Exercising free speech, that may ardently injure or sensitively indignant a certain ethnicity, is
criminalized. Henceforth, the sacrileges and profanities crossing all the limits of ethical or
moral codes and even humanity-based values, cannot, by any means or on any account, be
rationalized to be permissible or tolerable to mutilate, harm and detriment the inter-ethnic
peace of global communities by planting the seeds of hatred abhorrence or tarnished
blasphemies.???
There exists nowhere in the world where licenses can be granted that one can flagrantly say
and blatantly express whatever he or she likes to; but reasonably, there are certain limits that
one is supposed to be within.
However, pretty conversely, the kind of the moral trait-outlook manifested by certain vagrants
and nomad quarters, on the face of 'free speech', is neither explicable nor justifiable on the
least of any judicial, moral, ethical or humanitarian accounts!
Advocating for open license to the 'free speech' and spreading the dogma-notion behind this,
is nothing, but a clumsily and maladroitly disgraceful enough modality of ridiculous
manifestations by deflated societies, having no acclimatization of moral perspectives.
While advocating the tarnished-hatred, apparently, the 'tender-keepers' of free speech, along
with their biased and discriminatory partisan means, present certain devious and deceitful
arguments in wrapped misconceptions and logical- fallacies, however when it reaches to the
end of the tether or the commonsense truss-leash, one can easily comprehend and realize
that are these reason-indexes actually so, as they are dogmatized to appear or opinionated to
spread out? Do these jargons and verbiages certainly provide some justifiable grounds for a
'free speech' without any limits? With an absolute value..? Especially when it comes to the
sensitivities-based sentiments? These are the questions, that are serious-enough in their
nature. Not only questions, but, in a literal sense the morality-probes for a considerate mind
that can hold to the state of affairs, when it comes to moral convictions. and henceforth, are to
be dealt with great trepidations.
(Extracts taken from: Moral Fallacies and the Free Speech Notion by Dr. Bareera N.B.)
'Freedom of Speech' is the narrative that is vastly and quite pretentiously used by certain
quarters, to not only validate, but justifiably vindicate the blasphemies. The notion of an
'absolute free speech' serves as the basic 'construct-version of interpretation' for the nefarious
motives behind blasphemous acts.