Bolted Connections
A.K.Mandal
Connections form an important part of any structure and are designed more conservatively than
members. This is because, connections are more complex than members to analyse and the
discrepancy between analysis and actual behavior is large. Moreover, in case of overloading, we
prefer the failure confined to an individual member rather than in connection, which could affect
many members. Connections account for more than half the cost of structural steelwork and so their
design and detailing are of primary importance for economy of the structure.
Just as members are classified as bending members or axially loaded members depending on the
dominant force/moment resisted, connections are also classified into idealized types while
designing. But the actual behaviour of the connection may be different and this point should always
be kept in mind so that the connection designed does not differ from the intended type. Take for
example, the connection of an axially loaded truss members at a joint. If the truss is assumed to be
pin jointed, then the members should ideally be connected by means of a single pin or bolt.
However, in practice, if the pin or bolt diameter works out to be larger than that possible, more than
one bolt is used. The truss can then be considered pin-jointed only if the bending due to self-weight
or other superimposed loads between joints is negligible.
Connection elements consist of components such as cleats, gusset plates, brackets, connecting
plates and connectors such as rivets, bolts, pins and weld. The connections provided in steel
structures can be classified as 1) riveted, 2) bolted and 3) welded connections. Riveted connections
were once very popular and are still used in some cases, but will gradually be replaced by bolted
connections. This is due to the low strength of rivets, higher installation cost and inherent
inefficiency of the connection. Welded connections have the advantage that no holes need to be
drilled in the member and consequently have higher efficiencies. However, welding in the field may
be difficult, costly and time consuming. Welded connections are also susceptible to failure by
cracking under repeated cyclic loads due to fatigue which may be due to working loads such as trains
passing over a bridge (high-cycle fatigue) or earthquakes (low-cycle fatigue). A special type of bolted
connections using High Strength Friction Grip (HSFG) bolts has been found to perform better under
such conditions than the conventional black bolts used to resist predominantly static loading. Bolted
connections are also easy to inspect and replace. The choice of using a particular type of connection
is entirely that of the designer.
Riveted Connections:
A rivet is made up of round ductile steel bar (mild or high tensile) called shank, with a head at
one end. The head can be of different shapes. The usual form of rivet head used in structural steel
construction is the snap head. The snap heads and pan heads form a projection beyond the plate
face, whereas countersunk head remains flashed with plate face.
The diameter of the shank is called the nominal diameter. A hole slightly greater than the
nominal diameter is drilled in the parts to be connected. The rivet is inserted and the head is formed
at the other end. The rivets may be formed in cold state or may be heated to red hot state prior to
driving. The rivets may be placed in a variety of patterns. The most common types of rivet patterns
are chain riveting and diamond riveting. Staggered patterns can also be provided.
The design of riveted connections is same as that of bolted connections with ordinary bolts with
the following differences
1. The diameter of rivet to be used in calculation is the diameter of the hole, whereas for
bolted connections it is the nominal diameter of the bolt.
2. The design stresses are different, lesser for bolts.
Bolted Connections:
Classification of connections
a)
Classification based on the type of resultant force transferred: The bolted connections are
referred to as concentric connections (force transfer in tension and compression), eccentric
connections (in reaction transferring brackets) or moment resisting connections (in beam to column
connections in frames)
Ideal concentric connections should have only one bolt passing through all the members
meeting at a joint [Fig 2 (a)]. However, in practice, this is not usually possible and so it is only
ensured that the centroidal axes of the members meet at one point [Fig 2 (b)].
The Moment connections are more complex to analyse compared to the above two types
and are shown in Fig 3 (a) and Fig 3 (b). The connection in Fig 3 (a) is also known as bracket
connection and the resistance is only through shear in the bolts.
The connection shown in Fig 3 (b) is often found in moment resisting frames where the
beam moment is transferred to the column. The connection is also used at the base of a column
where a base plate is connected to the foundation by means of anchor bolts. In this connection, the
bolts are subjected to a combination of shear and axial tension.
b)
Classifications based on the types of force experienced by the bolts: The bolted connections
can also be classified based on geometry and loading conditions into three types namely, shear
connections, tension connections and combined shear and tension connections.
