D applications using models and tools.
for Sequence and Structure
Analysis
Processing
applications.
CO2: Develop a new testing application for pattern recognition.
CO3: Create a learning algorithm for neural networks.
CO1: Able to analyse, process, reconstruct and transmit medical
information.
Techniques
Databases
CO3: Adapt the partitioning and indexing strategies for new data
base application.
BCSE76- Geographical
Information Systems
agents.
CO2: Able to design and develop agent systems
CO3: Create a secure agent system.
architectures.
CO2: Design a tool for software architecture.
CO3: Create a interface for software architecture.
CO1: Implement different software designs to develop software.
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
11/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
CO3: Create a design model for software.
CO1: Able to analyse quality of software
BCSE93- Software Quality and CO2: Able to test software adopting different software testing
techniques and strategies
Testing
CO3: Understand the quality management systems for developing
software.
CO1: Able to analyse collected data to design a software
BCSE94- Software Metrics
and Practice
BCSEA2- Distributed
Computing
CO1: Able to understand the design of real time system with task
BCSEA3-Realtime System
Design
management
CO2: Understand the scheduling tools for real time systems.
CO3: Understand the reliability and synchronization concepts in real
time systems.
CO1:Able to design an operating systems
models.
CO3: Create parallel programming software.
CO4: Understand the design of advanced processors.
Systems
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
12/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
Statistical Methods
BCSEB3- Theory of
Computation
CO3: Derive NFA and DFA from the given regular expression.
CO4: Design own lemma for automata.
CO1: Able to apply the algorithmic graph theory to calculate the real
Theory
BCSEB5- Principles of
Programming Languages
time problems.
CO3: Can create own object oriented language.
applications.
CO2: Program different types of ROBOTs
CO3: Understand the concept of industrial robots thoroughly.
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
13/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
Information Systems
decisions.
CO3: Can plan the system efficiently by applying the theoretical
understanding of this subject.
BCSED3- Mainframe
Computing
BCSED4- e Commerce
Management
interaction
CO3: Can improve the business by adopting the TQM standards.
CO2: Able to identify and analyse the tools for human interaction.
CO3: Create and develop interactive devices by applying the natural
languages.
CO4: Able to interface machine according to the requirements of
human beings.
2.1.2 State how and where the POs are published and disseminated (3)
Institute Marks
(Describe in which media (e.g. websites, curricula books) the POs are published and how these are disseminated among
3.00
stakeholders)
Edit Answer
Institute Marks
(Describe the process that periodically documents and demonstrates that the POs are defined in alignment with the
graduate attributes prescribed by the NBA.)
5.00
Edit Answer
Program Outcomes are established through the consultation process with stake holders keeping the Graduate Attributes defined by
NBA as basis. Department Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives are also kept in view. UGC guidelines on curriculum and
graduate outcomes are also considered. The detailed establishment process is depicted below in Fig.2.1.3 (a).
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
14/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
2.1.4 Indicate how the defined POs are aligned to the Graduate Attributes prescribed by the NBA (10)
Institute Marks
(Indicate how the POs defined for the programme are aligned with the Graduate Attributes of NBA as articulated in
accreditation manual.)
10.00
Edit Answer
The Graduate Attributes of NBA and the Program Outcomes defined for the program are aligned to each other as shown in Table 2.1.4.
Graduate
Attributes
PO1
PO2
PO3
PO4
PO5
PO6
II
III
PO9
P
P
VII
PO8
IV
VI
PO7
P
P
P
P
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
P
P
15/52
4/17/2014
VII
VIII
IX
P
P
P
P
P
P
XI
XII
e-NBA
P
P
2.1.5 Establish the correlation between the POs and the PEOs (10)
(Explain how the defined POs of the program correlate with the PEOs)
Institute Marks
10.00
Edit Answer
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
16/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
Institute Marks
(Provide the correlation between the course outcomes and the programme outcomes. The strength of the correlation may
also be indicated)
10.00
Edit Answer
The program outcomes are achieved through curriculum that offers a number of mandatory courses as well as elective courses. Each
course has defined course outcomes that are mapped to the program outcomes and a set of performance criteria that are used to
provide quantitative measurement of how well course outcomes are achieved. The linkage among program outcomes and course
outcomes is shown in Table 2.2.1(a) The course outcomes are thus directly and quantitatively assessed, and are tied to the program
outcomes as shown in the course syllabi. Therefore if the course outcomes are met, the program outcomes are met.
