Bangalore
Project
Garuda
Design
Report
Project Garuda
1.Mission Statement:
The overall goal of this project is to design and fabricate a single-person,
fuel efficient vehicle powered by a modified, iso-octane burning Honda
four-cycle 2.1 hp motor. The objective of the Supermileage Team is to
apply our engineering knowledge and experience to design and build a
vehicle that will achieve in excess of 1000 miles per gallon while satisfying
all of the Shell Eco Marathon Competition rules and requirements. This
target will be met by designing and constructing a lightweight,
aerodynamic shell that will house a modified Honda 50cc engine.
2.Introduction:
RVCE Supermileage team consists of student from various engineering
backgrounds working on a common objective of building a highly fuel
efficient vehicle making this project truly interdisciplinary. Over the last
few months the project has made significant progress and is now currently
working on the 2011 prototype to take part in the Shell Eco Marathon
Event.
2.1.Our Aims and Targets:
Build on existing platform and optimize the Design efficiencies
Target to obtain a mileage of more than 1000mpg
Use the Supermileage energy efficient platform, to test out alternate
energy options and optimize automobile energy requirements
To improvise existing design and develop expertise in the field of
1) Automobile Design and Manufacturing
2) Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
3) Engine Design
4) Electronic Fuel Injection (EFI) Systems
The main intent of this project however, is to collaborate with various
minds across the industry and build on technical knowhow.
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 2
Project Garuda
3.Vehicle Configurations:
Our vehicle is a single seater and has three wheels. The driver sits in a
reclined position with his/her legs directed towards the front of the
vehicle.
The two independent wheels are mounted on the front and the drive is
sent to the rear wheel.
The Engine, transmission and its associated components are mounted in
the rear section of the vehicle, that is, just behind the firewall and the rollcage.
The steering system controlling the front two wheels is based on the
Ackermann Steering System, taken from a go-kart.
Our Chassis is made of tubular aluminum and the shell is made out of
Fiber Reinforced Plastic, a patented plastic generously donated by General
Electric (GE).
Overall length of the car is 2400mm, maximum width being 600mm and
maximum height above the ground being 700 mm. the minimum ground
clearance is 100mm.
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 3
Project Garuda
VEHICLE SYSTEMS:
4.Engine:
The engine of the Shell Eco-Marathon car is power source for the vehicle,
converting chemical energy stored in the fuel to rotational mechanical
energy output by the driveshaft. Three different base engines were
considered for the Eco Marathon vehicle including: a modified SAE Briggs
and Stratton engine, a Honda GX35 used by the 2010 Eco-Marathon team,
and a Honda GX50.
4.1. SAE Briggs and Stratton:
Teams entering the society of Automobile Engineers (SAE) Supermileage
competition are required to use a 148cc Briggs and Stratton engine as the
basis of their design.Garuda team in the past have experimented with this
engine and made progressive modifications to the base engine including
converting a side head valve engine to over head valve engine and
reducing the displacement by altering the bore and stroke. The engine has
not run for several years and is less efficient than some of the stock
engines because its design is not optimized to run at the lower
displacement it has been modified to. We are not planning to compete at
the SAE Supermileage, therefore the use of Briggs and Stratton engine will
not be required. Using a small displacement base engine will have the
advantage of a more optimized design and a significant weight reduction
over the Briggs and Stratton engine, giving us an advantage over teams
planning to compete at the SAE event.
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 4
Project Garuda
5. Fuel System:
The fuel system is responsible for supplying the correct air/fuel mixture to
the engine for combustion, balancing power output and fuel consumption.
Our design requirements specifically state that the 2011 Shell EcoMarathon car will use a fuel injection system (for improved fuel delivery),
so a carbureted system was not considered as an option. As well, Shell
does not permit the use of electric fuel pumps for the Eco-Marathon
competition. The remaining two options were: manifold injection with a
mechanical fuel pump and throttle body injection with pressurized fuel.
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 5
Project Garuda
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 6
Project Garuda
Page 7
Project Garuda
Page 8
Project Garuda
Specifications include:
*Injector quality performance...<1ppm
*IPTV at 12 months (4-cylinder applications)...<.7
*Plugging test cycles with <5% flow shift...>300 (Delphi test cycles)
*Dynamic durability, % at billion (1,000 million) cycles...+/-3%
*Tip leakage (mean cc/min) air at 420 kPa...<0.02 cc/min
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 9
Project Garuda
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 10
Project Garuda
All signals from sensors are fed to the microprocessor chip through a
simple data bus system. A serial bus / Bafo (a serial to USB adapter)
system connects the ECU system to our computers. The microprocessor
board runs on the same 12V battery source (1.4 Ah) being used for all
other systems onboard the car. Detailed studies on the ignition curves and
rpm v/s load curves gives us an idea about the optimum fuel amount to be
injected at the rpm level range at which our car will run.
