2012-2013
Master of Business Administration
Prepared by
Dr Mathew Shafaghi
Bolton Business School
Content
Section
Topics
12345678-
Introduction
Timetable and Submission
Choosing a Research Topic
Content and Structure of the Research Proposal
Content and Structure of the Dissertation
Style of Writing and Presentation
Assessment
The Role of the Supervisor and the Researcher
Page
3
4
5
6
7
12
13
14
15
16
18
1- INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the dissertation is to provide you with an opportunity to undertake a
substantial piece of research with a view to demonstrate mastery of a particular subject
area within the areas of business and management including; E-business, Business
Information Systems, E-marketing, HRM, and Logistics and Supply Chain Management
and to assist you to synthesise your academic knowledge acquired from the taught MBA
modules. The MBA dissertation should be at least 14,000 words and must demonstrate
that the learning outcomes stated in the module specification have been met. All MBA
students are required to complete a dissertation. This typically involves:
Components
Output
Credit
Assessment
Provisional proposal
Max 500 words
None
No assessment
(formative)
Dissertation
MBA dissertation
Minimum 14000 words
60
Assessed
Workshop Date
Submission Date
Stage 1 modules
As per timetable
As per timetable
Research Methods
Introduction
Literature review
Research objectives
Research Method
Research Ethics
Research Contribution
Timescale
References
Stage Two
Modules
6, 7, 8,
9
Stage 2 modules
Dissertation Submission
As per timetable
As per timetable
Stage Three
28th Sep 2012 (14.000 words).
Your research proposal (up to 500 words) should be submitted after the completion of the
Research Method module. This is intended to provide you and the MBA programme leader
with a clear idea about your research topic, how you are going to conduct your research,
and at the same time enable the Programme Leader at Bolton to allocate the required
supervisory support for your research. It is important to note that this provisional/tentative
proposal is not assessed and may be subject to modifications based on the
recommendation of your supervisor/supervisory team.
ID
Section
Tentative Content
123-
Title page
Table of content
Introduction
4-
Literature review
5-
Research objectives
6-
Research Method
7-
Research Ethics
8-
Research Contribution
9-
Timescale
Appendices
If required
References
The abstract should be bound into each copy of the dissertation, and a separate copy
should also be supplied. It should be headed with the name of the author, the title of the
dissertation and the year of submission. The abstract should not exceed 300 words.
5.3- Contents Page
The Contents Page should show chapters and pages, lists of tables, figures, appendices
and glossary of abbreviations, terms and special symbols (if required).
5.4- Acknowledgements
It is customary to acknowledge individuals and or organisations for their assistance,
support, or contribution to the work leading to the dissertation report.
5.5- Main body of the dissertation
The main body of your dissertation should contain the following structure:
5.5.1- General Overview; introduction, background, rationale and aims
Based on the introduction and background to the problem, the central argument and
objectives should be made clear so that the reader is able to understand the problem or
issue that is going to be investigated. This chapter should provide a summary of the
central points of the research including; the structure of the dissertation, timescale,
research ethics, and the contribution of the study to knowledge and professional practice.
5.5.2- Literature Review
One of the most important early steps in a research project is the conducting of the
literature review. This is also one of the most humbling experiences you're likely to have.
Because you're likely to find out that just about any worthwhile idea you will have has been
thought of before, at least to some degree. According to Trochim (2002), students
frequently complain that they cannot find anything in the literature that is related to their
topic, because:
They only look for articles that are exactly the same as their research topic. A
literature review is designed to identify related research, to set the current research
project within a conceptual and theoretical context. When looked at that way, there is
almost no topic that is so new or unique that we can't locate relevant and informative
related research. (Trochim, 2002)
Here are some tips about conducting the literature review. First, concentrate your efforts
on the scientific literature. Try to determine what the most credible research journals are in
your topical area and start with those. Put the greatest emphasis on research journals that
use a blind or juried review system. In a blind or juried review, authors submit potential
articles to a journal editor who solicits several reviewers who agree to give a critical review
8
of the paper. The paper is sent to these reviewers with no identification of the author so
that there will be no personal bias (either for or against the author). Based on the
reviewers' recommendations, the editor can accept the article, reject it, or recommend that
the author revise and resubmit it. Articles in journals with blind review processes are likely
to have a fairly high level of credibility. Second, do the review early in the research
process. You are likely to learn a lot in the literature review that will help you determine
what the necessary tradeoffs are. After all, previous researchers also had to face trade-off
decisions.
