cn
Optics Communications 283 (2010) 40124016
Optics Communications
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s ev i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / o p t c o m
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 30 November 2009
Received in revised form 5 June 2010
Accepted 7 June 2010
Keywords:
Magnetic uid
Faraday effect
Geometric shadowing effect
Magneto-optical devices
a b s t r a c t
The complete optical transmittance for a polarized light passing through the magnetic uids is investigated
theoretically and experimentally, when the externally magnetic eld is applied along the propagation
direction of the incident light. Hybrid effects due to the geometric shadowing and Faraday rotation are
considered simultaneously. The Langevin-like functions are employed to describe the magnetic-elddependent volume concentration of the particle-aggregation () and the approximate number of magnetic
nanoparticles in the particle-aggregation (N0). Based on the experiments on the geometric shadowing effect
of our magnetic uid sample, the analytical expression for the total transmitted power with externally
magnetic eld after an analyzer is derived. Theoretical simulations disclose the inuence of certain critical
parameters of the magnetic uids on the eld-dependent optical transmittance. For the entire polarized light
transmittance, qualitative agreement between the calculations and the experiments is achieved. Applications
of magnetic uids to several polarized devices operating in longitudinal eld arrangement are proposed and
discussed. The results presented in this work may be useful for designing the corresponding magnetic-uidbased optical devices.
2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Magnetic uids are two-phase stable systems of magnetically
ultrane particles dispersed in suitable liquid base carriers, which
possess both the uidity of liquids and the magnetism of solid
magnetic materials [1]. These peculiar properties imply that magnetic
uids are newfashioned functional materials with nanosized structure. The applications of magnetic uids to machinery have been
exploited since the invention of magnetic uids and the
corresponding products have been commercialized nowadays. The
conventional optical properties of magnetic uids, e.g. linear
birefringence, linear dichroism and Faraday rotation, have been
investigated for several decades [211]. The recently booming
development of nanostructured materials and the optical information
technology evoke the renewed study of the late-model optical
properties of magnetic uids such as magnetically tunable optical
scattering [1215], eld dependent refractive index [16] and optical
transmission [1723], clustering of nanoparticles [24,25], tunable
magnetic photonic crystals [2632], etc. Several potential magneticuid-based optical devices have been proposed and demonstrated by
researchers [3338], which signify that the nanostructured magnetic
uids are promising optical functional materials.
0030-4018/$ see front matter 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2010.06.028
http://www.paper.edu.cn
S. Pu et al. / Optics Communications 283 (2010) 40124016
4013
Fig. 1. The schematics of experimental setup for studying the longitudinal eld-induced polarized light transmittance of magnetic uids. The solid and dashed lines represent the
light rays and the electric wires, respectively.
4014
http://www.paper.edu.cn
S. Pu et al. / Optics Communications 283 (2010) 40124016
From Eqs. (2) to (4) and the above analyses, the analytical expression for the total transmitted power after the analyzer (for our
experimental sample) is given by
h
i
5 2
t
P = 76:5824517:00193 exp 1:04473 10 H
8
9
>
>
<
=
2d = xy s LL
2
q
;
cos 45
p
>
>
:
1 + Q 2 liquid 1 + s LP 1 + QL = ;
5
Fig. 2. The transmitted power P as a function of externally magnetic eld H when only
considering the geometric shadowing effect. The inset shows the relationship between
the magnetic eld strength H and the applied current I.
where = 0 V0 Md H = kT and = 0 N0 s V0 Md LH + Hw =
kT .
It should be pointed out that Eq. (1) was obtained for magnetic
colloids with paramagnetic polystyrene beads of radius of 1.4 and
0.5 m. They consist of nanoscale iron oxide grain in a polymer matrix
[39]. Our magnetic uid consists of magnetic beads with diameter of
about 10 nm. But Eq. (1) is fairly applicable to our sample as shown in
Fig. 2. So we believe that the geometric shadowing effect-induced
optical transmittance is mainly assigned to the nanosized magnetic
particles and the polystyrene has insignicant inuence. This can
readily explained by the transparency of the polystyrene and the
relatively low index difference between the polystyrene and the
liquid carrier compared to that between the magnetic materials and
the liquid carrier.
