Beverages
Prepared by Saga Analytics: Jake Decicco, Nicholas Gatto, Ryun Holder, Michael Lederhouse
April 2015
Executive Summary
Mcdonalds is struggling with decreasing sales and customer loyalty, introducing alcohol to the menu
is a method that could enhance customer experience and help the company overcome these
challenges. However, this introduction may pose a threat to McDonalds brand image and the family
dining experience. The key to a successful introduction is to first undergo a test market while
implementing the customer-preferred pricing, placement, and product specifications. If implemented
correctly, with the customer in mind; this test-market introduction may lead to a national roll-out and
result in an improvement in McDonalds sales and customer experience.
Contents
Background
Research Objectives
Design and Methodology
Detailed Results and Conclusions:
Insights from Focus Group and
Survey
Managerial Implications and
Recommendations
Appendix
Slide 4
Slides 5-9
Slides 10-13
Slides 14-27
Slides 28-32
Slides 33-51
Background Information
After experiencing its greatest decline in quarterly profits in the last seven years
(30%) and a decline in global sales growth of 3.3%, McDonalds is at a
strategic crossroads. Something must be done to stop constantly falling
revenues and a lack of customer loyalty while simultaneously converting
potential customers who are opting to spend their dollars at popular, fast-casual
restaurants like Chipotle and Panera. Competitors in the QSR sector such as
Sonic and Burger King have begun to offer alcoholic beverages on their menus
in the hopes to solve similar problems with declining sales and customer
loyalty. This research explores and analyzes the idea of introducing alcoholic
products to McDonalds menu.
Research Objectives
American consumers are increasingly demanding an actual dining experience and not just a
rapid, meal on the go. McDonalds has not been effectively satisfying this demand and this has
led to major losses in sales, profits, customer loyalty, and brand reputation as customers flock to
fast casual offerings like Chipotle and Panera that provide these experiences.
The key marketing decision problem is: Should McDonalds introduce alcoholic beverages to
their menus?
In order to answer this main, marketing decision problem, we must also answer:
1. Should McDonalds introduce alcohol to their menu?
2. If Mcdonalds should introduce alcohol to their menu, what type and brands should they
offer?
3. What will we price this product at?
4. Where will we sell this product: Traditional McDonalds Restaurants, McCafes, Specialized
McDonalds Bars?
7
In reference to MDP #2
2.1: Generate options of alcoholic beverages that McDonalds consumers would purchase
2.2: Select menu of alcoholic beverages based on survey results
10
Sampling
o
We utilized a judgement sampling technique when choosing respondents for our focus
group. The focus group consisted of four males, ages nineteen to twenty-one. A
homogenous group of college-age males was chosen because McDonalds has lost
millennials of this sort to competing quick-serve restaurants, like Chipotle.
The session was held in a quiet, casual setting with the goal of brainstorming current
millennial males perceptions regarding McDonalds and the proposition of adding alcoholic
beverages to the restaurants menu.
11
Sampling
o Convenience sampling was used to select family and friends for participating in the study
o 89 complete responses were used in analysis out of 115 surveys
o Respondents under the age of 21 were screened out of questions regarding alcohol
consumption but still responded to general questions regarding their perceptions and
evaluations of the McDonalds dining experience
Survey Method
o Online survey was chosen as the data collection method
Tabulation
o Data from questionnaires was transferred into SPSS, with which data tabulation and
statistical analyses were processed
12
13
14
By learning about the customer attitudes to the current McDonalds offerings, one can begin to
understand necessary changes for the consumer:
Focus group participants possessed an overall negative view of the McDonalds brand and
offerings. When utilizing word association techniques with the McDonalds name,
participants generally offered up negative statements like greasy, fake, processed.
Discussion proved that just being a fast and inexpensive offering is not enough,
McDonalds needs to improve the quality of their food.
MRO 1.2, MDP 1
15
Focus group participants had an overall negative view of McDonalds dining environment and
ambience, citing cheap furniture and poor lighting. Most were unaware of McDonalds recently
revamped interiors. .
16
Focus group members from urban areas viewed the restaurant as an establishment filled with
homeless people and drunks, while focus group members from more suburban locations viewed
it as just a normal quick service restaurant.
17
An alcoholic beverage transforms a dinner into a dining experience. Focus group participants
order a drink to relax, drinking an alcoholic beverage makes the meal more of an experience.
Alcohol is a paired-product, certain beverages go with certain food items and actually enhance
each other.
18
Focus group participants willingness to pay for alcoholic beverages depends on the type of
beverage, quality of beverage, the restaurant, and the environment of the meal. Focus group
participants were much more willing to pay higher prices for a beer at a bar or upscale
restaurant, then compared to a QSR or fast casual restaurant.
