Name of Firm/JV
CIVIL ENGINEERING
PVT.LTD.
Technical Mark
Obtained
RESEARCH
AND
CONSULTANCY
Remarks
17.80
Fail
17.40
Fail
14.40
Fail
Name of Firm
CIVIL ENGINEERING RESEARCH AND
CONSULTANCY PVT.LTD.
Max Mark
10
DPR Preparation
10
10
0
1
TOTAL
Marks for Understanding to the TOR, Methodology, Work Plan and Technology transfer/Training : Max 40
Description
Evaluation Remarks
Total Marks
Eval 2
Eval 3
Not Significant
General
1.6
1.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
12
7.2
4.0
Significant
Not Significant
General Review
Critical Review
No Description
If any of the key personnel has visited the site and has attached a photograph, described the site and has
attached a photograph, described the site.
General Description
General Description with site photograph
7.2
Not Significant
Fairly justify the proposed Work scheduled
4.0
4
40
Average TOTAL
40
Description
Evaluation Remarks
16.8
16.8
The idea of sharing know-how of the works highlights on dissemination of knowledge and training proposed by the
consultant.
Total Marks
0.0
0
Significant
TOTAL
Total
Grand Total
Remarks
Not Significant
Minimunm Experience
after Bachelor Degree
10
15
20
15
15
0
0.00
17.80
Fail
Marks for Relevant Experience of the firm(Last ten years only ) : Max 10
Road Length=10 KM
Work Experience As Consultant
DPR Preparation
1
TOTAL
Marks for Understanding to the TOR, Methodology, Work Plan and Technology transfer/Training : Max 40
Description
If any of the key personnel has visited the site and has attached a photograph, described the site and has
attached a photograph, described the site.
Total
Grand Total
Remarks
Name of Firm
SLATE CONSULTANTS PVT.LTD.
Max Mark
10
10
10
0
3
Training : Max 40
SLATE CONSULTANTS PVT.LTD.
Evaluation Remarks
Total Marks
Eval 2
Not Significant
General
1.6
1.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
12
7.2
1.6
4.0
Significant
Not Significant
General Review
Critical Review
General Description
General Description with site photograph
Technical Description with site photograph
Not Significant
General
Clear Methodology with flow charts
Not Significant
General Methodology Only
General Methodology with flow charts
7.2
1.6
Not Significant
Fairly justify the proposed Work scheduled
14.4
14.4
Evaluation Remarks
Total Marks
Eval 1 Eval 2
Not Significant
General (only standard method description)
0.0
0
Significant
Minimunm Experience
after Bachelor Degree
34
14
10
0
0.00
17.40
Fail
Eval 3
Eval 3
DPR Preparation
1
TOTAL
Marks for Understanding to the TOR, Methodology, Work Plan and Technology transfer/Training : Max 40
Description
If any of the key personnel has visited the site and has attached a photograph, described the site and has
attached a photograph, described the site.
Anand Gupta
Hydrologist
Deepak Paudel
Sociologyist /Economist
Sohan Maharjan
Total
Grand Total
Remarks
Name of Firm
Max Mark
10
10
10
0
0
Training : Max 40
RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD.
Evaluation Remarks
Total Marks
Eval 2
Not Significant
General
1.6
1.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
12
7.2
1.6
4.0
Significant
Not Significant
General Review
Critical Review
General Description
General Description with site photograph
Technical Description with site photograph
Not Significant
General
Clear Methodology with flow charts
Not Significant
General Methodology Only
General Methodology with flow charts
7.2
1.6
Not Significant
Fairly justify the proposed Work scheduled
14.4
14.4
Evaluation Remarks
Total Marks
Eval 1 Eval 2
Not Significant
General (only standard method description)
0.0
0
Significant
Minimunm Experience
after Bachelor Degree
Education(Y/N)
Experience
Marks
10
21
11
20
0
0.00
14.40
Fail
Eval 3
Eval 3
DPR Preparation
1
TOTAL
Marks for Understanding to the TOR, Methodology, Work Plan and Technology transfer/Training : Max 40
Description
If any of the key personnel has visited the site and has attached a photograph, described the site and has
attached a photograph, described the site.
GBS TAMRAKAR
Geotechnical Engineer
Sanjay Adhikari
Sociologyist /Economist
Total
Grand Total
Remarks
Name of Firm
CARD CONSULTANT PVT.LTD.
Max Mark
10
10
10
10
10
0
10
Training : Max 40
CARD CONSULTANT PVT.LTD.
Evaluation Remarks
Total Marks
Eval 2
Not Significant
General
4.0
4
Significant
Not Significant
General Review
5.0
5
0
Critical Review
General Description
General Description with site photograph
0.0
0.0
12
12.0
12
1.6
4.0
1.6
Not Significant
Fairly justify the proposed Work scheduled
26.6
26.6
Evaluation Remarks
Total Marks
Eval 1 Eval 2
Not Significant
General (only standard method description)
0.0
0
Significant
Minimunm Experience
after Bachelor Degree
20
30
23
0
0.00
36.60
Fail
Eval 3
Eval 3
Firms
Key Personnels
Highway/ Transport Engineer
Geotechnical Engineer
Hydrologist
Senior Surveyor
Anand Gupta
Deepak Paudel
Sohan Maharjan
GBS TAMRAKAR
Dr.Ram Krishna Poudel
Sanjay Adhikari
Hari Darshan Shrestha
Name of Work: -Detailed Engineering Survey, Design and Report Preparation of Haldarpur-Samsergung-Madanchowk-Baniyabhar
Road,Banke
Contract No. - 337159/071/72/DPR-10
Marks for Relevant Experience of the firm(Last ten years only ) : Max 10
Road Length =10KM
Work Experience As Consultant
DPR Preparation
Max Marks
10
TOTAL
10
0
1
0
3
Marks for Understanding to the TOR, Methodology, Work Plan and Technology transfer/Training
: Max 40
Description
Max Marks
1.6
1.6
If any of the key personnel has visited the site and has attached a photograph, described the site and has
attached a photograph, described the site.
0.0
12
7.2
40
40
16.8
16.8
1.6
1.6
TOTAL
Average TOTAL
The idea of sharing know-how of the works highlights on dissemination of knowledge and training proposed by the
consultant.
Max Marks
Name of Work: -Detailed Engineering Survey, Design and Report Preparation of Haldarpur-Samsergung-Madanchowk-Baniyabhar
Road,Banke
Contract No. - 337159/071/72/DPR-10
The idea of sharing know-how of the works highlights on dissemination of knowledge and training proposed by the
consultant.
TOTAL
15
10
10
10
45
100
0
17.8
0
0
Max Marks
Geotechnical Engineer
Hydrologist
Senior Surveyor
Total
Grand Total
Remarks
RURAL
INFRASTRUCTURE
DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD.
CARD CONSULTANT
PVT.LTD.
10
0
0
10
RURAL
CARD CONSULTANT
INFRASTRUCTURE
PVT.LTD.
DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD.
1.6
1.6
1.6
RURAL
CARD CONSULTANT
INFRASTRUCTURE
PVT.LTD.
DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD.
4
4
RURAL
CARD CONSULTANT
INFRASTRUCTURE
PVT.LTD.
DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD.
0
0
0
0
0
0
Government of Nepal
Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport
Department of Roads
Design and Planning Branch
Planning Monitoring and Evaluation Unit
Babarmahal, Kathmandu
SN.
1,504,983.84
Rate/Km Without
VAT
Technical
Score(80%)
Financial
Score(20%)
Rank
17.80
(100.00)
14.24
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
17.40
(100.00)
13.92
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
14.40
(100.00)
11.52
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
37