INSTITUTULUI
POLITEHNIC
DIN IAI
2012
Editura POLITEHNIUM
Editorial Board
President: Prof. dr. eng. Ion Giurma, Member of the Academy of Agricultural
Sciences and Forest, Rector of the Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iai
Editor-in-Chief: Prof. dr. eng. Carmen Teodosiu, Vice-Rector of the
Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iai
Honorary Editors of the Bulletin: Prof. dr. eng. Alfred Braier,
Prof. dr. eng. Hugo Rosman,
Prof. dr. eng. Mihail Voicu Corresponding Member of the Romanian Academy,
President of the Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iai
Editors in Chief of the MATHEMATICS. THEORETICHAL MECHANICS.
PHYSICS Section
Prof. dr. phys. Maricel Agop, Prof. dr. math. Narcisa Apreutesei-Dumitriu,
Prof. dr. eng. Radu Ibnescu
Honorary Editors: Prof. dr. eng. Ioan Bogdan, Prof. dr. eng. Gheorghe Nag
Associated Editor: Associate Prof. dr. phys. Petru Edward Nica
22
SUMAR
VALERIU POPA, O teorem de punct fix pentru funcii ocazional slab
compatibile care satisfac o relaie implicit fr ipoteza de descretere
i aplicaii (engl., rez. rom.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pag.
103
109
2012
CONTENTS
Pp.
11
97
MIHAI
97
Abstract. In this paper we extend the main result for occasionally weakly
compatible mappings satisfying a new type of implicit relation without
decreasing assumption in symmetric spaces using a weakly form of altering
distance. In the last part of the paper, we reduce the study of fixed points for
mappings satisfying a contractive condition of integral type to the study of fixed
points for mappings satisfying contractive conditions involving an altering
distance.
Key words: fixed point, occasionally weakly compatible mappings,
symmetric spaces, implicit relation, integral type.
1. Introduction
Let S and T be self mappings of a metric space ( X , d ) . Sessa (1982)
defined S and T to be weakly commuting if d ( STx, TSx) d ( Sx, Tx) for all
x X . In 1986, Jungck (1986) introduced the concept of compatibility as
follows: S and T are compatible if lim d ( STx n , TSx n ) = 0 whenever ( x n ) is
n
In (Khan et al., 1984) fixed point results involving altering distance have
been introduced.
An altering distance is a mapping : [0, ) [0, ) which satisfies
( 2 ) : (t ) = 0 if and only if t = 0 .
Fixed points of involving altering distance have also been studied in
(Popa & Mocanu, 2007; Sastri & Babu, 1998; Sastri & Babu, 1999) and in other
papers.
In (Popa, 1997; Popa, 1999) the study of fixed points for mappings
satisfying implicit relation is initiated.
Let F be the set of all real functions F :[0, )6 with the following
properties:
( F1 ) : F is nonincreasing in variables t 5 and t 6 ,
( F2 ) : For u 0, v > 0 ,
(2.2)
In the last part of paper we reduce the study of some fixed points for a
class of owc pairs satisfying a contractive condition of integral type to the study
of fixed points for mappings satisfying contractive conditions involving a
weakly altering distance.
3. Implicit Relations
Let Fd be the family of functions F :[0, )6 satisfying the
following conditions:
( F1 ) : for all u 0, v > 0 and w 0 with
Example 3.2.
F = t1 h max{t 2 , t 3 , t 4 } + bt 5t 6 , where
h [0,1)
and b > 0 .
Example 3.3.
F = (1 + pt2 )t1 pt3t4 h max{t2 , t3 , t4 } + b(t5 + t6 ) , where
0 h<1 , b > 0 and p 0 .
Example 3.4.
F = t12 at 22 b
t 32 + t 42
, where 0 < a, b < 1 and
1 + t5 + t 6
a + 2b < 1 .
Example 3.5.
t2 + t2
F = t12 at 22 b 3 4 , where
1 + t 5t 6
a + 2b < 1 .
Example 3.6.
t 32 t 42
F = t13
.
1 + t 2 + t5 + t6
= t13
t 32 t 42
.
1 + t 2 + t5t 6
Example 3.7.
Example 3.8.
a + b + c <1.
t 4 t5
, where 0 < a, b, c < 1 and
1 + t5 + t 6
Example 3.9.
min{t52 , t62 }
F = t at b
,
1 + t3 + t4
2
1
2
2
a > 0, b 0
where
and
a + b < 1.
Example 3.10. F = t1 bt2 a(t3 + t4 ) c min{t5 , t6 } , where a, b, c 0 ,
2a + b < 1 and b + c < 1 .
4. Main Results
T h e o r e m 4.1. Let ( X , d ) be a symmetric space and f , g , S and T
be self mappings of X such that
(4.1)
(4.2)
(4.4)
(4.6)
w = fu = Su = Tv = gv
is a common point of coincidence of ( f , S ) and ( g , T ) . If ( f , S ) have an
other point of coincidence q = fp = Sp fu = gv , then, by (4.3) we have
successively
F (d( fx, gy ),d( Sx, Ty ),d( fx, Sx),d( gy, Ty ),d( gy, Sx),d( fx, Ty ))0
(4.7)
5. Applications
Branciari (2002) proved the following theorem
Let ( X , d ) be a complete metric space, c (0,1)
and f : ( X , d ) ( X , d ) be a mapping such that for each x, y X
T h e o r e m 5.1.
d ( fx, fy )
d ( x, y )
h(t )dt c
h(t )dt ,
for any > 0 , h(t )dt > 0 . Then, f has a unique fixed point z X such that
0
F h(t )dt , h(t )dt , h(t )dt , h(t ) dt , h(t )dt , h(t )dt 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
d ( Sx ,Ty )
d ( fx , Sx )
d ( gy ,Ty )
d ( gy , Sx )
d ( fx ,Ty )
(5.2)
10
Pant R. P., Common Fixed Points for Noncommuting Mappings. J. Math. Anal. Appl.,
188, 436-440 (1994).
Popa V., A General Fixed Point Theorem for Expansion Mappings in Pseudo-compact
Spaces. Bul. Inst. Polit. Iai, XLVIII(LII), 3-4, s. Matematic. Mecanic
teoretic Fizic, 7-10 (2002).
Popa V., Mocanu M., A New Viewpoint in the Study of Fixed Points for Mappings
Satisfying a Contractive Condition of Integral Type. Bul. Inst. Polit. Iai,
LIII(LVII), 5, s. Matematic. Mecanic teoretic Fizic, 269-286 (2007).
Popa V., Mocanu M., Altering Distance and Common Fixed Points under Implicit
Relations. Hacettepe J. Math. Statistics, 38, 3, 329-337 (2009).
Popa V., Some Fixed Point Theorem for Compatible Mappings Satisfying an Implicit
Relation. Demontratio Math. 32, 157-163 (1999).
Popa V., Some Fixed Point Theorems for Implicit Contractive Mappings. Stud. Cerc. t.
Ser. Mat., Univ. Bacu, 7, 127-133 (1997).
Popa V., Symmetric Spaces and Fixed Point Theorems for Occasionally Weakly
Compatible Mappings Satisfying Contractive Conditions of Integral Type. Bul.
Inst. Polit. Iai, LV(LIX), 3, s. Matematic. Mecanic teoretic. Fizic., 11-21
(2009).
Rhoades B. E., Two Fixed Point Theorems for Mappings Satisfying a General
Contractive Condition of Integral Type. Intern. J. Math. Math. Sci., 63, 40074013 (2002).
Sastri K. P., Babu G. V. R., Fixed Point Theorems in Metric Spaces by Altering
Distances. Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc., 90, 175-182 (1998).
Sastri K. P., Babu G. V. R., Some Fixed Point Theorems by Altering Distance Between
the Points. J. Pure Appl. Math., 30, 641-647 (1999).