The course outcomes of each course are mapped to the Program Outcomes with a level of emphasis being slightly correlated (1),
moderately correlated(2) and strongly correlated (3). The level of emphasis of a program outcome is determined by the weight used
for assessing the outcome in each course. The level of emphasis for an outcome is determined by the weight as follows:
When the course outcome weightage is < 40%, it will be given as slightly correlated (1).
When the course outcome weightage is >=40% to <60%, it will be given as moderately correlated (2)
When the course outcome weightage is >=60%, it will be given as strongly correlated (3)
1 Slightly
2- Moderately
3-Strongly
The qualitative rubrics for the above process is enclosed in APPENDIX - III
PROGRAM OUTCOMES
PO1
PO2
PO3
PO4
PO5
PO6
PO7
PO8
PO9
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
17/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
4. Identify appropriate data
structure and algorithm for a given
contextual problem and develop in
C++.
2. Analyze a 3D structure
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
18/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
7. Understand the basic principles
and applications of operational
amplifier.
electrical engineering.
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
19/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
database systems, differentiate
3. Guide
information in a computational
manner.
BCS307- Operating System
1. Analyze the concepts of Operating
System and process.
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
20/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
1
1. Development of Leadership
circuits
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
21/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
hardware.
java beans
MATLABORATORY software
BCS309- Software Engineering
1. Identify and build an appropriate
process model for a given project.
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
22/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
2. Ability to write a program to do
the task for you and society
5. Demonstrate fundamental
understanding on the operation
between the microprocessor and
its interfacing devices
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
23/52
4/17/2014
reservation, hotel management
e-NBA
etc.
3. Implementations of the
applications using Tomcat server
controls;
given project.
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
24/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
ColLaboratoryoration diagrams
and generate interaction overview
diagrams working out the exact
variables.
the data
BCS409- Information Storage Management
1. Understands the overview of
Information Storage Systems
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
25/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
1. Able to plan business, financial
control, marketing skills, joint
ventures.
2. Demonstrate an understanding of
the functional areas of accounting,
marketing, finance, management,
and economics
3. Demonstrate an understanding of
the legal and social environment
of business
4. Demonstrate an understanding of
the global environment of
business
5. Demonstrate an understanding of
the ethical obligations and
responsibilities of business.
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
26/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
3. Able to understand the
background and knowledge of
some contemporary topics in
database research; typical topics
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
27/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
1. Able to implement quality TQM
standards in industries
3. Thorough understanding of
structured programming
BCSEA6-Fault Tolerance Systems
1. Able to understand the design of
fault tolerance systems with
architecture and coding.
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
28/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
BCSEC3-Robotics
1. Able to design different types of
robots for different kinds of
applications
2. Understand communication
concepts of distributed systems.
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
29/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
1. Able to implement shell programs.
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
30/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
Resource Planning) systems are
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
31/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
stack
3. Implementations of the
applications using Tomcat server.
user requirements.
2.2.2 Explain how modes of delivery of courses help in attainment of the POs (10)
Institute Marks
(Describe the different course delivery methods/modes (e.g. lecture interspersed with discussion, asynchronous mode of
interaction, group discussion, project etc.) used to deliver the courses and justify the effectiveness of these methods for
the attainment of the POs. This may be further justified using the indirect assessment methods such as course-end
10.00
surveys.)
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
32/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
Edit Answer
Lecturing
M1
Tutorial
M2
Demonstration
M3
Group Discussion
M4
Project
M5
Presentations
M6
Assignment
M7
Mentoring
The delivery methods are chosen appropriately to meet the Program Outcomes (PO).
