TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
1-2
Significance of Study
3-4
Review of Literature
10
12
Constitutional Proscription of
Double Jeopardy
18
Conclusion
20
Bibliography
22
Discussion
ABSTRACT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
Significance of Study
Review of Literature
10
12
Constitutional Proscription of
Double Jeopardy
18
Conclusion
20
Bibliography
22
Discussion
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Review of Literature
10
12
Constitutional Proscription of
Double Jeopardy
18
Conclusion
20
Bibliography
22
Discussion
Abstract
The drastic change and development in the technology has brought the world to
numerous dimensions and almost in all aspects of living of the people. From education, gadgets,
new machines and devices, communication, new inventions and even to our market, Of course
marketing and advertisement has its own growth by itself, but in this paper a certain marketing
style will be discussed profoundly in its relation with the evolving technology that the world has
to offer.
In basic selling the parties are primarily the seller and the buyer. The buyer will visit the
place or the location of the store wherein the transaction takes place. However, with the
intervention of the technology and the latters response to evolving needs and problems of the
people there exist what is called online selling. This type of business in marketing trends in the
world now and what numerous people are resorting into, mainly because it is just one click away.
People are, most of the time, if not all, are in a rush and have no time for leisure or
treating themselves with stuff that is sold in the market. Usually, people failed to go shopping for
their needs because of want and lack of time. Also, malls and stores in the Philippines, not to
mention malls in abroad, are being too small for the growing buyers. Therefore, with these, the
evolution of new style of selling is born. Online selling has answered the different problems and
inconveniences. In addressing the problem of lack of time to shop has been simplified by the
sellers who goes online and sell their goods and products. However, in every convenience and
new inventions there are always consequences that will later exist.
The main issue that has been throwing against these online sellers circulates on whether
they are paying their taxes or not. Like other sellers in the market, these online sellers are also
need to be subject of taxation. By the principle of equality and uniformity in taxation, all sellers
should be treated alike who are similarly situated. The dilemma with this issue is that not all
online sellers are even aware that there is a law applicable to them. E-commerce Law has been
passed and approved to treat this online sellers same as with the other sellers. Also its
Implementing Rules and Regulation has been laid down to empower what it is in the law for its
better execution and implementation.
In this paper, the sufficiency of the Implementing Rules and Regulation will be focused
on. How does the rule being implemented and why does it seem insufficient making the online
sellers not knowledgeable about the law
The increasing demands of internet and online activity carry with it complex issues on
privacy and security, contractual and regulatory problems. These concerns though not new in the
internet world, need to be clarified and to be addressed.
With the advent of R.A. 8792 some questions as to the legal recognition of electronic
document, data messages, electronic signatures and electronic contracts had been defined.
Internet subscribers were ensured of their privacy for penalizing the offense of hacking and
piracy.
Republic Act No. 8792 known as E-Commerce Act is the effect of the merging of the
House Bill No. 9971 and Senate Bill No. 1902. It was signed into law on June 14, 2000. A
month later or on July 14, 2000, the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) was digitally
signed by Secretaries Manuel A. Roxas II (DTI) and Benjamin E. Diokno (DBM) and Governor
Rafael B. Buenaventura (BSP) during the plenary session of the Global Information
Infrastructure Commissions (GIIC) Asia Regional Conference held in Makati City, Manila.1
In general, the E-Commerce Act intends to assist domestic and international dealings,
transactions, and exchanges of information through the utilization of Information Technology.
Moreover, the Act recognizes the authenticity and reliability of electronic documents for the
promotion and use of electronic transaction.
Such is the nature of E- Commerce that it generates profits for the private investors and
provides goods and services for the traders. In this view, the government sees the need of taxing
cyber trade in exchange of the protection and services rendered by the government. Hence, the
researchers are prompted to conduct a study on the how such trade is taxed, and as to how it is
enforced.
Introduction
In this modern age where electronic technology had reached global market for various
undertakings such as but not limited to selling of goods through cyberspace, it is noteworthy to
identify legal issues and potential risks to ensure a safe and secure environment for trading and
other internet transactions.
Due to the increasing demand and recognition of the vital role of the InfoTech in nation
building, the E- Commerce Law was enacted. This was approved in order to warrant a healthy
and friendly atmosphere in procuring goods and providing services in the internet world. The
1
birth of this Act provided security on the part of the investors as well the consumers or traders.
This removes the clouds of doubts in the mind of each trader that his or her rights are protected
and that his or her privacy is secured. And since more and more Filipinos are beginning to shop
online, the countrys e-commerce potential is expected to grow even more with the emergence of
enabling technologies.