Sedghi S., Shobe N., Common Fixed Point Theorems for Four Mappings in Complete
Metric Spaces. Bull. Iranian Math. Soc., 33, 2, 37-48 (2007).
Sessa S., On a Weak Commutativity Condition in Fixed Point Considerations. Publ.
Inst. Math. (Beograd) (N.S), 32, 46, 149-153 (1982).
Vijaraju P., Rhoades B. E., Mohansaj R., A Fixed Point Theorem for Pair of Mappings
Satisfying a General Contractive Condition of Integral Type. Intern. J. Math.
Math. Sci., 15, 2359-2364 (2005).
NICOLETA NEGOESCU
Universit Technique Gheorghe Asachi de Iai,
Dpartment de Mathmatiques
Reue: February 28, 2012
Accepte pour publication: May 15, 2012
Abstract. The aim of the present paper is to obtain a common fixed points
results for four mappings by using a weak **commutativity condition..
Key words: common fixed point, work commmutativity mapps, weak
**commuting maps.
12
Niooleta Negoescu
(1)
(2)
13
d 2 ( S 2 z , z ) d ( I 2 z , z )d ( S 2 z , z ) ou d 2 ( S 2 z , z ) d 2 ( S 2 z , z ) car S 2 z = I 2 z.
De la dernire ingalit il suit d 2 ( S 2 z , z ) = 0 (car < 1), donc S 2 z = z et
aussi S 2 z = z = I 2 z.
Dune manire analogue on montre que T 2 z = z = J 2 z.
Maintenant, en employant la faible **commutativit des applications S et
I, on a I 2 Sz = SI 2 z et ainsi I 2 Sz = S ( I 2 z ) = S 3 z = Sz. Alors
d 2 ( Sz , z ) = d 2 ( S 3 z , T 2 z ) = d 2 ( S 2 ( Sz ), T 2 z ) d ( I 2 ( Sz ), S 2 ( Sz )d ( J 2 z , T 2 z ) +
+ d ( I 2 ( Sz ), T 2 z ) d ( S 2 ( Sz ), J 2 z )
et
d 2 ( Sz , z ) d ( I 2 ( Sz ), S 3 z )d ( z , z ) + d ( I 2 ( Sz ), T 2 z )d ( S 2 ( Sz ), ou d 2 ( Sz , z )d ( Sz , z ),
14
Niooleta Negoescu
d 2 ( z , u ) = d 2 ( S 2 z , T 2u ) d ( I 2 z , S 2 z )d ( J 2 u , T 2u ) + d ( I 2 z , T 2 u )d ( S 2 z , J 2 u ) =
= d ( z , z )d (u.u ) + d ( z , u )d ( z , u ).
Donc d ( z , u ) d ( z , u ) et il suit d 2 ( z , u ) = 0 (car < 1), cest--dire u = z.
2
Observation 3. Du Thorme 1 on obtient, videment, le suivant thorme pour deux applications continues.
T h o r m e 2. Soient S, I: X X , o (X, d) est un espace mtrique
complet, deux applications continues faiblement **commutatives qui satisfont
aux conditions S 2 ( X ) I 2 ( X ) et d 2 ( S 2 x, S 2 y ) d ( I 2 x, S 2 x) d ( I 2 y , S 2 y ) +
d 2 ( I 2 x, S 2 x ) d 2 ( J 2 y , T 2 y )
,
d ( I 2 x , S 2 y ) d ( J 2 y , T 2 y ) + d ( I 2 x, T 2 y ) d ( S 2 x , J 2 y )
pour tous x, y X , x y.
d 2 ( S 2 x, T 2 y ) <
(3)
BIBLIOGRAPHIE
Fisher B., Four Mappings with Common Fixed Point. J. Univ. Kuwait Sci., B, 131
(1981).
15
Jain R. K., Dixit S. P., Some Fixed Point Theorems for Mappings in Pseudocompact
Tihonov Spaces. Bull. Math. Debrecen, 33, 195-197 (1986).
Junck G., Commuting Maps and Fixed Points. Amer. Math., Monthly, 83, 261-263
(1979).
Negoescu Nicoleta, Extensions des thorme de R. K. Jain et S. P. Dixit. Vol. Itinerant
Seminar of Functional Equations, Approximation and Convexity. Univ. ClujNapoca, 1988, 243-248.
Negoescu Nicoleta, Un thorme de point fixe pour deux applications commutatives
dun certain type de contractivit. Studii i cercetri tiinifice, Univ. Bacu, Ser.
Matematica, 2, 85-86 (1992).
Pathak H. K., Weak *Commuting Mappings and Fixed Points. Indian J. Pure Appl.
Math., 17, 201-211 (1986).
Pathak H. K., On Fixed Points of Weak **Commutative Mappings in Compact Metric
Spaces. Bull. Calcutta Math., 83, 203-208 (1991).
Rhades B. E., Sessa S., Common Fixed Point Theorems for Three Mappings under a
Weak Commutativity Condition. Indian J. Pure and Appl. Math., 17, 45 -47
(1986).
Sessa S., On Weak Commutativity Condition on Mappings in Fixed Points Conditions.
Publ. Inst. Math., 32, 149-153 91982).
Sessa S., Fisher B., On Fixed Points of Weakly Commuting Mappings in Complete
Metric Spaces. Jnnbha, 15, 79 91985).
Sessa S., Mukherjee R. N., Som T., A Common fixed Point theorem for Weakly
Commuting Mappings. Math. Japonica, 31, 235-245 (1986).
Singh S. L., Ha S. K., Cho Y. J., Coincidence and Fixed Points of Non-liniar Hybrid
Contractions. J. Math. And Math. Sci., 12, 147-156 (1989).
1. Introduction
There is evidence that the interest of the workers in non-Newtonian fluids
is on the leading edge during the last few years. Some researchers have the
opinion that flows of such fluids are important in industry and technology.
Several investigations in the field cite a wide variety of applications in
rheological problems, in biological sciences, geophysics, chemical and
petroleum industries (Zhaosheng et al., 1998). It is an established fact that
unlike the Newtonian fluids, the flows of non-Newtonian fluids cannot be
analyzed by a single constitutive equation. This is due to rheological properties
18
19
v = u ( y , z , t )i ,
(1)
and the governing equation is given by (Khan et al., 2007; Khan et al., 2006)
(1 + Dt )
2
u
2
= v(1 + r Dt ) 2 + 2
t
z
y
Bo2
u
(1 + Dt )u ,
(2)
is the electric
is the
f ( )
1
d , 0 < 1 is the Caputo derivative
(1 ) 0 (t )
operator (Hilfer, 2000), (Podlubny, 1999).
t
u( y, z,0) =
u( y, z,0)
= 0; y > 0, 0 z d ,
t
u(0, z, t ) = U ; t > 0,
0 < z < d,
u( y,0, t ) = u( y, d , t ) = 0;
y, t > 0
(3)
(4)
(5)
and
u( y, z, t ) =
u( y, z, t )
0 as y , t > 0 ,
y
(6)
The fractional differential equation (2) together with the initial and
boundary conditions (3)-(6) will be solved using the Fourier sine and Laplace
2
n
sin( y )sin( n z) , where n = ,
transforms. Multiplying this equality by
20
integrating the result with respect to y and z from 0 to infinity, 0 to d and taking
into account the conditions (3)-(6), we find that (see also (Podlubny, 1999),
(Sneddon, 1951))
(1 + Dt )
usn ( , t )
+ v( 2 + n2 )(1 + r Dt )
t
(7)
B
2 1 (1)
(1 + Dt ) usn ( , t ) == U
;
2
o
, t > 0,
usn ( , t ) =
2
u ( y, z, t )sin( y )sin( n z )dydz ,
0 0
(8)
usn ( ,0)
= 0;
t
> 0.
