Review
The necessity of well organized manufacturing sector is realized in every countrys economical
development. Sri Lanka's apparel manufacturing sector is highly developed and has evolved as an
export oriented industry for over two decades. Currently around more companies in Sri Lanka produce
a wide range of products including branded names -most of them catering to the international market.
This study is aimed to analysis the Risk and Return of the portfolio management of the manufacturing
sector. Portfolio management is the collection of different investments that make up on investors total
holding. Risk and Return of the portfolio management is very important aspect in the financial
management. Analysis of portfolio management of manufacturing sector is very useful for customers
and investors. Data were obtained from the CSE handbook and web sites. The efficiency of the portfolio
management of manufacturing sector is analysis based on the portfolio management ratio analysis and
correlation analysis. The detail of the analysis is explained in the study in detail. As a result of the
analysis it could be seen that positive strong correlation between the risk and return. It leads a high
risk on the investors fund to earn high return of manufacturing sector.
Keywords: Risk Management,Performance,Return
INTRODUCTION
Sri Lanka's apparel manufacturing sector is highly
developed and has evolved as an export oriented
industry for over two decades. Currently around more
companies in Sri Lanka produce a wide range of products
including branded names -most of them catering to the
international market. Today clothing labelled "Made in Sri
Lanka" can be found in major department stores in the
USA, UK, Germany and Australia. This research is aimed
to analysis the Risk and Return of manufacturing firms in
Sri Lanka. Portfolio management is the collection of
different investments that makeup on investors total
holding. Risk and Return of the portfolio management is
very important aspect in the financial management.
Portfolio management will involve the various
investments such as many different types of financial
assets. Risk involved in such investment and derived
from them. Every manufacturing firm is dependent on its
total advances portfolio has made manufacture
vulnerable to risk in- non- performing advances, which is
turn has led to liquidity and the long-term sustainability of
such profits depends to large extent on identifying and
managing the multitude of risk facing the manufacturing
companies. Currently investments of manufacturing
Statement of problem
Research problem focused here is risk of the manufacturing
Premkanth. 79
sector affect the return and efficiency of portfolio
management of manufacturing firms return will vary
according to the risk return of manufacturing firms will
determine the efficiency of portfolio management. This
research aimed in whether risk of the manufacturing
sector affects the return and efficiency of portfolio
management.
Objective of research
The manufacturing system and Product play an important
role in the daily life of the general public. Therefore it is
important system in details. The followings are the
objectives of this study.
1.
The compare the desired relationship between
investment risk and return.
2.
Portfolio management is an important feature in the
activities of manufacturing sector. The manage the
various risk of the manufacturing companies.
Literature Review
P. David, T. Yoshikawa, M.D.R Chari and A.A. Rashed
argue the effect of foreign ownership on strategic
investment in Japanese corporations by developing and
testing two competing perspectives, they found that
foreign ownership is move positively associated with
strategic investments for form with growth opportunities
than those lacking such opportunities. The relationship is
robust across both types of strategic investments studies.
R and D capital intensity.
Porter(1992) explain the effect of combing banking and
non bank. Financial activities on banking organizations
risk and return. In general, securities activities, insurance
agency, and insurance underwriting are all risker and
more profitable than banking activities. They also have
the potential to provide diversification benefits to banking
organizations. While real estate operations are more
profitable than banking. Real estate development may
not be real estate activities in general and their
diversification benefits for banking organization are less
clear.
The Economist (2002) examines risk, return and the
Data Collection
Primary and secondary data will be used for the study
.primary data collected form questionnaire and secondary
Type of sector
Manufacturing
No. of companies
available
32
No of companies
selected
12
Table 2. Operationalization
Concept
Risk
Variable
Overall
Risk
Indicator
CAPM Equation
Measurement
Market risk
Dividend cover
Earning yield
Return
Earning
Profit
ratio
Price earning ratio
ROE
ROCE
Conceptual model
See figure 1 above
Operationalization
See table 2 above
Premkanth. 81
Return
2.73
69.59
146.12
203.17
233.07
Risk
6986.72
8795.74
13256.37
19721.37
23226.22
Table 4. Correlations
Model
1
(Constant)
Risk
Unstandardized
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
Beta
-59.356
30.562
.013
.002
.969
t
-1.942
6.784
Sig.