Online shopping or online retailing is a form of electronic commerce whereby the
consumers directly buy goods or services from a seller over the internet without any intermediary
service. An online shop, e-shop, e-store, internet shop, web shop, web store, online store, or
virtual store evokes the physical analogy of buying products or services at bricks-and-mortarretailer or shopping center.
However, the taxability of our online retailers has become an issue due to the
insufficiency of the regulations being executed in collection on such taxes. The Bureau of
Internal Revenue has issued recently the Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 55- 2013 entitled
Reiterating Taxpayers' Obligation in Relation to Online Shopping. The said circular was
formulated to imperatively remind the parties to the transaction of their tax obligations.
The Memorandum Circular specifically provides that like any other business
establishments, persons who conduct business through online transactions and its permutations
have the obligations to register the business at the Revenue District Office (RDO) having
jurisdiction over the principal place of business/head office or residence in case of individuals by
accomplishing BIR Form 1901 for individuals or Form 1903 for corporations and partnerships
and pay the registration fee to any Authorized Agent Bank (AAB) located within the RDO. Also
to issue registered invoice or receipt, either manually or electronically, for every sale, barter,
exchange or lease of goods and properties, as well as for every sale, barter or exchange of
service. Said invoice or receipt shall conform to the information requirements prescribed under
existing revenue issuances and shall prepared at least in duplicate , the original to be given to the
buyer and the duplicate to be retained by the seller as part of the latter's accounting record. They
are required to file applicable tax returns on or before due dates, pay correct internal revenue
taxes, and submit information returns and other tax compliance reports such as the Summary List
of sales/purchases at the time or times required by existing rules and regulations. The
memorandum as well requires them to keep books of accounts and other business/accounting
records within the time prescribed by law, and such shall be made available anytime for the
inspection and verification by the duly authorized Revenue Officer for the purpose of
ascertaining compliance with tax rules and regulation. The memorandum was also clear in
providing that any person engaged in the internet commerce who fails to comply with the
applicable tax laws, rules and regulations shall be subject to the imposition of penalties provided
for under the existing laws, rules and regulations, in addition to the penalties pursuant to the
applicable Sections under Chapter II and IV, Title X of the National Internal Revenue Code of
1997, as amended.
Also under Implementing Rules and Regulations of our E- Commerce Law, under
paragraph 5 section 3 of which states that transactions conducted using electronic commerce
should receive neutral tax treatment in comparison to transactions using non-electronic means
and taxation of electronic commerce shall be administered in the least burdensome manner.
Thusly, just like all retailers, online stores must collect sales tax. Notwithstanding the fact that
online transactions make up only about 1 percent of total retail and are mostly made up of
occasional sellers, still the government must pursue more stringent executions of its laws and
implementing rules regarding the collection on tax online sellers on sites such as multiply.com,
sulit.com.ph, e-bay Philippines, alibaba.com, ayosdito.ph and even Facebook should be
registered, issue electronic invoices, and pay taxes the way entrepreneurs with physical stores do.
Besides purchasers and sellers will be definitely the beneficiaries themselves of these taxes from
the on their protection, education, health care and other services that sales taxes financed. And of
course, internet retailers could not get their wares to their customers without the airports and
roads that state and local governments maintain, all of which, again, are financed through sales
and other taxes.
Significance of the Study
In this age of technology, where everything is moving so fast and everything is tuned in
an instant, we cannot but forced ourselves to be abreast with the innovation so that we may be
equipped in the world advancement. For in a wink of an eye, we may forever left behind.
The same goes with the laws and our rules. In todays generation where people
recognized the importance of information technology in nation building, laws must be revisited
and reviewed in order to adopt in this fast changing world.
This research will aid in revisiting R.A. 8792 and other pertinent provisions relating to
Electronic Commerce. Moreover, this study addressed itself to: cyber traders, online
merchants and government that they may gain valuable insights and awareness in engaging in the
e-business industry. This will contribute to future studies of law students interested in ECommerce.
Finally, this study intended to be a guide for future court decisions regarding these
prevalent issues on e-business, such as; issues on jurisdiction in case of conflict against foreign
corporations and to stamp the issue on taxability of the trade and services that are exchanging
from line to line.
the government however on sufficiency wise these are but lacking. There are still existing online
retailers who do not register their business however big or small it is, worse is that some of them
may not even know that they are already engaged in business which must be registered. In reality
what really is happening is that the sale transactions begin and end with no legal conformities to
the existing laws. The buyer usually visits the page of the online seller and picks the item or
product he desires to avail. Next would be informing the seller or owner of the internet site,
facebook accounts and the like of his orders. The seller in return would ask the buyer to deposit
the payment of the product plus the shipping fee through a bank or through Cash Express Door
to Door Delivery like LBC, western Union and the like. After payment, the buyer will receive the
item or product through the same door to door delivery. In such a case both parties consumated a
sale transaction without having to comply with the legal requirements.