(9)
Applying the Laplace transform to Eq. (7) and taking into account the
initial conditions (9), we find that
2 1 (1) n
usn ( , t ) =
(10)
U
,
Bo2
+1
2
2
(1 + q )
q q + q + v( + n )(1 + r q ) +
U
q
2 1 (1) n
2 1 ( 1)n
U
F1n ( , q)
2
2
2
n
+ n
n
+ n2
(11)
2 1 (1)
F1n ( , q) F2 n ( , q),
n
n
in which
F1n ( , q) =
and
1
,
q + ( 2 + n2 )
(12)
21
F2 n ( , q) =
v q +1 + 1Bo2 q + 2 r ( 2 + n2 )q + 1Bo2
q q + q +1 + v( 2 + n2 ) + r ( 2 + n2 ) q + 1Bo2 + 1Bo2 q
{q
vq + vBq 1 + a ( 2 + n2 ) q 1 + Bq 1
+1
+ ( 2 + n2 ) + B + q + a( 2 + n2 ) q + Bq
(13)
Bo2
, a = r . The function F2 n ( , q) can be also written as a double
with
F2 n ( , q) =
(1) k vq + vBq 1 + a( 2 + n2 ) q 1 + Bq 1
q +1 + 1 ( 2 + n2 ) + B
k =0
k +1
q + a( 2 + n2 )q + Bq =
i + j +l =k
k = 0 i , j ,l 0
(14)
2
2
l
(1) k k ! B a( + n )
i ! j !l !
i
q + + Bq + 1 + a( 2 + n2 ) q + 1 + B 1
q +1 + ( 2 + n2 ) + B
k +1
where = i + j + l.
Inverting Eq. (11) by means of Fourier sine formulae and using Eq. (A2),
we find that
22
u ( y, z, t ) =
4U
dq
sin( N z ) N y
e
N
n =1
8U
d
sin( N z ) sin( y )
F1N ( , q)d
N 0 2 + N2
n =1
(15)
8U
d
sin( N z )
sin( y )F1N ( , q) F2 N ( , q)d ;
N 0
n =1
N =
(2n 1)
.
2
Introducing (12) and (14) into (15), inverting the result by means of the
inverse Laplace transform, using (A3) and the convolution theorem, we find the
velocity field under form
u ( y, z , t ) = u N ( y, z , t )
(16)
8U
d
2
2
sin( N z ) t
sin( y ) f 2 N ( , s)e ( + N )(t s ) dsd ,
N
n =1
0 0
where
uN ( y, z, t ) =
4U
d
sin( N z ) N y
e
N
n =1
(17)
8U
d
sin( N z ) sin( y ) ( 2 + N2 ) t
e
d ,
N 0 2 + N2
n =1
f 2 n ( , q) =
k = 0 i , j ,l 0
23
l
2
2
(1) k k ! B a( + n )
i ! j !l !
i
(18)
BG +1 , 1,b (cn ( ), t ) ,
( 2 + n2 ) + B
,
b = k +1
and
c j ( j + b)t ( j +b )a 1
.
j =0 ( j + 1) (b)[ ( j + b) a ]
G ,a ,b (c, t ) =
(19)
Finally, for later use, we take d = 2h and change the origin of the
coordinate system at the middle of the channel. Consequently, putting
z = z * + h and dropping out the star notation, Eq. (16) takes the suitable form
u ( y, z , t ) = u N ( y, z , t )
4U
h
(1) n +1 cos( N z )
N
n =1
(20)
t
sin( y ) f 2 N ( , s )e (
+ N2 )( t s )
dsd ,
0 0
where N =
(2n 1)
, f 2 N ( , s ) is the same function as before with
2h
N instead
2U
h
(1) n +1 cos( N z ) N y
e
N
n =1
(21)
4U
h
24
In order to determine the shear stress at the bottom wall we determine the
element 1 ( y , z , t ) = S xy ( y, z , t ) of the extra stress tensor S and use the relation
(Qi et al., 2007) For this we are using the relation (Qi et al., 2007)
(1 + Dt ) 1 ( y, z , t ) = (1 + r Dt )
u ( y, z , t )
.
y
(22)
Applying the Laplace transform to Eq. (22) and using the initial condition
(23)
we find that
1 ( y, z, q) =
1 + r q u ( y, z , q)
,
y
(1 + q )
(24)
u ( y, z, q) =
8U sin( N z )
d n =1 N
sin( y )
q q + q +1 + ( 2 + N2 )(1 + r q ) + B (1 + q )
(25)
d ,
from which
u ( y, z , q ) 8U sin( N z )
=
y
d n =1 N
(26)
2 cos( y )
d .
+1
2
2
0 q
q + q + ( + N )(1 + r q ) + B(1 + q )
1 ( y, z, q) =
8 U
d
sin( N z ) 2
cos( y ) H1 ( q) H 2 N ( , q)d ,
N 0
n =1
H1 ( q ) =
and
1 q 1
q q 1
+ r
,
q +
q +
(27)
H 2 N ( , q) =
{q
25
+ aq
+1
( 2 + n2 ) + B + q + a ( 2 + n2 )q + Bq
Inverting Eq. (26), using (A5) and the convolution theorem we find the
shear stress 1 ( y, z , t ) under simple form
1 ( y, z, t ) =
8U
d
sin(N z )
n =1
(28)
H1 (q ) and
H 2 N ( , q) are given by
h1 (t ) = G ,1,1 ( , t ) + r G , 1,1 ( , t )
(29)
respectively,
i + j +l = k
h2 n ( , t ) =
k = 0 i , j ,l 0
l
2
2
(1) k k ! B a( + n )
i ! j !l !
i
(30)
G +1 , ,b (cn ( ), t ) + aG +1 , + ,b (cn ( ), t ) .
1 ( y, z , t ) =
4U
h
(1) n +1 cos( N z )
n =1
(31)
0 0
1W ( z, t ) =
4 U
h
(1) n +1 cos( N z )
n =1
2 h1 (t s ) h2 N ( , s )dsd .
0 0
(32)
26
3. Special Cases
1. Making r 0 into Eqs. (18), (20), (28), (31) and (32) we obtain the
corresponding solutions for generalized Maxwell fluids performing the same
motion. Their form being the same, we only give the adequate expressions of
the corresponding functions f 2 n ( , t ) and h2 n ( , t ) , namely
i + j =k
f 2 n ( , t ) =
(1) k k! B j
[G +1 , + ,b (cn ( ), t ) +
i! j!i
k =0 i , j 0
(33)
and
i + j =k
h2 n ( , t ) = 1
k =0 i , j 0
(1) k k! B j
G +1 , ,b (cn ( ), t ),
i! j!i
(34)
where = i + j .
2. By now letting 1 into the last two relations and introducing the
result into Eqs. (18), (20), (28), (31), (32), the corresponding solutions for
ordinary Maxwell fluids are obtained.
3. The similar solutions for ordinary Oldroyd-B fluids are also obtained
making and 1 into our general solutions. Consequently, their
expressions are again given by Eqs. (18), (20), (28), (31) and (32), in which
i + j +l = k
f 2 n ( , t ) =
k = 0 i , j ,l 0
l
2
2
(1) k k ! B a( + n )
G2, k +1, k +1 (cn ( ), t ) +
i ! j !l !
i
(35)
1
2
n
and
j
2
2
l
i + j + l = k (1) k k ! B a( + n )
h2 n ( , t ) =
G2,k , k +1 (cn ( ), t ).
k = 0 i , j ,l 0 i ! j !l !
i
(36)
u ( y, t ) = u N ( y, t )
27
2U
sin( y ) f
( , s)e
(t s )
dsd ,
(37)
0 0
( y, t ) =
2 U
(38)
0 0
y
y
u N ( y, t ) = U 1 erf
= Uerfc
,
2 t
2 t
(39)
5. Conclusions
1. In this paper we studied unsteady MHD flows of an Oldroyd-B fluid
with fractional derivatives in the domain ( x, y, z ) (, ) (0, ) [0, d ]
between two side walls perpendicular to a plate situated in ( x, z ) plane of
Cartesian coordinate system Oxyz. The motion of the fluid is generated by the
plate that moves with constant velocity along x axis.