The RD0601 ecu system has proven itself robust, reliable and easy to
use. Using the RD0601 we can display up to four of the available ECU
parameters and have the values updated in real-time as we drive. It also
decodes the internal ECU error codes as they occur and displays them in
real time.
Having the EFI (Electronic Fuel Injection) system gives a computer
controlled injection rather than a mechanically controlled one. Electronic
fuel injection is considered to be superior to carburetion because it allows
more precise fuel metering for easier starting, lower emissions, better fuel
economy and performance.
7.Drive mechanism:
The drive mechanism transfers the power generated by the engine to the
clutch, transmission and finally the rear wheel to propel the vehicle. Three
concepts for the drive mechanism were considered: belt drive, gear drive
and chain drive.
7.1.Belt Drive:
Belt drive systems use pulleys that grip the belt on either end while they
rotate transmitting the angular rotation of the input pulley to that of the
output pulley Friction belts, such as flat or v-belts, are unstable because of
inherent power loss when slippage occurs as high torque overcomes the
friction generated by the tension in the belt. A notched synchronized belt
is more efficient because it uses grooves cut into the belt, low in cost, and
do not require lubrication; however a belt drive is not as robust as a chain
or gear drive because belts tend to wear and stretch with extended use.
As well, synchronized belts are not compatible with belt drive
transmissions (such as variable diameter sheaves); therefore a secondary
drive mechanism would be required if a belt drive is used .The
disadvantages of a synchronized belt drive outweigh the benefits,
eliminates it as an option.
7.2.Gear Drive:
In a gear drive, power is transmitted through the teeth of meshing spur or
helical gears. A gear drive is efficient and has low maintenance, but
weighs significantly more than a belt drive or chain drive and is more
costly. As well, a gear drive is not practical for transmitting power over
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 11
Project Garuda
distances that require idler gears to connect the driven and driving gears
because of the increased weight of the additional components. The layout
of the Eco-Marathon cars power train will require a distance between the
engines and drive wheel that would make a gear drive impractical, thus a
gear drive impractical, thus a gear drive is also unsuitable.
7.3.Roller Chain Drive:
The idea of a roller chain drive is much the same as a synchronized belt
system in that both the drive and driven pulleys or sprocket have teeth
that grip the notched roller chain as they rotate, transmitting power. Roller
chains are durable and offer high transmission efficiency at a reasonable
cost compared to a belt or gear drive.
8.Clutch:
A clutch is necessary to engage and disengage the engine to control
movement. As well, a clutch to disengage the engine while starting is a
requirement for the Shell Eco-Marathon. Three different clutch designs
were designs were considered: centrifugal clutch and cone clutch.
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 12
Project Garuda
9. TRANSMISSION:
A transmission is required to provide a variety of gear ratios to optimize
fuel
efficiency throughout the range of operating speeds encountered during
the course of
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 13
Project Garuda
Page 14
Project Garuda
lack of availability at power ratings required for the engine of the EcoMarathon
vehicle. Planetary hub transmissions are typically designed for bicyclists
and are not
able to take the higher torque and speed of a gasoline engine, therefore
hub
transmission is unsuitable for the Eco-Marathon vehicle.
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 15
Project Garuda
Selected
Honda GXH50
TBI with Pressurised Fuel System
Roller chain
Centrifugal clutch
10.1.Engineering Design:
Intermidiate drive:
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 16
Project Garuda
A direct chain drive from the engine to the wheel sprocket will be
incorporated. An automatic clutch assembly will be used to increase
efficiency.
The Honda GXH 50 cc engine comes with a power of 2.1 bhp (@7000rpm)
and a max torque of 2.8Nm (@4000rpm).
10.2. Calculations:
1. Sepang circuit distance (single lap) =2.8km
only 30% of this distance is done by running the
2. Number of laps to be done=4
3. Max time=28min (for 4 laps)=7min/lap
30% of this value=2.1min/lap=0.035hr/lap
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 17
engine=0.84km
Project Garuda
4. V= dist/time
0.84*1000 = 6.67m/s
0.035
5. V=W*r
6.67=W*0.127
(W)wheel=52.51rad/sec
Speed of wheel=60*33.35 = 501.46rpm
2*3.142
6. Speed of engine=4000rpm
(W)engine=2*3.142*4000 = 418.93rad/sec
60
7. (W)wheel = no. of teeth on engine shaft
(W)engine
no. of teeth on wheel sprocket
Assuming no. of teeth on engine shaft=12
418.93
12 teeth
no. of teeth on wheel sprocket
Intermediate Drive:
An intermediate drive will be included to change the direction of rotation
and also to change reduction since we need a reduction of 1:20.
So the number of teeth on the intermediate drive will be 48 and 20.
