for which the warehouseman claims as lien. If the precise amount for such
advances made or of such liabilities incurred is, at the same time of the issue of
who issues it, a statement of the fact that advances have been made or liabilities
damages caused by the omission from a negotiable receipt of any of the terms
herein required
> Validity of the receipt not affected
reasonably careful man would exercise with regard to similar goods of his own
authorized agent
> Receipt in which it is stated that the goods received will be delivered to the
owner, either solely or jointly or in common with others, the fact of such
ownership
9. A statement of the amount of advances made and of liabilities incurred
> Receipt in which it is stated that the goods received will be delivered to the
c.
acknowledgement that
warehouseman
> When more than one is issued for the same goods, the word duplicate
GOODS?
shall be plainly placed upon the face of every such receipt, except the first one
issued
original, even though the purchaser be after the delivery of the goods by
RECEIPTS
WHO IS
1. Person lawfully entitled to the possession of the goods, or his agent
2. Person who either himself entitled to delivery by the terms of the non-
negotiable receipt issued for the goods, or who has written authority from the
person so entitled either endorsed upon the receipt or written on another paper
accompanied by either
a.
indorsed to him or in blank by the person to whom delivery was promised by the
warehouseman
> Where a warehouseman delivers the goods to one who is not in fact lawfully
entitled to the possession of them, the warehouseman shall be liable for
the warehouseman is liable on the altered receipt according to its original tenor
> And though he delivered the goods as authorized he shall be so liable if prior to
right of property or
to the original tenor of the receipt to a purchaser of the receipt for value
Had information that the delivery about to be made was to one not
without notice, and even to the alterer and subsequent purchasers with notice
except
that
as
regards
to
the
last
two,
the
liability
NOTA BENE: it is clear that even a fraudulent alteration cannot divest the title
receipt which has been lost or stolen or to which the endorsement of the
such receipt, for failure to deliver the goods to him, whether such purchaser
> The court may order the delivery of the goods upon satisfactory proof of
acquired title to the receipt before or after the delivery of the goods by the
such loss or destruction and upon the giving of a bond with sufficient sureties to be
approved by the court to protect the warehouseman from any liability or expense,
> The court may also in its discretion order the payment of the warehousemans
CLAIMS
> If someone other than the depositor or person claiming under him has a
> The order of the court shall not relieve the warehouseman from liability to a
claim to the title or possession of goods, and the warehouseman has information
person to whom the negotiable receipt as been or shall be negotiated for value
of such claim, the warehouseman shall be excused from liability for refusing to
had a reasonable time to ascertain the validity of the adverse claim or to bring
2. Such original receipt is uncancelled at the date of the issue of the duplicate
> As a general rule, the warehouseman is under obligation to deliver the identical
> The warehouseman cannot refuse to deliver the goods on the ground that he
property stored with him and if he fails to do so, he is liable directly to the owner
has acquired title or right to the possession of the same unless such title
or right is derived
the custody of the goods, that is, the care is reasonably careful owner
> If more than one person claims the title or possession of the goods, the
> The warehouseman isnt liable for any loss or injury to the goods, which
Of course, what
> Neither shall it apply to actions for recovery or manual delivery of goods by
such as the character and value of the property and the character
the real owner nor to cases where the attachment is made before the issuance of
> A creditor whose debtor is the owner of negotiable receipt shall be entitled to
depositors
> In case of fungible goods, the warehouseman may mingle them with the goods
of the same kind and grade provided that he authorized by agreement or custom
> Commingling
is
intended
for
the
benefit
of
the warehouseman.
It
authorization
lawful
claims
for
money
advancedInterests, Insurance,
> The warehouseman has the direct obligation to hold possession of the
goods for the original owner or for the person known the negotiable receipt of
sale
warehousemans lien
liable to the debtor for the claims in regard to which the lien is asserted
> This shall not apply if the person depositing is not the owner of the goods
2. Against all goods belonging to others which have been deposited at any
or one who has no right to convey title to the goods binding upon the owner.
time by the person who is liable as debtor for claims in regard to which the
lien is asserted if such person had been entrusted with the possession of
the goods that a pledge of the same by him at the time of the deposit to one who
a.
took the goods in good faith for value would have been valid
An itemized statement of the claim, showing the sum due at the time
c.
A demand that such amount of the claim as stated shall be paid on or before
less than 10 days from the delivery of the notice if it is personally delivered, or
> With the exception of the charges for the storage or preservation of
d. A statement that unless the claim is paid within the time specified, the goods
goods for which a negotiable receipt has been issued, the lien exists only
for the other charges expressly enumerated in the receipt so far as they
are written although the amount of the said charge isnt stated
ENFORCEMENT OF WAREHOUSEMANS LIEN
OTHER THINGS IN CONNECTION TO WAREHOUSEMANS LIEN
nondelivery even if the receipt given for the goods when they were deposited
be negotiated.
2. When the sale was made without the publication requirement and
before the time specified by law, such sale is void and the purchaser of
has been indorsed in blank or bearer, any holder may indorse the same to
by such indorsee
delivery
goods
7. Failure to give notice in case of sale of goods to satisfy the lien or because the
goods are perishable or hazardous
assignor
deliver the goods to the order of a specified person, and such person or a
a.
enjoined
Where by the terms of the receipt, the goods are deliverable to bearer or
warehouseman to hold possession of the goods for him without notice to such
warehouseman
2. By any person to whom the possession or custody of the receipt has been
> For the purpose of determining whether the transferee is a purchaser for value
same time of such entrusting, the receipt is in such form that it may be negotiated
in good faith without notice, the negotiation shall take effect as of the time
by delivery
when the indorsement is actually made not at the time the receipt is delivered
> Reason for the rule: negotiation becomes complete only at the time of
indorsement
1. The title of the person negotiating the receipt over the goods covered by
the receipt
2. The title of the person to whose order by the terms of the receipt the goods
3. That he has knowledge of no fact which would impair the validity of the worth
of the receipt
4. That he has a right to transfer the title to the goods and that the goods are
TRANSFERRED
would have been implied, if the contract of the parties had been to transfer
> The purchaser, mortgagee, or pledgee of goods for which a negotiable receipt
has been issued, or of the negotiable receipt itself, has the duty to require the
negotiation of the receipt to him otherwise, his failure will have the same
faith, demands or receives payment of the debt for which such receipt is
> The subsequent purchaser must have taken the receipt in good faith and for
security, whether from a party to a draft drawn for such debt or from any
therein described
> An innocent holder of a negotiable receipt has a better right to the goods
> In other words, the holder of a security who in good faith accepts payment of a
for which the receipt is given than the vendor who has a vendors lien upon such
debt from a person doesnt warrant thereby the genuineness of the receipt nor
goods
negotiation was a breach of duty on the part of the person making the
A WAREHOUSE RECEIPT?
negotiation, or by the fact that the owner of the receipt was induced by fraud,
the court should require the surrender of the receipt and restrict further
negotiations.