Typical shear connections occur as a lap or a butt joint used in the tension members [Fig 4].
While the lap joint has a tendency to bend so that the forces tend to become collinear, the butt joint
requires cover plates. Since the load acts in the plane of the plates, load transmission at the joint
In case of a lap joint or a single cover plate butt joint, there is only one shearing plane and so
the bolts are said to be in single shear. In case of double cover butt joint, there are two shearing
planes and so the bolts will be in double shear. It should be noted that the single cover type butt
joint is nothing but lap joints in series and also bends so that the centre of cover plate becomes
collinear with the forces. In case of single cover plate (lap) joint, the thickness of the cover plate is
chosen to be equal to or greater than the connected plates. While in double cover plate (butt) joint,
the combined thickness of the cover plates should be equal to or greater than the connected plates.
A hanger connection is shown in Fig 5 (a). In this connection, load transmission is by pure
tension in the bolts. In the connection shown in Fig 5 (b), bolts are subjected to both tension and
shear.
c)
Classification based on force transfer mechanism by bolts: The bolted connections are
classified as bearing type (bolts bear against the holes to transfer the force) or friction type (force
transfer between the plates due to the clamping force generated by the pre-tensioning of the bolts).
Since HSFG bolts under working loads, do not rely on resistance from bearing, holes larger than
usual can be provided to ease erection and take care of lack-of-fit. Typical hole types that can be
used are standard, extra large and short or long slotted. These are shown in
Fig 7. However, the
type of hole will govern the strength of the connection.
Gauge distance (g): The distance between adjacent parallel line of bolts, transverse to the direction
of load/stress, or the distance between the back of the rolled section and the first bolt line or centre
to centre distance between two consecutive bolts measured along the width of the member is called
gauge distance. IS Handbook SP-1 provides gauge distance for various rolled sections.
Edge distance (e): The distance from the centre of a bolt hole to the edge of a member, measured at
right angles to the direction of load is called the edge distance. The distance in the direction of stress
from the centre of a hole to the end of the member is called end distance.
IS 800 specifies spacing and edge distance for bolt holes.
Types of Bolted Connections
a) Lap joint
b) Butt joint.
A) Bearing-type connections
In this type of connections, it is assumed that the load to be transferred is larger than the
frictional resistance caused by tightening the bolts. Consequently members slip a little over each
other and the bolts bear on the plates, placing the bolts in shear and bearing. Fig 9 shows the freebody diagram of the shear force transfer in bearing-type bolted connection. It is seen that tension in
one plate is equilibrated by the bearing stress between the bolt and the hole in the plate. Since there
is a clearance between the bolt and the hole in which it is fitted, the bearing stress is mobilized only
after the plates slip relative to one another and start bearing on the bolt. The section x-x in the bolt
is critical section for shear. Since it is a lap joint, there is only one critical section in shear (single
shear) in the bolt. In case of butt joint there would be two critical sections in shear in the bolt
(double shear), corresponding to two cover plates.
Vsb Vdsb
Vdsb = Vnsb / mb
Vnsb =
where,
f ub
( nn Anb + ns Asb )
[cl. 10.3.3]
Vdsb =
f ub
3 mb
( nn Anb + ns Asb )
lj = 1.075
lj
200 d
where,
Similarly, if the grip length exceeds five times the nominal diameter, the strength is reduced by a
factor lg as per cl. 10.3.3.2. The strength is also reduced if thickness of packing plate exceeds 6 mm
by a factor pk as per cl. 10.3.3.3.
So the design shear capacity of a bolt for long joint, long grip length and with packing plates (if
provided) will be modified as below.
Vdsb =
f ub
3 mb
( nn Anb + ns Asb ) lj lg pk
Vdpb = Vnpb / mb
Vnpb = 2.5 kb d t fu
where,
kb is smaller of
3 d0
3 d0
0.25 ,
f ub
fu
and
1.0
Vdpb = 2.5 kb d t
fu
mb
NOTE: In case of butt joints, thickness of cover plate should not be less than t, where t is the
thickness of main plate.
3.0 Tensile strength of bolt
When bolts are subjected to tensile load (see Fig 5), the bolts are designed as tension member.