To further understand the total optical transmittance with
externally magnetic eld, numerical simulations based on Eq. (5)
are done. For the calculations, the following reasonable values of the
concerned parameters are taken unless otherwise specially stated:
d = 200 m; = 0.6328 m; xy = 0.1 [44]; s = , where = Ms / Md
is the volume fraction of the magnetic nanoparticles within the magnetic uid and Ms is the saturation magnetization of the magnetic
uid; r = 5 nm, Ms = 100 Oe and Md = 4.46 105 A/m [1]; solid = 4.5
and liquid = 2.56 [3]; N0 s R2 d = 4r 3 = 3 = 3 108 (close to
8
3 10 particles per aggregation), where R = 0.5 m is the radius of
the aggregated column [45]. T = 295 K (room temperature) and
Fig. 3. The total transmitted power as a function of externally magnetic eld H for
samples with different reduced thickness d / .
http://www.paper.edu.cn
S. Pu et al. / Optics Communications 283 (2010) 40124016
Hw = 200 Oe [3,46]. Because we care more about the magnetic-eldand parameter-dependent optical transmittance rather than the
absolute transmitted power, the calculated optical transmittance
have been normalized and then the accurate value of the analyzer's
transmittivity (t) is unnecessary.
The magnetic-eld-dependent optical transmittance for samples
with different reduced thickness (d / ) is simulated and shown in
Fig. 3. d / = 316 approximates to our experimental conditions (four
other values of d / around 316 are also selected for comparison in
Fig. 3), and the Faraday rotation angle is smaller than 45 for all
cases. Fig. 3 reveals that the transmitted power increases fast with
magnetic eld until 500 Oe and then tends to saturate when the
externally magnetic eld is beyond 500 Oe. Moreover, the thicker the
sample, the higher the transmitted power. The sensitivity of the
transmitted power with respect to the externally magnetic eld is
high for thick sample, especially in the low eld region.
Fig. 4 shows the inuence of off-diagonal term of the dielectric
tensor of magnetic particles (xy) on the eld-dependent optical
transmittance, which is analogous to Fig. 3. Under a constant
externally magnetic eld, the increase of transmitted power with xy
is due to the change of Faraday rotation angle . When increasing the
sample thickness (d / ) under a constant externally magnetic eld, the
Faraday rotation angle and absorption of the sample can increase
simultaneously. So the increase of transmitted power with d /
indicates that the change of Faraday rotation effect dominates over
that of the absorption effect. If the transmitted power decreases with
d / , it means that the change of the absorption effect dominates over
that of the Faraday rotation effect.
The magnetic-eld-dependent optical transmittance for samples
with different liquid phase dielectric constants (liquid) is simulated
and shown in Fig. 5. Fig. 5 reveals that the transmitted power
increases fast with magnetic eld until 500 Oe for all samples and the
increase rate is almost independent of liquid. When the externally
magnetic eld is beyond 500 Oe, the samples with large liquid phase
dielectric constants have slightly high transmitted power.
Apparently, some similar behaviors between Fig. 5 and Figs. 3
and 4 are found. But the transmitted power is nearly independent of
liquid when H b 500 Oe and slightly dependent on liquid when
H N 500 Oe. Moreover, the property of liquid is different from d /
and xy, that is, liquid is magnetic-eld-dependent while d / and xy
are independent of magnetic eld. It is well-known that more
particles will agglomerate into aggregation when the externally
Fig. 4. The total transmitted power as a function of externally magnetic eld H for
samples with different off-diagonal terms of the dielectric tensor xy.
4015
Fig. 5. The total transmitted power as a function of externally magnetic eld H for
different liquid phase dielectric constants liquid.
4016
http://www.paper.edu.cn
S. Pu et al. / Optics Communications 283 (2010) 40124016
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
5. Conclusions
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (No. 10704048). We are grateful to the
reviewer(s) whose constructive comments have helped to improve
the quality of the paper considerably.
References
[1] R.E. Rosensweig, Ferrohydrodynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
1985.
[2] S. Taketomi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 22 (1983) 1137.
[3] S. Taketomi, M. Ukita, M. Mizukami, H. Miyajima, S. Chikazumi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 56
(1987) 3362.
[4] Y.T. Pan, X.D. Liu, C.W. Du, Z.G. Li, J. Appl. Phys. 71 (1992) 3937.
[5] Y.T. Pan, C.W. Du, X.D. Liu, Z.G. Li, R. Birngruber, J. Appl. Phys. 73 (1993) 6139.
[12]
[13]
[14]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
E.S. Kooij, A.C. Glc, B. Poelsema, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 304 (2006) 261.
K.V. Erin, Tech. Phys. 51 (2006) 1203.
K.V. Yerin, S.A. Kunikin, Opt. Spectrosc. 102 (2007) 765.
K.V. Erin, S.A. Kunikin, Opt. Spectrosc. 104 (2008) 277.
R. Patel, V.K. Aswal, R.V. Upadhyay, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320 (2008) 3366.
D. Jamon, F. Donatini, A. Siblini, F. Royer, R. Perzynski, V. Cabuil, S. Neveu, J. Magn.
Magn. Mater. 321 (2009) 1148.
R.V. Mehta, R. Patel, R. Desai, R.V. Upadhyay, K. Parekh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006)
127402.
