149
CCA 2243
Summary
Introduction
Calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis is the most common type of kidney stone disease,
but despite wide investigation, its pathogenesis remains unclear. The degree of urine
oversaturation with calcium oxalate is without doubt a necessary factor, but by itself
does not explain crystal growth and aggregation, since many stone-free subjects
show urine oversaturated with calcium oxalate [ 1,2]. This observation has led first to
the hypothesis, and then to the demonstration, of some protective inhibitors in urine
[3]. It now seems reasonable to consider calcium oxalate stone disease as a multifactorial disorder with the risk of forming stones dependent upon a disturbance in the
balance between oversaturation of urine and concentration of protective inhibitors.
Many attempts have been made to detect either an excess in promoting or a
defect in inhibiting factors in the urine of stone-formers. The pertinent literature is
Correspondence:
Padova, Italy.
0009-8981/82/000&0000/$02.75
di Padova, Policlinico
Press
Universitario,
35100
150
extremely contradictory, with much confusion arising from a chemical error. In fact,
urine constituents are usually measured in amount per day, which is quite misleading
since, from a chemical point of view, the important criterion is the concentration and
not the amount. The search for an abnormal relationship between promoting and
inhibiting factors seems to represent a more coherent approach to the problem
rather than the study of a single constituent. In fact, with this approach it makes no
difference whether concentration or amount are considered, since the relationship
remains exactly the same. If such a disturbance can be measured, then the risk of
forming stones may be estimated.
Our objective was to try to find an easy index with good sensitivity. We first
considered that if urine saturation is estimated theoretically as suggested by Marshall
and Robertson [4], then there should be a correlation with either calcium or oxalate;
if urine saturation is obtained empirically as suggested by Pak and Ohata [S]
correlation between urine saturation and ion concentration would be found [6].
Moreover, since oxalate appears more involved in urine oversaturation than calcium,
it should be more meaningful [7,8]. With respect to inhibitory substances, pyrophosphate was considered to have very weak inhibitory activity, but citrate and acid
mucopolysaccha~des (AMPs) are regarded as major inhibitors [9,10]. In the light of
these factors, any imbalance between promoting and inhibiting factors in calcium
oxalate stone disease should be demonstrable by a ratio between oxalate on the one
hand and citrate and AMPS taken alone or together on the other. The results
obtained, using this approach, are described in this paper.
Material and methods
Twenty normal subjects (10 males and 10 females) and 53 patients (28 males and
25 females) with recurrent idiopathic calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis, and who had
passed at least one stone during the two months immediately preceding our
investigation were studied. Four days before the study, both patients and controls
were placed on a standard diet containing 800 mg calcium, 7.5 mg oxalate, 85 mg
purine and 900 mg phosphate and were asked to drink 1 liter per day of mineral-free
water. A 24-h urine was collected on the 4th day. A single urine collection (from 7 to
9 a.m.) following an overnight fast was made from an additional group of 16
controls (11 males and 5 females) and from 24 stone-forming patients (14 males and
10 females) on a completely normal diet and without any restriction in water intake.
Renal function, as assessed by creatinine clearance, was normal in all patients. Urine
culture was negative in all patients. Serum PTH, urine CAMP were in the normal
range. As soon as the specimens had been collected, volume and pH were recorded.
Samples were then immediately assayed for sodium (by flame photometry), phosphate [ 111, ammonia 1121, uric acid [ 131, pyrophosphate f 141, citrate [15] and AMPS
[16]. To 100 ml urine 1 ml of concentrated HCl was then added and subsequently
calcium and magnesium were measured by atomic absorption and oxalate by the
method of Hodgkinson and Williams [ 171.Although the calorimetric assay of oxalate
has been criticized, it seems to give almost the same results as more sophisticated
procedures such as gas chromatography [IS]. Patients with a urinary excretion of the
CONCENT~TION
URINE
II
ap <O.OS; bp (0.02;
Uric acid
Oxalate
Calcium
Phosphate
Magnesium
Citrate
Pyrophosphate
AMPS
Volume
0.87
0.13
1.61
19.27
0.86
1.44
15.56
17.92
0.47
in mmo1/24
cp -=O.Ol.
3.502
0.78
0.28-c
0.11
5.04*
1.60
34.61 ;t 14.75
3.03%
0.80
3.40*
1.58
38.65 * 20.02
93.25 rt 20.7 1
1115
* 268
controls
24-h collection
as mean*SD
3.34rt
1.42
0.41*
0.15
4.20*
2.34
37.31= 19.32
2.49*
0.96
2.29*
2.69
22.562 18.07
58.19t20.97
6.012
0.54
stone-formers
0.65
4.24
0.35
1.60
0.17
1.74
2.46 b
3.62
0.98
0.36
0.025
0.33
4.15
0.21
0.35
3.63
9.84
102
controls
3.42*
0.83
0.24*
0.01
3.622
1.71
14.97f 12.20
2.04)
1.22
1.93-c 1.47
18.61~ 15.38
66.23*21.95
6.4Of
0.83
stone-formers
0.38*
0.20
0.03*
0.01
0.40*
0.20
l.81*
0.89
0.24*
0.15
0.16*
0.05
2.592
2.50
8.81*
5.09
144
--fll3
stone-former5
FACTORS
* 0.20
* 0.02
* 0.24
2 5.10
* 0.24
* 2.32
* 4.20
* 6.24
54
2-h collection
(cmol)
ANTI-LITHOGENIC
4.16-t
1.40
0.25~
0.08
3.38*
1.76
29.72k22.12
2.232
1.00
3.52k
1.24
33.632 27.48
95.95 -c 24.80
6.10-t 0.80
0.82
3.95 =
0.42
0.69
0.5 1
2.04 a
2.39 b
4.17 e
0.6 1
AND
controls
2-h collection
and pH.
