0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
1.1.1
Brief history of masonry structure and reinforced
concrete- framed structure design
Masonry structure has been used as structure since man began
building buildings. It was traditionally very widely used in civil and
structural works including tunnels, bridges, retaining walls and
sewage system however, the introduction of steel and concrete
with their superior strength and cost characteristics led to a sharp
decline in the use of masonry for their application.
Over the past two decades or so, masonry has recaptured some
of the market lost to steel and concrete due largely to the
research and marketing work sponsored in particular by the brick
development association. For instance, everybody now knows
that brick is beautiful, less well appreciated. Perhaps, is the fact
that masonry as excellent structural, thermal and acoustic
properties. Furthermore, the permanence of masonry construction
is illustrated in the many structures remaining from the days of
the Greeks and romance, who were primarily masonry builders.
The famous Pout de Crard, an aqueduct built across the Gard
River near Nirues, France, and about 17miles from Avignon. It was
built about 15 B.C and was laid without mortal, that is very hard
and a fair condition well preserved cement concrete bridge along
the famous Amalfi Drive in Italy, near Naples, built in about the
6th century AD, well illustrates the durability of this type of
construction.
Even in prehistoric times, the prototypes of our masonry
structures were found in the crude dolmens and cromlechs of
barbarous man. These consisted of unshaped stones set as
column and partial walls and covered with a slab(s) of stones
without any attempt attaching one to the other. Mortar was, of
course, unknown, but piles of stone with huge natural slabs of
stones spinning the intervals are to be found in the ruins at
maidstone and stone henge, England, and at various other places
in Europe. Gradually, those simple elements of support and cover
were improved.
Contributions
4
Organization of project
and bricks are made of fired clay, calcium silicate or concrete which
must conform to relevant national standards, for example BS3921
(clay units), BS187 (calcium silicate) and BS6073 part 1 (concrete
units). In these standards two classes of bricks are classified, namely
common and facing, BS3921 identifies a third category, engineering.
There are varieties of bricks i.e. bricks may be wire cut, with or
without perforations, or pressed with single or double frogs or cellular.
Perforated bricks contain holes; the cross sectional area of any one
hole; the cross sectional area of any one hole should not exceed 10%
and the volume of perforation 25% of the total volume of the bricks.
Cellular bricks will have cavities or frogs exceeding 20% of the gross
volume of the brick. In bricks having frogs the total volume of
depression should be less than or equal to 20%.
Bricks of shapes other than rectangular prisms are referred to as
Standard special and covered by BS 4729.
Concrete blocks may be solid, cellular or hollow from the structural
point of view, the compressive strength of the unit is the controlling
factor. For reinforced and prestressed brickwork, it is highly unlikely
that brick strength lower than 20N/mm will be used the design and
construction.
2.1.3 Material for concrete-framed structure
Concrete mixes for reinforced framed structure
Dilger, Ghali and Rao (1996), Dilger and Rao (1997), and Wang, Dilger,
and Kuebler (2001) determined that special mix designs were required
for masonry and concrete framed structure. It was found that normal
concrete mixes would have segregation problem due to the spinning
process and the dry or coarse mixes would not consolidate properly.
Drying shrinkage, freeze thaw, chloride penetration, mix proportions
and mixing time, spinning speeds and duration were all investigated.
The spinning process seemed to be the cause of differential shrinkage
due to the segregation of fines from the coarse aggregate. Differential
shrinkage between the inner and outer layers was linked to the
longitudinal cracking of concrete structure causing deterioration,
reduction in strength, and reduces life expectancy. Longitudinal
cracking was noted as a typical problem with concrete framed
structure in service. To eliminate segregation and therefore
9
cement, e.g. fly ash, natural pozzolans, blast furnace slag, and
condensed silica fume. The ratio of water to cement by weight that is
required to hydrate the cement the cement completely is about 0.25,
although larger quantities of water are required in practices in order to
produce a workable mix. For the concrete typically used in structural
concrete structure, the water-to-cement ratio is about 0.4.It is
desirable to use as little water as possible, since water not used in the
hydration reaction causes voids in the cement paste that reduce the
strength and increase the permeability of the concrete. The use of
chemical admixture to improve one or more properties of concrete is
now in commonplace. In recent year, high strength concrete with low
water-cement ratios has been made more workable by the inclusion of
superplasticizer in the mix. These polymers greatly increase the flow of
the wet concrete and allow very high strength, low permeability
concrete to be used with conventional concrete construction
techniques.
3.2.2 Mortar
Masonry mortal is a versatile material capable of satisfying a variety of
diverse requirements. It is one of the main constituents of a
constructed masonry structure. Mortar is required to lay masonry units.
As such, it must facilitate the placement of units, contribute to the
serviceability of masonry structure, provide structural performance,
and exhibit the desired appearance.
