Name of student:
Date of Visit to Mediation:
ADR
Miguel Castriciones
April 14, 2015
REACTION PAPER
Concubinage
Parties
Name of Mediator
** The Mediation which our group attended was already their 2nd session. Thus, during the
discussion of the parties, most facts were already implied and not threshed out by them extensively.
The complainant Legal Wife was demanding that certain properties in Sorsogon be
returned to her by the defendant Caregiver.
The Legal Wife alleges that said properties were a fruit of the industry and capital
between her and her American Husband, a US Veteran.
On the other hand, the defendant simply pleads ignorance: that she does not know
of any property which has been placed under her name.
o
An obvious legal issue here is that the American Husband cannot own Philippine
property based on the constitutional prohibition under Article XII, section 7.
While the defendant Caregiver and her elderly mother would want to settle just to
clear their name, they confess that they do not have the sum of money being
asked for by the Complainant. Thus, they would rather let the case proceed.
NOT SUCCESSFUL
If not successful, state the reason/s which hampered the successful mediation.
Confusion as to facts.
In this particular case, it seems that the parties are confused as to the fact of
possession and ownership of the disputed property. A classic case of My word against
yours. Thus, it seems ideal that evidence be adduced in order to clear up the
confusion.
Unmotivated mediator
Although the mediator was quite candid and approachable, he did not impress upon the
parties the necessity of settling the case. He would rather sit back and listen to the
parties argue among themselves.
===============