Original Contribution
Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Regensburg, Universittsstrasse 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
c
Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
b
art ic l e i nf o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 14 May 2013
Received in revised form
28 June 2013
Accepted 18 July 2013
Available online 24 July 2013
Prevention and control of biolm-growing microorganisms are serious problems in public health due to
increasing resistances of some pathogens against antimicrobial drugs and the potential of these
microorganisms to cause severe infections in patients. Therefore, alternative approaches that are capable
of killing pathogens are needed to supplement standard treatment modalities. One alternative is the
photodynamic inactivation of bacteria (PIB). The lethal effect of PIB is based on the principle that visible
light activates a photosensitizer, leading to the formation of reactive oxygen species, e.g., singlet oxygen,
which induces phototoxicity immediately during illumination. SAPYR is a new generation of photosensitizers. Based on a 7-perinaphthenone structure, it shows a singlet oxygen quantum yield of 99%
and is water soluble and photostable. Moreover, it contains a positive charge for good adherence to cell
walls of pathogens. In this study, the PIB properties of SAPYR were investigated against monospecies and
polyspecies biolms formed in vitro by oral key pathogens. SAPYR showed a dual mechanism of action
against biolms: (I) it disrupts the structure of the biolm even without illumination; (II) when
irradiated, it inactivates bacteria in a polymicrobial biolm after one single treatment with an efcacy of
99.99%. These results encourage further investigation on the potential of PIB using SAPYR for the
treatment of localized infectious diseases.
& 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Singlet oxygen
Photodynamic
PIB
Perinaphthenone
Polymicrobial biolm
Introduction
Successful inactivation of biolm-growing bacteria has gained
increasing importance because, according to the NIH, biolmassociated diseases are causative for more than 80% of all human
478
CH3
+
N+
NH
H3 C N
N CH3
HN
O
O
Cl-
S O
CH3
CH3
x3 4
Fig. 1. Chemical structures of SAPYR and TMPyP. (A) Chemical structure of SAPYR containing a positively charged pyridinium-methyl substituent. (B) Chemical structure of
TMPyP, a well-known reference PS and porphyrin derivative.
The object of the present study was to evaluate the antibacterial photodynamic properties of this new photosensitizer
SAPYR against biolms. Since oral diseases, e.g., periodontitis,
are a superior eld for application of PIB-mediated topical killing
of bacteria [9], biolms were formed by oral key pathogens. PIB
efcacy with SAPYR was tested against monospecies biolms of
Enterococcus faecalis and Actinomyces naeslundii and a polymicrobial biolm containing A. naeslundii, Fusobacterium nucleatum,
and Enterococcus faecalis, representing an early colonizer, a
bridge bacterium, and a species with increased resistance against
antimicrobial agents found in each phase of biolm formation
[2022].
479
480
Results
Photophysical characterization of SAPYR
For visualization of the 1O2 luminescence of SAPYR (Fig. 1A) and
TMPyP (Fig. 1B), three-dimensional plots were generated as a
combination of time-resolved and spectrally resolved measurements at the same absorbed energies (350 mJ per measurement)
(Fig. 3A, SAPYR; B, TMPyP). For SAPYR, a 1O2 quantum yield of
0.99 70.05 could be determined; this is clearly higher compared with TMPyP ( 0.74) [25]. For concentrations from 1 to
200 M, a 1O2 decay time of 3.5 7 0.2 s and a triplet decay time of
SAPYR of 2.3 70.2 s were measured; so no quenching ability of
1
O2 or of the triplet state of SAPYR could be observed. Moreover,
no dimerization of the SAPYR solutions could be detected. In order
to investigate the 1O2 generation of SAPYR and therefore its
photostability, the 1O2 luminescence was measured every minute
over a period of 20 min under continuous irradiation (100 mW)
(Fig. 4). Here a slight decrease of 1O2 luminescence generated by
SAPYR could be observed compared with TMPyP. The 1O2 luminescence and absorption of SAPYR decreased by 20% when
irradiated at 410 nm with 120 J for 20 min; during this process
approximately 20 J of the applied energy was absorbed. The 1O2
luminescence and absorption of TMPyP decreased by 2% with
virtually the same absorbed energy at 455 nm. However, the 1O2
luminescence of SAPYR still exceeded the 1O2 luminescence of
TMPyP after 20 min of continuous irradiation.
