PlainEiff,
I'NITED STATES'
FUNDS CONTAINED
BETTER BUSINESS
IN THE
CHECKING
RESPONSE TO
DISCOVERY)
OF
Defendants.
Come Now Ehe
1.
Admit that you never charged Claimant Marla Bednar with any
crime relaEed to this forfeiture act.ion.
RESPONSE: Admit.
2.
Admit thaE you never charged Claimant Marla Bednar with any
crime related Eo the Defendant property.
RESPONSE: Admit.
3.
AdmiE
RESPONSE: Admit.
anv
GOVERNMENT
EXHIBIT
CASE
NO.
ExHBn
fx-,,'
4-
Tom Bednar
with
any
RESPONSE: Admit.
Admit that you never charged Claimant Marla Bednar with any
crime related to stolen goods.
5.
RESPONSE: AdmiE.
6
Tom Bednar
v',ith any
RESPONSE: AdmiE.
7.
RESPONSE: Admit.
8.
RESPONSE: Admit
9
RESPONSE: Admit.
10. Admit. that during your i.nvesLigaEion you never found proof
thaL Claimant Tom Bednar knowingly sold stolen goodsRESPONSE: AdmiE.
11. Admit that during your investigation you never found proof
that Defendant Property included proceeds from illegal
activity.
RESPONSE: Admit.
L2.
AdmiE
14,
statemenE.
RESPONSE: Admit.
RESPONSE:
ant i
-s
15. Admit Ehat prior to your filing of the present action, you
never provided Claimant Marla Bednar with any not.ice that her
banking practices raised the possibilit.y t.hat her bank account
or its contents could be seized or forfeit.ed.
RESPONSE: AdmiL,
16. Admit that prior to your filing of Ehe present action, you
never provided Claimant Tom Bednar with any notice EhaE his
banking practices raised the possibility thaL his bank account
or its contents coul,d be seized or forfeit.ed.
RESPONSE: AdmiE.
any
18. Admit that you do not contend Ehat Defendant Property is the
proceeds of any criminal offense.
RESPONSE: Admit.
19. Admit Ehat. you have no evidence that the Defendant Property is
the proceeds of any criminal offense.
RESPONSE: Admit.
20. Admit that Ehe Defendant Property is not the proceeds of any
conduct giving rise to forfeiture under federal forfeiture
Iaws.
RESPONSE: Admj.t, provided EhaE the plaintiff
contends that the
property is involved in conduct giwing rise to forfeiture under
federal forfeiture Laws
-
2f.
22. Admit that you hawe no evidence that the Defendant Property is
the proceeds of any conduct giving rise to forfeiture under
federal forfeiEure Iaws.
RESPoNSE: Admit, provided that the plaintiff
contends that
property is involved in conduct giwi-ng rise to forfeiEure under
federal forfeiture Laws.
Che
plaintiff
24. Admit that you do not conlend that the Defendant Property is
anything other than the ]awfuI earnings from claimanE's
business.
can neither admit nor deny this
RESPONSE: 'Ihe plaintiff
it
has
no
knowledge
of Ehe source of the funds seized
staEemenE, as
26. Admit that you do not contend that. the Defendant Property is
anything other than the proceeds of legitimat.e business
activities at Claimants' business, Marla Enterprises.
can neither admiE. nor deny this
statement, as it has no knowledge of the source of the funds seized
and, thus, whether it is or is not 1awfu1 earnings from claimants'
business. ft further does contend that, even if it were lawful
earnings, it constitutes funds involved in conduct giving rise to
forfeiEure under federal forfeiture Laws.
RESPONSE: The
2'1
plaintiff
RESPONSE: Admit..
G.
WALKER
BY:
/s/ Stephen A.
STEPHEN A. WEST
West
for Pl-aintif f
Civil Division
At.E.orney
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Eo
bel-ow:
DanieLle R. Sassoon
Attorney at Law
Kirkland & E11is,
LLP
Danielle . sassoon@kirkland.
com
THOMAS
G.
WALKER
BY:
/s/
SEephen
A.
West
STEPHEN A. WEST
Assistant UniEed SEates Attorney
At.t.orney for PlainEiff
Civif Division
Telephone:
) 856-4530
Facsimile:
) 856 - 4821E-maiI: steve . west@usdoj . gov
NC St.aEe Bar No. 12586
(919
(919