DETERMINATION
OF
DISSOLVED OXYGEN CONTENT BY WINKLER
REDOX TITRATION
P. OGI1
1
RDR
1.
Na 2 S2 O3 .
I O3 =6 mol S 2 O3
standardization of
1 mol
+ 3 H 2 O
+ 3 I 3
+ 6 H
+8 I
I O3
+ I 2
I
I 3
2
+S4 O6
2 2 I
I 2 +2 S 2 O3
2. Explain the purpose of the addition of
H 2 SO 4
and excess
KI
during
H 2 SO 4
reaction. This would lead the reaction of iodate to take place. Addition of
used to form
I3
KI
was
+ 3 H 2 O
+ 3 I 3
+ 6 H
+8 I
I O3
O2 = 4 mol
S 2 O3
Mn(OH )2
2++2 OH
Mn
Mn(OH )2 +O 2 + H 2 O Mn(OH )3
4. Explain stepwise how
I3
O2
in
water sample. Explain briefly why the reagents are added in a definite
sequence.
5. Give the reason why starch was used as an indicator in this analysis
and why it was added towards the end of the titration.
Starch was used as an indicator because of hydrolysis that starch can undergo to
amylose and amylopectin according to the following reaction. [3]
I 2 starch
complex. When
I2
is introduced to starch,
I2
will be encaged
within the helical structure of starch which makes it difficult to achieve the
endpoint. [2]
6. How is the analysis (iodometric process) different from an iodimetric
one?
The difference of iodomeric method and iodimetric method is the used titrant and
analyte. In iodometric redox method, sodium thiosulfate is the titrant and iodine is
the analyte. For iodimetric redox method, iodine is the titrant and sodium
thiosulfate is the analyte which is the reverse of iodometric method. [2]
O2
between DO content and water quality which the water quality can be identified
from the experimental values.
Table 1. Relationship of DO Content in
DO Content ( ppmO2 ) , 20
8-9
7-11
Water quality
6.7-7.9
4.5-6.6
Below 4.5
0-2
Therefore, the water quality from the experimental values is highly polluted.
8. Predict the effect, if any, of each of the following on the DO oxygen
content obtained:
a. The water sample is made to stand overnight before analysis.
The water sample may contain organisms that could perform cellular respiration
and photosynthesis which the effect on oxygen is indeterminate.
b.
MnSO4
the alkaline
KI
solution is added.
Manganese is light sensitive which will undergo reduction. This would have a
decrease on the volume of titrant which the calculated dissolved oxygen to
decrease as well. [2]
9. What are the possible sources of errors and their effect on the
calculated parameters?
One possible source of error is personal error during solution preparation and in
preparation of sample. Solution preparation is crucial for the experiment that it
affects the entire experiment because it affects the concentration which affects the
volume of the titrant. If the sample preparation was not prepared under standard
operating procedures, the dissolved oxygen content may be affected and cause
discrepancy for the experiment. Method error is another possible for this experiment
since some reaction may be incomplete that would affect the dissolved oxygen
content. Indeterminate error may also arise in this experiment which could affect
experimental values.[1]
Additional Questions:
1. Account for the addition of sodium carbonate in titrant preparation.
Because sodium thiosulfate decomposes in acidic environment as shown in
the reaction below, addition of sodium carbonate stabilizes sodium thiosulfate. [2]
+ S(s )+ H 2 O(l )
+ SO 2(g )
+2 H (aq)
S2 O3(aq)
2. Why the titrant was prepared on the Day 2 of the experiment, unlike
others?
The titrant was prepared on the Day 2 to ensure that the water used in the
experiment was freshly boiled. If the titrant was prepared on day 1,
CO2
may
S 2 O3
[2]
3.
Give the side reactions that may happen if the reagent addition was
not sequential.
Formation of
+ HIO 3
+ H
IO3
Addition of sulfuric acid before potassium iodide may cause the molarity of
thiosulfate to increase while its volume decreases. This would also lead to an
increase in the calculated oxygen content because
IO3
will be
titrated. [2]
4.
I3
I2
[1] Skoog, West, Holler, Crouch. Fundamentals of Analytical Chemistry. 9th ed.
Belmont: Brooks/Cole, 2014. 87-89, 391. Print.
[2] Harris, Daniel. Qualitative Chemical Analysis. 8th ed. New York: W. H. Freeman,
2010. 130, 347-356. Print.
[3] Campbell, Mary, Farrell, Shawn. Biochemistry. 7th ed. Belmont: Brooks/Cole,
2012. 469-470. Print.