PO1
PO2
PO3
PO4
PO5
Lecturing
Tutorial
Demonstration
Group Discussion
Project
Assignment
Mentoring
PO7
PO8
PO9
P
P
Presentations
PO6
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
NPTEL
Digital Library
Stanford Engineering Everywhere (SEE) http://see.stanford.edu/
MIT Open Courseware http://ocw.mit.edu/index.htm
MOOC
2.2.3 Indicate how assessment tools used to assess the impact of delivery of course/course content contribute towards
the attainment of course outcomes/programme outcomes (10)
(Describe different types of course assessment and evaluation methods (both direct and indirect) in practice and their
relevance towards the attainment of POs. )
Institute Marks
10.00
Edit Answer
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
33/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
Home Assignment
In each semester, three or four assignments will be given to each and every student, and grades will be given to the
students depends on the creative thoughts and problem solving methodology.
Assignment
Using the assessment tool, knowledge of students in programming languages have been tested and given special
training to the students who have poor performance
Online Examination
Conducted Online Exams in a Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) pattern, for the core subjects like Operating System,
Computer Networks, Data Structure, C, C++ etc, to all the students, in result they have will be very strong in the basic
of computer science. It is easy for the staff members to evaluate.
Continuous Assessment Test
The assessment for all the subjects for the students will be conducted thrice a semester. Form this result, staff can
understand where the student stands, and then they will take necessary steps to improve the performance of
students and help to achieve the course outcomes
Semester End Examination
Semester End examination is a valuating tool for evaluating the achievement of course outcomes and program
outcomes.
PO1
Home
Assignment
Assignments
Direct
Evaluation
Methods
Online
Examinations
Sessional
Semester End
Examination
Program Level
Statistics
Indirect
Evaluation
Methods
Service Scheme
Survey
Alumni Survey
Employer
Survey
PO4
PO2
PO3
PO5
PO6
PO7
PO8
P
P
PO4
PO5
PO6
PO7
PO8
PO3
Assignments
Direct
Online
Evaluation
Examinations
Methods
Sessional
Home
Assignment
Semester End
PO1
PO2
PO9
PO9
P
P
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
34/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
Semester End
Examination
Program Level
Statistics
Service Scheme
Indirect
Evaluation
Methods
Survey
Alumni Survey
Employer
Survey
2.2.4 Indicate the extent to which the laboratory and project course work are contributing towards attainment of the POs
(10)
Institute Marks
(Justify the balance between theory and practical for the attainment of the POs . Justify how the various project works (a
sample of 20% best and average projects from total projects) carried as part of the programme curriculum contribute
10.00
Edit Answer
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
35/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
The Laboratory and project works tasks which are performed for the curriculum are illustrated in Fig. 2.2.4 (a) and tabulated in Table
2.2.4(a).
Type
Program outcomes
Implementation
1,3
Design
Demonstration
Design & Implementation
Design
Demonstration
Design
Design
Laboratory
Demonstration
1,3
1,3
Design
2,3
Problem analysis
Design
Laboratory
Problem analysis
1,3
Case study
Case study
2,3,7,8,9
2,3,7,8,9
Academic
Project Title
Year
Area of
specialization
Web Technology
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
Contribution /
Achievements/ Research Output
Best
Project with a social cause
36/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
system
Mining agricultural data
Web Technology
Ontology
Mobile Technology
(GPS)
Average
Live project
Average
Eye recognition security
Network Security
2010
Mobile computing
Image Processing
Multimedia
TO
2011
Average
Outcome is satisfactory
Average
Outcome is satisfactory
Best
A new approach of problem
solving
Web Technology
Development
Web Technology
Image Processing
Best
Project with a social cause
Best
A new approach of problem
solving
Average
Project with a social cause
Best
Project with a social cause
Mobile Apps
Average
Development
Live project
Mobile Application
Average
development
Live project
Average
Image Processing
