Dr. L G Navale
Professor in Mechanical Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Puna University,
Dr. D. Y. Patil Institute of Engineering & Technology, Pimpri, Pune-411018, India
Abstract- Unique property high strength to weight ratio of fiber reinforced spring has drawn the attention of manufacturers in automobile
industry. A single leaf with variable thickness and width for constant cross sectional area of unidirectional glass fiber reinforced plastic(GFRP)
is considered for analysis and subsequently for replacement of steel spring considering identical performance. The objective is to compare the
carrying capacity, stiffness and weight saving of mono composite leaf spring with that of steel leaf spring with view to replace. The comparison
of performance parameters of mono composite GFRP leaf spring. With steel leaf spring is carried out to assess its suitability for replacement in
light motor vehicles. Model is fabricated and tested. The solid model of the leaf spring was made in Creo parametric and the analysis was done
using ansys 14.0.
Keywords-Convectional leaf spring; mono composite leaf spring; glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP);Creo parametric;ansys 14.0
I.
INTRODUCTION
In order to conserve natural resources and economize energy, weight reduction has been the main focus of automobile
manufacturer in the present scenario. Weight reduction can be achieved primarily by the introduction of better material, design
optimization. Mono leaf springs are simple forms of springs, commonly used for the suspension system in wheeled vehicles.
Vehicle suspension system is made out of springs that have basic role in power transfer, vehicle motion and driving.
The suspension leaf spring is one of the potential items for weight reduction in automobile as it accounts for ten to twenty
percent of the unsprung weight. This helps in achieving the vehicle with improved riding qualities. The automobile industry tends
to improve the comfort of user and reach appropriate balance of comfort riding qualities and economy .There is increased interest
in the replacement of steel leaf spring with composite leaf spring due to high strength to weight ratio.
Fig. 1
The stress strain curves for the composites and conventional steel are shown in the figure-1.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
2015, IRJIE-All Rights Reserved
Page -1
ISSN: 2395-0560
II.
MATERIALS
______________________________________________________________________________________________
2015, IRJIE-All Rights Reserved
Page -2
ISSN: 2395-0560
6530
900
450
2433
1698
2433
0.217
0.366
0.217
2.6*106
40000
1200
Length(L)
Width(b)
50 mm
Thickness (t)
6 mm
Chamber height
130 mm
V.
The model of leaf spring is imported to ANSYS 14, the boundary conditions and material properties are specified form the
standards used in the practical applications. The structural steel having approximately similar isotropic behavior and properties as
compared to composite material is selected.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
2015, IRJIE-All Rights Reserved
Page -3
ISSN: 2395-0560
______________________________________________________________________________________________
2015, IRJIE-All Rights Reserved
Page -4
ISSN: 2395-0560
VI.
ADVANTAGES
Specially made to give effects like air suspension without any extra external energy.
No permanent deformation.
Softer ride, lower noise level.
Increase in fuel efficiency due to better aerodynamic.
VII. CONCLUSION
These work involves the comparison of conventional steel and Composite material leaf spring under static loading
conditions the model is developed using Creo parametric software and then analysis is performed through ANSYS 14.0 from the
result obtained it is concluded that the development of a composite mono leaf spring having constant cross sectional area, where
the stress level at any section in the leaf spring is considered constant due to the parabolic type of the thickness of the spring, has
proved to be very effective.
VIII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are thankful to Prof. Nagendra I J, and Dr. K K Dhande Head of Department, for their valuable suggestions and guidance. I
am also thankful to M/s Raval Composite, Surat for providing facilities for fabrication of the model.
REFERENCES
[1] Gulur siddaramanna Shiva Shankar & Sambagam Vijayarangan (2006), Mono Composite Leaf Spring for Light Weight Vehicle- Design,
End Joint Analysis and Testing, Journal-ISSN 1392-1320, Material science Vol 12.No.3.
[2] V.Pozhilarasu, T. Parameshwaran Pillai, Comparison of Performance of Glass Fiber Reainforced Plastic Leaf Spring With Steel Leaf
spring. International Jouranal of ChemTech Research, CODEN(USA): IJCRGG ISS : 0974-4290 Vol.5, No.3, pp 1339-1345, April-June
2013.
[3] G.S.Shivashankar, S.Vijayarangan, D. Rajiv, R.Pradeep, Research Scholar and Corresponding Author. PSG College of
Technology.Coimbatore-641004,india.
[4] Pankaj Saini, Ashish Goel, Dushyant Kumar,DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE LEAF SPRING FOR LIGHT VEHICLE
International of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. ISSN: 2319-8753, Vol 2, Issue, may 2013.
[5] D. K. Damor, K. D. Kothari, RK University, Rajkot, A Review on Design and Analysis of Long Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Leaf
Spring, ISSN-2250-1991, Vol. 2 Issue-3, March-2013.
[6] ASME Standard specification of design data handbook.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
2015, IRJIE-All Rights Reserved
Page -5