19
On average, consumers are willing to pay $3.14 for a standard drink at McDonalds, with a
median of $2.99
MRO 3.1
20
Some of the focus group participants viewed McDonalds as a family restaurant and believed
that serving alcohol would contradict this image. At the same time, many participants said that
they would feel uncomfortable drinking in front of families, while some feared that offering
alcohol could attract a transient clientele.
Focus group participants were attracted to McDonalds offering alcohol but would not go out of
their way just to have it. Many would have to be passing by a McDonalds and be hungry/thirsty
to actually go in.
We explored this insight further in the survey and found consistent results (See next page)
MROs 1.1-1.4, MDP 1
21
RO1.2, 1.3
22
Beer was unanimously mentioned first as the go to beverage for McDonalds. The participants
had little issue reconciling beer with the McDonalds menu because, burgers and beer go
together. Beers are considered a casual alcoholic beverage which would be more socially
acceptable to drink at a place like McDonalds than a cocktail or hard liquors.
Cost of beer must follow McDonalds value menu pricing style. Respondents suggested that
the quality of beer needs to be correlated to the quality of McDonalds food. Suggestions of
beers like Pabst Blue Ribbon and Bud Light came from focus group participants.
MROs 2.1, 2.2, 4.1, MDP 2, 4
23
RO 2.2
24
Focus group participants think that it is important to separate those consuming alcohol at
McDonalds from those who are not. By creating an alcove, separate room, or patio, McDonalds
would be able to preserve the family dining experience and create a unique experience for those
of age.
Introduction alcoholic beverages on McDonalds menu will create many regulatory issues, such
as ID enforcement.
25
RO 4.1
26
RO 1.4
27
28
Test Market
Although data analysis from the survey indicates an undecided yet non-negative effect on
customer visitation with the introduction of alcohol, insights from the focus group reveal that this
product introduction may negatively affect McDonalds brand image and the overall customer
experience. It is imperative that McDonalds does not underestimate the effects of social
influence and criticism on this product introduction and as a result, it is recommended that
McDonalds begins this roll-out in a test market. This test-market must be highly-contained but
also representative of McDonalds customer base. Introducing alcoholic beverages to the
McDonalds menu in a contained test-market will allow the company to further observe the effect
that this introduction has on the McDonalds experience and brand image and aid in a decision
regarding a national roll-out.
The following recommendations should be implemented in this test market (See following pages)
29
Data contains information to support the introduction of Coors Light as the primary alcoholic
beverage on McDonalds menu
We found that serving beer in a glass bottle was highest rated by respondents. Thus, it is
recommended to serve these beverages in bottles.
30
Analysis found that the average consumer was willing to pay $3.14 for a bottle of beer, with a
median of $2.99. Thus, it is recommended that McDonalds prices a bottle of Coors Light at
$2.99.
31
We found that customers would prefer to consume alcohol in a designated area, either at a bar
or table. As a result, it is recommended that McDonalds creates a private area for drinking at
their test market location complete with a bar and tables. Current QSR competitors have created
outdoor patios and lounges for customers who are drinking alcohol and this designated area
would aid McDonalds in separating the experience of of-age customers and families, while
facilitating the regulation and monitoring necessary to serve alcohol at a restaurant. In short,
data supports that this designated area would improve and preserve the dining experience of all
McDonalds customers.
32
Technical Appendix
33
34
35
Dissatisfied
(2)
Somewhat
Dissatisfied
(3)
Neutral (4)
Somewhat
Satisfied (5)
Satisfied (6)
Very
Satisfied (7)
Food Quality
(1)
Price (2)
Service (3)
Dining
Experience
(4)
Restaurant
Atmosphere
(5)
36
37
Poor (2)
Fair (3)
Good (4)
Food Quality
(1)
Price (2)
Service (3)
Dining
Experience
(4)
Restaurant
Atmosphere
(5)
38
39
40
41
42
Unlikely (2)
Neutral (3)
Likely (4)
Very Likely
(5)
Miller (1)
Budweiser
(2)
Pabst Blue
Ribbon (3)
Coors (4)
Natural Light
(5)
43
44
45
46
47
48
Results:
With a test statistic of
16.78 and a p-value of
0.000 there is evidence to
reject the null hypothesis
at the 5% significance
level.
This implies that there was
a significant difference in
the distribution of
responses.
49
Results:
With a test statistic of
10.29 and a p-value of
0.016 there is evidence to
reject the null hypothesis at
the 5% level.
This reinforces prior
findings that Coors
received mostly positive
responses; the result of the
test implies that there were
differences in the
distribution of responses.
50
51