Title
Abstract/Summary
Introduction
Aims
Theory
Apparatus
Methodology/Procedure
10
Results
10
Calculations
10
Discussion
20
10
Conclusion
11
Recommendations
12
Reference / Appendix
13
Supervisors grading
10
TOTAL MARKS
Marks
100
Checked by :
Date :
TABLE OF CONTENT
Page
1 ABSTRACT
2 INTRODUCTION
3 OBJECTIVE
4 THEORY
5 APPARATUS
6 PROCEDURE
8 DISCUSSION
21
9 CONCLUSION
22
10 RECOMMENDATION
22
11 REFERENCES
23
12 APPENDICES
1 ABSTRACT
This experiment has been conducted on 6th May 2014. The experiment is conducted to
achieve the objective that has been considered which is to examine the effect of pulse input and
step change input in tubular flow reactor and to construct the residence time distribution function
2
by using tubular machine. Based on the experiment, two experiment were conducted which is
pulse input experiment and step change input experiment. In the pulse input experiment, the flow
rate was set up at 700 m3s-1 and let it for one minute before reading taken every 30 seconds until
the conductivity reading is 0.0. In the other hand, the step change input experiment, the
conductivity were observe every 30 seconds until the reading at Q2 is constant.
2 INTRODUCTION
A tubular reactor is a vessel through which flow is continuous, usually at steady state, and
configured so that conversion of the chemicals and other dependent variables are functions of
position within the reactor rather than of time. Flow in tubular reactors can be laminar , as with
3
viscous fluids in small-diameter tubes, and greatly deviate from ideal plug-flow behavior, or
turbulent, as with gases.
In an ideal plug flow reactor, a pulse of tracer injected at the inlet would not undergo any
dispersion as it passed through the reactor and would appear as a pulse at the outlet. The degree
of dispersion that occurs in a real reactor can be assessed by following the concentration of tracer
versus time at the exit. This procedure is called the stimulus-response technique.
3 OBJECTIVE
To examine the effect of a pulse input and step change input in a tubular flow reactor.
To construct a residence time distribution (RTD) function for the tubular flow reactor
4 THEORY
A tubular reactor is a vessel through which flow is continuous, usually at steady state, and
configured so that conversion of the chemicals and other dependent variables are functions of
position within the reactor rather than of time. In the ideal tubular reactor, the fluids flow as
if they were solid plugs or pistons, and reaction time is the same for all flowing material at any
given tube cross section. Tubular reactors resemble batch reactors in providing initially high
driving forces, which diminish as the reactions progress down the tubes. Tubular reactor are
often used when continuous operation is required but without back-mixing of products and
reactants.
Flow in tubular reactors can be laminar, as with viscous fluids in small-diameter tubes,
and greatly deviate from ideal plug-flow behavior, or turbulent, as with gases .Turbulent flow
generally is preferred to laminar flow, because mixing and heat transfer are improved. For slow
reactions and especially in small laboratory and pilot-plant reactors, establishing turbulent flow
can result in inconveniently long reactors or may require unacceptably high feed rates.
Tubular reactor is specially designed to allow detailed study of important process. The
tubular reactor is one of three reactor types which are interchangeable on the reactor service unit.
the reactions are monitored by conductivity probe as the conductivity of the solution changes
with conversion of the reactant to product. This means that the inaccurate and
inconvenient
process of titration, which was formally used to monitor the reaction progress, is no longer
necessary.
The residence-time of an element of fluid leaving a reactor is the length of time spent by
that element within the reactor. For a tubular reactor, under plug-flow conditions, the residencetime is the same for all elements of the effluent fluid. (K. G. Denbigh) The procedure would be
to carry out experiments with tubular reactor at varying feed rates, measuring the extent of
reaction of the stream leaving the reactor. One possible method might to add inert gas to the
acetaldehyde vapor in such quantity that the change in density between entry and exit of the
5
reactor could be neglected. In that case, the batch reactor time and the residence-time would both
be equal to the space-time.