What should you look for in the literature review? First, you might be able to find a study
that is quite similar to the one you are thinking of doing. Since all credible research studies
have to review the literature themselves, you can check their literature review to get a
quick start on your own. Second, prior research will help ensure that you include all of the
major relevant constructs in your study. You may find that other similar studies routinely
look at an outcome that you might not have included. Your study would not be judged
credible if it ignored a major construct. Third, the literature review will help you to find and
select appropriate measurement instruments. You will readily see what measurement
instruments researchers used themselves in contexts similar to yours. Finally, the literature
review will help you to anticipate common problems in your research context. You can use
the prior experiences of others to avoid common traps and pitfalls.
As well as academic journals, conference proceedings are often useful sources of data.
Textbooks are clearly important, but it should be remembered that they are not always
based on evidence and research, and therefore may be considered less substantive than
academic journals. Further, they may also be less up to date in a rapidly changing
discipline. Weekly and monthly magazines in the discipline must be located and regularly
reviewed. The articles in such papers are often merely gossip, items of news and the like.
They may therefore be considered to be lightweight and subjective. However, they often
contain leads to important research documents and reports.
The expectations of a literature review can be said to have increased in recent years,
because the process is assisted by electronic searching techniques. The student must
clearly endeavour to make best use of the Internet, commercial CD Roms, library search
catalogues etc. Students may become aware that their subject area is one for which a
particular university may have specialised staff. It follows that there may be several
dissertations or theses stored on that university's shelves, and which are not listed on
commercial CD Roms or the like. The Internet can be useful in obtaining direct access to a
university library search catalogue and thereby access to this specialised work. Equally as
important as the electronic search is the 'browse' search. Libraries often contain paper
documents that list publications relevant to particular disciplines. Bolton Institute library
has a booklet called 'Index to Journals'. If the discipline relevant to the research project is
ICT it is useful to look for titles beginning with 'i'. At the end of the literature review process
the student should clearly know:
The literature review is an important component of your dissertation and it is often feasible
to assess the quality of the dissertation by the literature review contained in it. Within the
literature review it would be useful to examine important contributions of researchers and
scholars in the context of the problem or argument that is central to the dissertation.
A characteristic that could add value to the quality of the work would involve a relative
judgement of the contribution that these different experts, proponents have made.
Rejecting some of these contributions as being inappropriate to support the central
argument is as much a part of a good literature review as adding new and relevant
material that has existed within the domain. Therefore it would be helpful to agree or
disagree with existing and/or traditional viewpoints.
5.5.3- Research Design, Methodology
Different terminologies are use to describe the components of the research. It is important
that your chapter on the Methodology make clear references to various research
philosophies (positivism, interpretivism, and realism), research process (induction and
deduction), research approaches (Qualitative and quantitative), and research
methodologies. A number of methodologies are listed below, and their combination
(triangulation) often leads to a better understanding of the research problem:
Survey
Statistical/data analysis
Semi-structured Interview
Observation
Case Study
Ethnographic study
In-depth Interview
Focus group
Content analysis
Action research
Personal reflection
Participant Observation
Telephone Survey
Online Focus Groups
Ephone survey
Internet survey
Mystery shopper
10
This chapter should address the development of the research in terms of data collection
and analysis, pointing out; variations, similarities, and trends. An important component of
this chapter is detailed analysis and synsethis of the results leading to a detailed
understanding of the problem under investigation. Self-constructed diagrams, tables and
figures could facilitate and should be used to support the findings, and arguments. Further,
discussions that enable pattern recognition including the evolution of a story would
certainly demonstrate quality and would add value to the research. This chapter should
conclude with the principal emergent points of the analysis with references to the
questions put forward in the early chapters of the dissertation, and the research
objective/s.
