Abstract
Miscible
gas
injection
nowadays
(EOR)
approach
for
Due to the
Such accuracy
for
displacement;
gas
the
miscible
minimum
are
demanding
processes.
industry
demands
Expectation
(ACE)
is
parameter
optimal
response
transform.
literature
and
the
are
experimentally
an
MMP.
ACE
Addition
to
this,
the
(MMP);
Alternating
T (F)
265
3705(psig)MMP
71
1101
MC7+
286
151
C7+
262
132
MC5+
73.61
5.70
C6
0.79
C5
9.49
16.00
0.25
C3
C4
11.23
18.40
0.89
0.28
23.16
0.01
C2
76.43
2.56
C1
16.44
0.001
N2
24.00
0.001
CO2
Max
17.56
Min
0.001
H2S
Introduction
This
been
define
and
fact
miscibility
is
reservoir
temperature
composition,
both
an
immiscible
reported
that
that
the
even
small
achievement
strongly
of
related
to
and
oil
particularly
C5+
Experimental Techniques
Empirical Correlations
Equation of State
Numerical Methods
Analytical Methods
Table 1.
Data range used for the
input variables
Metcalfe
(1980)
found
little
James et al
variate
statistics.
The
word
variables
variables) are
This
independent variable.
temperature
and
composition,
showed
injection
gas
substantially
to
facilitate
screening
i X i
The
(i.e.,
the
conditional
determined.
The
Conditional
i X i
Xi
and
proposed
nonparametric
variables.
An
ACE
Y i X i
i 1
Alternating Conditional
Expectation (ACE) Algorithm
The name alternating conditional
squares
of
mathematical
the
errors).
expectation
The
is
the
solvent.
Model is:
maximum/optimal
correlation,
the
using
the
independent
and
Plus
obtained.
reservoir
and
into
set
molecular
The
space.
pressures
two
ACE
sets.
The
algorithm
training
provides
All
mole
weights
fractions
are
having
it
does
computational
not
provide
model
for
these
Validation
be
increased.
To
find
the
Proposed
Non-
Parametric Model
To check the validity/credibility of
ACE
model
and
to
check
its
polynomials
of
variables
of
Conclusions
Correlation of
SPE/DOE 9790.
2. Glaso, O. (1987).
and
Miscible
relationships
variables,
between
and
suggest
if
complicated
relationships
and
it
these
Measurement
(1981).
is
an
P. et
al.:
The
determination of pressures of
It
provides
method
for
straightforward
identifying
functional
Authors
would
8-16.
6. Firoozabadi, A. and Aziz, K.
Analysis
and
to
(1986).
Acknowledgement
The
SPE 13669
7. Rathmell, J.J., Stalkup, F. I.,
and
Hassinger,
laboratory
R.
investigation
C.:A
of
6.
Miscibility Pressures.
by
Carbon
SPE
7477
13. Brieman, L., and Friedman, J.
H.:
Estimating
transformations
optimal
for
multiple
619.
Condensing/Vaporizing
Mechanism
Displacement
in
of
Alternating
the
Oil
by
Conditional
Expectations,
15. Xue,
G.,
Valko
P.
Datta-Gupta,
and
A.,
Blasingame
Regression:
to
Permeability
Formation
Evaluation,