0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
70 tayangan16 halaman
1) This decision involves consolidated petitions that raise issues regarding jurisdiction over cases involving the implementation of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law of 1988.
2) The petitioners, who are owners of land subject to agrarian reform, filed petitions in regional trial court challenging the constitutionality of administrative orders related to the implementation of the law.
3) The regional trial court initially ruled it had jurisdiction but the Court of Appeals later reversed, finding that based on the law, the Court of Appeals, not the regional trial court, has jurisdiction over such cases.
1) This decision involves consolidated petitions that raise issues regarding jurisdiction over cases involving the implementation of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law of 1988.
2) The pe…