ETRUSCAN ARCHITECTURE
(B.C. 750B.C. 100)
The Etruscans, who were the early
inhabitants of Central Italy, were great
builders, and their methods of
construction influenced Roman
architecture in a marked degree. Etruscan
architecture, which dates from about B.C.
750, is especially notable for the use of
the true or radiating arch, while walls
are of solid cyclopean masonry, in which
huge masses of stone are piled up without
mortar.
Examples of Etruscan architecture
The remains, which consist chiefly of
tombs, city walls, gateways, bridges, and
aqueducts, were similar in character to
early Pelasgic work.
The Cloaca Maxima, Rome (c. B.C. 578)
constructed to drain the valleys between
the hills of Rome, has a semicircular vault
of peperino stone, 11 ft. in span, of three
concentric rings of voussoirs, each 2 ft. 6
ins. high, forming probably the oldest
example in Europe of true arch
construction, with radiating joints.
The Arch of Augustus, Perugia, is so called
because the part above the frieze was
added by Augustus. The Arch forms part
of the old Etruscan walls, about two miles
long, surrounding the ancient city, and is
the best existing example of Etruscan
masonry. It is built of large blocks of
travertine stone without mortar,
surmounted by a frieze resembling the
Doric with triglyphs represented by dwarf
Ionic pilasters.
The Temple of Jupiter Capitolinus, Rome
(B.C. 509) the most important example of
this type of building, had its cella divided
into three chambers for statues of Jupiter,
Minerva, and Juno, and was nearly square
ROMAN ARCHITECTURE
(B.C. 146A.D. 365)
The Romans adopted the columnar and
trabeated style of the Greeks and
developed also the arch, vault, and dome
of the Etruscans. This combined use of
column, beam, and arch is the keynote of
the Roman style in its earliest stages. The
Colosseum, Rome, everywhere throughout
its structure, displays these two features
in combination, for piers strengthened and
faced by attached half-columns support
arches, which in their turn carry the
entablature.
In works of an engineering character, such
as aqueducts, the arch was supported on
piers without the facing column. Thus the
Orders of architecture which, as used by
the Greeks, were essentially constructive
were frequently employed by the Romans
as decorative features which could be
omitted and even at times lost their
original use, although the Romans also
used them constructively in temple
colonnades and basilicas.
The Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian Orders of
architecture were used by the Greeks ,
and the Romans added the Tuscan and
Composite, making five in all. The Tuscan
Order is a simplified version of the Doric
Order, about 7 diameters high, with base,
unfluted shaft, and simply moulded
capital, and with a plain entablature, as
seen in the Colosseum, and as used by a
Renaissance architect in S. Paul, Covent
Garden, London.
The Composite Order of the Romans has
a capital which is a combination of the
Corinthian and Ionic capitals, and was
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
ROMAN TEMPLES
Roman temples are an amalgamation of
Etruscan and Greek types; for while in
many respects they resembled the Greek,
the typical prostyle portico and podium
were derived from Etruscan temples.
There are several types, of which the most
characteristic is pseudo-peripteral which,
instead of side colonnades, has halfcolumns attached to the walls with a
prostyle portico in front.
The steps to the principal entrance were
flanked by massive, low walls which were
an extension of the lateral podium, and
they frequently supported groups of
statuary. Greek peripteral temples were
normally twice as long as their width, but
Roman temples were much shorter in
proportion, while the cella itself, used as
a treasure house and as a museum for
Greek statuary, frequently occupied the
whole width of the building. The
intercolumniation was sometimes wider
than in Greek temples, and then the
architrave and frieze were built in
voussoirs as flat arches, but this
treatment was unnecessary where walls
supported the entablature. Nothing
definite is known as to the cella ceilings,
but they may have been coffered, as in
the colonnades; of timber beams, as in
the basilicas ; or vaulted.
The absence of a surrounding colonnade
and continuous stylobate resulted in a
certain loss of unity, as compared with
Greek temples, which were more-over
generally isolated so as to be visible on all
sides. Roman temples were intended to be
seen from the forum which they faced,
and the entrance was emphasized by the
deep portico and steps, while there was