For further comparison of both PSs, the overall energies absorbed
Eabs for SAPYR and TMPyP were calculated as follows:
!
"
Eabs A # E 1!10!cd # E
481
Fig. 3. 3D plots of the 1O2 luminescence of SAPYR and TMPyP. (A) Three-dimensional plot (left) generated by combination of time-resolved and spectrally resolved singlet
oxygen signals (right) of SAPYR. (B) Three-dimensional plot (left) generated by combination of time-resolved and spectrally resolved 1O2 signals (right) of TMPyP.
482
Fig. 4. 1O2 luminescence of SAPYR and TMPyP under long-term irradiation: 1O2
luminescence generated by SAPYR (lled dots) and TMPyP (open dots) under
continuous irradiation for 20 min (100 mW) at 410 and 455 nm, respectively.
Fig. 5. Visualization of EPS. Polyspecies biolm stained with Con A (red) for EPS,
visualized by multichannel uorescence microscopy. The corresponding brighteld image was colored green to enhance contrast using an imaging software.
Presence of EPS is demonstrated by the red-colored area.
Biolm detachment
The ability of SAPYR to detach parts of the biolm was analyzed
in EF monospecies biolms which were used as a model. The
results (Fig. 8A) show a signicant decrease of OD median (P 0) in
experimental groups that were incubated with SAPYR, regardless
of whether the samples were illuminated or not (groups PS+L+
and PS+L-), compared with the controls that were incubated with
PBS (PS-L- and PS-L+). This means that incubation with SAPYR
leads to detachment of parts of the biolm.
Discussion
In the present study we evaluated a new photosensitizer SAPYR
which is based on a 7-perinaphthenone structure against EF and
AN in monospecies and polyspecies biolms.
Oxidative stress, mostly generated by ROS such as superoxide
(O2d ! ), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and the free hydroxyl radical
(HOd), is ubiquitous in bacterial life [35]. Thus, bacteria express
superoxide dismutases (SOD) as a defense mechanism; these SOD
enzymes, catalases, and peroxidases are able to catalyze the
dismutation of ROS to H2O and molecular oxygen [36]. The ROS
generated by type I mechanism of the photodynamic processes are
similar to those produced in the bacterial oxygen metabolism or
by neutrophils and macrophages [37]. Therefore, these defense
mechanisms could be effective against PIB-mediated oxidative
death of bacteria. Karavolos et al. demonstrated that expression
of SOD increased in S. aureus after treatment with oxidative stressgenerating agents [38]. Furthermore SOD activity of S. aureus was
increased after PIB with Protoporphyrin IX, but only in PIBsusceptible strains [39].
However, these defense mechanisms may also be overcome by
exalted generation of ROS of type I mechanism of action. This has
been shown for several functionalized fullerenes which act mostly
via type I mechanism and were found to be efcient PSs for
PIB [40].
483
Fig. 6. Photodynamic biolm inactivation. (AF) All following PIB experiments in this gure are shown as CFU medians with 25 and 75% quartiles. Solid and dashed lines
show a CFU reduction of 3 and 5 log10 steps, respectively. In detail: (A) PIB in EF monospecies biolm with TMPyP: PS+L+ group (orange) shows no reduction of CFU.
(B) PIB in EF monospecies biolm with SAPYR: CFU of PS+L+ group (yellow) reduced by 5 log10 steps. (C) PIB in polyspecies biolm with SAPYR, detection of EF: CFU of PS+L
+ group (yellow) reduced by 5 log10 steps. (D) Open bars left: PIB in AN monospecies biolm with SAPYR: CFU of PS+L+ group (yellow) reduced by 2 log10 steps. Hatched
bars right: PIB in polyspecies biolm with SAPYR, detection of AN: CFU of PS+L+ group (yellow) reduced by 4 log10 steps. (E) PIB in duospecies biolm with SAPYR,
detection of EF: PS+L+ group (yellow) shows a reduction 4 log10 steps CFU. (F) PIB with bacteria from a disrupted AN biolm with SAPYR: PS+L+ group (yellow) shows a
reduction by 8 log10 steps CFU.
mechanism remains. Thus, to minimize up-regulation of stressregulated genes on oxidative stress signals induced by PIB, we
developed a new type of photosensitizerSAPYRfor PIB regarding
type II mechanism of action only. The precursor molecules of SAPYR,
7-perinaphthenone (phenalen-1-one; PN) and perinaphthenone-
484
Fig. 7. Measurement of extracellular polysaccharides. (A) OD medians with 25 and 75% quartiles of total carbohydrate concentration in AN monospecies (AN), EF
monospecies (EF), and polyspecies (poly) biolms. Groups with different lower letters x or y were found signicantly different (P 0 for each pair). (B) Standard calibration
curve with glucose concentrations from 10 to 50 g/ml which was used for ensuring linearity (r2 0.997).