Methodology
This chapter identifies the appropriate research method to be used in conducting the
study. This paper will utilize qualitative data collection. The researcher will gather relevant
information and laws from the specified documents and compiling databases in order to analyze
the material, provide legal basis and arrive at a more complete and comprehensive understanding
of the subject.
The instruments to be used to extract information are identified. The researcher will
utilize the use of internet resources to gather related literature pertaining to the fact in issue.
This research is descriptive in character. The researcher will examine facts and conditions
relating to the subject matter. The researcher will collect factual evidence, laws and jurisprudence
to provide for a legal basis in providing a position. Thus, this paper aims to provide an accurate
account of a subject by utilizing evidence and laws in resolving the fact in issue. As a result this
study is explorative in nature.
Principle of Equality
Equality of taxation as a maxim of politics, means equality of sacrifice. It means
apportioning the contribution of each person towards the expenses of government so that he shall
feel neither more nor less inconvenience from his share of the payment than every other person
experiences from his. This standard, like other standards of perfection, cannot be completely
realized; but the first object in every practical discussion should be to know what perfection is.
[J.S. Mill (1848, Book V, Chapter II)]. The equal sacrifice principle has often been invoked to
justify specific types of tax schedules. In particular, some have claimed that it justifies
progressive, or at least nonregressive, taxation. Since a dollar of tax falls more lightly on a rich
man than on a poor one, it seems right that the rich should pay at a higher rate than the poor if all
are to sacrifice equally. But in fact, equal sacrifice only implies that the rich should pay more in
tax. As Schumpeter remarks, This error can be found, as a witness to our loose habits of
thinking, in the writings of quite reputable economists, though it should be obvious that, given
the intention to take away equal amounts of satisfaction, nothing follows from the law of
decreasing marginal utility of income except that higher incomes should pay higher absolute
sums than lower incomes. [Schumpeter (1954, p. 1070, n.3)].
Implementing Rules and Regulation of E-Commerce Law
chanrobles
The abovementioned provision provides that taxing online sellers is same as taxing the
non-electronic sellers. There is no exemption to pay tax unless the law expressly provide.
Section 3 (f) Electronic Commerce Awareness. - Government and the
private sector will inform society, both individual consumers and businesses, about the
potentials of electronic commerce and its impact on social and economic structures.
The Bureau of Internal Revenue issued Revenue Memorandum Circular number 55-2013.
This intends to govern how individuals and businesses should handle their sales and taxes
accordingly.
Sellers rendering the following services are covered by this guideline:
Online shopping or online retailing This includes e-commerce business owners who owns a
website and sells their own products and services. An online shop, e-shop, e-store, internet shop,
web shop, webstore, online store, or virtual store evokes the physical analogy of buying products or
services at a bricks-and-mortar-retailer or shopping center.
Online intermediary service An intermediary is a third party that offers intermediation
services between two trading parties. The intermediary acts as a conduit for goods or services offered
by a supplier to a consumer, and receives commission therefor. In this case, the relationship between
the intermediary and the merchant shall be that of a principal-agent relationship which shall be
governed by their agreement including but not limited to the amount of commission, manner of
transmitting the same, etc. However, in the following instances the intermediary service provider
shall be considered the merchandiser / retailer itself:
a. when consumers buy goods or services from an intermediary service
provider who controls such collection of buyers payments, and
thereafter receives commission from the merchant / retailer
b. when the intermediary markets multiple products for its own account
(considered retailer or merchandiser as to the said products).
E-Commerce Business Owners are required to issue invoices or official receipts to customers. Give
acknowledgment receipt for amount received from payment gateways. Pay the commission of
payment gateways net of withholding tax.
Like any other business establishments, persons who conduct business through online
transactions and its permutations have the obligations to:
1.