2. Using the sine Fourier and Laplace transforms we established
expressions for the velocity u ( x, y, z ) and tangential shear stress
1 ( y, z, t ) = S xy ( y, z , t ) . These solutions, corresponding to an Oldroyd-B fluid
with fractional derivatives, are new in the literature and particularized for
Maxwell fluid with fractional derivatives and for ordinary Maxwell and
Oldroyd-B fluids. Also, solutions corresponding to flows over an infinite plate
have been determined as a particular case of general solutions. It is important to
point out that several hydrodynamic flows can be studied with our solutions
making zero the magnetic coefficient B.
Appendix
1+ j + l = k i j l
1
xk
a b c k!
= (1) k k +1 ; (a + b + c) k =
,
x + a k =0
a
i ! j !l !
i , j ,l 0
(A1)
28
sin( y )
d = e ay ; Re(a) > 0,
2
2 + a2
qb
d
Ga ,b,c (d , t ) = L1 a
; Re(ac b) > 0, Re(q) > 0, a < 1
c
q
(q d )
(A2)
(A3)
REFERENCES
Fetecu C., Fetecu C., On Some Axial Couette Flows of Non-Newtonian Fluids. Z.
Angew Math. Phys. (ZAMP), 56, 1098-106 (2005).
Fetecu C., Fetecu C., The First Problem of Strokes for an Oldroyd-B Fluid. Int. J.
Non- Linear Mech., 38, 1939-1944 (2003).
Fetecu C., Fetecu C., Vieru D., On Some Helical Flows of Oldroyd-B Fluids. Acta
Mech., 189, 53-63 (2007).
Fetecu C., Hayat T., Fetecu C., Steady State Solutions for Some Simple Flows of
Generalized Burgers Fluids. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 41, 880-887 (2006).
Hayat T., Sajid M., Ayub M., A Note on Series Solution for Generalized Couette Flow.
Comm. Nonlinear Sci. Numerical Simulation , 12, 1481-1487 (2007).
Hilfer R., Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics. World Scientific Press,
Singapore, 2000.
Khan M., Fetecu C., Hayat T., MHD Transient Flows in a Channel of Rectangular
Cross-section with Porous Medium. Phys. Lett. A., 369, 44-54 (2007).
Khan M., Hayat T., Asghar S., Exact Solution for MHD Flow of a Generalized
Oldroyd-B Fluid with Modified Darcys Law. Int. J. Eng. Sci., 44, 333-339
(2006).
Lorenzo C.F., Hartley T.T., Generalized Functions for Fractional Calculus. NASA/TP1999-209424, 1999.
Nazar M., Zulqarnain M., Akram M. S., Asif M., Flow through an Oscillating
Rectangular Duct for Generalized Maxwell Fluid with Fractional Derivatives.
Comm. Non-Lin. Sci. Numer. Simul., 17(8), 3219-3234 (2012).
Oldroyd J.G., On the Formulation of Rheological Equations of State. Proc. R. Soc.,
London, Ser. A., 200, 523-541 (1950).
Podlubny I., Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, San Diego, 1999.
Qi H., Xu M., Stokes First Problem for a Viscoelastic Fluid with the Generalized
Oldroyd-B Model. Acta Mech. Sinica., 23, 463-469 (2007).
Rajagopal K.R., On the Boundary Cnditions for Fluids of the Differential Type in: A
Sequira. (Ed.), Navier-Strokes Equation and Related Non-Linear Problems.
Plenum Press, New York, 1995.
Rajagopal K.R., Bhatnagar R.K., Exact Solutions for Some Simple Flows of an OldroydB Fluid. Acta Mech., 113, 233-239 (1995).
Rajagopal K.R., Kaloni P.N., Some Remarks on Boundary Conditions for Fluids of
Differential Type. In: G.A.C.Grams, S.K. Malik (Eds.), Continuum Mechanics
and its Applications. Hemisphere, Washington DC , 1989.
Rajagopal K.R., Srinivasa A.R., A Thermodynamical Frame-work for Rate Type Fluid
Models. J. Non- Newtonian Fluid Mech., 88, 207-227 (2000).
29
Sneddon I.N., Fourier Transforms. McGraw-Hill Book Company. Inc., New York
Toronto London, 1951.
Tan W.C., Masuoka T., Stokes First Problem for an Oldroyd-B Fluid in a Porous Half
Space. Physc. Fluids, 17, 023101-023107 (2005).
Tan W.C., Pan W.X., Xu M.Y., A Note on Unsteady Flows of a Viscoelastic Fluid with
the Fractional Maxwell Model Between Two Parallel Plates. Int. J. Non- Linear
Mech., 38, 615-620 (2003).
Vieru D., Fetecu C., Fetecu C., Flow of a Viscoelastic Fluid with the Fractional
Maxwell Model Between Two Side Walls Perpendicular to a Plate. Appl. Math.
Comput., 200(1), 459-464 (2008).
Zhaosheng Y., Jianzhong L., Numerical Research on Coherent Structure in the
Viscoelastic Second Order Mixing Layers. Appl. Math. Mech., 19, 671-677
(1998).
Zheng L., Liu Y., Zhang Z. Y., Slip Effects on MHD Flow of a Generalized OldroydFluid with Fractional Derivatives. Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Appl., 13(2),
513-523 (2012).
1. Introduction
Recent papers have shown that fractality is essential in the analyze of the
nucleation mechanism in the electrodeposition phenomena (Bagotsky, 2006;
Zhou et al., 1999; Shaikh et al. 2009). One way to introduce fractality is on the
base of scale relativity theory (SRT) (Nottale, 1993; Nottale, 2011). In the
present paper, using the SRT approach, some unusual reciprocal dependences of
the process parameters will be highlighted.
32
2. Theoretical Model
Considering that the electric charged particles move on fractal curves
(Nottale, 1993, Nottale, 2011; Agop et al., 2008; Casian-Botez et al., 2010), the
particle dynamics are described by the equation
V V
( 2 D ) 1
=
+ V V iD ( dt ) F V = 0
t
t
(1)
V = V iU
(2)
V of the form
V = 2iD ( dt )
(2
DF ) 1
( ln )
(3)
( 2 D ) 1
( 2 D ) 1
V = 2D ( dt ) F S iD ( dt ) F ln ,
V = 2 D ( dt )
U = D ( dt )
(2
(2
DF ) 1
DF ) 1
S ,
(4)
ln .
By substituting (4) in (1) and separating the real and the imaginary parts, up to
an arbitrary phase factor which may be set at zero by a suitable choice of the
phase of , we obtain
m0
+ (V )V = Q,
+ ( V ) = 0,
t
(5a,b)
33
Q = 2m0D 2 ( dt )
(4
DF ) 2
m0U 2
( 2 D ) 1
m0D ( dt ) F U .
2
(6)
Eq. (5a) represents the law of momentum conservation while equation (5b)
represents the law of probability density conservation. Together, these two
relations define the fractal hydrodynamics. If the fractal fluid is placed inside an
external field W , then the momentum conservation law (5a) becomes
V
m0
+ (V )V = (Q + W ) .
