moral judgment of the community in which he takes part, from the level of the local
community to the nation.
He can not really be politically relevant only to the extent that it is competent and moral.
Freedom of information means that every person has the right to
require information kept by the public sectors according the law of free
acces to information (Freedom of Information Act). Freedom of
Information Act gives us the right to ask every public employee about
the information that they have and about what we want.
Complete freedom of information face many obstacles. The
international experience proved that , adopting the law of information
at a global level , doesnt led to a respect of the rights to information.
Another obstacle is that the freedom of information is undermined by
the mechanisms for acces and execution, the deplorable state of the
management systems and, of course, by the poor monitoring of
appliance of it.
Many countries have already adopted laws that involve the acces of
information according the international standards. Some of the states
where this law applies have experimented regressive processes
including legal amendments which imply the risks of the degradation
of the rights to know. It seems that the freedom of information attracts
considerable obstacles at a local level in many countries, while the
efforts to advance are insufficient to the expansion beyond the
executive branch.
The acces of information in a specific time can make people more
powerful, allowing them to participate, in an informed way, in
decisions that affect them. Obviously, in many cases, the vital
information doesnt reach the disadvantaged people. We need to
encourage the request for information from the public and especially
from the poor and vulnerable people, which could suffer in a
disproportional way by restricting the access to information.