5 APPARATUS
1.
2.
3.
4.
6 PROCEDURE
6.1 General start-up procedures
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. The water de-ionizer is connected to the laboratory water supply. Valve V3 is opened and
feed tank B1 is filled with the deionized water. Valve V3 is closed.
6. Valves V2 and V10 are opened. Pump P1 is switched on. P1 flow controller is adjusted to
obtain a flow rate of approximately 700 mL/min at flow meter F1-01. The conductivity
display is observed at low value then valve V10 is closed and pump P1 is switched off.
7. Valves V5 and V12 are switched on. Pump P2 is switched on. P2 flow controller is
adjusted to obtain a flow rate of approximately 700 mL/min at flow meter F1-02. Valves
V12 is closed and pump P2 is switched off.
6.2 Experiment 1: Pulse input in a tubular flow reactor
1. The general start-up procedure is performed.
2. Valve V9 is opened and pump P1 is switch on.
3. Pump P1 flow controller is adjusted to give a constant flow rate of de-ionized water into
the reactor R1 at approximately 700 ml/min at Fl-01.
4. Let the de-ionized water to continue flowing through the reactor until the inlet (Ql-01)
and outlet (Ql-02) conductivity values are stable at low levels. Both conductivities values
are recorded.
5. Valve V9 is closed and pump P1 is switch off.
6. Valve V11 is opened and Pump P2 is switch on. The timer is started simultaneously.
7. Pump P2 flow controller is adjusted to give a constant flow rate of salt solution into the
reactor R1 at 700 ml/min at Fl-02.
8. Let the salt solution to flow for 1 minute, then reset and restart the timer. This will start
the time at the average pulse input.
9. Valve V11 is closed and pump P2 is switch off. Then, open valve V9 quickly and
pumpP1 is switch on.
10. Make sure that the de-ionized water flow rate is always maintained at 700 ml/min by
adjusting P1 flow controller.
11. Both the inlet (Ql-01) and outlet (Ql-02) conductivity a value at regular intervals of
30seconds is start recorded.
12. The conductivity values is continue recording until all readings are almost constant and
approach the stable low level values.
Conductivity(mS/cm)
Inlet
Outlet
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.3
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.8
1.5
0.0
1.9
2.0
0.0
1.1
8
2.5
0.0
0.2
3.0
0.0
0.0
3.5
0.0
0.0
C ( t ) dt
0
Area = (
t1
t2
f ( t 1 ) + f (t 2)
2
]
9
Area = ( t 2 t 1
E (t 1+t 2)
2
= (1.0 0.5)
0+ 0.8
2
= (1.5 1.0)
0.8+1.9
2
= 0.675 g .min
= (2.0 1.5)
1.9+1.1
2
= 0.75g .min
= (2.5 2.0)
1.1+0.2
2
= 0.325 g .min
= (3.0 2.5)
0.2+0.0
2
= 0.005 g .min
m3
= 0.1 g .min
m3
Area = ( t 2 t 1
E (t 1+t 2)
2
m3
Area = ( t 2 t 1
E (t 1+t 2)
2
m3
Area = ( t 2 t 1
E (t 1+t 2)
2
Area = ( t 2 t 1
E (t 1+t 2)
2
C ( t ) dt
0
1.855 g.min/m3
10
E (t)=
C (t)
C ( t ) dt
0
11
E(t)=0/1.855=0
Time(min)
Conductivity Oulet
E(t)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.8
0.4313
1.5
1.9
1.0242
2.0
1.1
0.5930
2.5
0.2
0.1078
3.0
0.0
0.0
3.5
0.0
0.0
E(t) VS Time(min)
1.2
1
0.8
E(t) 0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
Time(min)
Area = ( t 2 t 1
E (t 1+t 2)
2
= (1 0.5)
0.4313
2
= 0.107825
E (t 1+t 2)
2
= (1.5 1)
0.4313+1.0242
2
= 0.363875
= (2 1.5)
1.0242+0.593
2
= (2.5 2)
0.593+0.1078
2
= (3 2.5)
E (t 1+t 2)
2
= 0.4043