(7)
The fractal potential (6) results from the non-differentiability and has to
be treated as a kinetic term and not as a potential term. Moreover, the fractal
potential Q can generate a viscosity stress type tensor. Indeed, written in the
form
Q = m0D 2 ( dt )
(4
DF ) 2
2 1 2
(8)
il = m0D 2 ( dt )
(4
DF ) 2
i l ln = m0D 2 ( dt )
(4
DF ) 2
( i )( l ) .
i l
(9)
The divergence of this tensor is equal to the force density associated with Q
= Q.
(10)
dV
= .
dt
The momentum flux density type tensor is
m0
(11)
il = m0 ViVl il ,
(12)
m0 ( V ) = .
(13)
t
In order to complete the analogy with the classical fluid mechanics, we
formally introduce the kinematical and dynamical types viscosities:
34
= 2 D ( dt )
1
(2
1
m D
2 0
DF ) 1
( dt )
(2
DF ) 1
(14)
The quantities and are formal viscosities, both of them being induced by
the fractal scale. Then, the tensor il takes the usual form
U U l
il = i +
.
xi
xl
(15)
In particular, if il is diagonal
il = il ,
(16)
m0
,
+ (V V ) =
(17)
+ ( V ) = 0
t
If we assimilate the tensor (15) with the gas pressure, i.e. il = pil , Eqs. (17)
are reduced to the classical hydrodynamics.
In the one-dimensional case, using the substitutions
t = ,
kx = ,
v
=V ,
v0
=N,
0
2 =
D 1
k 3D 2
(dt ) F ,
v0
(18)
V
V
2 2 2
+V
=
t
N 2
N ( NV )
+
= 0.
t
N ,
(19)
35
Using the method described in (Casian-Botez et al., 2010) with the initial
conditions
0 2
exp
V ( 0 , =0) =c, N ( 0 , =0) =
= N 0 ( 0 ) (20)
V ( 0 =c , ) =c, N ( 0 = , ) = N ( 0 =+ , ) =0 ,
(21)
2
c + ( 0 )
,
V ( 0 , ) =
2
2 2
2
+
2
(22a, b)
2
( 0 c )
1
N ( 0 , ) =
exp
,
2
2
2 2
2 2 2
2
+
+
2
c +
( 0 )
0 c
V ( 0 , ) =
2i
,
2
2
2 2
2 2
2
2
+
+
2
(23)
36
2
c 2 +
( 0 )
( 0 c )
j ( 0 , ) =
exp
3/2
2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2
+
+
2i
0 c
2
2 2
2 +
3/ 2
2
( 0 c )
exp
,
2 2 2 2
+
(24)
Q ( 0 , ) = 0 2i 2
( 0 c ) 2
2 2 2 2
+
+ 2i 2
1
2
2 2
+
(25)
F ( 0 , ) = 0 + 4i 2
0 c
2 2 2 2
+
(26)
V ( 0 = c , ) c + i0 .
(27)
This means that the particle of fluid in free motion polarizes the fractal
medium behind itself, 0 c , and ahead of itself, 0 c , in such a
form that the resulting forces are symmetrically distributed with respect to the
37
( 0 , ) =
2
c 2 c ( )
( 0 ) c
1
0 .
=
+i
exp
exp i
4
2
1/
4
+i
2 2 1+i
(28)
N R ( 0 , ) = ( 0 , ) (( 0 ), ) =
= N + ( 0 , ) + N ( 0 , )
0 (2 / )2 c 2
,
2 N + ( 0 , ) N ( 0 , ) cos 2
+
(2
/
)
(29)
38
N + ( 0 , ) = N ( 0 , ) ,
N ( 0 , ) = N (( 0 ), )
where
and
N ( 0 , ) are given by equation (22b). The result (29) is equivalent with the
interference of a progressive scalar potential speed packet (for > 0 ) with a
regressive one (for < 0 ).
The interference term from Eq. (29) gives the local maxima and
minima. These can be associated with the multi-peak structure of the
normalized charge density N R ( 0 , ) - see Figs. 1a-1c and Figs. 2a-2c, and
implicitly of the normalized current density. Their space-time positions depend
on the initial velocity c . From Figs. 1a-1c and 2a-2c it results that the multipeak structure can be observed both for the spatial component and for the
temporal one, but in the last case only for << 2 - see Figs. 2a-2c.
a) c = 5
b) c = 7
1.5
1.5
0.5
0.4
0.5
0
0.5
0.4
0.5
0
0.3
-4
0.3
-4
0.2
0.2
-2
-2
0
0.1
2
0.1
2
c) c = 9
N R ( 0 , )
2
1.5
0.5
1
0.4
0.5
0
0.3
-4
0.2
-2
0.1
2
4
39
3. Experimental Results
Using a solution of lead acetate 0.5 molar, the time dependence of the
current (Fig. 3) shows that, initialy a instantaneous nucleation take place
(accending part of the experimental curve), followed by a progressive one (the
horizontal part).
a) c = 0.1
b) c = 0.2
0.5
10 0.25
0.5
0
-0.5
0
10
0
-0.25
-0.5
0
0.2
8
6
4
0.2
0.4
0.4
2
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.8
1
c) c = 0.3
N R ( 0 , )
0.5
0.25
0
-0.25
-0.5
0
10
8
6
4
0.2
0.4
-0
0.6
0.8
1
40
0.25
current, mA
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
time, s
41
c = 0.5
c = 0.3
Fig. 5 Normalized current versus time for 0 = 0.1 and different values of the
initial normalized speed.
4. Conclusions
1. The reciprocal dependences of the process parameters for lead acetate
solution 0.5 molar, by means of fractalic method were established.
2. The experimental data confirm the theoretical model: initialy a
instantaneous nucleation take place (accending part of the experimental curve),
followed by a progressive one (the horizontal part).
REFERENCES
Agop M., Forna N., Casian-Botez I., Bejenariu C., J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci., 5, 483
(2008).
Bagotsky V.S., Fundamentals of Electrochemistry. Wiley Interscience, New Jersey,
2006.
Casian-Botez I., Agop M., Nica P., Pun V., Munceleanu G.V., J. Comput. Theor.
Nanosci., 7, 2271 (2010).
Kilbas A. A., Srivastava H. M., Trujilto J. J., Theory and Applications of Fractional
Differential Equations. Elsevier, Armsterdam 2006.
42
Mandelbrot B.B., The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Freeman, San Francisco, 1983.
Munceleanu G.V.; Paun V. P., Casian-Botez I., Agop M., Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos, 21, 603
(2011).
Nottale L., Fractal Space-Time and Microphysics: Towards a Theory of Scale
Relativity. World Scientific Singapore, 1993.
Nottale L., Scale Relativity and Fractal Space-Time. World Scientific Singapore, 2011.
Oldham K. B., Spanier J., The Fractional Calculus: Theory and Applications of
Differential and Integration to Arbitrary Order. Dover Publications, New York
2006.
Shaikh Y.H., Khan A.R., Pathan J.M., Aruna Patil, Behere S.H., Fractal Pattern
Growth Simulation in Electrodeposition and Study of the Shifting of Center of
Mass. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 42, 2796-2803 (2009).
Stauffer D., Stanle H. E., From Newton to Mandelbrot. Academic Press, New York,
1996.
Zhou J. G., He Z. and Guo J., Fractal Growth Modeling of Electrochemical Deposition
in Solid Freeform Fabrication. Proceedings of the Tenth Solid Freeform
Fabrication Symposium, Austin, Texas, August 1999.
1. Introduction
The discovery of the quantum Hall effects, both integer and fractional
(von Klitzing & Dorda, 1980; Tsui et al., 1982), opened a new area of
44
ds 2 = dx 2 + dy 2 + dz 2 - dt 2 ,
the relativistic complex charged boson of mass m0 , evolving in a static
magnetic field orthogonal to a static electric field is described by the wellknown U (1) -gauge invariant Lagrangian density
L = i j ( Di ) D j + m02 * ,
*
iq
iq
Ai , Di = , i + Ai .
