Roland Clan Forums View topic - A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

Pgina 1 de 9

Roland Clan Forums

Get new sounds for your Roland synth:
Fantom-G Fantom-X V-Synth JUNO-G

Skip to content
Search
Search

Advanced search
Board index Roland forums Roland FA-06/08
Change font size
Print view
FAQ
Register
Login

A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

Post a reply
Search this topic

Search

12 posts Page 1 of 1

A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

by progferbrains 11:29, 3 July 2014
This is going to be an exhaustive and comprehensive niggly review of the Roland FA 06 keyboard. It's based on its use
in a recording setup making my 8th studio album for a progressive rock band, plus a European tour with that band where
I used it onstage as both instrument and main sound device for a complete computer driven system. However it is going
to be a review made from the point of view of a traditional electronic Keyboards player - not a DJ or contemporary tech
player and I DO indeed feel a bit embittered by the provison of new toys AT THE EXPENSE of basic functions - I love
new toys but feel that I am over provided with sampler pads today and could use some more pots instead.
I have a great deal of good stuff to say about it, and some severe criticisms. There will doubtless be criticisms that are
based on my own ignorance of how to do something. If you have solutions to problems I highlight in the review, please
feel free to let me know them. If you only want the outcome... here it is without having to read the rest.
If you tried to take it away, I would attack you, quite viciously. This device /instrument is like nothing I could even have
dreamed of when I was younger. It is an Organ, it is a synthesiser, it's a piano, it can record music, it can play back
music, you can compose on it, perform on it, you can use it as a vocoder, as a sound card, a controller, a sampler (of
sorts) and with a computer you can record a whole arrangement on it of nearly any kind of music you can imagine with lifelike instruments of nearly every type from every major grouping of instruments from percussion to the human voice
itself. You could set it up in the loo and write and record AND master the theme tune for "Game Of Thrones" and then
play some Lounge Jazz. It is, when seen through the eyes of the 17 year old boy from 1976, an unbelievable miracle.
However, the late middle aged bloke from 2014 has seen a few miracles in his time and this review is forced to take
those other miracles into account. The music workstation first came into my life in 1994 (I was a late adopter) and I've
seen a few. This is undoubtedly the best I have owned, and if I dwell a lot on the negative points it's to reinforce the need
for all keyboards manfacturers to listen more to musicians and build them the kit they need, and to listen to DJs and
build them the kit they need, not try to unite the two with a poor compromise. Because I believe that this astonishing feat

http://forums.rolandclan.com/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=48723

05/01/2015

Roland Clan Forums View topic - A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

Pgina 2 de 9

of electronic engineering is seriously flawed and could do with a rethink.