2011
Live project
Networking Project
TO
Emergency vehicle reorganization system Mobile Technology
2012
One world vigilant online surveillance
system
Network security
Average
Live project
Best
Live project
Best
Live project
Average
Project with a social cause
Best
Image Processing
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
37/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
Knowledge base construction using
Microsoft data mining techniques in
report generation / deployment using
Average
Data Mining
university
Best
Image Processing
Best
Developing a MMORPG game
Game Development
Best
MNRTGA program administration
Web Development
Best
Social networking service or site for IET
Web Development
2012
Average
Network Security
Average
Networking
TO
2013
Average
Spam detection
Network Security
Average
Result alert system with e-mail and SMS
Networking
Average
Insurance system with tracking manager Web Development
Best
Highly confidential security system
Network security
2.3.1 Describe assessment tools and processes used for assessing the attainment of each PO (25)
Institute Marks
Describe the assessment process that periodically documents and demonstrates the degree to which the Programme
Outcomes are attained. Also include information on:
a) A listing and description of the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of each the
programme educational objective is based. Examples of data collection processes may include, but are not limited to,
specific exam questions, student portfolios, internally developed assessment exams, senior project presentations,
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
25.00
38/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
specific exam questions, student portfolios, internally developed assessment exams, senior project presentations,
nationally-normed exams, oral exams, focus groups, industrial advisory committee;
b) The frequency with which these assessment processes are carried out.
Edit Answer
S.No.
1
2
3
Assessment
Processes
Semester
Exams
Practical Exams
Laboratory
Practice
PO1
PO2
PO3
PO4
PO5
PO6
PO7
PO8
PO9
Continuous
4
Assessment
Test
5
Seminar
Assignment
Case Study
Tutorial
Debate
Role Play
10
11
Chart
Preparation
Demonstration
13
Quiz
15
Group
Discussion
Presentations
12
14
Personality
Development
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
39/52
4/17/2014
16
Development
e-NBA
Program
17
18
Mentoring
Project Work
Executed
19
Internship
20
Industrial Visit
Professional
Society
21
Membership
and
Activity
22
Term paper
23
Internet usage
24
25
26
Usage of
Digital library
Library visited
No of library
books taken
National /
International
27
Technology /
skill
certification
National /
28
International
Project
competition
National /
International
29
Course
Training and
work shop
30
Research
Publications
Inter college
31
Events
Organized
Inter college
32
Events
Participation
Institute Marks
100.00
Add Row
Save
File Name
Upload File
View File
Action
2.3.2-c
2.3.2-d
2.3.2-e
Edit Answer
PO1: Prepares graduates to contribute to the Computer Science and Information Technology Profession and Society.
Table 2.3.2.a.
Sl.
Assessment
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
(2006-
40/52
4/17/2014
Sl.
Assessment
No
Processes
Weightage
for PO1
e-NBA
(2009-13) (2008-12) (2007-11)
(200610)
Semester Exams
30
23.55
25.2
24.5
27.43
Practical Exams
20
15.7
16.8
16.33
18.28
Laboratory Practice
10
9.61
9.71
9.84
9.73
10
8.92
9.13
8.93
9.13
4.83
4.91
4.81
4.82
4.89
4.93
4.96
4.91
4.96
4.94
4.95
10
9.9
9.86
9.8
9.7
4.95
4.98
4.78
4.88
4
5
6
Continuous
Assessment Test
Class Room Activity
Institute industry
Interaction
Knowledge
Upgradation
Co-curricular activity
Leadership Quality
Fig 2.3.2.a.
conducted and the average of the three tests / best of two are considered for the internals.
Class Room Activities which includes Seminar, Assignment, Case Study, Tutorial, Debate, Role Play, Chart Preparation,
Demonstration, Quiz, Group Discussion, Presentations, Soft Skill & Personality Development Program, and Mentoring is
assigned a weightage of 5 with respect to PO1. In every semester there is 100% participation for class room activities
like Assignment, Case Study, Tutorial, Mentoring and Soft Skill & Personality Development Program.
For the remaining activities student participation is as follows. Sample with respect to 2009-2013 batches is also
shown
Table 2.3.2.b.