E (t 1+t 2)
2
= 0.1752
E ( t 1 +t 2 )
2
0.1078
=0.02695
2
E ( t ) dt
0
Residencetime , t m=
tE ( t ) dt
0
Time(min)
Oulet
Conductivi
ty
(mS/cm)
E(t)
tE(t)
= 3.5(1.07815)= 3.773525
(ttm)2E(t)dt
(ttm)3E(t)dt
13
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.8
0.4313
0.4313
3.3177
-9.2019
1.5
1.9
1.0242
1.5363
5.2940
-12.0360
2.0
1.1
0.5930
1.1860
1.8652
-3.3080
2.5
0.2
0.1078
0.2695
0.1748
-0.2227
3.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
=2.1563
=3.4231
=10.6517
=-25.0926
tE ( t ) dt=
t m=
3.4231
(ttm )2
0
= 10.6517
1
3
s= 3
Third moment, skewness,
2
(ttm )3
0
1
=
(3.2637)
E(t) dt
3
2
E(t) dt
-25.0926) = -4.2558
14
Time (min)
Conductivity(mS/cm)
Inlet
Outlet
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
3.7
0.0
1.0
4.0
0.0
1.5
4.2
0.0
2.0
4.2
0.0
2.5
4.2
1.0
3.0
4.2
2.3
3.5
4.3
2.6
4.0
4.2
2.6
4.5
4.3
2.6
15
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
time (min)
Calculation
C ( t ) dt
0
Area = (
t1
t2
f ( t 1 ) + f (t 2)
2
Area = ( t 2 t 1
E (t 1+t 2)
2
= (1.0 0.5)
= (2.5 2.0)
[ ]
0+ 0.0
2
= 0 g .min
m3
Area = ( t 2 t 1
E (t 1+t 2)
2
0+1
2
= 0.25 g .min
m3
16
Area = ( t 2 t 1
E (t 1+t 2)
2
= (3.0 2.5)
1.0+2.3
2
= 0.825 g .min
m3
= (3.5 3.0)
2.3+2.6
2
= 1.225 g .min
= (4.0 3.5)
2.6+2.6
2
= 1.3 g .min
m3
= (4.5 4.0)
2.6+2.6
2
= 1.3 g .min
Area = ( t 2 t 1
E (t 1+t 2)
2
Area = ( t 2 t 1
E (t 1+t 2)
2
Area = ( t 2 t 1
E (t 1+t 2)
2
C ( t ) dt
0
g.min/m3
E (t)=
C (t)
C ( t ) dt
E(t)=0/ 4.9=0
For t = 0.5, C(t) = 0.0
17
E(t)=0/ 4.9=0
For t = 1.0, C(t) = 0.0
E(t)=0/ 4.9=0
Time(min)
Conductivity Oulet
E(t)
0.0
0.0
0.0
18
0.5
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0 .0
1.5
0.0
0 .0
2.0
0.0
0.0
2.5
1.0
0.204
3.0
2.3
0.469
3.5
2.6
0.5306
4.0
2.6
0.5306
4.5
2.6
0.5306
Y-Values
0.6
0.5
0.4
E(t)
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
Time (min)
19
Area = ( t 2 t 1
E (t 1+t 2)
2
= (2.5 2)
0+ 0.204
2
= 0.051
E ( t 1 +t 2 )
2
= (3 2.5)
0.204+ 0.469
=0.16825
2
E ( t 1 +t 2 )
2
= (3.5 3)
0.469+0.5306
=0.2499
2
E ( t 1 +t 2 )
2
= (4.0-3.5)
0.5306+ 0.5306
=0.2653
2
E ( t ) dt
0
(0.2653+0.2653+0.2499+0.16825+0.051) =0.99975
Residencetime , t m=
tE ( t ) dt
= 4.5(0.99975)= 4.498875
Time(min)
Oulet
Conductivi
ty
(mS/cm)
E(t)
tE(t)
(ttm)2E(t)dt
(ttm)3E(t)dt
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
20
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.5
1.0
0.204
0.51
0.2038
-0.4073
3.0
2.3
0.469
1.407
0.378
-0.5666
3.5
2.6
0.5306
1.8571
0.2493
-0.249
4.0
2.6
0.5306
2.1224
0.066
-0.0652
4.5
2.6
0.5306
2.3877
0.00358
3.77 x 10-10
11.1
0.99975
8.2842
0.90068
-1.321
tE ( t ) dt=
t m=
8.2842
2
Second moment, variance ,
(ttm )2
= 0.90068
1
s 3= 3
Third moment, skewness,
2
(ttm )3
0
1
=
(0.949)
E(t) dt
3
2
E(t) dt
-1.321) = -1.4289
8 DISCUSSION
Firstly, the objectives that need to be achieve for this tubular reactor experiment is to
examine the effect of a pulse input and step change in a tubular reactor and also to construct the
residence time distribution (RTD) function for the tubular flow reactor at the end of the
experiment. The experiment was run at the 700 mL/min of flow rate. While the experiment is
21
running, the conductivity for the inlet and outlet of the solution had been recorded at the period
