PerformanceManagementSystem
ObjectiveAssessment
AppraiseeDetails
AppraiseeName:
Mr.MustaqueAli
AppraiserName:
Mr.KumarvelSriranga
EmployeeCode:
100603
EmployeeCode:
100069
Designation
T3ManagerProjects
Grade
T3
Grade
T3
ReviewerName:
Mr.ManojLNarasimhan
DateofJoining:
25/04/2011
EmployeeCode:
100020
Category
MiddleManagement
Grade
T2
AssessmentisSubmittedandcannotbechanged
ScoreCard
SubCategory
Perspective
Projects/
Tasks/
Activities
handled
Key
Performance
Indicatorsof
theProject/
Tasks/
Activities
Handled
Objective
Revenue
Increasein
Revenuefrom
Existing/New
accounts
Weightage Action
(%)
Steps
15
Projects/
Tasks/
Activities
handled
Key
Performance
Indicatorsof
theProject/
Tasks/
Activities
Handled
Profitability
Maintain
overall
profitability
forthe
account
15
Projects/
Tasks/
Activities
handled
Key
Performance
Indicatorsof
theProject/
Tasks/
Activities
Handled
ClientFocus
Ensurethe
client
expectations
aremet
20
Projects/
Tasks/
Activities
handled
Key
Performance
Indicatorsof
theProject/
Tasks/
Activities
Handled
Quality
Focusonhigh
quality
deliverables
Projects/
Tasks/
Activities
handled
Key
HRFocuson
Performance Employee/Skill
Indicatorsof development
theProject/
Tasks/
Activities
Handled
NA
NA
Measure
Timelines/
Targets
1.15%Increase Yearly
fromExisting
Service/Technology
2.10%Increase
innewProduct
/Serviceoffered
40%GM
Yearly
AppraiseeAchievement
AppraiseeRating
MeetsExpectations
AppraiseeRemarks
Additionalonpremteamhasbeen
onboardedandin85%production
capacity.
TwoMACTeamsarebeingformed
andwillbeinactive
developmentfromApril/May.
1.3yearexperienceAhilS
hasbeenonboardedinthe
AppraiseeRating
secondsprintteam.
MeetsExpectations
AppraiseeRemarks
5TraineesinSwiftpageR&D.
1.DivyaBonboardedinAEM
QA.
2.AkhilaandPriyaworking
activelyindevelopment
activitysupportingSprint
andDefectFixing.
3.GoutamandReshmaworking
inNetsuitereporting.
NA
1.CSATScore>4, Yearly
2.Escalationsper
Year<1,3.2
Valueadditionsper
Year
25
NA
1.%ofontime Yearly
deliveriesmadeto
client>952.
%100%SLA
adherenceonthe
services3.No.of
defects/errorsin
deliveriesmadeto
client(0Major&<
5Minorper
quarter)4.Effort
Variance<=10%
5.100%Process
Compliance(GAVS)
25
NA
1.Attrition(4raters Yearly
<=10%,overall
<=20%)
2.Trainings
provided4Per
year3.Self
development2
Trainings4.GAVS
AppraiseeRating
1.Scored5/5inProject
OutstandingPerformer
Management.OverallProject
AppraiseeRemarks
CSATScoreis4.15.
2.NoDeliveryescalations
withrespecttoQuality.
3.Removedimpedimentswith
respecttoKnowledgeSilos,
internalandexternal
communication.
1.Alluserstoriesother
AppraiseeRating
than2werecompletedontime
OutstandingPerformer
withintheIterationin
AppraiseeRemarks
Nov/DecSprint.v18Sprint1
(9userstories96story
points)wascompletedon
time.
2.AllP1andP2defectswere
closedin17.1release.
3.Onlyonedefectleakagein
finalbuild(Google
Integrationfeature)and
hotfixwaspreparedontime.
AppraiseeRating
OutstandingPerformer
AppraiseeRemarks
https://ess.cnergyis.com/MYHRMS/GAVS/StartUp/PMS_publish/StartUp/Forms/RespondentRatingsQB.aspx?vmyr=&appid=36873&resid=36873&rtype=1&re
1/2
3/10/2015
PerformanceManagementSystem
Initiatives/TAG
Support4Per
Year
Back
Home
1.No4raterattrition.
Onlyoneresource3Rater
(Ruba)hadresigned.
2.DevelopmentandQA
internaltrainingofthe
producthasbeenconducted.
KnowledgecapturedinWebEx
forfuturereferences.
3.LeadtheEPGSupport
Average
Processgroupandcompleted
3.7
Score
thereviewsontimeaheadof
otherprocessgroups.
Next
https://ess.cnergyis.com/MYHRMS/GAVS/StartUp/PMS_publish/StartUp/Forms/RespondentRatingsQB.aspx?vmyr=&appid=36873&resid=36873&rtype=1&re
2/2