Project Report
on
Study of Consumer
Perception
in
Liberty Shoes Limited,
Karnal-132001
(Haryana)
Under Supevision of
By
Mr. Vishal Goel
Rani
(C.A)
Submitted
Pooja
CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY
the patial
Certificate
This is to certify that the project titled " Finance " is an academic
work done by
Acknowledgement
Signature of Student
Preface
The purpose of
Signature of Student
Certificate
This is to certify that report entitled " Finance" submitted for the
degree of BBA in subject of Summer Training Report, is a bonafide
research project earned out by Pooja Rani " Govt. P.G Collage for
Woman, Karnal student under my supervision and no part of this
report has been submitted for any other degree.
The assistance and help received during the coures of investigation
have been fully acknowledge.
Contents
Chaper No.
Title
Industry Profile
1.1
Overview of industry as a
whole
1.2
1.2.1
History
1.2.
2
Corporate Philosophy
1.2.
3
Social Responsibility
1.2.
4
Corporate Goals
1.2.
5
Awards
1.2.
6
Product
1.2.
7
1.2.
8
1.2.
9
Board of Directors
1.3.
Competition information
1.3.
1
Corporate values
1.3.
2
1.3.
3
1.3.
5
Page No
1.3.
6
2.
Re-search Methology
3.
Balance Sheet
4.
5.
6.
Suggestion &
Recommendations
Industry Profile
COMPANY CREDO :1. To ensure that the method we use is the latest
technology world over
2. To follow the highest standards
workmanship in whatever we make.
of
honest
Late Sh.R.K.Bansal
He was the promoter Director of the Company. He had
been associated with shoe industry and with the trade for
the last 45 years. He had the knowledge of international
market and with his abilities he was able to introduce
Liberty products in most advanced countries like Italy
and America.
GROUP COMPANIES
LIBERTY AUTOMOTIVE
Liberty Automotive is a joint venture company promoted by
Azin Khodro Group of Iran and Liberty Group of India
manufactures Automotive Trim Parts.
It came up with its green field at Bawal Industrial Growth
Centre on Delhi-Jaipur national highway for manufacturing
automotive trim parts.
Drawing upon the considerable manufacturing experience
of Azin Khodro group and business acumen of Liberty
group it is all set to deliver high quality finished product.
CORPORATE VALUES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Performers thrive.
8.
9.
Organizational Transparency.
Visionary & Dynamic Leadership.
Fair Employment Practices.
Multi-technology Manufacturing Capabilities.
Manufacturing Flexibility.
Multi-disciplinary R & D.
It
wants
to
maintain
good
relationship
among
the
training
and
thus
raise
their
morale
and
competence.
Research Methodology
Research, which is done for this particular project, is with the help
of data collection.
Data, which is collected, is mainly secondary data, which is
collected from the account books of the Liberty Shoes Limited.
Here the research process, which is used, is as follows:
Research problem: here the problem is to analyze the ratio of the
company for which we have to conduct the research.
Extensive literature survey: now we have to see that from where
the data is being collected on which we have to perform the
research.
2.
Limitation of study
Balance Sheet
Amount in crores.
Year
Share capital
17.04
17.04
5.07
81.81
64.63
57.12
50.90 45.91
81.67
62.19
55.97 50.98
Secured loans
104.03
48.82
22.1
23.17 23.67
Unsecured loans
23.92
23.04
32.91
48.71
Total debt
127.95 71.86
55.02
71.88 27.97
Total Liability
Gross block
110.55
79.70
5.07
5.07
4.30
66.50
60.65 51.43
35.54
31.21
27.39 23.74
48.49
39.11
36.91 31.32
20.11
Net block
75.01
8.14
0.92
0.25
0.12
Investment
18.49
6.42
4.02
1.53
Inventories
76.17
53.64
41.01
44.37 44.31
Sundry debtors
72.08
48.33
47.26
48.55 21.49
2.94
2.45
4.62
4.25
1.32
0.00
1.47
28.31
30.01
23.20
25.64 23.45
Current liabilities
43.53
22.26
31.82
25.24 37.40
7.36
8.27
97.70
73.83
0.00
0.00
Provisions
Net current assets
Misc. expenses not w/o
Total Assets
5.20
127.26
0.00
8.28
7.16
89.29 46.16
0.00
0.15
Contingent liabilities
15.16
16.14
18.11
17.83
6.34
Mar 08
Mar 07
237.54
1.67
20.12
259.33
221.11
1.11
6.49
228.71
194.84
1.25
0.13
196.22
199.20
0.42
1.94
201.56
70.57
1.14
14.62
86.33
121.22
15.64
4.65
16.26
96.67
16.35
5.00
14.95
81.79
17.32
4.09
13.10
83.27
22.05
3.99
6.75
41.78
11.53
1.92
5.94
exp.