(1)
Ax = Az = 0,
Ay = B0 x,
A4 =
45
E0
x,
c
m02 c 2
ij Di D j
= 0,
(2)
q
q
i j , i j 2i B0 x, y + 2i 2 E0 x, t
c
2
2
2
2
2
m c
E
q x
0 2 + 2 B02 20 = 0 ,
c
(3)
p y y + pz z wt ,
= ( x ) exp
(4)
the Eq. (3) leads to the following differential equation for the x-depending part,
E w
2 1 w2
+ 2 2 ( p 2 + p z2 ) m02 c 2 + 2q B0 p + 0 x
2
c
c
x
E2
q 2 B02 20
c
2
x = 0,
(5)
where
p py .
By introducing the notations
E w
= B0 p + 02 ,
c
E2
= B02 20 0,
c
(6)
46
p
p
m
c
qx
+
= 0,
z
0
x 2 2 c 2
2
(7)
= a qx .
a2 =
1
,
q
leading to
qx ,
q
1
(8)
the Eq. (7) with the notations (6) turns into the familiar form
2
2 1 ( wB0 + pE0 )
2
2 2
2
p
m
c
=0,
+
z
0
c2 2
2 q
(9)
1
( ) = Cn exp 2 2 H n ( ) ,
(10)
Cn = 2 n n !
1/2
(11)
Thus, putting everything together, the wave function (4) gets the explicit
form
= 2n n!
1/2
2 i
+ ( py + pz z wt ) H n ( ) ,
exp
2
( wB + pE )2
0
0
2
2 2
= ( 2n + 1) q
p
m
c
z
0
c2 2
(12)
wn = p
E0
p2
q
m0 c 2 1 + 2z 2 + ( 2n + 1) 2 2 .
B0 B0
m0 c
m0 c
47
(13)
Even though the above dependence on the quantum number n looks quite
complicated, this is in agreement with the energy spectrum of Dirac
quasiparticles in graphene,
En = 2nv F2 qB + 2 ,
which has been obtained within a theory based on a Lagrangian which includes
a gap that can be set to zero when non-interacting quasi-particles on the
hexagonal lattice with nearest neighbor hopping are considered (Novoselov et
al., 1980)
Inspecting the formula (13), one may notice that, regarding it as a
dispersion relation, w versus p , the group velocity of the quantum waves,
dwn
E
E
= 0 = H ,
B0 B0
dp
(14)
is the quantum analog of the well-known classical Hall relation for the electric
field, EH = B0v .
Let us focus on the second term in (13), which is expressing the quantum
contribution.
For B02 E02 / c 2 , so that B0 , and
( 2n + 1)
c
m0 c 2
1 ,
where c = qB0 /m0 is the frequency of the cyclotron motion, one may keep only
the dominant contribution in the series expansion of the second term in the right
hand side of (13) and gets
wn = p
E0
p2
1
+ m0 c 2 + z + n + c
2m0
2
B0
(15)
n = p
E0
p2
1
+ z + n + c
B0 2m0
2
(16)
48
E0
q
B0 ,
=
B0 2m0
whose existence has a deep influence on the properties of the system of bosons.
If the first term of the right hand side of (16) is missing, the energy levels are
highly degenerated and can be filled, as in the usual quantum Hall effect, by
nB = qB/h charged particles per unit area or of flux quanta 0 = h/q per unit
area respectively. The ration between the number of electrons, N , and nB is
called the filling factor,
v=
N
,
nB
nB h
,
q
(17)
UH =
I
,
Nq
(18)
H =
I
q2
=n
,
UH
h
(19)
49
semi-width of the sample is fixing the maximum number of the Landau levels
by
N max N =
1
2
2 1 ,
(20)
where
2 =
b 2 qB0b 2
=
l02
and
l0 =
qB0
n = n +
1
2
c p
E0
p2
+ z = n + a ,
B0 2m0
(21)
= c , a = p
E0
p2 1
+ z + c
B0 2m0 2
(22)
Z = exp n =
n =0
eN 1
,
N +a )
e 1
e (
(23)
F =
1
1 e N 1
ln Z = ( N 1) + a ln
,
e 1
(24)
and the main thermodynamic quantities Dariescu M. A., Dariescu C.,, namely:
i) the energy
E=
ln Z
N
= a +
N
,
e 1 e
1
(25)
C=
E
e
N 2e N
2
= k ( )
,
2
T
(e N 1) 2
(e 1)
(26)
50
depending on B0 / T ;
ii) the entropy
S=
e N 1
1
e
e N
( E F ) = N N + k ln ,
T
T e 1
T e
1
e 1
(27)
F ( N 1) + a kT ln N ,
E a = p
E0
p2 1
+ z + c ,
B0 2m0 2
(28)
.
T
Regarding S as a function of N , one may easily check that, for
N m = kT / , the entropy has a maximum positive value,
S = k ln N ( N 1)
kN
+
1 ,
S max = k ln
kT
F a,
E a + e N e N ,
2
C k ( ) e N 2 e N ,
(29)
e
Ne N ,
T
51
exp a
2
Z = exp ( n ) =
.
n =0
2sinh
2
(30)
E
pz2
p 0 + kTln 2sinh
,
B0
2
2m0
F=
(31)
E
F
= BP coth
+ p 02 ,
2
B0
B0
(32)
x=
.
2kT
(33)
E=
E
p2
ln Z
= z p 0 + kT x ctgh x,
2m0
B0
(34)
C=
x2
E
.
=k
T
sinh 2 x
(35)
C
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
1
52
In terms of the same variable (33), the entropy is the positive function
S = k x coth x ln ( 2sinh x ) .
(36)
By inspecting the Fig. 2, one may notice that the entropy is slowly
decreasing to 0, for x , namely for T 0.
S
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
E=
E
pz2
p 0 + kT ,
2m0
B0
(37)
C=k .
In the opposite case of low temperatures, meaning x 1 , the heat
capacity, given by
C = k x 2 e 2 x ,
is exponentially decreasing to zero, in agreement with Nerst's Principle.
4. Conclusions
1. In the present paper, we derive the solutions to the Klein-Gordon
equation describing a boson moving in a static configuration of orthogonal
magnetic and electric fields. The expression (13) of the energy levels, which
looks quite complicated, is in a good agreement with the energy spectrum of
Dirac quasiparticles in graphene (Novoselov et al., 2006).
2. Further exploiting the simplified expression (21), we perform a
53
thermodynamic analysis and compute the partition function and the main
thermodynamic quantities: the energy, the heat capacity and the entropy. In the
case of an infinite number of energy levels, we derive the magnetization of the
bosonic system and the entropy, represented in the Fig. 2, as a function of
temperature.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT. OB work was supported by the European Social Fund in
Romania, under the responsibility of the Managing Authority for the Sectoral
Operational Programme for Human Resources Development 2007-2013, Grant
POSDRU/88/1.5/S/47646.
REFERENCES
Dariescu M. A., Dariescu C., Finite Temperature Analysis of Quantum Hall-type
Behavior of Charged Bosons. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 33, 776-781 (2007).
Dariescu M. A., Dariescu C., Murariu G., Topological Quantum Dynamics of Charged
Bosons. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals. 28, 1-7 (2006).
Dariescu M. A., Dariescu C., WKB Approach to Quantum Hall States. Chaos, Solitons
& Fractals, 38, 1292-129 (2008).
Datta S., Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems. Cambridge:Cambridge Univ.
Press, 2003.
Girvin S. M., Mac Donald A. H., Off-diagonal long-range order, oblique confinement,
and the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett., 58, 1252-1255, (1987).