As per cl. 10.3.5, a bolt subjected to a factored tension force (Tb) shall satisfy
Tb Tdb
where, Tdb = design tension capacity of bolt
= Tnb / mb
fu
m 1
An
[cl. 6.3.1]
where,
b n dh + pi 2 /(4 g i ) t
i=1
b = width of plate
n = number of holes
dh = diameter of hole
pi = staggered pitch
gi = gauge distance
x 100
A bolt required to resist both shear and tension at the same time shall satisfy
V
where,
V sb + T b
dsb
db
1.0
10
11
HSFG bolts will come into bearing only after slip takes place. So if slip is critical (i.e., if slip cannot
be allowed), then slip resistance is to be calculated which will govern the design. However, if slip is
not critical, and limit state method is used, then bearing failure can occur at the limit state of
collapse and needs to be checked. Even in the limit state method, since HSFG bolts are designed to
withstand working load without slipping, slip resistance has to be checked anyway as a serviceability
limit state.
a) Slip reistance: Design for friction type bolting in which slip is required to be limited, a bolt
subjected only to a factored design shear force Vsf in the interface of connections shall satisfy the
following [cl. 10.4.3]Vsf Vnsf / mf
The design slip resistance or nominal shear capacity of a bolt as governed by slip for friction type
connection is calculated as
Vnsf = f ne Kh Fo
where,
f = coefficient of friction (slip factor) [as specified in Table 20, page 77 of IS 800]
ne = number of effective interfaces offering frictional resistance to slip
Kh = 1.0 for fasteners in clearance holes
= 0.85 for fasteners in oversized & short slotted holes and for fasteners in long
slotted holes loaded perpendicular to the slot
=0.7 for fasteners in long slotted holes loaded parallel to the slot
mf = 1.10 (if slip resistance is designed at service load)
= 1.25 (if slip resistance is designed at ultimate load)
Fo = minimum bolt tension (proof load) at installation (= Anb fo)
Anb = net area of bolt at threads
Vdpb = Vnpb / mb
c) Tensile strength of HSFG bolts: The design tensile strength of HSFG bolt is similar to that of
bearing-type i.e., ordinary (or black) bolts and is given by
12
V sf + T f
dsf
df
1.0
where, Vsf is applied factored shear at design load, Vdsf is design shear strength, Tf is externally
applied factored tension at design load and Tdf is design tensile strength.
Examples:
P-1: Find the efficiency of the lap joint shown in the figure. Given: M20 bolts of grade 4.6 and
Fe 410 plates are used.
Ans:
For M20 bolt of grade 4.6,
Diameter of bolt, d = 20 mm
Diameter of bolt hole, d0 = 22 mm
Ultimate strength, fub = 400 N/mm2
Partial safety factor, mb = 1.25
For Fe 410 plate
Ultimate strength, fu = 410 N/mm2
Partial safety factor, m1 = 1.25
Strength of bolts
(i) Design strength in shear
Bolts will be in single shear.
Considering shear plane at threads, nn = 1 and ns = 0
Vdsb =
f ub
3 mb
( nn Anb + ns Asb ) =
400
3 x 1.25
. . . . . (1)
13
Vdpb = 2.5 kb d t
kb is least of
e
30
=
3 d0
3 x 22
p
0.25
3 d0
f ub
400
=
=
fu
410
a)
b)
c)
fu
mb
= 0.4545
=
60
3 x 22
0.25 = 0.6591
0.9756
d) 1.0
kb = 0.4545
Design strength of a single bolt in bearing
Vdpb = 2.5 kb d t
fu
410
= 2.5 x 0.4545 x 20 x 20 x
mb
1.25
= 149,076 N = 149.076 kN
(2)
(3)
Strength of plates
Net tensile strength of plate is
Tdn = 0.9
fu
m 1
An = 0.9 x
410
1.25
x (180 3 x 22) x 20
= 673,056 N = 673.056 kN
.....
(4)
Hence strength of the given bolted joint = lesser of (3) and (4)
= 271.632 kN
Strength of solid plate = 0.9
fu
A = 0.9 x
m 1
410
1.25
x (180 x 20)
= 1062,720 N = 1062.72 kN
Strength of bolted joint
1062 .720
x 100
x 100 = 25.56 %
P-2: Find the efficiency of the joint, if in the above example (P-1) instead of lap, butt joint is made
using two cover plates each of 12 mm thick and 6 numbers of bolts on each side.
