ETHICS
The term corruption is vague and is not easily defined. Corruption can take on
different meanings depending on whether the acts occur in the public or private sector
(Eiras, 2003). Corruption can be thought of as embezzlement, fraud, bribery, treason, or
acts that constitute a conflict of interest (Everett, Neu, Rahaman, 2006). The unclear
term can involve different types of corruption including political corruption, grand
corruption, productive corruption, and petty corruption, among others (Everett et al.,
2006). Other authors who seek to define the term have included just under sixty
different actions that constitute corruption in the manner we think of today (Everett et al.,
2006). For purposes of this paper, corruption will be any act deemed illegal due to the
belief that it creates an unfair advantage for one party over the other. For example,
fraud or embezzlement can be considered corrupt because it places the fraudulent party
at a personal advantage over the non-fraudulent party.
CAUSES OF CORRUPTION
Low Pay scales/ Wages
Bribery, corruption and facilitation payments were the most commonly reported
issues recorded by the Institute of Business Ethics' media monitoring during 2013. They
accounted for 13% of all the stories on business ethics. The sectors most frequently
mentioned were extractives (70%), defence and security (63%), pharmaceuticals (47%)
and broadcast/media (33%).
Businesses still have some way to go to embed anti-bribery and corruption mechanisms
effectively into their culture. This gap between saying and doing is also reflected in
external studies. A survey by Control Risks and the Economist Intelligence Unit found
that 25% of companies felt there was at least a "somewhat likely chance" their company
would be required to investigate a suspected violation of anti-bribery laws involving an
employee in the next two years.
Employers need to provide relevant support to staff to help them recognise, understand
and respond to the ethical challenges they may face.
Creating a culture that influences employees' actions, decision making and behaviour
can be a challenging and lengthy process, requiring sensitivity, patience and resources.
Corruption can be so ingrained into a company's culture as to be considered "the way
business is done".
This can be the case especially for companies who use agents, or who operate in
countries where enforcement of anti-corruption regulation is poor and facilitation
payments are seen as the norm. Getting staff to see that a backhander is actually a
form of corruption takes time and requires regular communication and training.
At the heart of this Rs.1.76-lakh crore worth of scam is the former Telecom minister A
Raja who according to the CAG, has evaded norms at every level as he carried out
the dubious 2G license awards in 2008 at a throw-away price which were pegged at
2001 prices.
The cases are still going on against many people including A. Raja, M. K. Kanimozhi
and many telecommunication companies as well.
The Bofors scandal is known as the hallmark of Indian corruption. The Bofors scam was
a major corruption scandal in India in the 1980s;
The Swedish State Radio had broadcast a startling report about an undercover
operation carried out by Bofors, Swedens biggest arms manufacturer, whereby $16
million were allegedly paid to members of PM Rajiv Gandhis Congress.
Most of all, the Bofors scam had a strong emotional appeal because it was a scam
related to the defense services and Indias security interests