Gradstein I. S., Ryzhik I. M., Table of Integrals, Sums, Series and Products. New York,
Academic Press, 1980.
Kukushkin I. V., Smet J. H., von Klitzing K., Cyclotron Resonance of Composite
Fermions. Nature, 415, 409-412 (2002).
Laughlin R. B., Anomalous Quantum Hall effect: An Incompressible Quantum Fluid
with Fractionally Charged Excitations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 50, 1395-1399 (1983).
Novoselov K. S., Mc Cann E, Morozov S. V., Unconventional Quantum Hall Effect and
Berry's Phase of 2 in Bilayer Graphene. Nature Physics, 2, 177180 (2006).
Tsui D. C., Strmer H. L., Gossard A. C., Two-dimensional Magnetotransport in the
Extreme Quantum Limit. Phys. Rev. Lett., 48, 1559-1564 (1982).
von Klitzing K., Dorda K, The Fractional Quantum Hall Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett., 45,
494-498 (1980).
54
Novoselov pentru probele de grafen. n limita semi-relativist, se regsesc binecunoscutele niveluri de energie Landau. n ultima parte, n cadrul unui studiu
termodinamic, se calculeaz funcia de partiie, principalele mrimi termodinamice i
ecuaia de stare.
1. Introduction
The complex dynamical systems, such as the systems in which
electrodeposition take place, display nonlinear behavior and are recognized to
acquire self-similarity, self-structuring and manifest strong fluctuations at all
possible scales (Nottale, 1993; Nottale, 2011; Mandelbrot, 1983; Stauffer et al.,
1996). Since the fractality appears as a universal property of these systems, it is
necessary to construct a fractal physics (Nottale, 1993; Nottale, 2011) to
describe their evolution and, particularly, the electrodeposition processes
dynamics. In such context, by considering that the complexity of the physical
processes is replaced by fractality, the whole classical arsenal of quantities
from the standard electrodeposition theories (Bagotsky, 2006) must be
56
0,
W ( x) =
,
a
,
2
a
x > .
2
(1)
n
( 2 D ) 1
, D = D ( dt ) F
En = 2m0 D 2
(2)
n ( x ) =
2
nx
sin
,
a
a
a
, n even,
2
2
nx
cos
,
a
a
a
, n odd,
2
x >
a
2
0,
(3)
57
E1 = 2m0 D 2 k12 ,
k1 =
,
a
(4)
En = E1n 2 + 2 E1n ( n n ) + E1 ( n n )
(5)
or in the form
( n n ) ( n n )2
, En = E1n 2
En = En + 4m0 D
+
T
T
(6)
T =
2 m0 D
,
nE1
(7)
4 m0 D
T =
E1
k E 2
1
= 1 1 .
f0 =
T 2 2m0
(8)
( x, t = 0) = i ( x).
(9)
We expand this scalar potential velocity function by using the relation (3)
i ( x ) = cnn ( x ),
n =1
(10)
58
with
+
( x ) ( x ) dx.
cn =
(11)
By using the time scale T , the time evolution of the system is found from the
Schrdingers type equation
4D 2 ( dt )
(4
DF ) 2
2
W
( 2 D ) 1
+ 2iD ( dt ) F
0,
2
x
t m0
(12)
to be
( x, t ) = exp[i2 ( t T ) n 2 ]cn n ( x ).
(13)
T ( p, q ) =
p
T
q
(14)
f ( p, q ) =
1
q
= f0 , ,
T ( p, q ) p
f0 =
1
.
T
(15a, b)
E1 =
m0V 2
p
= 4m0 D f ( p, q )
2
q
(16)
59
VL
p
Re( p, q ) = c~ c =
(17)
Vc = V ,
Lc = Vf
( p, q ) ,
= 8 D ( dt )
(2
DF ) 1
(18a-c)
From (17) and (Landau et al., 1987) it results a critical value for the
Reynolds number, ec . Up to this value the fractal fluid flow becomes
turbulent. Because from (15a) with p > q results sub-harmonics for ec ,
according to (Arecchi et al., 1982; Dubois et al., 1983) a criterion of evolution
to chaos through a cascade of spatio-temporal sub-harmonic bifurcations is
stated. We call this criterion the fractional criterion of transition towards
chaos. We note that not only this chaos scenario is present; intermittence chaos
can be also observed.
3. Experimental Results
For lead acetate solution, 0.5 molar, the time dependence of the current
is reprezented in Fig. 1. We note the presence of the intermittents in the
electrodeposition processes dynamics.
lead acetate, 0.5M
0.080
0.070
current, mA
0.060
0.050
0.040
0.030
0.020
0.010
0.000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
time, s
Fig. 1 Time dependence of current for a lead acetate solution, 0.5 molar concentration.
60
The results obtained for lead acetate solution, 0.4 molar, are presented in Fig. 3.
61
current, mA
2.00E-01
1.50E-01
1.00E-01
5.00E-02
0.00E+00
0
20
40
60
80
100
time, s
Fig. 3 Time dependence of current for a lead acetate solution, 0.4 molar.
62
`
Abstract. Using the scale relativity theory, the nucleation mechanisms
in the electrodeposition of copper from the aqueous copper sulphate solution is
explained. It was observed that with the development of the nucleation process,
visualized by extending ramifications, fractal dimension of the deposited layer
increases, fact that was correlated with the increase of the fractal dimension of
the fractal curves.
Key words: nucleation mechanism, fractal, electrodeposition
1. Introduction
The process of electrodeposition of the composite layers consists in
incorporating metallic atoms, located as hydrated ions in a bath of electrolysis,
in the new crystalline metallic phase and that represents the metal matrix. These
particles are considered insoluble. Electrochemical co-deposition cannot be seen
as a separate electrochemical process of metal electrodeposition itself.
64
dN 0,t
dt
= AN 0,t ,
(1)
where N 0,t is the density of the active places available for nucleation at t
moment. Integrating this equation, for which we have, at the initial moment,
N 0, 0 = N 0 , we obtain
N 0,t = N 0 exp( At ).
(2)
(3)
65
associated with diffusion areas. The number of the active places decreases in
time because on a part of them starts nuclei to growth and others are covered by
growing nuclei and can be no longer used at nucleation.
In general, the nucleation processes are supposed to take place in the socalled surface active places like steps, kinks or other defects. The density of the
formed nuclei, at moment t, can be expressed as a function depending on the
nucleation rate constant A by a relation of the form
N (t ) = N 0 [1 exp( At )] ,
(4)
zF ( 2 Dc )
32
1 2
M 1 2t1 2
(5)
66
I N ( t ) = I i ( )
(6)
i =1
If nucleation is instantaneous, the nuclei will have all the same age and
raise all with the same speed so that we can write
I N ( t ) = N I1 ( t ) =
zF ( 2 Dc )
32
1 2
M 1 2t1 2
(7)
N N
( 2 D ) 1
=
+ V N iD ( dt ) F N = 0,
t
t
(8)
(9)
67
N
+ V N = 0,
t
U N = D ( dt )
(2
DF ) 1
(10)
(11)
(12)
N (t , x ) = T (t ) X ( x )
(13)
N (t ,0 ) = 0 , N (t , L ) = 0 , N (0, x ) = F ( x ) , 0 x L
(14)
implies
1
D (dt )(
2 DF ) 1
1 dT (t )
1 d 2 X ( x)
m
=
= l 2 =
, m=1, 2,
2
T (t ) dt
X ( x) dx
L
(15)
68
ln T = l 2D ( dt )
DF
(16)
Taking into consideration some results of the fractional integrodifferential calculus (Oldham et al., 2006; Kilbas et al., 2006), (16) becomes
ln T =
l 2D
2
+ 1
DF
2
DF
DF 1 x
e dx.