Thickness of main plate is less than sum of thicknesses of cover plates. So, in this case strength
of plates and strength of bolts in bearing are same as in example P-1. However strength of bolts in
shear will be different.
Strength of bolts in shear
Bolts are in double shear. Consider one shear plane at root of threads and the other at shank of
bolt.
Asb =
x d2 =
Anb = 0.78 x
x d2 = 0.78 x
14
and ns = 1
Vdsb =
f ub
3 mb
( nn Anb + ns Asb ) =
= 103,306 N = 103.306 kN
400
3 x 1.25
( 1 x 245 + 1 x 314.16)
Efficiency =
619.836
x 100 =
1062 .720
= 58.33 %
x 100
P-3: Two plates 10 mm and 18 mm thick are to be jointed by a double cover butt joint. Assuming
cover plates of 8 mm thickness, design the joint to transmit a factored load of 500 kN. Assume
Fe 410 plate and 4.6 grade of bolts.
Ans:
Assume diameter of bolt, d = 20 mm
Diameter of bolt hole, d0 = 22 mm
For Fe 410 grade of steel, fu = 410 N/mm2 and m1 = 1.25
For bolts of grade 4.6, fub = 400 N/mm2 and mb = 1.25
Thickness of plate from bearing consideration will be least of 10 mm, 18 mm and 16 mm (2 x8)
and hence t = 10 mm.
The bolts are in double shear and bearing. Since two plates to be joined are of 10 mm and 18
mm thick, packing plate of 18 10 = 8 mm thick will be required. Since thickness of packing plate
is more than 6 mm, shear strength of bolts has to be reduced by a factor pkg whose value is
pkg = 1 0.0125 x tpkg = 1 0.0125 x 8 = 0.9
Now, bolt strength in double shear per pitch length will be
Vdsb =
f ub
3 mb
Considering one shear plane at root of threads and the other at shank of bolt,
Asb =
x d2 =
Anb = 0.78 x
nn = 1
and ns = 1
x d2 = 0.78 x
f ub
Vdsb =
3 mb
= 92,980 N = 92.98 kN
400
3 x 1.25
15
Since pitch of bolt is not known, the factor kp and thus bearing strength of bolt can not be
determined now. However, since in general shear controls the strength of bolts, not the bearing,
we can calculate number of bolts on the basis of strength in shear of the bolt [ in other words,
assuming strength of bolt in bearing to be more than that in shear, no of bolts can be
calculated].
So, number of bolts required =
500
92.90
= 5.38
Provide 6 bolts, 3 in a line. Since there will be 2 bolts per pitch length, strength of joint per pitch
length on the basis of shearing strength of bolts = 2 x 92.98 = 185.96 kN.
Now equating strength of bolt in shear per pitch length to the net tensile strength of plate per
pitch length, we find pitch (p) of the bolts.
Tdn = 0.9
or,
fu
m 1
0.9 x
410
1.25
or,
p = 84.99 mm
Provide pitch of 80 mm > 50 mm ( = 2.5 d)
[cl. 10.2.4.2]
Provide e = 40 mm.
kb is least of
a)
b)
c)
e
40
=
3 d0
3 x 22
p
0.25
3 d0
f ub
400
=
=
fu
410
= 0.61
=
80
3 x 22
0.9756
d) 1.0
kb = 0.61
0.25 = 0.96
Vdpb = 2.5 kb d t
fu
mb
= 2.5 x 0.61 x 20 x 10 x
410
1.25
= 100,040 N
Hence there is no need to increase end distance. Provide additional two bolts of 20 mm dia on
the packing plate as shown.
NOTE: End distance causes value of kb to be the least among other values of kb. So if Vdpb comes out
to be less than Vdsb, value of e can be increased and consequently the bearing strength.
16
P-4: A member of a truss consists of two angles ISA 75 x 75 x 6 placed back to back. It carries an
ultimate tensile load of 150 kN and is connected to a gusset plate 8 mm thick placed in between the
two connected legs. Determine the number of 16 mm diameter 4.6 grade ordinary bolts required for
the joint. Assume fu of plate as 410 MPa.