Fig. 8. Biolm detachment following PIB and bacterial viability in supernatants. (A) Biolm detachment following PIB with SAPYR, EF monospecies biolm: OD medians with
25 and 75% quartiles representing the amount of biolm that stayed attached. Groups incubated with SAPYR (PS+) exhibit signicantly more detachment compared to
groups incubated with PBS (PS-). Groups with different lower letters x or y were found signicantly different (P 0 for each pair). (B) Bacterial viability in supernatants
following PIB with SAPYR: EF monospecies biolm: CFU medians with 25 and 75% quartiles. There were 10 CFU detectable in PS+L+ group (yellow) compared to 108 in
control groups, indicating that bacteria that detach following PIB are not viable.
485
Conclusion
In this study we present SAPYR as a new generation of photosensitizers. Based on 7-perinaphthenone structure, SAPYR exhibits
486
Acknowledgments
We thank Christoph Leibl for helpful discussions and Karin
Lehner for her help with the experimental setup for synthesizing
precursors of SAPYR. The excellent technical assistance of Martin
Rappl is gratefully acknowledged. Special thanks are given to
Hannah Beiche for linguistic improvement of the manuscript.
Johannes Regensburger and Anita Gollmer are funded by grants
of the German Research Foundation (DFG-RE-3323/2-1 and DFGGO-2340/1-1, respectively). All authors declare that they have no
conict of interest.
References
[1] PA-07-288: Immunology of Biolms (R01). grants1.nih.gov [cited 2013 Feb 20].
Available from: http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-les/PA-07-288.html.
[2] Marsh, P. D.; Moter, A.; Devine, D. A. Dental plaque biolms: communities,
conict and control. Periodontology 2000(55):1635; 2011.
[3] Shani, S.; Friedman, M.; Steinberg, D. The anticariogenic effect of amine
uorides on Streptococcus sobrinus and glucosyltransferase in biolms. Caries
Res 34:260267; 2000.
[4] Ceri, H.; Olson, M. E.; Stremick, C.; Read, R. R.; Morck, D.; Buret, A. The Calgary
biolm device: new technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biolms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:17711776; 1999.
[5] Marsh, P. D. Dental plaque as a microbial biolm. Caries Res. 38:204211; 2004.
[6] Cookson, B. D.; Farrelly, H.; Stapleton, P.; Garvey, R. P.; Price, M. R. Transferable
resistance to triclosan in MRSA. Lancet 337:15481549; 1991.
[7] Yamamoto, T.; Tamura, Y.; Yokota, T. Antiseptic and antibiotic resistance
plasmid in Staphylococcus aureus that possesses ability to confer chlorhexidine and acrinol resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 32:932935; 1988.
[8] Rossolini, G. M.; Mantengoli, E. Antimicrobial resistance in Europe and its
potential impact on empirical therapy. Clin. Microbiol. Infect 14(6):28; 2008.
[9] Dai, T.; Huang, Y. -Y.; Hamblin, M. R. Photodynamic therapy for localized
infectionsstate of the art. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 6:170188; 2009.
[10] St Denis, T. G.; Dai, T.; Izikson, L.; Astrakas, C.; Anderson, R. R.; Hamblin, M. R.;
Tegos, G. P. All you need is light: antimicrobial photoinactivation as an
evolving and emerging discovery strategy against infectious disease. Virulence
2:509520; 2011.
[11] Wainwright, M. Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 42:1328; 1998.
[12] Schweitzer, C.; Schmidt, R. Physical mechanisms of generation and deactivation of singlet oxygen. Chem. Rev. 103:16851757; 2003.