Class Room
Expected Student
Activities
Participation
Seminar
20%
Debate
10%
10%
Role Play
10%
9.3%
Chart Preparation
10%
10%
Demonstration
20%
19.4%
Quiz
10%
9.8%
Group Discussion
10%
9.2%
Presentations
10%
9.6%
100%
96.6%
Total
19.3%
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
41/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
Weightage of Class Room Activity (100%) = 5
Achievement 96.6% = 4.83
Institute industry interaction which includes Project Work Executed, Internship, Industrial Visit, Professional
Society Membership and Activity and Term paper for which a weightage of 5 given.
Our University has the following centre of Excellence which enables the students to interact with the
industry experts as well as get hands on experience on the cutting edge technologies.
IBM Software Centre of Excellence
The IBM Software Centre of Excellence has enabled the University to conduct training for the students. IBM
Academic Initiative program is offering Software, Training and Professional Certification to Students and
Faculties.
MICROSOFT IT Academy
Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute became a member of Microsoft IT Academy Program in the year
2011.Students of Microsoft IT Academy receive hands-on experience with the latest Microsoft Software and
hundreds of Web-based E-Learning courses. Microsoft Certifications are widely recognized by employers, so the
program can give students an edge in todays competitive job market.
C-DAC GARUDA Grid (Super Computing) Connectivity
Objective of this facility
To enable Staff and Students to use heterogeneous Computing facilities of various operating systems, platforms, Software for
Research and Development.
To be a knowledge centre for parallel programming initiative.
Brought together major Research & Development and User groups to GARUDA.
To create more resource persons to work in the following fields which require High Performance Computing.
Bio informatics
Geo Physics
Automobile and Aerodynamics
Climate modelling
Computer Aided Engineering
Health Informatics
Indian Heritage
Open Source Drug Discovery
Assessment Processes
Weightage
for PO2
Semester Exams
20
15.7
16.8
16.33
18.28
10
9.9
9.3
9.1
9.5
20
19.01
18.9
19.4
19.08
Institute Industry
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
42/52
4/17/2014
3
e-NBA
Institute Industry
Interaction
20
19.01
18.9
19.4
19.08
14.6
13.9
14.8
14.09
Knowledge Upgradation
15
Co-curricular Activity
20
19.6
18.7
19.4
19.5
Leadership Quality
15
14.01
13.8
14.6
13.6
Fig 2.3.2.b.
The assessment process is done by considering the following components with respect to the PO2
Semester Exams conducted once per semester for which a weightage of 20 is assigned. Result analysis is done
regularly for every subject and documented.
Class Room Activity which includes Seminar, Debate, Demonstration, Group Discussion and Soft Skill & Personality
Development Program is assigned a weightage of 10.
Institute industry interaction which includes Industrial Visit and Professional Society Membership and Activity for which
a weightage of 20 is given.
Knowledge up gradation for which the factors like frequency of Internet usage is given a weightage of 15.
Co-curricular activities which includes National / International Project competition, National / International Course
Training and Workshop are given a weightage of 20.
Leadership Quality which consists of Intercollege events Organized and Intercollege events participated, conducted at
least once per year assigned a weightage 15.
PO3: Ability to apply Knowledge of Mathematics, Science, Computing, Engineering and Management to
Evaluate, Model and Implement Computing Solutions suitably considering issues such as Economic,
Environmental, Social and Ethical.
Table 2.3.2.d. Distribution of weightage of assessment processes for PO3
Sl.No Assessment Processes
Weightage
for PO3
2009-13
Practical Exams
20
15.7
Laboratory Practice
20
20
4
5
Institute Industry
Interaction
Co-curricular Activity
2008-12
2007-11
2006-10
16.8
16.33
18.28
19.7
18.4
19.01
18.6
19.5
18.03
18.9
17.6
30
28.12
27.04
27.8
28.06
10
9.01
8.8
8.7
8.71
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
43/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
Fig 2.3.2.c.
The assessment process is done by considering the following components with respect to the PO3
Practical Exams conducted once per semester for which a weightage of 20 is assigned.