Right.. that said, nothing's perfect but we can hope for perfection and hope that the designers and builders of these things
will listen to us and use us as some kind of beta testers for the model 2.
Befor ewe continue we must remember that as of April 2014, Roland NO LONGER MAKE the Fantom series and they
call the FA synths "Their Flagship Workstation"
THE CASE
The FA-06 is a lightweight compact workstation that is truly portable and practical for a gigging musican providing
he/she doesn't drop it because it's pretty flimsy. Every part of the case is plastic, no metal or wood anywhere in sight.
That's why it's light enough to comply with even Ryanair's weight restrictions. It's very black. It's also mind bogglingly
cheap for what it is.
THE KEYBOARD (FA-06 ONLY)
The keys are short. Paying no attention to the way we have learned our instruments over the years, Roland have seen fit
to shorten the length of a key and not tell us in any of the advertising bumph that they have done this. They did this once
before on the Juno G and probably others. It DOES affect playing but it is not impossible. I personally find the fact that
the keys are not as long as they should be responsible for occasionally tripping over the ends of black notes which would
not ordinarily be there and I occasionally stub my longest finger against the fall bar. This worries me because I actually
have unusually small hands... There are no official standards about key length. Sadly, there should be, and there should
be rules that non standard key sizes must be declared in bumph!
THE CONTROL PANEL
The Control panel is in a gloss finish. This means that under stage lighting it is very difficult to see as you are dazzled by
reflections... for this reason my FA -06 will not be on the top rack of my system. A gloss finish control panel is
something I haven't met in a long long time... there's a reason for that. I've just stated it... and someone obviously forgot
this. The LETTERING is in silver and is exceptionally difficult to read in shadows and high intensity light. The
illuminated pads totally disappear under strong while light. Better memorize everything. I shall be covering the whole
control panel with Matt black PVC with White text overlays.
The MANUAL
is useless really - the VK7 manual for a straight Drawbar organ was thicker and more detailed , and this has a large
chapter about how to put the thing on a stand (duh!) but NOTHING about how to play user samples with the keyboard
instead of the pads.... You can get a fair amount of info from it, but the minute you wanna do something complex it lets
you down. For example - the internal 3 oscillator synthesiser has dozens of parameters and the MANUAL allocates just
ONE column of ONE page to the operation of that.. no "instructions" are given - just a screenshot (with no caption or
explanation of what you are even looking at), a table of grouped functions, a flow diagram and a three line explanation
of "a partial". The complexity of this function requires a manual of its own.. it's fine for an experienced operator, but a
newbie would just use presets... shame. A separate "Parameter Guide" is also available,, this does Help, but all it is is a
list and a basic explanation of each function with not a great deal of "how to do it".
THE SOUNDS
Switch the thing on and have a play. The sounds are fantastic really. The strong suit of this device. The Supernatural
Pianos (ghastly name) guitars, basses, drums are wonderful, responsive, the keyboard (despite the length of keys)
controls them well as a decent spring action thing... good velocity curves for my playing although when it comes to solo
piano it's time to connect a weighted job....
Some of the pianos are gobsmacking (including the electric pianos).. rich, mellow, bright, thundering with great sustain
properties and excellent resonance. Acoustic basses that actually interpret slurred notes as bends, clunk and thud fantastic. Acoustic guitars that kind of strum when you play a chord and like the basses interpret motions as slides.
Wonderul orchestral sounds, gooey pads, lots of variety - no mellotron. Daft Buggers. There are great surprises like the
most realistic harmonica you ever ever heard (but probably don't need) and some of the most unrealistic flutes since a
Sound Canvas. The device still has a section of GM sounds which can loosely be described as POO and I wonder if the
fact that the sounds are always POO is somewhere written into the GM spec. No-one will use them.
THE ORGAN
A complete Drawbar Organ simulator can be brought up on the tiny screen, and fiddled with - drawbars can be changed
(the screen is NOT touch sensitive) with up/down buttons. IF you are a organ specialist beware.. although this thing is
useful it's not a patch on VB3 or even the old B4 simulators. The rotary speaker simulators are very EQ colouring and
the controls for speed are at default levels ridiculously slow at slow speed, over fast at fast speed and with a huge
acceleration time like a very rusty old leslie. Changing them is fiddly and time consuming. Keyclick is OK but not
great... percussion the same. leslie overdrive is horrid. I abandoned organs after 2 days of trying to match the sound to a
Hammond organ i have downstairs. It didn't come close. The VB3 DOES come staggeringly close..... just in case you
were gonna say "well it wouldn't"

http://forums.rolandclan.com/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=48723

05/01/2015

Roland Clan Forums View topic - A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