Employee cost
Selling &
21.23
45.86
19.91
42.03
16.41
37.95
15.23
46.83
4.86
7.13
administration
Miscellaneous
1.51
1.21
1.06
1.59
1.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
32.95
32.59
24.24
21.85
12.05
8.81
4.74
6.99
5.60
0.71
24.14
27.85
17.25
16.25
11.34
Depreciation
Profit before tax
4.63
19.51
3.99
23.85
3.71
13.54
3.64
12.61
3.15
8.19
Tax
Profit after tax
2.50
17.01
5.36
18.49
3.75
9.79
4.21
8.40
1.72
6.47
0.15
0.43
0.10
0.26
0.11
11.72
1.69
1.47
1.48
2.98
Stock adjustment
Total Income
Raw materials
Excise duty
Power & fuel coast
Other manufacturing
Expenses
Less: Preoperative
expenditure
capitalised
Profit before
depreciation
Interest & financial
charges
Profit before depreciation
& tax
forward
Appropriation
P& l Bal. Carried
down
6.00
22.90
8.89
11.72
9.47
1.69
8.15
1.47
7.86
1.48
b)
The data, which are shown by the Co. in both the statements, do
not show better insight to various users, unless these data
reanalyzed. So it is very crucial aspect to analyze the information
and shown in statements so they can provide the knowledge of
strength & weakness of the firm. In firm many parties are always
interested to know firm financial position & they came to know all
this by analyzing the data & information.
2.
Balance sheet
3.
4.
5.
Various schedules
6.
To determine the absolute figure for last three years and the
absolute changes from one year to another two years and the
absolute change in term of percentage.
To compare assets & liabilities and find out the any increase
or decrease in above on three different dates.
External analysis: Outsiders, who dont have access to the detailed internal
accounting record of business firm, do this analysis. These
outside parties are potential investors, creditors, government
agencies & general public.
2.
Internal analysis: The analysis conducted by person who has access to the
internal accounting records of a business firm is known as
internal analysis.
2.
Vertical analysis: This analysis refers to the study of relationship of the various
items in the financial statements, of one accounting period. It
is also known as Static analysis.
Window dressing.
Incomparable.
Current ratio.
Quick ratio.
Solvency ratio:
Preparatory ratio.
Activity ratio:
Profitability ratio:
Operating ratio.
Return on equity.
Liquidity ratios
Current
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
90.70
122.81
113.92
134.94
181.20
56.26
89.89
77.28
75.67
60.67
1.61
1.37
1.47
1.78
2.99
assets
(In Crores)
Current
Liabilities
(In Crores)
Current
Ratio
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Quick assets
46.40
78.40
72.91
81.29
85.29
( In Croces)
Current
56.26
89.89
77.28
75.67
60.67
0.82
0.87
0.94
1.07
1.41
Liabilities
( In Crores)
Quick ratio
Interpretation: Usually a high quick ratio is an indication that the firm is liquid and
has the ability to meet its current liquid liabilities in time and on
the other hand a low quick ratio represent that the firms liquidity
position is not good. As a rule of thumb or as a conversion quick
ratio 1:1 is considered satisfactory. The quick ratio of the company
is in years 2006 2007 and 2010 2011 i.e. 0.82 and 1.41 while in
the year 2006 2007, 2007 2008, 2008 2009, it grows.
