Dr. K. S. Zakiuddin
Dean Academics, Professor & Head,
Department of Mechanical Dept,
Priyadarshni College of Engineering, Nagpur
ABSTRACT:
Moulding operation of a cylinder head is a complex process. This process includes the worker who
makes the mould and his working environment such as the moulding machine, his posture while taking the
moulding box. In addition to this, various parameters such as tools used in moulding process, amount of energy
input by the worker, anthropometric data of the workers, working conditions such as humidity, temperature,
surrounding noise etc [1.1] also influence the productivity of moulding operation. Considering these parameters
the two important aspects to be considered are productivity of the mould of the head along with the comforts to
the workers. The aim of the work is to increase the productivity of moulding operation keeping in mind more
convenience to the workers. Out of so many parameters mentioned above we would like to find out which of
these parameters are most important for increasing the productivity and also reducing the human energy input.
Simultaneously it would be interesting to know influence of one parameter over the other.
Keywords: Sand Moulding, Cylinder Head, Human Energy Input, Mathematical Models, ANN Analysis,
Optimization, Productivity.
Awkward working posture can lead to discomfort or injury. Working posture is determined by
interaction of many factors in the work place such as workstation layout, visual demands, hand tool design,
anthropometric characteristics of the workers and work methods. Low or extended reaches may involve
significant trunk flexion while lateral reaches may involve axial twisting. High or far reaches may involve
significant elevation of the shoulder. Little research has been done relating occupational health risks of the
operators to the layout of the assembly as far as mathematical modelling is concerned. One factor of importance
in determining the operators posture and use of hands is the design of the work place and specially the layout of
the parts and location of work within the workplace.
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Planning of experimentation
Establish relationship between o/p ( Result) & i/p (Cause) using graphs.
For many man machine systems test planning part of experimentation approach is not feasible to be adopted. In
such cases one has to allow to carry out the activity as it takes place or as planned by others. The major
drawback of experimental data based modelling is we cant model a man and measure the effects of atmospheric
conditions like temperature, humidity, vibrations in the surrounding area on the efficiency of the worker. In
order to measure the effect of the parameters stated above Field Data Based Model is suitable.
The limitation of Experimental data based modelling is that for man machine systems Moulding
process it is only partially possible to plan experimentation, A.R. Bapat and J.P. Modak [1.3]. However in many
of such systems, test planning part of experimentation approach is not feasible to be adopted.
MATHEMATICAL MODEL
Any activity occurs because of four essential parameters / sub systems / issues namely System, Causes,
Effects and Extraneous Variables.
In order to develop a mathematical model for the present phenomenon following essential parameters / sub
systems / issues are identified.
System Mould
Causes knowledge of the operation, attitude towards work, experience, enthusiasm, general health status,
Pattern condition, habits, tooling's condition etc.
Extraneous variable Atmospheric temp., humidity, air circulation, surrounding noise level, disturbances etc.
In this process as regards the operator performing moulding operation causes would be :
Information of the Worker (A)
Anthropometric data of worker & Ergonomics of work table(A1), his attitude towards the work (A2), aptitude
towards the work (A3), skills of doing this work (A4), Experience of doing this work (A5), His enthusiasm
(A6), General Health status (A7), Habits (A8) etc.
Specifications of the tools used. (B)
In this case, the Material of the ram (B1), Weight of the ram (B2), Length of the vent rod (B3), Material of the
vent rod (B4), Weight of the Mould Box (B5), swab (B6) etc..
Posture adopted by an operator(C)
Specifications of the Moulding sand (D)
Responses (i.e. effects) (Y) would be :
Human Energy Input (Y1), Process time (Y2), Quality (Y3), Productivity (Y4)etc.
The influence of the above factors on the process cannot be measured. In order to optimize the process
completely it is necessary to consider the factors mentioned above and calculate the sensitive factors affecting
the process.
In order to formulate relationships we can write Y1 =
f1 [(A1,A2,A3,A4,A5,A6,A7,A8), (B1,B2,B3,B4,B5),(C),
(D1,D2,D3,D4)] ---------------------(1.1)
Y2 =
(D1,D2,D3,D4)] ---------------------(1.2)
Y3 =
(D1,D2,D3,D4)] ---------------------(1.3)
Y4 =
(D1,D2,D3,D4)] ---------------------(1.4)
There are chances that some of the observed data being erroneous either from inputs or responses. The observed
data can be purified or in other words can be made more reliable for Formulation of Models.
Let us assume the quantity observed has less number of say four inputs. A, B, C, D, and the responses
Y1 and Y2. It is intended to established the mathematical relationship in a very generalized form as under :
Y1 = K1 [(A)a1, (B)b1, (C)c1, (D)d1] -----------------------------------------------(1.5)
and
Y2 = K2 [(A)a2, (B)b2, (C)c2, (D)d2] -----------------------------------------------(1.6)
Y3 = K2 [(A)a3, (B)b3, (C)c3, (D)d3] -----------------------------------------------(1.7)
Y4 = K2 [(A)a4, (B)b4, (C)c4, (D)d4] -----------------------------------------------(1.8)
This is known as exponential form of the model.
In equation (1.5) all needs to be done is to decide 5 unknowns in this equation viz., K1, a1, b1, c1, d1. Substituting
any one observation in the equation (1.5) we get,
Y1 = K1 [(A)al (B)b1 (C)c1 (D)d1]
-----------------------------------(1.5.1)
d1 are
calculated, we can find out the factor which factor influences the output Y1.
Suppose index of (refer eq. 1.5.1) B is 3.2 which is the maximum of all the indices, we can conclude that factor
B influence the output Y1 most. Hence B should be kept maximum.
Similarly equations 1.6,1.7,1.8 can be solved and we can find out the sensitive factor which affects the output.
In order to reduce human energy input, Process time, to improve quality and productivity we have to control the
sensitive factor.
FUTURE WORK
This concept will be applied in a industry and the reliability of model can be studied by putting known inputs for
every observation and decide the difference in response by model and actually observed response [1.4]. This
will give us pattern of error and frequency of its occurrence. The maximum reliability of the model can be
established by ANN Simulation of the gathered data. [1.5-1.8] of the gathered data is performed.
REFERENCES
1.1 Eastman Kodak Co. Ltd, Chapter V Environment Ergonomic Design for People at Work, VAN
NUSTRAND REINHOLD, New York, 1983
1.4 Stamatics V. Kartalopous, Understanding Neural Networks and Fuzzy Logic. Prentice-Hall of
India. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi. Edn 2004
1.5 J.P. Modak, Application Of AI (Artificial Intelligence) Techniques for Improvement of Quality of
Performance of a Process Unit / Man Machine System : A Philosophy. Key- Note Lecture at A
National Conference, Organised by Disha Institute of Technology and Management, Raipur, 14-16
Dec 2009.
1.6
A.R. Bapat and J.P. Modak, Various Efficiencies of a Human Powered Flywheel
Human Power a Tech. Jnl of IHPVA USA. No. 54. 2003
1.7
Motor.
Spring pp 21-23
Eastman Kodak Co. Ltd, WORK PLACE Ergonomic Design for People at work, VAN
NOSTRANS REINHOLD New York 1983
1.8
K.F.H.
Muwell,
Nature
of
Ergonomics.
Ergonomics
(Man
In
His
Working