Pgina 3 de 9

ON THE OTHER HAND The organs are the best I have heard from any all-in-one workstation device. Miles better thant the Fantoms, Junos,
Motifs etc... far more real and intuitive. But VB3 trounces it. Pianos are up there with Alicia's Keys and have good
editable decisions.
SYNTHESISER - What SYNTHESISER?
The FA 06 and 08 have a section called Supernatural Synthesiser. This is of course a contradiction in terms, but lets not
get too pedantic. Strangely enough,the words SEQUENCER, ARP/RHYTHM, SAMPLER all appear in capital letters on
the front panel, and the word SYNTHESISER does not. How odd, because the synth section is really good. Although it
requires a whole load of peering at a tiny screen that should be touch responsive and selecting virtual pots and pushing
them up and down with increment buttons, it's actually quite good... essentially a 3 oscillator synth with VCF, VCA,
ADSR, EG etc. NOISE is available as an alternative to using one of the oscillators... rather than being a separate source.
Waves include the standard set of Saw, Triangle, Sine, Square and Pulse and as well as this you can use one of the huge
library of PCM tones instead of the oscillators... There's a RING MOD switch (haven't had time yet) and I haven't
managed to do Oscillator sync yet, although those sounds are not in my usual repertoire so I won't be exploring that too
far. Anyways, if you have an hour and very good eyesight you can build up a really great sound that you could have got
in 10 seconds on a Minimoog. But it IS yours to keep for ever and ever....
SAMPLER
the SAMPLER section is one of the machine's biggest (but not THE biggest ) rip-offs. This sampler is very very poor.
Not at making samples which it does as well as any iPhone, but the way it implements them. It's essentially designed to
work with the PADS as some kind of hybrid DJ tool for spinning samples and beats into a piece. To ME this is NOT
what is meant by a sampler. When something sells itself to me as a "Sampler" I'm expecting a device where I can build
up a composite sample of, say, a Mellotron, map the samples to the keys, use effects on them, use them as sounds within
other patches etc. FORGET THAT. The machine is able to load in four banks of 16 samples which are crudely editable
and loopable, but they are NOT mappable, therefore my mellotron requires one sample for every note, no stretching or
mapping is provided. This is more primitive than Roland's own MKS 100 which was released in the late 80s. The
manual totally fails to adequately explain how you get the keys to play the samples, but forums have let me know that
there is a switch in a pretty unlikely menu (STUDIO SET COMMON - GENERAL - PAD PART SELECT). Whichever
part you select then features the samples you put into memory starting at bottom C - note 36 and moving up a semitone
for each subsequent sample. The note you want to appear on note 36 MUST be in Sample bank ONE - slot (PAD) ONE.
Can't be anywhere else. The samples are only SAVED as part of a SONG - and as one full keyboard of an organ would
use all the sample memory slots (if not all the memory) therefore you would only be able to have one full sampled
instrument in memory at any one time. There is no function to save my four banks of sixteen as asingle file called
Mellotron - just a "song". Silly. I had a toy Casio thing that could sample and implement samples better than this. For DJ
work, these pads might be great as sample triggers, but this is NOT a comprehensive proper sampler. It's a toy.
THE AFTERTOUCH SCAM
The BIGGEST RIP OFF OF ALL, which is a product of supreme arrogance at Roland is AFTERTOUCH. Not everyone
is a user, but for me, Aftertouch is a wonderful device that allows me to control the speed of Leslies, vibrato, volume,
cutoff frequency and other parameters without having to take my hands off the keyboard. It's invention was potentially
the greatest development of the keyboard instrument since Bob Moog attached a synthesiser to one. The FIRST thing I
do when checking out a new keyboard is to download the manual and check the MIDI Spec chart at the end. And in the
FA manuals it shows that AFTERTOUCH is transmitted and recieved on ALL channels. Hence I decided to buy the
thing. And prebooked mine as I needed it for an up-coming tour. The manual was typically vague about aftertouch, but
did mention it a lot in my initial reads. When it arrived though, I couldn't work out how to switch it ON!!! A few letters
to varous forums later, the truth dawned on me. This keybed does NOT have Aftertouch at all - it has a fricking KNOB
that transmits the AFTERTOUCH command!!!!! Which means I have to take my hands off the keyboard (getting more
annoyed) which means that IT'S NOT FRICKING AFTER TOUCH THEN, IS IT???? That's the whole blooming point.
This is like saying that your hotel room has a hot tap and cold tap. But you need to go to the village pump if you want
water because the TAPS AREN'T CONNECTED to anything!!!
So just in case anyone is out there wondering THERE IS NO AFTERTOUCH on a Roland FA 06 even though it says
there IS in the manual. VERY very poor do!! A few Fanboys have scolded me for expecting too much on an 800 quid
keyboard. I have Full incremental aftertouch on an EMU Xboard which cost 150. Nonsense. I'd have paid more anyway.
I need it!!! I think the way they incorporate mentions of aftertouch into the manual is snide, misleading and verges on
dishonesty. Apologies are due.
The INTERNAL SOUND STRUCTURE
is next on my hit list. Like most workstations going back as far as the SY85 and maybe even M1, there is a setting where
16 sounds can be used as a "MULTI MODE" as Yamaha used to call it, and "STUDIO SET" as Roland are currently
referring to it. I use this function more or less all the time. To compare this with the Yamaha SY85 (1994) - the quality
of the sounds is a lot better... we've already dealt with that. The FA has also addressed to biggest problem of such
devices in that effects built for each individual patch ceased to function properly when incorporated into PerformanceStudio Set mode. Roland have nailed this completely, so if your Rhodes has a leslie effect on it as a standalone patch, it