R.V. Mehta, R.J. Patel, B.N. Chudasama, H.B. Desai, R.V. Upadhyay, Magnetohydrodynamics 44 (2008) 69.
C. Rablau, P. Vaishnava, C. Sudakar, R. Tackett, G. Lawes, R. Naik, Proc. SPIE 7032
(2008) 70320Z.
J. Philip, J.M. Laskar, B. Raj, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 (2008) 221911.
S.Y. Yang, J.J. Chieh, H.E. Horng, C.-Y. Hong, H.C. Yang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 (2004)
5204.
K.T. Wu, Y.D. Yao, C.W. Chang, J. Appl. Phys. 105 (07B505) (2009).
Y. Kou, Z. Di, X. Chen, J. Appl. Phys. 106 (2009) 014501.
E.R. Cintra, J.L. Santos Junior, L.M. Socolovsky, N. Buske, A.F. Bakuzis, J. Magn.
Magn. Mater. 320 (2008) e351.
J. Li, Y.Q. Lin, X.D. Liu, B.C. Wen, T.Z. Zhang, Q.M. Zhang, H. Miao, Opt. Commun.
283 (2010) 1182.
J. Li, Y. Huang, X.D. Liu, Y.Q. Lin, Q. Li, R.L. Gao, Phys. Lett. A 372 (2008) 6952.
J. Li, X.D. Liu, Y.Q. Lin, L. Bai, Q. Li, X.M. Chen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 (2007) 253108.
G. Narsinga Rao, Y.D. Yao, Y.L. Chen, K.T. Wu, J.W. Chen, Phys. Rev. E 72 (2005)
031408.
A.R. Wang, J. Li, R.L. Gao, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 (2009) 212501.
H.D. Deng, J. Liu, W.R. Zhao, W. Zhang, X.S. Lin, T. Sun, Q.F. Dai, L.J. Wu, S. Lan, A.V.
Gopal, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 (2008) 233103.
J. Ge, H. Lee, L. He, J. Kin, Z. Lu, H. Kim, J. Goebl, S. Kwon, Y. Yin, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
131 (2009) 15687.
W. Libaers, B. Kolaric, R.A.L. Valle, J.E. Wong, J. Wouter, V.K. Valev, T. Verbiest, K.
Clays, Colloids Surf. A 339 (2009) 13.
S. Pu, M. Liu, J. Alloys Compd. 481 (2009) 851.
J. Ge, Y. Yin, J. Mater. Chem. 18 (2008) 5041.
J. Ge, Y. Yin, Adv. Mater. 20 (2008) 3485.
J. Ge, Y. Hu, T. Zhang, T. Huynh, Y. Yin, Langmuir 24 (2008) 3671.
S. Pu, T. Geng, X. Chen, X. Zeng, M. Liu, Z. Di, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320 (2008)
2345.
S.Y. Park, H. Handa, A. Sandhu, J. Appl. Phys. 105 (07B526) (2009).
S. Pu, L. Yao, F. Guan, M. Liu, Opt. Commun. 282 (2009) 908.
S. Pu, X. Chen, Z. Di, Y. Xia, J. Appl. Phys. 101 (2007) 053532.
J.J. Chieh, S.Y. Yang, H.E. Horng, C.-Y. Hong, H.C. Yang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 (2007)
133505.
S. Pu, X. Chen, Y. Chen, Y. Xu, W. Liao, L. Chen, Y. Xia, J. Appl. Phys. 99 (2006)
093516.
S. Pu, X. Chen, L. Chen, W. Liao, Y. Chen, Y. Xia, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 (2005) 021901.
L.E. Helseth, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 (2009) 105005.
J. Li, X.D. Liu, Y.Q. Lin, Y. Huang, L. Bai, Appl. Phys. B 82 (2006) 81.
J. Li, X.D. Liu, Y.Q. Lin, X.Y. Qiu, X.J. Ma, Y. Huang, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 37 (2004)
3357.
J. Li, B.G. Zhao, Y.Q. Lin, X.Y. Qiu, X.J. Ma, J. Appl. Phys. 92 (2002) 1128.
Y.F. Chen, S.Y. Yang, W.S. Tse, H.E. Horng, C.-Y. Hong, H.C. Yang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82
(2003) 3481.
X. Zhang, J. Schoenes, P. Wachter, Solid State Commun. 39 (1981) 189.
S.Y. Yang, H.E. Horng, C.-Y. Hong, H.C. Yang, M.C. Chou, C.T. Pan, Y.H. Chao, J. Appl.
Phys. 93 (2003) 3457.
K. O'Grady, A. Bradbury, S.W. Charles, S. Menear, J. Popplewell, R.W. Chantrell,
J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 3134 (1983) 958.
C.-Y. Hong, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 201 (1999) 178.