Laboratory Practice for which 6 hours are allotted in a week for which weightage of 20 is given. Every semester there are 2
subjects with Laboratory practice. Students are assessed based on the attendance, observation work/quality of programs
written, output and viva conducted regularly.
Class Room Activity which includes Seminar, Assignment, Case Study, Debate, Chart Preparation, Demonstration, Group
Discussion, Presentations is assigned a weightage of 20.
Institute Industry Interaction which includes Project Work Executed, Industrial Visit and Term paper for which a weightage of
30 is given.
Co-curricular Activity which includes National / International Project competition is given a weightage of 10.
PO4: Understand and Articulate Professional, Ethical, Legal, Security and Social issues and responsibilities.
Table 2.3.2.e. Distribution of weightage of assessment processes for PO4
Sl.No
1
Assessment
Weightage
Processes
for PO4
Class Room
Activity
(2009-13)
(2008-12)
(2007-11)
(2006-10)
30
29
28.7
28.6
27.04
25
24.01
23.8
23.5
23.6
20
19.01
18.7
18.5
18.3
25
24.01
23.08
23.8
22.5
Institute
2
Industry
Interaction
Knowledge
Upgradation
Leadership
Quality
Fig 2.3.2.d.
The assessment process is done by considering the following components with respect to the PO4
Class Room Activity which includes Role Play, Group Discussion, Presentations, Soft Skill & Personality Development Program,
and Mentoring is assigned a weightage of 30.
Institute Industry Interaction which includes Professional Society Membership and Activity for which a weightage of 25 given.
Knowledge Upgradation for which the factors like frequency of Internet usage, Usage of Digital library, Library visited, No of
library books taken given a weightage of 20.
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
44/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
Leadership Quality assessment for which factors like Intercollege Events Organized & Inter college Events Participation are
considered and is assigned a weightage of 25.
PO5: Act and communicate effectively in Collaborative Work Environment with Peers, Customers, Authorities and
Society
Table 2.3.2.f. Distribution of weightage of assessment processes for PO5
Assessment
S.No
Processes
PO5
Class Room
Weightage for
Activity
(2009-13)
35
33.7
32.5
32.07
31
20
19.02
18.8
18.6
17.06
20
19.4
18.7
18.2
18.6
25
24
23.6
24.01
23.8
Institute
2
Industry
Interaction
Co-curricular
Activity
Leadership
Quality
Fig 2.3.2.e.
The assessment process is done by considering the following components with respect to the PO5
Class Room Activity which includes Seminar, Case Study, Debate, Role Play, Group Discussion, Presentations, and Soft Skill &
Personality Development Program is assigned a weightage of 35.
Institute Industry Interaction which includes Project Work Executed for which a weightage of is 20 given.
Co-curricular Activities which includes National / International Project competition is given a weightage of 20.
Leadership Quality assessment for which factors like Inter college Events Organized & Inter college Events Participation are
considered and is assigned a weightage of 25.
PO6: Ability for Continuous Learning and apply state of the art Tools and Technologies in Software Development to be a
Skilled Employable Professional
Table 2.3.2.g. Distribution of weightage of assessment processes for PO6
S.No
1
2
3
4
Assessment
Weightage
Processes
for PO6
Practical Exams
Laboratory
Practice
CAT
Class Room
Activity
2009-13
(2008-12) (2007-11)
(2006-10)
20
15.7
16.8
16.33
18.28
20
19.7
18.4
19.01
18.6
10
8.92
9.13
8.93
9.13
10
9.9
9.3
9.1
9.5
10
9.51
9.4
9.3
8.53
10
9.85
9.2
9.505
9.3
Institute
5
Industry
Interaction
Knowledge Up
gradation
Co-curricular
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
45/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
Co-curricular
7
Activity
Fig 2.3.2.f.
20
19.1
18.7
18.6
17.9
The assessment process is done by considering the following components with respect to the PO6
Practical Exams conducted once per semester for which a weightage of 20 is assigned.