http://forums.rolandclan.com/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=48723

05/01/2015

Roland Clan Forums View topic - A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

Pgina 4 de 9

will still be there in the Studio Set. Hurrah! About time! But it's as though Roland have totally forgotten what we might
actually want to USE these studio sets FOR!! You see, each sound in the studio set has a "keyboard" in the video display
(a bit like mainstage) in which you can set zones, limits and stuff to build up a composite sound. But ONLY ONE
composite sound. Because the key limits etc only work if a little button (called the Keyboard button) is illuminated on
the part. So the ones where it's illuminated can be used to build up really quite marvellous composites. To explain the
problem, lets say I have a Piano/Bass Split on the FA. It sounds great. No problem. BUT if my dumb controller
keyboard just above it wants to play another sound that is split - like for example a velocity sensitive brass pad that
becomes a STAB when I hit it harder - well this can't be done. Well... not easily without having to pre program a PCM
tone specifically for this purpose. In order to get around this, I'm having to do all my zoning with the dreaded laptop
which I just can't seem to get rid of... The "keyboard button" is either ON or OFF, when it's off you CAN play those
channels, but the note limitations do not apply and you get a whole keyboard full of Bass and Piano, no split! How hard
can this have been to program properly? maybe an upgrade... probably not!
ON THE OTHER HAND,,,,
The studio set architecture can do some surprisingly good stuff too. For example, I;ve built up a huge composite where
an acoustic jazz bass and brushes kit can be played in the left hand, and a huge combination of SELECTABLE different
instruments can be played in the right. this is by using the pads in Keyboard Switch on/off mode. So I can start off with a
piano "trio", add some vibes a few bars later, bring in a Hammoind for the chorus, fade it out using the expression pedal
on a long chord, replace it with a Rhodes, enable the strings and fade them in with the expression pedal, switch in a
distorted clav on the left hand, switch off the acoustic bass and replce it with an electric thumper - all as part of one, real,
live performance that requires no backing track at all. It's quite certainly the best device at doing this I've ever played,
and is worth the ticket price alone. Superb, in the extreme.
THE PEDALS.
Roland seem to have a dreadful FEAR on my behalf. That I may run out of notes... Therefore, in this and previous
workstations they have built a safety feature which cannot be switched off, unless you know otherwise. There are
THREE pedal inputs, all of which suffer from the same thing.
So here's a little scenario which illustrates the problem. Lets say I play a really nice motion strings pad, hold the pedal
down and sustain it indefinitely. Lovely. Now, i can switch to another part and play a nice soft synth lead over it. Very
nice. Trouble is, this can't be done.. (it can but not by the FA on its own) Roland have made the machine so as soon as
you select another part (using the pads in part select mode) the sustain you applied to the strings pad is cancelled!!!!
Ludicrous! Even when connected as master to another keyboard, the FA transmits a PEDAL OFF command via midi the
second you change part! Similarly, lets say you are using an organ sound and have used the expression pedal to turn it
down... you flick to another part while holding down a chord on the organ.... and the FA kindly transmits an Expression
command of 127, promptly bouncing the organ up to full volume!!! And I can't find a bypass in the OS for this! The
manual doesn't even mention it. I have developed workarounds for BOTH these pedal problems, the first being to use
the pedals from another keyboard beciuse these resets are only generated if the original command was from the FAs own
ports. Using the FA as a slave, if I'm playing a hammond sound and using a pedal to cotrol leslie speed, if I change the
FA's patch, then the leslie reverts to slow speed!!. These mandatory resets are spoiling the experience and are really
unnecessary but could at the very least be optional. Remember they are ACTIVE off commands.. someone has
programmed them to do it, and they aren't needed and are obstructive in more complex systems.
THE SEQUENCER.....
Well... it's not gonna be a thing for me... onstage I'm a live musician with no backing tracks. At home I have a dedicated
Cubase 7 system with a super processor and terrabytes of disk space and 2 massive hi res monitors. I'm not really gonna
want to peer at a 4 inch wide screen to do my sequencing. Occasionally in the past I have used some inbuilt sequencer to
cobble an idea together while "on the road" but now I have a laptop to do that with... not worth the eyestrain to use this.
Also, for some reason, Roland decided not to let you record Audio on this thing which is odd because you could on the
Juno G machine a few years back and that was a lower order of life financially. There is a frig you can do where you
record your audio as samples and fly them into your sequence - but that's like going back to the very first PC programs
like Samplitude and Procyon where you had a sampler that played in time with a midi sequencer... unreliable at best.
DAW Control...
Roland have made great play of this in their bumph. It's at best, a nice little extra. Well, this is useful onstage for sorting
a couple of things out without having to turn 90 degrees to my left, but it's not exactly amazing stuff. In my studio I find
all remote control devices to be a hinderance, however simple or complex, I can always work faster with the keyboard
and mouse of the computer. In my many years of experience with DAWS, (Steinberg Pro-24 is where I came in) the
more you try to make them like old school recording interfaces, the slower it all gets. Sure, you can get 8 pads on the FA
to do 8 different functions on the computer. Whoopee. 8. You need to program up what those 8 buttons do, you think
"fantastic" and then you just carry on using the keyboard key commands and the mouse 'cos it's faster and you don't have
to remember what you programmed into those 8 options and in what order. Why we need fast forward and fast rewind
buttons eludes me.... there's no TAPE!!! Just GO to the place you wanna go from! So you can program 8 "GOTO"
functions into the FA pads... but what happens when you write songs with 12 sections in?
ERGONOMICS