Mortar consists of cementitious materials to which are added water
and approved additives so as to achieve workable plastic consistency.
The cementitious materials may be lime, masonry cement, mortar
cement, and Portland cement, and should not contain epoxy resins and
derivatives, phenols, asbestos; fiber or fireclays. The mortar should be
able to resist the water uptake by the absorbent bricks/blocks, e.g. by
incorporating a water-retaining admixture and/or use of a mortar type
that includes lime, otherwise hydration and hence full development of
the mortar strength may be prevented. The mortar must also be
durable. For example, if masonry remains wet for extended periods of
time the mortar may be susceptible to sulphate in clay masonry units,
12
Reinforcing bar are produced in two grades: hot rolled mild steel bars
have a yield strength fy of 250 N/mm: hot rolled or cold worked high
yield steel bars have a yield strength f y of 460 N/mm. Steel fabric is
made from cold drawn steel wires welded to form a mesh: it has a yield
strength fy of 460N/mm.
The hot rolled bars have a definite yield point. A defined proof stress is
recorded for the cold worked bars. The value of Youngs modulus E is
200KN/mm.The behavior in tension and compression is taken to be
the same. Mild steel are produced to be smooth round bars. High yield
bars are produced as deformed bars in two types defined in the code
to increase bond stress.
Wall ties External cavity walls are used for environmental reasons.
The two skins of the wall are tied together to provide some degree of
interaction. Wall ties for cavity walls are always galvanized mild steel
or stainless steel and must comply to BS 1243.Three types of ties are
used for cavity walls:
Vertical twist type made from 20mm wide, 3.2 to 4.83mm thick
metal strip
Butterfly- made from 4.5mm wire
Double-triangle type-made from 4.5mm wire.
For load bearing masonry vertical twist type ties should be used for
maximum co-action. For a low rise building or a situation where
large differential movements is expected or for reason of sound
insulation, more flexible ties should be selected. In certain cases
where large differential movements have to be accommodated,
special ties or fixings have to be used. In especially unfavorable
situations non-ferous or stainless-steel ties may be required.BS 5628
(table 6) gives guidance for the selection and use of ties for normal
situations.
15
Fig 3.1: A typical cavity wall: outer, insulation board and inner leaf with
metal ties in position
4.0 Theory
4.1 Analytical models of the structure
4.1.1 General Masonry Structure Design
The design of bending and shear stress in masonry walls is based on
the standard masonry wall approach used for all masonry members.
The design for bending stress in masonry structure involves the bricks
and blocks geometry.
The design of the behavior of the composite unit-mortar material under
various stress conditions requires a clear understanding. Masonry walls
are vertical load bearing elements in which resistance to compressive
stress is the predominating factor in design. However, walls are
frequently required to resist horizontal shear forces or lateral pressure
from wind and therefore the strength of masonry in shear and in
tension will be considered.
16
The current values for the design strength of masonry have been
derived on an empirical basis from tests on piers, walls and small
specimens. Whilst this has resulted in safe designs, it gives very little
insight into the behavior of the material under stress so that more
detailed discussion on masonry strength is required. The final strength
of the structural elements formed is dependent on:
The strength of the brick required (obtained from the calculation
output), and
The strength of the mortar required (dependent on mortar
constituents and proportions)
4.1.2 General Concrete-framed Structure Design
The design of concrete-framed structure is based on approximate
method approach used for concrete-framed structural members. All
members of the frame are considered continuous in the two directions
frame system, and the columns participate with the flat slab in
resisting external loads. The effects of lateral load i.e. wind load, is also
spread over the whole frame, increasing its safety. In this method, the
analysis of the floor under consideration is made assuming that the far
ends of the columns above and below the slab level are fixed using the
moment distribution method. The thickness of the flat slab and drop
panel is estimated first, and their relative stiffness based on the gross
concrete sections is used. The moment and shear force are calculated
and the values used to calculate for the tension, compression and
shear reinforcement.
To aid in the analysis of the concrete flat slab, a computer software
programme (SAFE) was also used to calculate the displacement and
stress values of the slab. See the attached displacement and resultant
maps.
