ACRA2014
May 18-21, 2014, Jeju, KOREA
ACRA2014-264
MULTIPLE PARAMETERS ANALYSIS FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY
OF BUILDING AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEMS
Yew K. Chuah, Yoong P. Chng
Department of Energy and Refrigerating Air-conditioning Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology,
1, Sec. 3, Chung Hsiao E. Road, Taipei, 10608, Taiwan
ABSTRACT: Multiple parameters statistical analysis is proposed for the diagnosis of energy performance of airconditioning systems. Hourly data output of a building energy simulation is provided for the validation of this proposed
method. The annual hourly complex energy data are processed to create Bin parameters such as Bin temperatures and
Bin enthalpy difference. The results of the Bin parameters analysis show that air-conditioning systems can be diagnosed
for comparison or verification of real-time performance. The research also shows that outdoor dry bulb and wet bulb,
and also the indoor outdoor enthalpy difference Bin parameters, are the important parameters for diagnosing the
system performance factor (SPF) of the air-conditioning system. It has been found that for the same temperature and
enthalpy Bins, the SPF values obtained are close. In general the higher the enthalpy difference the higher SPF is
obtained. Frequency of the occurrence of the Bin parameters is also discussed. Hourly air-conditioning energy use is
also analyzed corresponding to different Bins of the parameters. The method of diagnosis as proposed can be used in
comparing system performance such as green building energy saving retrofitting.
Keywords: Air-conditioning, energy saving, statistical analysis, BEMS
1. INTRODUCTION
Much research literature can be found on energy
saving of building air-conditioning. Thermostats were
used to provide feedback temperature control [1]. Liu et
al [2] investigated energy management of public
buildings in China. Lam [3] worked on the optimal
control models for air-conditioning. Chen [4] considered
the building thermal mass in the dynamic operation of
building energy systems. iroky et al [5] used Model
Predictive Control (MPC) method to solve optimal
control over a finite number future window.
Clarke et al [6] mentioned that building simulation
can be used to test the efficacy of control strategies.
Crawley et al [7] introduced building energy simulation
programs. Of which DOE-2.2 [8] can be used to
performance hourly simulation of building energy. Ellis
and Mathews [9] mentioned that existing building energy
simulation tools are complex and time consuming
applying to general design problem. Simpler building
simulation modeling can be found such as degree day
method [10], for which efficiency or conditions of use
vary with outdoor temperature. The Bin method [10]
calculates the energy consumption by the number of
hours Nbin in a temperature interval (Bin) centered on
that temperature. Westphal & Lamberts [11] estimated
the annual cooling and heating using monthly average
values of temperature, relative humidity, pressure and
cloud cover.
With statements mentioned above the objectives of
this research are:
1. Verification of air-conditioning system energy
performance under equivalent operating conditions.
2. Diagnosing the parameters of energy performance
cool load
Eheat rejection
cool load
Epump
E
+ fan
cool load cool load
(1)
coincident dry bulb and wet bulb for H=-3 kJ/kg are in
the low temperatures of below 19 and below 16,
respectively for dry and wet bulb temperatures.
Table 3 SPF for H= -3 DB=16 WB=15
Hour #
HVAC
Part load
SPF
Energy
ratio
1185
210.7
0.253
2.04
1186
202.0
0.210
2.08
1617
217.0
0.280
2.23
1618
206.8
0.231
2.25
2391
241.8
0.299
2.53
SPF
4.01
10
6785
22
24
677.6
3.68
12
5607
22
24
1079.5
3.65
11
6826
22
24
932.9
4.19
3305
22
24
720.5
3.64
Occur Mean
Mean
-rence energy Energy SPF SPF
22
24
822.2
175.7
3.837 0.253
Figure 3
WB
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
DB
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
HVAC
Energy
200.8
203.9
201.7
198.4
199.5
200.3
202.1
198.3
222.3
200.8
PLR
SPF
0.201
0.215
0.205
0.189
0.194
0.198
0.207
0.186
0.236
0.201
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
2.02
2.13
2.06
1.92
1.97
2.00
2.07
1.89
2.15
2.02
HVAC Mean
rence HVAC HVAC Energy SPF
Energy energy 90%
Interval
9
202.4 7.58 197.75 2.032
207.15
.
SPF
SPF
90%
interval
0.0898 1.977
2.088