http://forums.rolandclan.com/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=48723

05/01/2015

Roland Clan Forums View topic - A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

Pgina 5 de 9

Lastly, the golden area on the control panel where both hands have easiest access to (i.e the middle) is occupied by a TV
screen that we don't need to touch all that much. I know it looks right to have a screen in the middle, but those Part
Change Pads are a long way across for my left hand to reach when my right hand is busy playing the keyboard! Please
please please put vital controls in the middle and eyecandy to the sides... that's to all keyboards designers.
SUMMARY
To sum up - hard to think this, but this is a wonderful machine that suffers from HUGE problems caused by the desire to
produce something that both Trad Musicians and DJs want. Many manufacturers are pandering to this market. (not
Clavia though) The truth is that Musicians need total control of their performances, this is sadly lacking here. The
sampler is a toy for spinning samples into the mix and is royally trounced by specialised DJ gear to start with. The
controls are fiddly, irritating and very screen reliant, and the screen is very small. Real Aftertouch is a glaring omission
and a badly exercised con... The case is flimsy, the controls are hard to see, the text is silver and nigh on illegible
without moving your head, the pedals system is badly and deliberately compromised, the Studio Set architecture is badly
flawed and inflexible in some ways, amazingly versatile in others. The keys are the wrong length. For me the most
important controls are on the extreme right of the keyboard and the hand I want to use them with is inconveniently
located on the left hand side of my body. For all my complaining though, I have never, ever, ever had a device that CAN
do so much, can sound so good and weigh as much as three bags of sugar.
If I had my money back in my account, and the keyboard was still in the shop, knowing now what I know, this keyboard
is so good that I would have to get on the bus, buy it again and have all the joys of getting irritated by how close to
perfect it is, to come again.
If anyone has any doubts.. it is worth every penny you pay for it and represents the most wonderful clash of design and
practicality you are ever likely to meet. It has more power per currency unit than any other keyboard I've tried in a 40
year long journey. Buy one now.
progferbrains
Posts: 18
Joined: 20:18, 3 March 2014
Top