Ans:
For M16 bolt of grade 4.6,
Diameter of bolt, d = 16 mm
Diameter of bolt hole, d0 = 18 mm
Ultimate strength, fub = 400 N/mm2
Partial safety factor, mb = 1.25
For gusset plate
Ultimate strength, fu = 410 N/mm2
Partial safety factor, m1 = 1.25
Strength of bolts
(i) strength of bolt in shear
Bolts are in double shear. Consider one shear plane at root of threads and the other at shank of
bolt.
Asb =
x d2 =
Anb = 0.78 x
= 0.78 x
x d2
x 162 = 156.83 mm2
nn = 1
and ns = 1
Vdsb =
f ub
3 mb
( nn Anb + ns Asb )
400
3 x 1.25
( 1 x 156.83 + 1 x 201.06)
= 66,121 N = 66.121 kN
(ii) strength of bolt in bearing
Assume pitch, p = 2.5 d = 2.5 x 16 = 40 mm
[cl. no. 10.2.2]
end distance, e = 1.5 d0 = 1.5 x 18 = 27 mm
[ cl. no. 10.2.4.2]
30 mm
Thickness of plate from bearing consideration will be minimum of 8 mm and 2 x 6 = 12 mm.
So t = 8 mm.
kb is least of
a)
b)
c)
30
=
3 0
3 18
p
0.25
3 d0
f ub
400
=
=
fu
410
d) 1.0
kb = 0.49
= 0.56
=
40
3 x 18
0.9756
0.25 = 0.49
17
Vdpb = 2.5 kb d t
fu
mb
= 2.5 x 0.49 x 16 x 8 x
410
1.25
= 51,430 N = 51.43 kN
d2 =
Anb = 0.78 x
x
4
2
d
4
Bolts will be in double shear. Considering one shear plane at threads and the other at shank,
nn = 1 and ns = 1
Strength of a single bolt in shear
Vdsb =
f ub
3 mb
( nn Anb + ns Asb ) =
400
3 x 1.25
( 1 x 156.83 + 1 x 201.06 )
= 66,121 N = 66.121 kN
Assuming strength of bolts in bearing will be more than strength of bolts in shear,
Design strength of bolts per pitch length = 66.121 kN
For maximum efficiency of the joint, net tensile strength of the plate per pitch length must be
equal to strength of bolts per pitch length.
Thickness of cover plates = t = x 12 = 7.5 mm
Provide 2 cover plates of 8 mm thick.
Then sum of thicknesses of cover plates (2 x 8 =16 mm) > thickness of plate (=12 mm). Hence
O.K.
Net tensile strength of plate per pitch length is
Tdn = 0.9
fu
m 1
An = 0.9 x
410
1.25
1.25
x (p 1 x 18) x 12
410
or, p = 36.67 mm
Provide pitch of 40 mm 2 d (2.5 x 16 = 40 mm)
Now, we have to check the strength of bolts in bearing.
Let e = 30 mm ( > 1.5 d0 = 1.5 x 18 = 27 mm)
18
e
3 d0
f ub
fu
=
=
3040
3 x 18
400
410
= 0.5556
b)
= 0.9756
kb = 0.4907
p
3 d0
0.25 =
d) 1.0
40
3 x 18
0.25 = 0.4907
Vdpb = 2.5 kb d t
fu
410
= 2.5 x 0.4907 x 16 x 12 x
mb
1.25
= 77,256 N
fu
m 1
A = 0.9 x
141.696
410
1.25
x (40 x 12)
x 100
x 100 = 46.66 %
P-6: An ISA 100 x 100 x 10 mm carries a factored tensile force of 100 kN. It is to be jointed with a
12 mm thick gusset plate. Design a high strength bolted joint when (a) no slip is permitted, (b) when
slip is permitted. Steel of grade Fe 410.
Ans:
Let us provide HSFG bolts of grade 8.8S and diameter 16 mm.