(pmol/l)
FACTORS
3.79-c
1.91
0.49-c
0.22
4.822
2.52
44.21 -t 25.15
2.97-i:
1.42
2.69*
1.55
25.21 -c 21.08
69.50-t
26.37
1197
-c 336
stone-formers
h or mmol/Z
OF THE LITHOGENIC
Cp -=O.ool.
dp co.005;
3.06;?:
0.26k
4.44*
33.80*
2.621t:
2.98*
33.52rt:
80.31 -c
6.10*
controls
24-h collection
pyrophosphate
AND ANTI-LITH~ENIC
OF THE LITH~ENI~
as mean* SD in mmol/l
=p co.01;
EXCRETION
bp (0.02;
URINARY
TABLE
ap co.05;
Uric acid
Oxalate
Calcium
Phosphate
Magnesium
Citrate
~r~hospha~
AMPS
PH
TABLE
d
a
=
0.33
0.94
1.03
2.21 a
0.83
3.91 c
0.99
0.57
1.39
0.93
0.37
0.43
2.72
0.51
3.55
2.22
3.98
0.93
g
-
152
TABLE III
DIAGNOSTIC
ACCURACY
OF THE SELECTED
INDICES
Index
* Normal range
False
positive
False
negative
Ox/Citrate
* 693.30+615.40
** 746.02 + 595.18
5%
0%
28%
33%
0.67
0.67
OX/AMPS
Ox/Cit
AMPS
* (Mean*2
* 27.60+
** 26.64+
23.00
14.96
0%
0%
30%
67%
0.70
0.33
* 8.81+
** 8.25+
5.78
5.44
5%
0%
13%
17%
0.82
0.83
SD)X IO4 are reported for both 24 h (*) and 2 h (**) collections.
153
factors. An attempt to quantitate this risk was reported by Robertson et al [20] who
developed a saturation-inhibition index.
However, it was difficult and time-consuming to determine both the state of urine
oversaturation and inhibitory activity. The same workers later attempted a different
approach to the problem, starting from the observation that stone-formers showed a
higher urine pH? excreted more calcium, oxalate and uric acid, and less AMPS [21].
Robertson et al calculated the frequency distribution of the single variables and used
them to quantitate the risk of stone formation. They then obtained an overall
probability of forming stones from each risk factor. In this procedure, all the
variables considered must be stochastically independent, and Robertson and Peacock
ox
Xl04
cIT./iNB
100
50
30
10
C
2 HDDRS
21HOURS
A CONTROLS
. ST@NE FORI'ERS
Fig. 1. Shows the abnormal distribution of the index Ox/Cit X AMPS in stone-formers
24-h urine collections.
154
155
8 Robertson WG, Peacock M. The cause of idiopathic calcium stone disease: h~rcalciuria
or
hyperoxahuia? Nephron 1980; 26: 105-l 10.
9 Meyer JL, Smith LH. Growth of calcium oxalate crystak Ii. Inhibition by natural urinary crystal
growth inhibitors. Invest Ural 1975; 13: 36-39.
10 Robertson WG, ?&owles F, Peacock M. Urinary mu~polysa~ha~d~
in~bitors of calcium oxalate
crystallizatio& In: Ffeisch H, Robertson WG, Smith LH, Vahlensieek, eds. Urolithiasis research. New
York: Plenum Press, 1976: 331-334.
11 Goldenberg M, Femandez A. Simplified method for the estimation of inorganic phosphorus in body
fluids. Clin Chem 1966; 12: 871-874.
12 Chaney AL, Marbach EP. M~ified reagents for the estimation of urea and ammonia. Clin Chem
1962; 8: 130-132.
13 Liddle L, Seegmillet JE, Laster L. The enzymatic spectrophotometric method for determination of uric
acid. J Lab Clin Med 1959; 54: 903-913.
14 Suter DJ, Wilkie LI. The estimation of pyrophosphate in urine with u~dine-S-dipbosphoglucose
pyropho~ho~lase. Clin Chim Acta 1978; 86: 329-332.
I5 Moellering H, Gruber W. Determination of citrate with citrate lyase. Anaiyt Biocbem 1966; 17:
369-376.
16 Whiteman P, Henderson H. A method for the deter~nation of am~otic-~ujd ~ycosa~no~iycans
and its application to the prenatal diagnosis of Hurler and Sanfilippo diseases. C&n Chim Acta 1977;
79: 99-105.
17 Hodgkinson A, Williams A. An improved calorimetric procedure for urine oxalate. Clin Chim Acta
1972; 36: 127-132.
18 Moye HA, MaIagodi MH, Clarke DH, Miles CJ. A rapid gas chromatograp~c procedure for the
analysis of oxalate ion in urine. CIin Chim Acta 1981; 114: 173-185.
19 Arm&age P. Statistical methods in medical research. Oxford and Edinburgh: Blackwell Scientific
Publications, 1971: 420-424.
20 Robertson WG, Peacock M, ~~shall RW, M~shall DH, Nordin BEC. Saturation-in~bition index as
a measure of the risk of calcium oxalate stone formation in the urinary tract. N Engl J Med 1976; 294:
249-252.
21 Robertson WG, Peacock M, Meybum PJ, Marshall OD, Clark PB. Risk factors in calcium stone
disease of the urinary tract. Br J Ural 1978; 50: 449-454.
22 H~~nsou
A. Evidence of increased oxalate absorption in patients with calcium-containing renal
stones. Clin Sci Mol Med 1978; 54: 291-294.