Laboratory Practice for which 6 hours are allotted in a week for which weightage of 20. Every semester there are 2 subjects
with Laboratory practice. Students are assessed based on the attendance, observation work/quality of programs written,
output and viva conducted regularly. Practical internals are given by considering all these factors.
Continuous Assessment Test conducted thrice per semester for which weightage 10 is given. Three CAT test are conducted
and the average of the three tests / best of two are considered for the internals.
Class Room Activities which includes Assignment, Case Study, and Tutorial is assigned a weightage of 10 with respect to
PO6.
Institute Industry Interaction which includes Internship, Industrial Visit, Professional Society Membership and Activity and
Term paper for which a weightage of 10 is given.
Knowledge Upgradation for which includes frequency of Internet usage is given a weightage of 10.
Co-curricular Activity which includes National / International Technology / Skill Certification, National / International Project
Competition, National / International Course Training & Work shop and Research Publications is given a weightage of 20.
PO7: An ability to function effectively in multidisciplinary teams to accomplish a Common Goal
Table 2.3.2.h. Distribution of weightage of assessment processes for PO7
Sl.No
1
2
3
4
Assessment
Weightage
Processes
for PO7
Fig 2.3.2.g.
2009-13
2008-12
2007-11
2006-10
20
19.4
18.7
18.2
18.6
30
29.01
28.6
28.01
27.6
30
29.5
28.06
27.05
27.01
20
19.6
18.07
19.04
19.5
The assessment process is done by considering the following components with respect to the PO7
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
46/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
Class Room Activities which includes Seminar, Debate, Role Play, Demonstration, Group Discussion, Presentations is assigned
a weightage of 20.
Institute Industry Interaction which includes Project Work Executed, Industrial Visit for which a weightage of 30 is given.
Co-curricular Activity which includes National / International Project Competition, National / International Course
Training
Assessment
Weightage
(2009-
Processes
for PO8
13)
25
24.01
23.08
24.7
23.07
20
18.9
18.4
18.02
17.8
15
14.6
14.1
13.7
13.9
20
19.01
18.5
18.04
18.5
20
19.1
18.7
18.6
17.9
Class Room
Activity
Institute
2
industry
interaction
3
4
5
Knowledge
Upgradation
Co-curricular
Activity
Leadership
Quality
Fig 2.3.2.h.
The assessment process is done by considering the following components with respect to the PO8
Class Room Activities which includes Soft Skill & Personality Development Program is assigned a weightage of 25.
Institute Industry Interaction which includes Project Work Executed, Internship, Industrial Visit, Professional Society
Membership and Activity for which a weightage of 20 is given
Knowledge Upgradation for which the factors like frequency of Internet usage is given a weightage of 15.
Co-curricular Activities which includes National /International Course Training and Workshop, Research Publications is given a
weightage of 20.
Leadership Quality which factors like Intercollege Events Organized is assigned a weightage of 20.
PO9: Has the right composition of Knowledge, Skill, Leadership and Managerial Ability to be an Entrepreneur
Table 2.3.2.j. Distribution of weightage of assessment processes for PO9
Sl.No
Assessment
Processes
Class Room
Activity
Weightage
for PO9
(2009-13) (2008-12)
2007-11)
2006-10
20
19.01
18.3
18.5
18.01
20
19.01
18.01
17.03
17.68
10
9.5
9.01
8.7
8.01
Institute
2
Industry
Iinteraction
Knowledge
Upgradation
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
47/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
Upgradation
4
Co-curricular
Activity
Leadership
Quality
Fig 2.3.2.i.
20
19.01
18.05
17.4
18.1
30
29
28.7
28.01
28.56
The assessment process is done by considering the following components WRT PO9
Class Room Activity which includes Case Study, Group Discussion, Presentations and Soft Skill & Personality Development
Program is assigned a weightage of 25.
Institute Industry Interaction which includes Industrial Visit is given a weightage of 20.
Knowledge Upgradation for which the factors like frequency of Internet usage is given a weightage of 15.
Co-curricular Activity which includes National/International Project competition is given a weightage of 20.