2
For 8.8S grade bolts: fub = 800 N/mm
f = 0.5 (assuming)
ne = number of effective interfaces offering frictional resistance to slip = 1
mf = 1.25 at ultimate load
kh = 1.0 (assuming bolt in clearance holes)
100
35.16
87.9
1.25
= 35.16 kN
= 2.84 3
19
Vdsb =
f ub
3 mb
( nn Anb + ns Asb ) =
Vdpb = 2.5 kb d t
fu
mb
400
3 x 1.25
= 2.5 x 1 x 16 x 10 x
100
58
x 1 x 157 x 10-3 = 58 kN
410
1.25
= 1.72 2
2
fub = 1040 N/mm
Vdsb =
f ub
3 mb
( nn Anb + ns Asb ) =
Vdpb = 2.5 kb d t
fu
mb
1040
3 x 1.25
= 2.5 x 1 x 20 x 12 x
410
1.25
So, strength of bolts = 117.68 kN [minimum of strength of bolt in shear and bearing]
Hence, strength of connection = no of bolts x strength of bolt = 4 x 117.68 = 470.72 kN.
Prying Forces
In the design of HSFG bolts subjected to tensile forces, an additional force, called prying force is
to be considered. This additional force is mainly due to flexibility of connected plates. Consider the
connection of a T-section to a plate as shown in the Fig 12, subjected to tensile force 2Te. As tensile
force acts, the flange of T-section bends in the middle portion and presses connecting plate near
20
bolts. It gives rise to additional contact forces known as prying forces. IS 800 2007 has given the
following expression for the prying force Q (cl. no. 10.4.7 of code) -
Q =
lv
2l e
Te
f0 b e t4
27 l e l v 2
....
(1)
where, lv = distance from the bolt centerline to the toe of fillet weld or to half the root radius
for a rolled section
le = distance between prying force and bolt centerline and is minimum of either end
distance or the value given by
f0
le = 1.1 t f
T e lv
2 le
The thickness of end plate to avoid yielding of plate is obtained by equating the moment in the
plate at bolt centre and at a distance lv from it to the plastic moment capacity of plate Mp. Thus, we
get
MA = Q le and MC = Te lv - Q le
MA = MC = Te lv / 2 = Mp
2
Taking Mp = (fy/1.1) (be t /4), the minimum thickness of end plate is obtained as
P-8: Design a hanger joint as shown to carry a factored load of 300 kN. Use an end plate of size 250
mm x 150 mm and appropriate thickness, M24 HSFG bolts (2 nos) and Fe 410 steel for end plate (fy =
250 MPa).
Ans:
We shall consider grade of HSFG bolt as 8.8
21
2
2
For 24 mm diameter bolt, Asb = /4 x 24 = 452 mm ,
do = 30 + 3 = 33 mm
2
2
Proof stress, fo = 0.7 fub = 0.7 x 800 = 560 N/mm = 0 .56 kN/mm
For pre-tensioned bolt, = 1
Assuming an 8-mm fillet weld between hanger
and end plate and an end distance of 40 mm, the
distance from centre line of bolt to the toe of the
fillet weld is
lv = (250/2) 10 8 40 = 67 mm
For minimum thickness,
Mp = Telv / 2 = (300/2) x 67/2
= 5025 kNmm
and
= 1.1 x 25 x
lv
2l e
Te
le = 1.1 t
f
1 x 560
250
= 41.158 mm
f0 be t4
27 l e l v 2
67
2 x 40
27 x 40 x 67 2
150
= 117 kN
-3
Tnb = 0.9 Anb fub = 0.9 x 353 x 800 x 10 = 254 kN
-3
= 329 kN
Hence, Tdb = 254 / 1.25 = 203 kN < 267 kN. So, it is unsafe.
To reduce prying force, let us provide a thicker plate.
Assume 45 mm thick plate.
Tensile force in bolt = 150 kN
Tension capacity of bolt = 203 kN
So, prying force that can be allowed = 203 150 = 53 kN
Moment at toe of weld = Te lv Q le = 150 x 67 - 53 x 40 = 7930 kNmm
Moment capacity =
So, ok.
Prying force, Q =
fy
1.1
lv
2l e
be t2
4
Te
250
1.1
150 x 45 2
4
f0 be t4
27 l e l v
67
= 2 x 40 150
27 x 40 x 67 2
* * * * *
= 36.37 kN < 53 kN