Solvency ratios
The term solvency refers to the ability of a concern to meet its
long-term obligations. The long-term indebtedness of a firm
includes debenture holder, financial institutions providing medium
and
long-term
loans
and
other
creditors
selling
goods
on
2006
2007-
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
( In crores )
9.65
Share
holder
8.50
10.30
71.84
127.95
fund
55.97
62.19
81.67
98.85
0.15
0.16
0.87
1.29
Loan funds
50.98
( In crores )
Debt
equity 0.19
ratio
2006-
2007-
2008-
2009-
2010-
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
27.97
71.87
55.02
71.84
127.95
crore)
Total
78.85
127.84
117.21
153.51
226.80
0.35
0.56
046
0.47
0.56
capitalization
Funded debt to
total
capitalization
ratio
Interpretation: This ratio establishes a link between the long-term funds raised
from outsider and total long-term funds available in the business.
Through there is no role of thumb but still the reliance on
outsiders the better it will be. If this ratio is smaller, better it will
be upon 50% or 55%. If ratio is smaller better than we can say that
this ratio was better position in the year 2006-2007as compared to
the years 2006-2007 to 2010-2011.
2006-
2007-
2008-
2009-
2010-
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Shareholder
50.98
55.97
62.19
81.67
98.85
fund
Shareholder
60.63
64.47
83.78
128.39
188.40
0.84
0.87
0.74
0.64
0.52
fund + long
term fund
Proprietary
ratio
Interpretation:
As proprietary ratio represents the relationship of owners fund to
total assets, higher the ratio or the share of the shareholder in the
total capital of the company, better the long-term solvency position
of the company. This ratio indicates the extent to which the assets
solvency position of the company can be lost without affecting the
interest of creditors of the company. It changes fraction from the
years 2006-2007 to 2010-2011 i.e. 0.84 to 0.52.
Fixed interest coverage ration: - EBIT / Interest
Year
2006-
2007-
2008-
2009-
2010-
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
8.90
0.71
18.20
5.59
20.52
6.98
28.59
4.74
27.11
8.81
12.52
3.25
2.05
6.03
3.08
crore)
Fixed interest
coverage ratio
Interpretation: The interest coverage ratio indicates how much interest charges
operating profit available to pay the interest charge covers. It is
desirable in the years 2006-2007 & 2010-2011 i.e. 12.52 & 3.08
respectively. But in the years 2008-2009 & 2007-2008 it shows 3.25
& 2.05 indicates excessive use of debt. However in the years 20062007 it is too high i.e.12.52 shows that firm is very conservative.
2006-
2007-
2008-
2009-
2010-
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
8.50
64.47
21.59
83.78
46.72
128.39
89.55
188.40
0.13
0.25
0.36
0.48
fund + long
term fund
Fixed assets to 0.16
net worth
ratio
Interpretation: In the years 2006-2007 , 2007-2008 & 2008-2009 debt to total
funds ratio is not satisfactory as if only 0.16,0.13 & 0.25
respectively. Which is less than ideal. However in the years 2006-
2007 & 2010-2011. It is more than desirable i.e. 0.16 & 0.48
respectively. Means in last five years three is no improvement in
this context.
Fixed assets
Net worth
2006-
2007-
2008-
2009-
2010-
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
32.64
50.98
37.03
55.97
39.35
62.19
49.40
81.67
83.14
116.86
0.66
0.63
0.60
0.71
net worth
ratio
Interpretation: 1. The ratio of fixed assets to net worth indicates the extent to
which shareholders fund sunk in to the need assets. There is
rule of thumb to interpret this ratio but 60% to 65% is
considered to be satisfactory ratio in case of industrial
undertaking. As this ratio less than 100% in the years 2006-
Activity ratios
Activity ratios are also called Turnover ratio it indicates
efficiency with which firms manage its capital employed is rotated
in the business. We know that the funds of the creditors and owner
are invested in various assets to generate sale profit, which
depends upon the better management of assets. So better
management can be said that it is better efficiency of managers. So
in these ratio efficiency is evaluated.