.147
.007
Hypotheses
The following hypotheses are formulated for the purpose
of this study.
H1:- Manufacturing companies portfolio management is
efficiency.
H2:- High degree of risk lead to high degree of return.
Correlation coefficient analysis
In this study, which is undertaken to find out the
relationship between the risk and return of manufacturing
firms. Correlation analysis is carried out in order to find
out the nature of relationship between the variable based
on the value of correlation coefficient, Here, Table 3 and
4.
According to the coefficient correlation, there is positive
moderate relationship between risk and return during the
2005-2009. So conclusion may be made, that there is
positive relationship between the risk and return.
Through this finding, manufacturing firms can derive the
Coefficient of determination (R )
A more useful indicator will be the coefficient of
determination, which is defined at the squared value of
Pearlmans moment correlation coefficient. The
coefficient of determination of the Manufacturing firms
during last 5 years as showing the following table 4.10.
Table 5.
2
The coefficient of determination rp is 0.969. It means
that 96.9% of variability of risk can be accounted. For by
its liner strong relationship with return it follow that 4.1%
of variability of risk is not explained by the return.
By using the correlation analyzes it can be found that
how the relationship is between the variables and but the
nature of the relationship is between the variables. It is
not a proper way to describe the relationship exactly
between the variables by using the correlation analyzes.
Therefore regression analyses are the most suitable way
in order to find out the exact relationship between the
variables.
Table 6. Coefficient
a
Coefficients
Model
1
(Constant)
Risk
Unstandardized
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
Beta
-59.356
30.562
.013
.002
t
-1.942
Sig.
.147
6.784
.007
.969
Regression analysis
Regression analysis made to find out the equation, which
describes the relationship between the variable. From
this analysis the dependent variable can be forecasted
through the independent variable, regression line was Y=
a+bx. Here the regression summary output is obtained
through the statistical analysis. This output is given in the
table 6.
In this period, Coefficient of regression is 0.013, it
indicates that for every year increase of the independent
variable return, will increase by 0.013(Rs 000) that is Rs
13. On the basis of risk-weighted base, the coefficient of
regression is 0.013. It indicates that for every year
increase of the dependent variable return will increase by
0.013 that is Rs 1.3. Hence these analyses provide the
hypothesis of high degree of risk lead to high degree of
2
2
return.This fitness is shown by the rp in the rp summary
2
output. This value rp is 96.9% (based on risk weight)
therefore only 96.9% of can be explained through this
regression equation. That is the return affects the risk the
risk only 96.9%. Rest of 4.1% denotes the other factors,
which determines the return. However the rp2 subjective
therefore f-test examine the fitness of regression
equation.
0.969
0.939
0.918
46.021
0.007
Hypotheses Testing
Null Hypothesis
Here null hypothesis means no relationship presumes to
risk and return. Now researcher can take the null
hypothesis by the regression output. The following output
show below. (On the basic of risk weighted) Table7.
Regression equation could be accepted at 5% of
significant level through the probability related to the
value of F. The null hypothesis can be rejected because
of the probability of significance level is less than 0.05 is
Premkanth. 83
inefficiency.
H2- High degree of risk lead to high degree of return
This is accepted on the basis of finding got from the
correlation analysis and regression analysis. According to
this analysis, this hypothesis is accepted. Hence this
research, the positive linear relationship between risk and
return could be proved. Therefore when risk of
investment increases, the return from investment also
increase
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
Ahthur WC, Michael lS, Peter CY (1995). Risk and Return and
Insurance 7th edition, (Mc Graw Hill Inc)
Chales PJ (1994). Investment analysis Management 4th edition,
(JOHN) Wiley and sons, Inc
Harry M (1950) Modern portfolio management page no674-684
Jack CF (1991). Investment analysis Management 5 edition, (Mc Graw
Hill Inc)
Jack CF, Stephen HA (1979). Portfolio Analysis 2th edition,(PreticeHall,Inc)
Lawrence DS, Charles WH (1991). Intrudction to Fiancial
Management 6th edition, (New yorl:Mc Graw Hill Inc)