[13] Freinbichler, W.; Colivicchi, M. A.; Stefanini, C.; Bianchi, L.; Ballini, C.; Misini, B.;
Weinberger, P.; Linert, W.; Varelija, D.; Tipton, K. F.; Corte, Della L. Highly
reactive oxygen species: detection, formation, and possible functions. Cell. Mol.
Life Sci. 68:20672079; 2011.
[14] Jori, G.; Roncucci, G. Photodynamic therapy in microbial infections. Adv. Clin.
Exp. Med. 15:421; 2006.
[15] Tavares, A.; Carvalho, C. M. B.; Faustino, M. A.; Neves, M. G. P. M. S.; Tom, J. P. C.;
Tom, A. C.; Cavaleiro, J. A. S.; Cunha, A.; Gomes, N. C. M.; Alves, E.; Almeida, A.
Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy: study of bacterial recovery viability and
potential development of resistance after treatment. Mar .Drugs 8:91105; 2010.
[16] Giuliani, F.; Martinelli, M.; Cocchi, A.; Arbia, D.; Fantetti, L.; Roncucci, G. In
vitro resistance selection studies of RLP068/Cl, a new Zn (II) phthalocyanine
suitable for antimicrobial photodynamic therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 54:637642; 2010.
[17] Fontana, C. R.; Abernethy, A. D.; Som, S.; Ruggiero, K.; Doucette, S.; Marcantonio, R. C.; Boussios, C. I.; Kent, R.; Goodson, J. M.; Tanner, A. C. R.; Soukos, N. S.
The antibacterial effect of photodynamic therapy in dental plaque-derived
biolms. J. Periodont. Res. 44:751759; 2009.
[18] Kishen, A.; Upadya, M.; Tegos, G. P.; Hamblin, M. R. Efux pump inhibitor
potentiates antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation of Enterococcus faecalis
biolm. Photochem. Photobiol. 86:13431349; 2010.
[19] Maisch, T.; Baier, J.; Franz, B.; Maier, M.; Landthaler, M.; Szeimies, R. -M.;
Bumler, W. The role of singlet oxygen and oxygen concentration in photodynamic inactivation of bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:72237228; 2007.
[20] Dige, I.; Raarup, M. K.; Nyengaard, J. R.; Kilian, M.; Nyvad, B. Actinomyces
naeslundii in initial dental biolm formation. Microbiology 155:21162126;
2009.
[21] Bolstad, A. I.; Jensen, H. B.; Taxonomy, Bakken V. biology, and periodontal
aspects of Fusobacterium nucleatum. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 9:5571; 1996.
[22] Sun, J.; Song, X.; Kristiansen, B. E.; Kjaereng, A.; Willems, R. J. L.; Eriksen, H. M.;
Sundsfjord, A.; Sollid, J. E. Occurrence, population structure, and antimicrobial
resistance of enterococci in marginal and apical periodontitis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
47:22182225; 2009.
[23] Bumler W.; Felgentrger A.; Lehner K.; Maisch T.; Regensburger J.; Santarelli F.;
Speth A. Phenalene-1-one derivatives, method for producing same and use
thereof. WO Patent WO/2012/113860; 2012.
[24] Nonell, S.; Gonzalez, M.; Trull, F. R. 1 H-Phenalen-1-one-2-sulfonic acid: an
extremely efcient singlet molecular oxygen sensitizer for aqueous media.
Anidad 50:445450; 1993.
[25] Wilkinson, F.; Helman, W. P.; Ross, A. B. Quantum yields for the photosensitized formation of the lowest electronically excited singlet state of molecular
oxygen in solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 22:113262; 1993.
[26] Baier, J.; Maisch, T.; Maier, M.; Engel, E.; Landthaler, M.; Bumler, W. Singlet
oxygen generation by UVA light exposure of endogenous photosensitizers.
Biophys. J. 91:14521459; 2006.
[27] Baier, J.; Fuss, T.; Pllmann, C.; Wiesmann, C.; Pindl, K.; Engl, R.; Baumer, D.;
Maier, M.; Landthaler, M.; Bumler, W. Theoretical and experimental analysis
of the luminescence signal of singlet oxygen for different photosensitizers. J.
Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 87:163173; 2007.
[28] Pratten, J.; Wills, K.; Barnett, P.; Wilson, M. In vitro studies of the effect of
antiseptic-containing mouthwashes on the formation and viability of Streptococcus sanguis biolms. J. Appl. Microbiol. 84:11491155; 1998.