Re: A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

by Cyrano 12:23, 3 July 2014
Yo Progferbrains,
Very nice review, it happens I agree with you 99% (I own a FA 08)
Just a couple of things:
1) as you can export each track as a wav audio stem, and you can send audio out over usb, I really don't miss an
integrated audio recorder..
2) the sampler can be used in an inventive way...for example you can re-sample your own sequence plus external input
(processed by the FA effects) and trigger this thing inside a new sequence..or you can use the samples as a sort of
additional audio tracks...
3) I am also impressed by the added value brought by the free of charge axial exps

http://forums.rolandclan.com/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=48723

05/01/2015

Roland Clan Forums View topic - A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

Pgina 6 de 9

Well, I have to agree with your conclusion: should I get the money back, I would buy my FA again
Cyrano
Posts: 31
Joined: 17:10, 16 June 2014
Top

Re: A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

by miden 17:59, 3 July 2014
But it still does not save the "Pad Mode State" to a Studio setup. It is supposed to according to the way I interpret the
manual.
Also the convoluted way one has to record audio, and cannot stream audio (as in MP3) direct from the SD card without
first HAVING to convert it the "Roland Format" which takes about 2 minutes per MP3, and then you need to save
THAT to a pad , then you need to change the pad mode to hold (also NOT saved in a Studio set) so the MP3 actually
plays all the way through instead of a half second stab!
This keyboard has a lot of growing up to do.
miden
Posts: 144
Joined: 05:17, 15 January 2008
Top

Re: A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

by Cyrano 19:02, 3 July 2014
True, some operation can be quite...complicated
On the other hand, I go directly out with audio over usb to audacity...and then ovedub the audio tracks using the FA as
audio interface
Cyrano
Posts: 31
Joined: 17:10, 16 June 2014
Top

Re: A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

by miden 20:09, 3 July 2014
Well TBH, I don't call it complicated when the keyboard does not do what it is supposed to!
To be able to assign a different mode to the pads and then NOT be able to save it to the Studio Set is rather silly! Or a
bug that should have already been fixed as the Studio Set is the MAIN operational workflow.
This is awful when using it live as you cannot simply load a set, you then have to open pad mode, re-select the operation
you want then get back out to actually start playing.
miden
Posts: 144
Joined: 05:17, 15 January 2008

http://forums.rolandclan.com/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=48723

05/01/2015

Roland Clan Forums View topic - A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

Pgina 7 de 9

Top

Re: A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

by Cyrano 20:24, 3 July 2014
miden wrote:Well TBH, I don't call it complicated when the keyboard does not do what it is supposed to!
To be able to assign a different mode to the pads and then NOT be able to save it to the Studio Set is rather
silly! Or a bug that should have already been fixed as the Studio Set is the MAIN operational workflow.
This is awful when using it live as you cannot simply load a set, you then have to open pad mode, re-select
the operation you want then get back out to actually start playing.

Yes, on this specific topic you are 100% right

Cyrano
Posts: 31
Joined: 17:10, 16 June 2014
Top

Re: A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

by JFP 20:26, 3 July 2014
I totally agree with all the findings in the review. It's good bang for the bucks, but with proper programming and thinkwork it could have been soooo much better and useful.
I hated the FA-06 keys when I first bought it, traded it in for a FA-08. Liked that 88 board much, but wanted a second
tier and decided to buy another FA-06 after all. In that way I can also have 4 simultaneous EXP boards active. For short
licks on the 61 keys it will do, but I still don't understand the reason to produce such a crappy keybed with such nonstandard keys and the lack of aftertouch....we'll...
It's hit & miss all over the place but they are both easily transportable and the basic sound is OK (though better brass,
more (el-) guitars and extra strings will do !). I hope some Roland guys are taking notes and feel the urge to fix what's
wrong and add what's missing and make us - and many potential buyers (!) happy. Probably not, considering Roland
history , but still...
JFP
Posts: 3
Joined: 20:19, 3 July 2014
Top