In these ratio we come to know the speed which assets are being
converted into sales. Thats why these are called turnover ratio.
Activity ratio can be calculated to judge effectiveness of assets
utilization.
2006-
2007-
2008-
2009-
2010-
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Sales ( in
70.57
199.20
194.82
221.11
237.54
crore )
Average
19.65
35.01
47.89
47.79
71.08
debtors
Debtors
3.59
5.68
4.06
4.62
3.34
turnover ratio
Average collection period
No of days / debtors turnover ratio:
Years
No. of days
Debtors turnover
2006-
2007-
2008-
2009-
2010-
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
365
3.59
365
5.68
365
4.06
365
4.62
365
3.34
102
64
90
79
110
ratio
Average
collection
period ( days )
2006-
2007-
2008-
2009-
2010-
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
199.20
127.85
194.83
117.21
221.11
153.53
237.54
226.80
1.55
1.66
1.44
1.04
Total assets
0.89
turnover ratio
Interpretation: The ratio means how much sales is generated by one rupee
invested in total assets, it is high in year 2006-2007 & 2007-2008
i.e. 1.55, 1.66 in both years which higher than one rupee, so these
are favorable to co. & indicates efficient use of resources by the
company but it was low in 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009,
2009-2010 & 2010-2011 i.e. 0.89, 1.55, 1.66, 1.44 & 1.04
respectively.
Net assets turnover ratio: Sales / net assets
Net assets = net fixed assets + net current assets + investments
Years
2006-
2007-
2008-
2009-
2010-
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
199.20
134.80
194.83
124.70
221.11
161.15
237.54
234.15
1.48
1.56
1.37
1.01
Net assets
turnover ratio
0.83
Interpretation: Net assets turnover ratio of the company is good in the year 20062007 & 2006-2007 i.e. 1.48 & 1.56 respectfully. Which indicates
efficiency utilization of resources. It also show good response in
the year 2006-2007 & 2007-2008 but it was low in the year 20062007 i.e. 0.83 shows inefficiency of resources.
Fixed assets turnover ration: - sales / fixed assets
Years
2006-
2007-
2008-
2009-
2010-
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
199.20
37.03
194.83
39.35
221.11
49.40
237.54
83.14
5.37
4.95
4.48
2.85
Fixed assets
2.16
turnover ratio
Interpretation: - As calculated above, this ratio 2.16 in the year
2006-2007 which is low indicates inefficiency of assets but it is
good in the next four years and in the year 2006-2007 it has gained
its maximum in last five years i.e. 5.37 shows higher efficiency.
This indicates the progress of the company.
Stock turnover ratio:- sales / stock
Years
2006-
2007-
2008-
2009-
2010-
2007
2008
2009
2010
2010
199.20
44.37
194.83
41.01
221.11
53.64
237.54
76.17
4.49
4.75
4.12
3.11
ratio
Interpretation: The stock turnover ratio shows how long goods are kept in store
before being sold. In the year 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009,
2009-2010, 2010-2011 the ratio is good which indicates efficient
sales performance. However in the year 2002-2003 it is very low
i.e. 1.59 shows that stock does not sell quickly and remains in
godown for a long time.
Working capital turnover ratio: - sales / capital employed
Years
2006-
2007-
2008-
2009-
2010-
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
199.20
71.47
194.83
80.01
221.11
107.47
237.54
125.35
1.49
2.44
2.05
1.89
0.82
Profitability ratio
What is profitability?