4.1.3 Sizing of Members and Load Estimation
4.1.3.1 Masonry structure
For the masonry structure, the masonry unit of standard brick format
215mm long x 102.5mm wide x 65mm high will be used based for
17
12.6
8.58
21.18 KN/m
5.4 KN/m
21.18
Cumulative
dead
load to
floor, Gk
Cumulative
live
load to
floor, Qk
21.8
5.4
17.28
18
1.2
Wall
90% of Imposed load,
(5.4 + (5 x 3
x1.2))x 0.9
2nd floor
Floor dead weight, 4.8 x 3 x
1.2
Wall
80% of 3 floors imposed load,
(18+21.06) x
0.8
1st floor
Floor dead weight, 4.8 x 3 x
1.2
Wall
70% of 4 floors imposed load,
(18+31.25) x
0.7
Ground floor
Floor dead weight, 4.8 x 3 x
1.2
Wall
60% of 4 floors imposed load,
(18+34.48) x
0.6
8.58
25.86 KN/m
25.86
47.66
21.06
25.86
73.52
31.25
25.86
99.38
34.48
25.86
125.24
31.49
21.06 KN/m
17.28
8.58
25.86 KN/m
31.25 KN/m
17.28
8.58
25.86 KN/m
34.48 KN/m
17.28
8.58
25.86 KN/m
31.49
Cumulative
dead
load to floor,
Gk
Cumulative
live
load to floor,
Qk
4th floor
roof dead weight , 3.5 x
3 x 0.45
Wall ( roof to 4th floor),
2.42 x 3.3
4.725
7.99
12.715
12.715
2.025
15.06
27.775
3.645
15.06
42.835
4.86
15.06
57.895
5.67
15.06
72.955
6.075
KN/
12.715 m
KN/
2.025 m
6.48
8.58
KN/
15.06 m
KN/
3.645 m
6.48
8.58
KN/
15.06 m
KN/
4.86 m
6.48
8.58
KN/
15.06 m
5.67
6.48
8.58
KN/
15.06 m
6.075 KN/
20
2.025
x 0.6
21
Fig 4.1
22
Fig 4.2
23
Fig 4.3
Fig 4.4
24
Fig 4.5
25
Fig 4.6
26
Design
load/m
design load x Ym
t
4th
38.29
2.51
3rd
100.42
6.59
2nd
152.93
10.04
194.298
12.76
225.8
14.83
1st
Ground
floor
Design
load/m
design load x Ym
t
4th
21.04
1.38
3rd
43.15
2.83
2nd
68.16
4.48
1st
95.43
6.27
125.05
8.21
Ground
floor
27
28
29
Reinforcement
(tonnes)
Columns
Slab (roof & floor
slab)
Shear wall
Edge beams
Wall ties
592
1334.7
318.6
47.43
8.02626
37.90503
4.26631
0.77853
13036/ m
7717312
17399149.2
4153269.6
618297.48
29,888,028.28
379928/tonne
3049400.909
14401182.24
1620890.626
295785.3458
1084
7000/250 pcs
13.90252
5,281,956.62
4837 pcs
135,436.00
5,417,392.62
19,367,259.12
Wall (m)
Cavity wall: (utility brick 102.5mm thick facing
wall)
14,131,024.00
1239.5
6944000
30
Inner leaf
Cellular wall type
C
Load bearing wall
type A
Non load bearing
block
2482
1147.65
6428800
785
2,355,000.00
993.7
5560800
4,964,000.00
21288600
86,278,968.9
0
68,413,266.2
4
It can be approximated that Seventeen million eight hundred and sixtyfive thousand seven hundred and two Naira (# 17,865,702.66) can be
saved per structure using masonry structure for the same purpose.
Using a similar method, approximately twenty-one percent (21%) will
be saved. The savings will be more significant when it is compared to
the beam-slab concrete-framed structure as flat slab concrete-frame
structure is more economical over other type. When many medium
height building are produced, savings may be more substantial
31
of
masonry
Speed of erection
The erection of masonry structure can quickly follow on thus
achieving a faster overall construction time for the whole
32
33
(v)
34
35
37
References:
BS 5628:
Code of practice for use of masonry; part 1: structural use
of unreinforced
masonry; Part 3: Materials and components, design and
workmanship.
BS 6399:
Design loading for buildings; Part 1: Code of practice for
dead and imposed
loads, 1996; Part 2: Code of practice for wind loads, 1997;
Part 3: Code of
practice for imposed roof load.
BS 8110:
Structural use of concrete; Part 1: Code of practice for
design and
construction, 1997; Part 2: Code of practice for special
circumstances, 1985;
Part 3: Design charts for singly reinforced beams, doubly
reinforced beams
and rectangular columns, 1985.
38
CP3:
Code of basic design data for the design of buildings;
Chapter V: Part 2:
Wind loads.
Curtin, W.G.,Shaw, G.,Beck, J.G and Bray, W.A. (1995) Structural
Masonry Designers Manual, Blackwell, Oxford.
DD 140-2 Recommendation for design of wall ties
Institution of Structural Engineers and The Concrete Society, Standard
method of detailing structural concrete- a manual for best practice,
London,2006.
Sinha, B.P, Henry, A.W and Davies, S.R (2004) Design of Masonry
Structure,3rd Edition E&FN SPON, U.K
APPENDICE A
39
APPENDICE B
40