Re: A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

by bennyseven 17:51, 4 July 2014
Right JFP,
the history shows that they do not care about bugs. Remember the Fantoms (i.e. the RPS switch not saved in the song...)
But maybe there is a mind change with the a management.
bennyseven
Posts: 144
Joined: 18:01, 19 April 2014
Location: Germany

http://forums.rolandclan.com/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=48723

05/01/2015

Roland Clan Forums View topic - A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

Pgina 8 de 9

Top

Re: A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

by wadrad 14:54, 13 July 2014
Great assessment Progferbrains. I'm a pretty good vocalist who tries to help out on keys in a guitar-bass-drums band
setup, and I mostly got this for the well-rounded sounds, predominantly organ and electric piano stuff. Was previously
using a Casio XP-W1, which for HALF the price had some tricks up its sleeve the Roland guys never even seemed to
contemplate (unfortunately an acceptable Leslie rotary effect wasn't one of those features on the XP-W1). Was also a
Fantom X6 user til a couple years ago (only in the studio), and I was surprised by how Roland dropped some of the
better features of the X6 to accommodate things I'm not inclined to use (like the non-versatile sampling). I know PRICE
was an impacting consideration, but I would have paid more for some of those features. To this day, the keyboard
construction of the X6 was one of my better-liked keyboards features...can't say that about the FA-06.
I'm hoping an OS upgrade will improve SOME of the things you mentioned, but Roland's track record on that is mixed.
Was surprised that like unlike the X6, the sound modify knobs aren't default mapped to certain variables in the sound
edit window. For example, when you change the "sound modify" cutoff knob, it doesn't effect the cutoff setting for synth
programming.
Lastly, looking at the midi specs, it appears I can't do any "midi-controlling" on the organ draw bar partials (if I'm
missing something, please let me know) for real time, on-the-fly control. Thought FOR SURE I would be able to use the
assignable "sound modify" knobs to control organ draws bar settings, but I'm either missing it, or it can't do it.
Again, great assessment...thanks for taking the time...
Cheers,
WadRad
wadrad
Posts: 2
Joined: 14:32, 13 July 2014
Top

Re: A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

by Fleer 09:37, 22 July 2014
Indeed, Progferbrains, much appreciated.
Fleer
Posts: 31
Joined: 03:32, 22 July 2014
Top

Re: A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

by billw 16:42, 24 July 2014
Thanks for your comprehensive review...spot on! I really want these sounds, but not the way Roland has packaged them.
I'll pass...
billw
Posts: 246
Joined: 15:34, 31 October 2006
Location: Virginia
Top

http://forums.rolandclan.com/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=48723

05/01/2015

Roland Clan Forums View topic - A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

Pgina 9 de 9

Re: A personal and lengthy review of the FA-06

by SoundworldA.D. 19:14, 24 July 2014
Bloody good show, what!? A very comprehensive review with pro's and cons the way that KEYBOARD magazine used
to do it in the old days. I'm glad that PFB mentioned "bang for the buck" as we sometimes expect caviar and champagne
on a value meal budget and lose sight of the big picture.
That said, I can not for the life of me understand the omission of aftertouch on a so-called "flagship" workstation. As he
said, it allows for "expressiveness" in playing in a way that knobs and sliders just can't match. Roland must have had a
reason but I sure don't get it.
I was killing time at the Guitar Center in Austin, Texas yesterday and got to play around with an FA-06 and FA-08. I
liked the sounds but was not very taken with the layout or the colours chosen for the lights and such. I will just have to
continue to be contented with my OASYS, Jupiter-80 and V-Synth's for now.

SoundworldA.D.
Posts: 722
Joined: 22:09, 30 April 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Website
Top
Display posts from previous: All posts Sort by Post time Ascending

Go

Post a reply
12 posts Page 1 of 1
Return to Roland FA-06/08
Jump to:

Roland FA-06/08

Go

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

Board index
The team Delete all board cookies All times are UTC + 1 hour
Powered by phpBB 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

http://forums.rolandclan.com/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=48723

05/01/2015