[29] Sutherland, I. W. Biotechnology of microbial exopolysaccharides. Cambridge
studies in biotechnology. Cambridge University Press; 1990.
[30] Miles, A. A.; Misra, S. S.; Irwin, J. O. The estimation of the bactericidal power of
the blood. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 38:732749; 1938.
[31] DuBois, M.; Gilles, K. A.; Hamilton, J. K.; Rebers, P. A.; Smith, F. Colorimetric
method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem.
28:350356; 1956.
[32] Decker, E. -M.; Dietrich, I.; Klein, C.; Ohle von, C. Dynamic production of
soluble extracellular polysaccharides by Streptococcus mutans. Int. J. Dent.
2011:435830; 2011.
[33] OToole, G. A.; Kolter, R. Initiation of biolm formation in Pseudomonas
uorescens WCS365 proceeds via multiple, convergent signalling pathways:
a genetic analysis. Mol. Microbiol 28:449461; 1998.
[34] Boyce, J. M.; Pittet, D. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings:
recommendations of the healthcare infection control practices advisory
committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA hand hygiene task force. Infect.
Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 23:340; 2002.
[35] Miller, R. A.; Britigan, B. E. Role of oxidants in microbial pathophysiology. Clin.
Microbiol. Rev. 10:118; 1997.
[36] Dwyer, D. J.; Kohanski, M. A.; Collins, J. J. Role of reactive oxygen species in
antibiotic action and resistance. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 12:482489; 2009.
[37] Babior, B. M. Phagocytes and oxidative stress. Am. J. Med. 109:3344; 2000.
[38] Karavolos, M. H.; Horsburgh, M. J.; Ingham, E.; Foster, S. J. Role and regulation
of the superoxide dismutases of Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiology
149:27492758; 2003.
[39] Nakonieczna, J.; Michta, E.; Rybicka, M.; Grinholc, M.; Gwizdek-Winiewska, A.;
Bielawski, K. P. Superoxide dismutase is upregulated in Staphylococcus aureus
following protoporphyrin-mediated photodynamic inactivation and does not
directly inuence the response to photodynamic treatment. BMC Microbiol
10:323; 2010.
[40] Mizuno, K.; Zhiyentayev, T.; Huang, L.; Khalil, S.; Nasim, F.; Tegos, G. P.; Gali, H.;
Jahnke, A.; Wharton, T.; Hamblin, M. R. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy
with functionalized fullerenes: quantitative structure-activity relationships. J.
Nanomed. Nanotechnol 2:19; 2011.
[41] Kuznetsova, N. A.; Reznichenko, A. V.; Kokin, V. N.; Kaliya, O. L. Photolysis of 6substituted phenalenones in deaerated alcohol media. J. Org. Chem. USSR
18:620624; 1982.
[42] Gollmer, A.; Regensburger, J.; Maisch, T.; Bumler, W. Luminescence spectroscopy of singlet oxygen enables monitoring of oxygen consumption in
biological systems consisting of fatty acids. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
15:1138611393; 2013.
[43] Alves, E.; Costa, L.; Carvalho, C. M.; Tom, J. P.; Faustino, M. A.; Neves, M. G.;
Tom, A. C.; Cavaleiro, J. A.; Cunha, A.; Almeida, A. Charge effect on the
photoinactivation of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria by cationic
meso-substituted porphyrins. BMC Microbiol 9:70; 2009.
[44] Eichner, A.; Gonzales, F. P.; Felgentrger, A.; Regensburger, J.; Holzmann, T.;
Schneider-Brachert, W.; Bumler, W.; Maisch, T. Dirty hands: photodynamic
killing of human pathogens like EHEC, MRSA and Candida within seconds.
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 12:135147; 2012.
[45] Di Poto, A.; Sbarra, M. S.; Provenza, G.; Visai, L.; Speziale, P. The effect of
photodynamic treatment combined with antibiotic action or host defence
mechanisms on Staphylococcus aureus biolms. Biomaterials 30:31583166; 2009.
[46] Collins, T. L.; Markus, E. A.; Hassett, D. J.; Robinson, J. B. The effect of a cationic
porphyrin on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biolms. Curr. Microbiol. 61:411416;
2010.
487