5.5.5- Conclusion and Recommendations
The purpose of the concluding chapter is to satisfy a number of objectives. It needs to
connect the research questions raised in the early part of the dissertation through to the
literature search and then reiterate from a comparative perspective what was found within
the dissertation. Reiterating the findings within a discussion will facilitate appreciation of
the quality of work undertaken. This chapter should also point out the central
characteristics, the limitations of the study, and the areas for further research that might be
necessary to extend
5.5.6- Appendices
The aim of appendices is to provide a repository for supporting information relevant to the
research. They are excluded from the word count of the dissertation. Typical appendices
may include; blank questionnaires, interview schedule, observational notes, list of
participating companies, etc.
5.5.7- References, or Bibliography
A list of references after the appendices should include all sources and texts (Harvard
Style) referred to within the body of your dissertation (Rudd, 2001). Some examples of the
general format for such references are listed below.
Books
Name, Initials (Year of publication) Title in Italics. Place of publication: Publisher e-g
McKellar (1957).
Journals
Name, Initials (Year of publication) Article Title in inverted commas Journal Title in Italics,
Vol. Number, no. of part, pp. [i.e. pages e.g. pp. 23-34] e.g. Hepburn (1991).
Newspapers and Magazines (any publication which appears more frequently than once a
month)
Name, Initials (Year of publication) Article Title in inverted commas Newspaper Title in
Italics Date [i.e. day and months], pp. [i.e. pages e.g. pp. 23-34] e.g. Anon (1980).
Internet/WWW site, page, document etc
11
Name [or indicative name] (year) Item title [or indicative title]. Medium [i.e. Online]. Host
if there is one. Available: [specify URL, etc]. [date of access].
6- STYLE OF WRITING AND PRESENTATION
The style of writing and presentation should conform to the following guidelines:
Paper size
Margins
Typeface
Line spacing
Paragraphs
Page
numbering
Numbers
Symbols
Abbreviations
References
Tables and
figures
12
7- ASSESSMENT
Normally, failure to meet one or more of the following basic
requirements could result in an overall fail for the dissertation.
Your dissertation will be marked by your supervisor and an internal second marker
designated by the MBA Programme Leader. Normally and when practical all dissertations
are moderated by the external MBA examiner for moderation, Otherwise a representative
sample is forwarded for external moderation. The final mark will not be agreed until the
meeting of the Examination Board and no marks will be released until finalised by the
board. Your dissertation will be assessed according to the criteria described in Appendix 2.
13
investigation.
Decide how to present your solution.
Assume ownership of the work
Plan and execute the work on your own initiative.
Communicate with your supervisor on a regular basis (please refer to Appendix 3,
dissertation monitoring log).
Submit materials for comments during all stages of the work (do not complete the
majority of your work before submitting any materials for comment).
To comply with the recommendations made by the supervisor
Complete the work on-time to the required quality standards
Your research proposal and dissertation is the most essential element in your MBA as it
represents one-third (60 credit) of the total credit (180). The amount of time and effort that
you put into your proposals and dissertation should reflect this, and the dissertation should
contain intellectual content commensurate to Masters Degree.
14
15
Total
Allocated
Mark
Quality, utilisation and
interpretation of relevant source of
materials
Suitability of the research design
and methods
Evidence of intellectual challenge,
innovative thinking and rigorous
analysis
Conclusions including implications
Critical assessment of results
against objectives including future
development
Evaluation and progress in terms
of planning, execution and
achievements
Format, clarity and readability of
the dissertation together with the
standard of written English.
Supervisor
10
15
25
10
25
5
10
100
16
Comments (supervisor)
Total
Allocated
Mark
Quality, utilisation and
interpretation of relevant source of
materials
Suitability of the research design
and methods
Evidence of intellectual challenge,
innovative thinking and rigorous
analysis
Conclusions including implications
Critical assessment of results
against objectives including future
development
Evaluation and progress in terms
of planning, execution and
achievements
Format, clarity and readability of
the dissertation together with the
standard of written English.
Supervisor
10
15
25
10
25
5
The same as
1st
Supervisor
10
100
Comments:
17
Agreed Mark
External Examiner:
Comments
Date:
Final Mark
Topic of Communication
Date
Action agreed
18
19