=x
0
DF
(17)
2
l 2D
T ( t ) = exp
t DF
+ 1
DF
(18)
T (t ) =
N N
N
(19)
2
N
l 2D
t DF
= 1 exp
2
N
+ 1
DF
(20)
N
= 1 exp(at b ),
N
a and b representing constant specific for each system that are defined by
(21)
a=
69
D
m
,
=
2
L 2
+ 1
+ 1
DF
DF
2
b=
.
DF
l 2D
(22)
current, mA
0.050
0.040
0.030
0.020
0.010
0.000
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
-0.010
time, s
70
Table 1
Fractal dimension evolution in the nucleation process for a copper sulfate solution
No.
Fractal Dimension
Figure
1.723
1.725
1.728
1.784
1.8
71
4. Conclusion
1. A theoretical model was constructed based on the scale relativity
theory in order to explain the nucleation mechanisms in the electrodeposition of
copper from the copper sulfate solution.
2. It was observed that with the development of the nucleation process,
visualized by extending ramifications, fractal dimension of the deposited layer
increases, fact that was correlated with the increase of the fractal dimension of
the fractal curves.
REFERENCES
Agop M., Forna N., Casian Botez I., Bejenariu C., J., Comput. Theor. Nanosci., 5, 483
(2008).
Bagotsky V. S., Fundamentals of Electrochemistry. Wiley Interscience, New Jersey,
2006.
Casian-Botez I., Agop M., Nica P., Pun V., Munceleanu G.V., J. Comput. Theor.
Nanosci., 7, 2271 (2010).
Gelings P. .J., Bouwmeester H. J. M. (Eds.), The CRC Handbook of Solid State Electrochemistry. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1997.
Jude L., Mathematics Physics Equations. Theory and Applications. Ed. Matrix Rom.,
Bucureti, 2010.
Kilbas A. A., Srivastava H. M., Trujilto J. J., Theory and Applications of Fractional
Differential Equations. Elsevier, Armsterdam, 2006.
Mandelbrot B.B., The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Freeman, San Francisco 1983.
Munceleanu G.V.; Pun V. P., Casian-Botez I., Agop M., Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos, 21, 603
(2011).
Nottale L., Fractal Space-Time and Microphysics: Towards a Theory of Scale
Relativity. World Scientific, Singapore, 1993.
Nottale L., Scale Relativity and Fractal Space-Time. World Scientific, Singapore, 2011.
Oldham K. B., Spanier J., The Fractional Calculus: Theory and Applications of
Differential and Integration to Arbitrary Order. Dover Publications, New York,
2006.
Shaikh Y.H., Khan A.R., Pathan J.M., Aruna Patil, S.H. Behere, Fractal Pattern
Growth Simulation in Electrodeposition and Study of the Shifting of Center of
Mass. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 42, 2796-2803 (2009).
Soltzberg L. J., Fappiano S. A., Hidek L. E., O'Brien M. J., Suarez L. L., Crystal
Anisotropy and Dendritic Crystal Growth. Acta Cryst., A48, 457-461 (1992)..
Stauffer D., Stanley H. E., From Newton to Mandelbrot. Academic Press, New York,
1996.
Zaski C. G., Handbook of Electrochemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007.
Zhou J. G., He Z., Guo J., Fractal Growth Modeling of Electrochemical Deposition in
Solid Freeform Fabrication. Proceedings of the Tenth Solid Freeform Fabrication
Symposium, Austin, Texas, August, 1999.
72
1. Introduction
Recently, the diagnosis and treatment of cancer have made improved
considerably. Technology now allows the diagnosis and treatment of tumors of
ever-diminishing size. The earlier detection allows a better understanding of
growth patterns.
74
2. Mathematics of Cancer
In comparison to molecular biology, cell biology and drug delivery
research, mathematics has so far contributed relatively little to the area.
75
76
(1)
and hence the partial differential equation governing tumor cell motion (in the
absence of cell proliferation) is
n
= Dn 2 n (nf ) .
t
77
(2)
We assume that the MDEs degrade ECM upon contact and hence the
degradation process is modelled by the following simple equation
f
= mf ,
t
(3)
(4)
(5)
78
diffusion
uptake
production
decay
c
2
= Dc c + f n c ,
t
where Dn, Dm and Dc are the tumor cell, MDE and oxygen diffusion
coefficients, respectively, is the haptotaxis coefficient and , , , , and
are positive constants. We should also note that cellmatrix adhesion is
modeled here by the use of haptotaxis in the cell equation, i.e. directed
movement up gradients of MM. Therefore, may be considered as relating to
the strength of the cellmatrix adhesion. In order to use realistic parameter
values, one must first of all non-dimensionalise the equations in the standard
way. We rescale distance with an appropriate length scale L (e.g. the maximum
invasion distance of the cancer cells at this early stage of invasion,
approximately 1 cm), time with (e.g. the average time taken for mitosis to
occur, approximately 824 h [15]), tumor cell density with n0, ECM density
with f0, MDE concentration with m0 and oxygen concentration with c0 (where
n0, f0, m0 and c0 are appropriate reference variables). Therefore, setting
n
f
m
c
x
t
=
n = , f = , m
, c = , x = , t = ,
n0
f0
m0
c0
L
in (5) and dropping the tildes for notational convenience, we obtain the scaled
system of equations
random motility
haptotaxis
n
2
= d n n ( nf ) ,
t
degradation
f
= mf ,
t
diffusion
production
decay
m
2
= d m m + n m ,
t
diffusion
production
uptake
decay
c
2
= d c c + f n c ,
t
79
d n = 0.0005,
(7)
dn
= 0,
dt
df
= mf ,
dt
dm
= n m,
dt
(8)
dc
= f n c.
dt
To see if a modified version of the system (8a-d) could lead to a chaotic
description of tumor growth, and following the method in [16], four new
parameters, a1, a2, a3, and a4 are introduced. The resulting model is
dn
= 0,
dt
df
= a1(m f ),
dt
dm
= f ( a3 c ) m + a2 n,
dt
dc
= fm a4 c n.
dt
The introduction of the parameters (a1, a2, a3, a4) was motivated by the
fact that tumor cell shape represents a visual manifestation of an underlying
balance of forces and chemical reactions (Olive & Durand, 1994).
80
Fig. 2 A 3D Lorenz-like chaotic attractor from the modified tumor growth model (9).
The attractor effectively couples the MMconcentration f, the MDEconcentration m,
and the oxygen concentration c in a masklike fashion.
3. Conclusions
1. Cancer does not conform to simple mathematical principles. Its
irregular mode of carcinogenesis, erratic tumor growth, variable response to
tumor agents, and poorly understood metastatic patterns constitute highly
variable clinical behavior. Defining this process requires an accurate
understanding of the interactions between tumor cells and host tissues and
ultimately determines prognosis. Applying time-tested and evolving
mathematical methods to oncology may provide new tools with inherent
advantages for the description of tumor behavior, selection of therapeutic
modes, prediction of metastatic patterns, and providing an inclusive basis for
prognostication. Mathematicians describe equations that define tumor growth
and behavior, whereas surgeons actively deal with biological processes.
Mathematics in oncology applies these principles to clinical settings.
81
82
Roose T., Netti P.A., Munn L.L., Boucher Y., Jain R., Solid Stress Generated by
Spheroid Growth Estimated Using a Linear Poroelastic Model. Microvasc. Res.,
66, 204-212 (2003).
Sedivy R., Fractal Tumors: their Real and Virtual Images. Wien Klin. Wochenschr.
108(17), 547-551 (1996).
Waliszewski P., Konarski J., Molski M., On the Modification of Fractal Self-space
During Cell Differentiation or Tumor Progression. Fractals. 8, 195-203 (2000).