Home | A
| HOME | NEWS TRACK | TECH TRACK | TECH TALK | TECH REVIEW | TECH INNO
| PRO-SOLUTIONS | TECH RESOURCES | TECH EXIM | BOOKS AND TECHNI
Name of the Article
....TECHTALK
1/7
10/14/2011
2/7
10/14/2011
The bar chart 2 shows the balance achieved with additional operators added. If we notice we s
operators being appointed in bottleneck operations 4, 6, 7, 10, etc. while no action was
operations 5, 9, 11, etc. It was because the trimming was added to these operations to balan
from another operation.
The production output from the 32-operator team averaged 92 pieces per hour, even after ba
some of the above operations with additional operators; the average output was at 110 pieces p
The I.E. department with the JAAF team tackled all those operations above the red line (avera
operation), and those operations with little work content.
Operation 1 and 3 join together
Operation 10 removed trimming and added to
operation 11
Operation 14 and 15 join together
Operation 19 add an operator
The result of the changes (shown in the balancing bar chart 3) was decrease in number of ope
32 to 31 and an increase in output to 115 pieces per hour; an increase in productivity of 29%
output per operator. The balance was still not ideal, but was improved and could be improved
more study.
stitchworld.net/display0.asp?msg=22
3/7
10/14/2011
4/7
10/14/2011
and 5-10% extra time per operation was added for variations in material, speed, han
unforeseeable interruptions.
The detail of the balancing chart makes it easy to see which operations need to be checke
joined, and also where the attention needs to be applied on the pick up and alignme
machining, or check, trim and placing work aside.
The operations are performed in linear sequence, i.e. operation 4 is performed after operation 3
15 is performed after operation 14, and so on
Operation 4 was allocated the trimming from operation 3. The trimming was of thread end
the operation, not separation of the garments, for example, the thread ends left after s
waistband.
Operation 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 18, 19 an operator was added.
Operation 15 was allocated the trimming from operation 14.
Operation 21 the handling was changed to present the work for operation 22 in a way th
the handling on Operation 22.
The outcome (as shown in bar chart 5) was a sewing team where every operator completed th
less than the takt time required, and worked with a single piece flow from operator to operator.
was a predictable one piece every 27 seconds (0.45 standard minute takt time) which meant
per hour. There was no re-balancing carried out unless an operator could not achieve the takt tim
The takt time (red line in bar chart 5) is the rate of production required to meet the customer s
demand. In this case the customer order was divided by the number of production days availab
required rate of 1100 pieces per day. The takt time was calculated by dividing the working
hours x 60 minutes) by the required output.
Takt time = (9 x 60)/1100 = 0.49 minutes
Therefore every 0.49 minutes a garment needed to be produced. To give a little bit of security, th
was set at 0.45 minutes, which means the output (with 0 delay time) was 1200 pieces per da
for a loss of 100 pieces per day if any unexpected problems occurred.
stitchworld.net/display0.asp?msg=22
5/7
10/14/2011
Conclusion
The initial balance and continual re-balance of lines is one of the most critical jobs for ensu
production. It is not an activity that can happen only once and then be ignored for the prod
unless you are running a one piece flow based on takt time. Every team supervisor must be
check cycle times and assess whether sewing operators are capable of achieving the time
required. Decisions can be made quickly using this simple tool.
Balancing charts can be a great tool for analyzing problems and balancing lines, but it takes so
collect the cycle times of every operator. Supervisors need to start with monitoring line input vs
to see if there is an imbalance, then look for the operations with lots of work. Cycle checking c
used to help deal with the bottleneck problems of balancing.
Go Back
6/7
10/14/2011
| HOME | NEWS TRACK | TECH TRACK | TECH TALK | TECH REVIEW | TECH INNO
PRO- SOLUTIONS | TECH RESOURCE | TECH EXIM | ABOUT US | A
stitchworld.net/display0.asp?msg=22
7/7