Register the business at the Revenue District Office (RDO) having jurisdiction over the principal
place of business / head office (or residence in case of individuals), by accomplishing BIR Form
1901 (for individuals) or 1903 (for corporations or partnerships), and pay the registration fee to
any Authorized Agent Bank (AAB) located within the RDO. A BIR Certificate of Registration shall
be issued by the RDO, reflecting therein the tax types required of the concerned taxpayer for
filing and payment, which shall be displayed conspicuously in the business establishment;
2. Secure the required Authority to Print (ATP) invoices / receipts and register books of accounts
for use in business, which may either be:
Transactions
thru Banks
is:
(c) pay the commission
received.
control the
collections /
payments of
buyers or
buyer;(b) Issue
acknowledgment receipt to buyer/performance of
acknowledgment receipt to the bank for the amount service and to;2. Issue
markets
products /
received;
either electronically or
manually the BIR
registered Invoice / OR
(official receipt) for the
full amount of the sale to
the buyer.
commission (include in
the said remittance to
amount of commission
received, if agent.
buyer to claim the goods / buyer to claim the goods / 1. Secure the invoice / OR
service (in this case, the
service (in this case, the
(Official Receipt) from the
merchant acting as the
principal shall assign a
/ agent);(b) Ensure
merchant delivers the
/ agent);(b) Ensure
merchant delivers the
electronically or manually
the BIR registered Invoice
to the buyer.
3. Issue OR (Official
Receipt) for the amount
of commission
received, if agent
amount withheld by
merchant.
amount withheld by
merchant.
Discussion
a. Taxation challenges on E-Commerce
Electronic Commerce is defined as the process of buying and selling goods electronically by
consumers and from company to company through computerized business transactions .2
It has changed the manner of doing businesses in the country. A lot of businesses are
already selling goods and services online. Banking sectors, travel industry, clothing lines, and
other industries are now being offered online. E-commerce likewise has changed how the
government agencies and offices deliver its services towards opportunities for better tax
administration.
However, the E-commerce Act including its implementing rules and regulations and the
tax code do not have a clear definition of proper characterization of income derived from
digitized transactions.3 The internet and E-commerce have confronted huge challenges to tax
administrators such as the proper characterization of income, challenge on audit and collection,
and lack of audit trail.
E-commerce transactions are hard to track down and trace in the absence of papers on
which to establish audit trails, as it is, the cost of discovery methods for conventional taxable
transactions is already quite high, but with the increasing use of electronic processes, our
conventional audit skills would have to be enhanced at considerable expense in order to match
the required computerized auditing skills in an E-Commerce regime.4
Taxing on-line professional service also arise when actual service is being provided
through the internet which involves the establishment of an ongoing relationship between the
foreign service provider and a local customer. Examples of such service would be providing
consultancy work on-line, and even on-line gambling. 5 Article 14 [Independent Personal Service]
and Article 15 [Dependent Personal Services] of the tax treaties adopt a length of stay test,
normally an aggregate of 183 days as one for the criteria to determine the rendition of services in
the source country is taxable. With the Internet, certain services can be performed without even
setting foot in the source country. One can access the internet and download various information
and avail of various services such as consultancy, advisory, designs without even requiring the
service provider to be physically present in the source country.
Transactions can therefore occur directly between the parties and without the knowledge
of tax authorities simply because there is no more need to establish physical presence in the
country by the service provider.6 A tax loss should likely be anticipated.
CONCLUSION
The Philippines still has a number of hurdles to face, even though E-commerce is gaining
momentum in the country. The E-commerce law is confronted with challenges as regards to the
2
Padilla, Joan M. RA 8792: An Overview of ITs Impact on the Philippine legal System viewed
September 10, 2013,
http://ustlawreview.com/pdf/vol.L/Articles/The_Electronic_Commerce_Act_RA_8792.pdf
3
Basu, Subhajit and Jones, Richard. Taxation of Electronic Commerce: A Developing Problem
viewed September 16, 2013,
http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan007357.pdf
4
Lacson, April and Pasadilla Gloria. E-Commerce in the Philippines: A Preliminary Stocktaking
viewed Sept 16, 2013, http://serp-p.pids.gov.ph/serp-p/details.php?
pid=3922¶m=Lacson%2C+April
5
ibid., p.4
6
Cueto, Franklin. Legal Ramifications of Philippine E-Commerce viewed September 16, 2013,
http://ublawjournal.tripod.com/issue/jan-mar2000/legal_ramifications.html
proper characterization of income, challenge on audit and collection, lack of audit trail, and
jurisdiction in case of conflict.
The country has to exploit the potential of the internet in facilitating the e-commerce
transactions and continue the use of information communication technology to strengthen tax
administration to attain transparency in its operations and empowerment of revenue personnel in
the performance of its functions at the same time collect tax dues on clearly taxable incomes
earned or gained over the internet.
Moreover, the complex taxation issues brought about by E-commerce need to be
addressed on both international and national level. On the international level, the issue should be
focused on the right of a State to exercise its sovereign power within its jurisdiction. On the
national level, it should focus on the application of existing taxation regimes to different ecommerce transactions. The BIR shall implement E-Commerce taxation by taking into
consideration all the accepted and agreed taxation principles with other nations. In order to
achieve high international acceptance, cooperation between and among tax administrators of
different jurisdictions must be achieved.