of time where until the conductivity of the solution is constant. For a tubular reactor, the flow
that through the vessel is continuous, usually at the steady state and also configured thus the
conversion of the chemicals and other dependent variables are functions of position within the
reactor rather than of time.
For this experiment, we are examined the effects of flow for two types of reaction which
are in pulse input and step change. The flow rate of solution is kept constant at 700ml/min. For
these types of experiments, the graph of outlet conductivity versus times had been plotted. Based
on graph of pulse input, the outlet conductivity that had been plotted is 1.9 mS/cm at time of 1.5
minutes which are the highest value. After that, the conductivity decreases within the time and
comes to be constant at the time of 3 minutes. From the result, it showed that it results was not
differ from the theory that recorded that the conductivity is reaching zero at time of 4 minutes.
Thus, the experiment 1 is a success.
In addition, for the graph of step change the outlet conductivity is increase within the
time by started at time of 2.5 minutes which it inlet conductivity is 4.2 mS/min and then
undergoes some increment until at minutes 4.0 which the outlet conductivity is 2.6 mS/min.
There are differences between both of the graph where the outlet conductivity for step change is
increase smoothly compare to pulse input where the outlet conductivity is increase at the same
period of times and then it became decrease into the constant value.
Next experiment, to construct the residence time distribution (RTD) function for the
tubular flow reactor for pulse input and also step change. The residence time distribution is
plotted based on exit time (E(t)) versus time from the data that had been recorded in the table. From the graph,
it can be concluded that the residence time distribution is depends on the outlet conductivity.
9 CONCLUSION
From the experiment, we able to examine the effect of the pulse input and step change in
a tubular flow reactor and we also can differentiate both of the effect. Besides, we also able to
construct the residence time distribution (RTD) function for the tubular flow reactor. The
conductivity for inlet and outlet after 3 minutes for pulse input are both 0.00 mS/ while for the
22
step change is 4.2 mS/min and 2.3 mS/min respectively. The distribution of exit time, E(t) is
calculated for each 30 second until 4 minutes interval. The graphs for both pulse input and step
change experiments are plotted.
RECOMMENDATION
There are a few recommendations during conducting this experiment. First, all valves
should be properly placed before the experiment started. Secondly, the volume of sample
collected must be accurate throughout the experiment to avoid error during calculation. Next,
the flow rates should be constantly monitored so that it remains constant throughout the
experiment. Titration should be conducted carefully. It should be immediately stopped when
the indicator turned light pink. Titration should be repeat if the solution turns dark pink.
11 REFERENCES
Levenspiel O., Chemical Reaction Engineering, John Wiley (USA), 1972
Fogler H.S., Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, 3rd Ed., Prentice Hall (USA),
1999
23
24