CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc. Doc.

170
Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW Document 170 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 1 of 2

1 DAVID T. BIDERMAN, Bar No. 101577

JUDITH B. GITTERMAN, Bar No. 115661
2 M. CHRISTOPHER JHANG, Bar No. 211463
PERKINS COIE LLP
3 Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94111-4131
4 Telephone: (415) 344-7000
Facsimile: (415) 344-7050
5 Email: DBiderman@perkinscoie.com
Email: JGitterman@perkinscoie.com
6 Email: CJhang@perkinscoie.com

7 Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc.

9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
11

12 CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a CASE NO. C O5-03649 JW

INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD
13 STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
similarly situated, PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD MOTION TO
14 SEAL PURSUANT TO CIV. L.R. 79-5(d)
Plaintiffs, PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS’
15 OPPOSITION MEMORANDUM
v. (DOCUMENT NOS. 140-142)
16
GOOGLE, INC., Date: June 11, 2007
17 Time: 9:00 a.m.
Defendant. Dept.: Courtroom 8
18 Judge: Honorable James Ware

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 05-03649 [41063-0023-000000/13278113_1.DOC]
41063-0023/LEGAL13278113.1

Dockets.Justia.com
 Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW Document 170 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 2 of 2

1 ORDER

2 The Court finds, having considered Plaintiffs CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC, d/b/a

3 Industrial Printing, and Howard Stern’s Third Motion To Seal Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 79-5(d)

4 Portions Of Plaintiffs’ Opposition Memorandum Due To Confidentiality Designations By

5 Defendant Google Inc. (“Plaintiffs’ Third Motion to Seal Document”) (Document Nos. 140-

6 142), the Declaration of M. Christopher Jhang In Response To Plaintiffs’ Third Motion to Seal

7 Document, and the papers submitted therewith and arguments raised therein, and good cause

8 appearing:

9 1. That the redactions (i.e., sealing as confidential documents) requested in

10 Plaintiffs’ Third Motion to Seal Document, in connection with Plaintiffs’ Memorandum In

11 Opposition to Defendant Google Inc.’s Supplemental Brief in Support of Summary Judgment

12 Motion (“Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Opposition Memorandum”), include information and

13 testimony that Google has designated confidential; and

14 2. That Google has demonstrated that Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Opposition

15 Memorandum is subject to seal because of overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the

16 right of public access to the record in these documents.

17 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

18 1. That Plaintiffs’ Third Motion to Seal Document is GRANTED.

19

20 IT IS SO ORDERED.

21

22 DATED: ___________________
The Honorable James Ware
23 United States District Judge
24

25

26

27

28 -2-
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 05-03649 [41063-0023-000000/13278113_1.DOC]
41063-0023/LEGAL13278113.1