Acceleration:
1. T/r = F
2.8/0.0075 = 373N
2. F/20 = (F)wheel
373/20 = 18.65N
3. (F)wheel+mmg = ma
18.65+0.3*9.81*100 = 100*a
a=3.1295m/s
4. For 45kmph,
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 18
Project Garuda
v = u+at
45*10^3 = 0+3.1295t
3600
t=4 sec
For 65kmph, t=5.32sec
11. CHASSIS:
The material selected for construction of the chassis is aluminum 6063, T6
age hardened. This was our material of choice because of its relatively
high specific strength for its weight, ease of machinability and its
corrosion resistance.
We specifically chose 6063, T6 grade due to its availability in Bangalore
and due to its widespread use in structural applications.
Wheel base:
Wheel Track:
Maximum height:
Ground Clearance:
Chassis Material:
78 inches
18 inches
11 inches
6 inches
Tubular Aluminum, 6063, T6.
Page 19
Project Garuda
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 20
Project Garuda
The ladder frame provides more rigidity and provides a more stiffer platform for the
application of loads.
Now the frame is being analysed for stress:
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 21
Project Garuda
According to the rules the roll hoop must be able to withstand 70kgf of load.
The roll hoop is required to protect the car during an accident when the
car overturns. Here the roll hoop is analysed to withstand 70kgf.the roll
hoop consist of 1 circular section profile over a path to protect the
driver.
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 22
Project Garuda
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 23
Project Garuda
steering column
tie rod
to chassis
Page 24
Project Garuda
Turning Radius:
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 25
Project Garuda
to chassis
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 26
Project Garuda
50
Page 27
Project Garuda
front view
tie rod
wheel
to chassis
tochassis
topview
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
back view
Page 28
Project Garuda
fro
n
tv
ie
w
12.5.Fabrication:
Aluminum sections will be used to build the steering sections.
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 29
Project Garuda
13. SHELL:
The shell design and fabrication represents one of the most complex and
challenging aspects of our project.
13.1. Shell Design Considerations:
1) The shell geometry should have as low a drag co-efficient as possible,
thereby
Reducing air resistance and improving mileage.
2) The Aero design must produce as low negative lift (down force) as
possible.
3) The shell should be light weight.
4) It should be possible to mount the shell to the chassis.
5) Parts of the shell should be readily detachable to facilitate driver exit as
well as
Servicing of vehicle components.
6) The shell surface should be as smooth as possible, so as to reduce
friction drag.
7) The finalized shape should be easy to fabricate.
The drag force experienced by the shell can be divided into two
components, namely form drag and the frictional drag. Our goal is to
determine the optimal shell design to reduce both components.
The basic design factors that reduce the form drag are:
1) Reducing the frontal area of shell
2) Contouring of shell to provide optimal streamlining
3) Prevention of separation of flow, both through optimal contouring and
using special
Techniques for boundary layer control
The friction drag is influenced by the surface roughness of the body, as
well as the surface area (particularly over which un-separated flow
occurs).
Further, to reduce the negative lift experienced by the shell, we need to
reduce the upsweep at the rear of the shell as far as possible, preventing
the formation of a large low pressure region at the rear underside of the
shell that would reduce down force at the rear.
In order to design a contour that was relatively simple to analyze and
fabricate, we needed to settle upon a basic curve/function to define the
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 30
Project Garuda
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 31
Project Garuda
This image shows the vehicle configuration with two wheels in the front
and one wheel at the rear.
Page 32
Project Garuda
14.2. Brakes:
In order to select an appropriate braking system for our vehicle, we had to
consider various brakes on the market that could easily be fitted onto our
wheels. Further, the brakes needed to be as light as possible. They should
also be compact as the wheels are covered.
The logical choice was to go in for three disc brakes, one on each wheel,
as they provide sufficient braking force, while satisfying the above
mentioned requirements.
Configuration of brakes: We are using three sets of the aforementioned
disc brakes, with one set for each wheel. The brakes are readily
adjustable, allowing us to set an optimal brake balance. The discs will be
mounted (coupled) on the hub shaft of the wheels and the calipers that
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 33
Project Garuda
will hold the disc and thereby stop the wheel from moving will be mounted
onto the chassis.
Braking force: We estimate a braking force of approximately 0.7g. Our
method of calculating this is as follows (for locking of wheels):
Nr = mg (0.47 h/l), Nf = mg (0.53 + h/l).. Normal forces at front and
rear respectively
F = (Nr + Nf) Total Breaking Force
Our tires on dry asphalt have = 0.7 approx.
h = 6 (height of centre of gravity), l = 78 (wheel base)
m = 100 kg, fully loaded.
Hence, Nr = 41.61 kgf at the rear wheel and Nf = 59 kgf at the front
wheels, combined.
Therefore, F = 71 kgf.
Estimated Stopping distance from a speed of 10m/s (36 kmph) = 7.28 m.
Estimated Stopping distance from a speed of 4.44 m/s (10 mph) = 1.438
m.
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 34
Project Garuda
R V College of Engineering
Dept of Mechanical Engineering
Page 35