Leadership Quality assessment for which factors like Intercollege Events Organized & Intercollege Events Participation are
considered and assigned a weightage of 20.
Result of Assessment of each POs
Table 2.3.2.k. Distribution of weightage of POs
2008-
2007-
2006-
2012
2011
2010
16.4
13.4
14.3
15.1
20
18
17.6
17.8
18.3
20
18.64
16.3
16.7
18.01
PO4
4.6
4.1
PO5
4.2
PO6
4.4
3.3
4.11
4.29
PO7
4.07
4.01
3.5
PO8
4.3
PO9
15
7.9
8.1
7.6
Sl.No
POs
Weightage
2009-2013
PO1
20
PO2
PO3
4
5
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
48/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
Fig 2.3.2.j.
Fig 2.3.2.k.
Results Documentation
The assessment methods are documented and maintained in the department as follows
Semester Exams are documented at the end of semester in the form of result analysis.
Practical Exams are documented at the end of semester in the form of result analysis.
Laboratory Practices are documented at every Laboratory sessions in the log book and the observation record
CAT Marks are documented after the correction, marks to be entered in the log book and also updated in the Department
Class Room Activities are documented in the log book
Institute, Industry, Interactions are documented in the respective file in the Department Office
Knowledge Upgradations are monitored by Class Coordinators.
Co-curricular activities are documented by the respective In-Charges and updated in the respective files in the Department.
Leadership Qualities are documented by Department Office and the respective Class In-Charges.
2.4.1 Indicate how results of assessment used for curricular improvements (5)
Institute Marks
(Articulate with rationale the curricular improvements brought in after the review of the attainment of the POs)
5.00
Edit Answer
The assessment results of each PO are given in 2.3.1. There is a constant improvement in the target weightage for each PO in
chronological order. If there is a decrease in the weightage target of any course, the faculty discuses with the Program coordinator
based on the feedback from the students. Indirect feedback is taken by the Program Coordinator from Alumni, Employer and Industry.
The Department Advisory Board analyzes attainment of Pos based on the recommendations from the Program Coordinator. The
necessary ratifications for the curriculum are done in the Board of Studies.
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
49/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
Fig 2.4.1.a.
2.4.2 Indicate how results of assessment used for improvement of course delivery and assessment (10)
Institute Marks
(Articulate with rationale the curricular delivery and assessment improvements brought in after the review of the
attainment of the POs)
10.00
Edit Answer
The following methods are used for improvement of course delivery and assessment for Results of assessment
Counseling
Seminar
Assignment
Case Study
Tutorial
Debate
Role Play
Chart Preparation
Demonstration
Quiz
Group Discussion
Presentations
Soft Skill & Personality Development Program
Mentoring
Project Work Executed
Internship
Industrial Visit
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
50/52
4/17/2014
Industrial Visit
e-NBA
2.4.3 State the process used for revising/redefining the POs (15)
Institute Marks
(Articulate with rationale how the results of the evaluation of the POs have been used to review/redefine the POs in line
with the Graduate Attributes of the NBA.)
15.00
Edit Answer
The need to revise / redefine the existing Pos is identified with the help of the Assessment results of PO attainment
from direct/indirect assessment methods.
The improvement of PO attainment is done in three stages: Curriculum, Delivery methods /course outcomes and
Program Outcomes.
For curriculum, the Program Coordinator initiates the process with the feedback from the Module co-coordinator. Based
upon the notifications of the Department Advisory Board makes the necessary changes and submits the inference to
the Board of Studies for approval
The module Coordinator initiates the process to improve the delivery methods/course outcomes in course assessment
and discusses with the program assessment committee to formulate methodologies to enhance the program outcome.
The program performance is improved based on the findings of the Program coordinator. The Program Coordinator
analyzes the PO assessment and attainment and discusses the necessary changes to be revised in the existing Pos
with program assessment committee/department advisory board.
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
51/52
4/17/2014
e-NBA
Fig 2.4.3.a.
Previous
https://enba.nbaind.org/SARTemplates/SARUGTemplate.aspx?Appid=671&Progid=558
Next
52/52