Profitability is the indication of the efficiency with which the
operations of business are carried on. Every business is established
for profit. Profit is the main aim of any business concern. Profit
depends upon the sales and operational performance. But sale
alone are not the factor. Sometimes sale may be high but company
is earning low profit and vice versa. Other factor also affects the
profitability. Although we know profit is the difference the revenue
and expenditure. But if expenditure is such like financial expenses,
2006-
2007-
2008-
2009-
2010-
2007
Net profit ( in
6.46
crore)
Sales ( in crore) 70.57
Net profit ratio
10.94
2008
2009
2010
2011
8.39
9.80
18.49
17.01
199.20
194.83
221.11
237.54
4.73
5.52
8.36
7.16
Interpretation: Net profit ratio is slightly fluctuating it was 10.94% in 2006-2007 &
8.36%
in
2009-2010.
This
ratio
expresses
the
cost
price
Interest &
2006-
2007-
2008-
2009-
2010-
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
0.57
5.30
6.70
4.74
8.81
crore)
Sales ( in crore) 70.57
199.20
194.83
221.11
237.54
Interest &
2.67
3.44
2.14
3.71
financial
coverage ( in
0.81
financial
ration %
Interpretation: -
In the year 2006-2007 this ratio is 0.81% which is favorable for the
company but there is constant increase after as in 2006-2007 it has
increased to 0.81% in 2010-2011 it is 3.71% & in 2010-2011 it has
increased maximum up to 3.71 which is very unfavorable for the
company. This ratio also should be as far as low for company
profitability.
Operating ratio: Cost of goods sold + operating expenses / net sales * 100
Years
Cogs +
2006-
2007-
2008-
2009-
2010-
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
43.27
140.48
138.10
14.87
16.88
59.04
177.15
177.51
204.88
222.14
73.28
79.30
77.79
7.25
7.60
operating exp. (
in crore)
Net Sales ( in
crore)
Operating
ratio
Interpretation: In the year 2006-2007 this ratio is desirable but in 2006-2007 &
2007-2008 but in year 2009-2010 a very low ratio i.e. 7.25% it is
not satisfactory as in these years this ratio is quite high, high
means it leaves a small portion of income to meet other nonoperating expenses. A low ratio is better because it reflects the
efficiency of management. The lower ratio higher would be
profitability.
Return on capital employed: Profit before interest, tax and dividend / capital employed * 100
Years
Profit before
2006-
2007-
2008-
2009-
2010-
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
8.90
18.20
28.59
20.52
18.10
67.10
71.47
80.01
107.47
125.35
13.25
25.46
28.44
19.09
14.44
Pat ( in crore)
Share holder
2006-
2007-
2008-
2009-
2010-
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
6.46
50.98
8.39
55.97
9.80
62.19
18.49
81.67
17.01
98.85
12.67
15.00
15.74
22.63
17.21
fund ( in crore)
Return on equity
%
Interpretation: This ratio measures the profitability o the capital committed to the
business by equity shareholders. This ratio tends to increase at
increasing rate as in 2006-2007 it was 12.67% in 2007-2008 it was
15% & in 2010-2011 it was 17.21% which shows good return &
indicates that firm has earned a satisfactory return for its
shareholders. It enables that firm has earned a satisfactory return
for its shareholders. It enables the earning capacity of the
enterprises to be contrasted with the earning capacity of other
investments.
Pat ( in crore)
No of equity
2006-
2007-
2008-
2009-
2010-
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
6.46
507
8.39
507
9.80
507
18.49
170.40
17.01
170.40
12.74
16.55
19.32
10.88
9.98
shares (in
crore)
Earning per
share
Interpretation: This ratio is low in 2006-2007 i.e. 12.74 but it show good response
in upcoming year as in 2006-2007 it was 16.55 & in 2007-2008 it
which
shows
its
earning
capacity,
2006-
2007-
2008-
2009-
2010-
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
27.35
77.72
118.59
141.90
154.20
59.04
177.15
177.51
204.88
222.14
46.32
43.87
67.17
69.26
69.42
crore)
Net Sales ( in
crore)
Operating
ratio
enumerates
on
cash
net
and
effect
takes
of
into
the
various
accounts
business
receipts
and
disbursement or cash.
In a broader sense the term funds refer to money values in
whatever from. It may exist, here funds means all financial
resources used in business weather in the form of men, material,
money, machinery and others.
