= 2 CrCl3 +3 I2 +7 H2O+8KCl
6Na2S2O3 +3I2
= 3 Na2S4O6 + 6 NaI
I2
(aq)
+ I- (aq)
I2 has higher atmospheric pressure as it melts away in air and oxidized by O2 . This
phenomena causes wrong calculation in experiment due to less amount of I- . So, the
conical flask is covered with watch glass .
4I-
+ O2
+ 4 H+
= 2I2
(g)
+ 2H2O
To make inert atmosphere CO2 layer is produced upon the conical flask( I- solution) for
preventing oxidizing of I- from NaHCO3 salt solution.
NaHCO3
+ HCl = NaCl + H2O + CO2
Here , K2Cr2O7 works as an oxidizing agent and it can oxidize properly in presence of
HCl acid.
Cr2O72- + 14H+ +6 I- = 2Cr3+ + 3I2 + 7 H2O
From the above eqn. we observe I is the reducing agent that comes from KI . This
reducing agent becomes oxidized into I2 . This liberated iodine reacts with Na2S2O3 .
I2 + 2Na2S2O3
Na2S4O6 + 2NaI
After completion of this reaction, starch is used as an indicator. Because of following the
above steps there remains some I2 into the conical flask, when starch is added it makes an
absorption complex with iodine, distinguished by deep blue color.
The iodine of this starch-iodine complex reacts with Na2S2O3 .
Starch
standardize before. From the volume of Na2S2O3 of known strength we can determine the
amount of Cu Present in stock solution.
2Cu2+ + 4KI = 2CuI + I2 + 4K+
2Cu2+ I2 Na2S2O3
Sometimes free mineral acid is present in the solution, for that a few drops of dilute
sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) solution or 1:1 ammonia solution must be added until a faint
permanent precipitate remains. This precipitate is removed by means of a drop or two of
ethanoic acid. KI is then added and the titration continued. For accurate results, the
solution should have a pH of 4 to 5.5.
Cu 2+
Cu +
Na2SO3
Chemicals Involved:
Na2S2O3, K2Cr2O7, KI, NH4OH, NH4CNS, Na2SO3, NH4CNS, (NH4)2HPO4,
methyl orange.
Procedure:
Data Tables:
a) Standardization of Na2S2O3 by standard K2Cr2O7 with
starch as a indicator:
No of
Volume Initial
Final
Volume Average
observ of
burette burette of
(ml)
ation
K2Cr2O Readin Readin Na2S2O
7 (ml)
g (ml)
g (ml)
3 (ml)
1
10
0.0
12.1
12.1
2
10
12.3
24.6
12.3
12.23
3
10
24.6
36.9
12.3
Calculation:
Strength
of
Na2S2O3
(M)
0.08176
= 0.099
0.49
x N1
V1
Normality of Na2S2O3, N2 =
V2
10
.099
=
12.23
= 0.08176
Na2S2O3
Na2S2O3
0.06354 g Cu
Final
Burette
Reading(
ml)
12.5
25.1
37.6
0.06463 x 1000
10
= 6.463g Cu / L
Volume
of
Na2S2O3(
ml)
12.5
12.4
12.3
Average
volume
of
Na2S2O3
12.45
Result:
The amount of Copper ( Cu) = 6.463g/l
The amount of Zinc (Zn) = 33.563x10-3g
Discussion:
Not only this experiment but also all experiment must be done very
carefully. When we estimated Cu and Zn we should be very careful from the
beginning of the experiment because When we standardizing Na2S2O3 by standard K2Cr2O7 then the standardization
must be correct if we dont standardize Na2S2O3 , then the estimation of Cu
would not be perfect.
In standardization of Na2S2O3 , NaHCO3 & HCl is added to create inert
environment , otherwise iodide I- make reaction with air.
2I- + O2 +4H+ = I2 + H2O
so, to create inert environment , this reaction happens,
NaHCO3 +HCl = NaCl + H2O + CO2
When Cu is estimated , then Na2S2O3 & CH3COOH is added for same
purpose, which described in
Na2CO3 + CH3COOH = CH3COONa + H2O + CO2
To indicate the end point starch is added at last . when Na2S2O3 is
standardized and Cu is determined. Starch make reactions with the remaining
iodide ion in the solution. If starch is added at first , then it makes reaction
with iodine & iodide ion will make wrong result.
When Cu is estimated , NH4CNS is added after adding starch, because it
makes reactions with Cu2I2 & I2 is produced . Otherwise , the correct result
will not achieves
2NH4CNS + Cu2I2 = 2NH3I + 2CuCNS + I2
The mass of crucible and Zinc Pyrophosphate is weighted carefully for getting
proper result.
Cu is separated by filtration, it should be done carefully, if Cu remained in
solution the correct weight of Zn would not achieve
Merits:
The merit of a volumetric analysis is that , it can be done in a short time. If we
be careful to trace the end point then the result would be quite acceptable. In a industry
time is a very important factor . when approximate result is acceptable then we can use
volumetric analysis to determine Cu.
On the other hand gravimetric analysis has its own merits. By this process we can
determine the exact amount of a substance. In a laboratory of science when we need to
determine the exact amount then gravimetric analysis is mostly used.
Demerits:
Though volumetric analysis can be done within a short time, there is more
probability of getting wrong result. The wrong result can be caused by not using burette
and pipette correctly.
Again gravimetric analysis needs much time. We should heat the solution and wait to
obtain a good precipitate If we make mistake in weighting of crucible there would occur
a discrepancy in result.