Significance of fund flow statement:
Current
assets
Inventories
Sundry debtors
Cash & bank
balances
Loan
&
advances
Current
year
( 2010)
Previous
year
( 2010 )
Effect on
working
( increase)
73,17,38,3
15
72,08,97,4
74
4,62,40,48
3
28,31,64,8
80
53,64,96,0
35
48,33,85,8
17
2,94,45,56
1
30,01,48,4
34
19,52,42,280
23,75,11,657
1,67,94,922
-1,69,83,554
Capital
(decreas
e)
Total (A)
1,78,20,4
1,152
1,34,94,7
5,847
Sundry
Creditors
Advances from
Customers
35,55,87,1
55
1,29,14,75
5
12,02,22,9
74
2,82,47,54
1
23,53,64,181
Expenses
payable
Other liabilities
6,54,71,16
2
3,13,80,14
0
5,20,13,50
0
4,86,07,62
7
2,55,42,57
9
7,36,57,31
7
1,68,63,535
51,73,66,
712
29,62,78,
038
1,26,46,7
4,440
1,05,31,9
7,809
Current
Liabilities
Provisions
Total ( B)
(AB)
Net increase
in working
capital
1,53,32,7
86
58,37,56
1
2,16,43,817
27,38,71,53
3 94,95,22
5
28,33,66,75
8
31.03.2007
31.03.2007
27,8166,047
28,27,06,838
58,78,246
4,63,34,608
7,10,758
18,62,142
2,918
32,78,03,083
6,27,720
3,99,98,538
5,65,596
5,86,356
1,69,866
32,18,87,030
23,75,08,657
22,52,42,280
54,48,87,395
57,93,85,239
49,89,24,780
3,66,06,698
46,23,18,082
7,40,683
46,30,58,765
1,08,11,770
12,63,54,123
61,44,440
18,20,56,916
36,06,33,613
5,78,06,406
30,28,27,207
54,964
30,28,82,17
1
38,99,54,764
68,96,605
18,62,142
2,918
12,07,37,395
50,19,30,497
14,16,89,324
6,58,778
5,86,356
1,69,866
2,40,40,581
16,43,14,90
5
14,01,69,870
1,99,58,904
5,86,66,066
..
6,15,44,900
.
2,66,74,830
4,40,14,944
6,35,91,743
13,42,81,51
7
2,26,73,168
43,85,749
2,94,45,561
58,78,246
4,62,40,483
2,45,32,092
6,27,720
2,94,45,561
Year
2011
Change
% change
2,05,03,42,
236
1,23,12,13,
758
2,22,39,72, +17,36,30,2
520
84
1,81,74,29, +38,62,15,9
658
00
Gross profit
(A)
81,91,28,4
78
50,65,42,8 +31,25,85,
62
616
+38.16%
Operating
expenses: Payment to
employees
administrati
on expenses
+6.61%
Less: - cost
of goods
sales
+8.47%
+31.37%
+9.63%
43,20,32,91 47,36,32,51 +4,15,99,59
8
4
6
Total (B)
63,11,88,6
62
68,59,59,0 +5,47,70,3
24
59
Operating
profit ( AB)
Less: Operating
exp.
Add: Operating
income
18,79,39,81 17,94,16,16
3
2
+8.68%
-85,23,651
-4.54%
3,99,98,538
4,63,34,608
+63,36,070
+15.84%
1,11,11,202
4,74,18,093
1,67,28,098 +56,16,896
8,81,68,867 +4,07,50,77
4
19,51,16,28
+50.55%
+85.94%
23,85,56,73
-18.21%
Less: Interest
Profit
before tax
4,34,40,449
4,88,26,320
2,46,36,260
2,41,90,060
12,96,900
32,48,830
-49.51%
-150.51%
-19,51,930
Less:provision
for deferred
tax liability
Net profit
18,49,28,5
14
17,01,94,5
55
1,47,33,95
9
-7.97%