Anda di halaman 1dari 18

LAMPIRAN

LAMPIRAN 1
LEMBAR KUESIONER
Hubungan Antara Sikap Keaktifan Dalam Kegiatan Posyandu Desa Jambangan
Kecamatan Candi
No. Responden

: .....................................

Nama Responden

: .....................................

Alamat

: .....................................

Tanggal

: .....................................

Petunjuk Pengisian : Beri tanda () pada kotak yang tersedia sesuai dengan tanggapan
saudara.
1. Umur
< 20 tahun
20-35 tahun
35 tahun
2. Pendidikan
Rendah (tidak sekolah/SD)
Pendidikan Pertama (SMP)
Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA)
Pendidikan Tinggi (Akademi, PT)
3. Pekerjaan
Ibu Rumah Tangga
Tani
Wiraswasta
Buruh
PNS

4. Jumlah Anak
1 Anak
2 Anak
3 Anak
4 Anak
5. Jarak Rumah Ibu Dengan Posyandu
Sangat Dekat (1-10 meter)
Dekat (10-50 meter)
Sedang (50-100 meter)
Jauh (> 100 meter)
6. Frekuensi Ibu Balita mengunjungi posyandu dalam 5 bulan terakhir
Aktif
Tidak Aktif
7. Menimbang balita saat di posyandu
5 kali
4 kali
3 kali
< 3 kali
8. Berat badan balita dalam 5 bulan terakhir
Bertambah
Tetap
Menurun
9. Pemberian Makanan Tambahan (PMT)
Teratur
Tidak teratur

LAMPIRAN 2
Hasil Penelitian Data Umum Dan Khusus
UMUR PENDIDIKAN PEKERJAAN
19
18
34
34
35
33
32
31
35
34
32
31
30
35
32
33
31
33
34
35
31
30
29
30
36
37
40
38
36
36
39
18
18
20
21

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

4
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

JUMLAH
ANAK
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

JARAK
RUMAH
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0

PMT
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

KEAKTIFAN
IBU
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

BERAT BADAN
BALITA
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

24
25
22
23
27
26
25
22
23
24
25
29
25
22
23
21
20
24
25
26
27
22
24
23
26
21
23
29
22
23
24
36
36

2
2
2
1
1
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
4
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

1
1
1
1
1
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

0
0
0
0
0
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Keterangan:
Pendidikan
0.
1.
2.
3.

Rendah (tidak sekolah/SD)


Pendidikan Pertama (SMP)
Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA)
Pendidikan Tinggi (Akademi, PT)

Pekerjaan
0.
1.
2.
3.
4.

Ibu Rumah Tangga


Tani
Wiraswasta
Buruh
PNS

Jarak Rumah Ibu Dengan Posyandu


0.
1.
2.
3.

Sangat Dekat (1-10 meter)


Dekat (10-50 meter)
Sedang (50-100 meter)
Jauh (> 100 meter)

Frekuensi Ibu Balita mengunjungi posyandu dalam 5 bulan terakhir


1. Aktif
0. Tidak Aktif
Berat badan balita dalam 5 bulan terakhir
1. Bertambah
0. Menurun
Pemberian Makanan Tambahan (PMT)
1. Teratur
0. Tidak teratur

LAMPIRAN 3
Uji Hipotesis

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
Pendidikan ibu * Keaktifan
Ibu
Pekerjaan Ibu * Keaktifan Ibu
Jumlah Anak Ibu * Keaktifan
Ibu
Jarak Rumah Ibu * Keaktifan
Ibu

Missing
Percent

Total

Percent

Percent

68

100.0%

.0%

68

100.0%

68

100.0%

.0%

68

100.0%

68

100.0%

.0%

68

100.0%

68

100.0%

.0%

68

100.0%

Pendidikan ibu * Keaktifan Ibu


Crosstab
Keaktifan Ibu
tidak aktif
Pendidikan ibu

Rendah (tidak sekolah/SD)

Pendidikan Pertama (SMP)

Sekolah Menengah Atas


(SMA)
Pendidikan Tinggi
(akademi/PT)
Total

Count

aktif

Total

Expected Count

1.2

1.8

3.0

Count

12

14

Expected Count

5.8

8.2

14.0

Count

12

22

34

14.0

20.0

34.0

16

17

Expected Count

7.0

10.0

17.0

Count

28

40

68

28.0

40.0

68.0

Expected Count
Count

Expected Count

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

24.980a

.000

Likelihood Ratio

28.901

.000

Linear-by-Linear Association

23.583

.000

Pearson Chi-Square

N of Valid Cases

68

a. 2 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is 1.24.

Symmetric Measures
Asymp. Std.
Errora

Value
Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx. Sig.

Phi

.606

.000

Cramer's V

.606

.000

Contingency Coefficient

.518

.000

Interval by Interval

Pearson's R

.593

.071

5.988

.000c

Ordinal by Ordinal

Spearman Correlation

.594

.076

6.002

.000c

N of Valid Cases

68

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.


b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Pekerjaan Ibu * Keaktifan Ibu


Crosstab
Keaktifan Ibu
tidak aktif
Pekerjaan Ibu

Ibu Rumah Tangga

Count

38

57

23.5

33.5

57.0

2.5

3.5

6.0

1.2

1.8

3.0

Count

Expected Count

.8

1.2

2.0

Count

28

40

68

28.0

40.0

68.0

Count
Expected Count

Buruh

Count
Expected Count

PNS

Total

Expected Count

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

df

sided)

10.888a

.012

12.985

.005

5.827

.016

68

a. 6 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .82.

Total

19

Expected Count
Wiraswasta

aktif

Symmetric Measures
Asymp. Std.
Errora

Value
Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx. Sig.

Phi

.400

.012

Cramer's V

.400

.012

Contingency Coefficient

.372

.012

Interval by Interval

Pearson's R

-.295

.121

-2.507

.015c

Ordinal by Ordinal

Spearman Correlation

-.346

.110

-2.994

.004c

N of Valid Cases

68

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.


b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Jumlah Anak Ibu * Keaktifan Ibu


Crosstab
Keaktifan Ibu
tidak aktif
Jumlah Anak Ibu

Count

16

25

10.3

14.7

25.0

13

22

35

14.4

20.6

35.0

2.9

4.1

7.0

Count

Expected Count

.4

.6

1.0

Count

28

40

68

28.0

40.0

68.0

Count
Expected Count

Count
Expected Count

Total

Total

Expected Count
2

aktif

Expected Count

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

4.585a

.205

Likelihood Ratio

4.913

.178

Linear-by-Linear Association

2.657

.103

Pearson Chi-Square

N of Valid Cases

68

a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .41.

Symmetric Measures
Asymp. Std.
Errora

Value
Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx. Sig.

Phi

.260

.205

Cramer's V

.260

.205

Contingency Coefficient

.251

.205

Interval by Interval

Pearson's R

-.199

.118

-1.651

.104c

Ordinal by Ordinal

Spearman Correlation

-.165

.122

-1.363

.178c

N of Valid Cases

68

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.


b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Jarak Rumah Ibu * Keaktifan Ibu


Crosstab
Keaktifan Ibu
tidak aktif
Jarak Rumah Ibu

sangat dekat (1-10 meter)

Count

10

10

4.1

5.9

10.0

16

19

Expected Count

7.8

11.2

19.0

Count

13

10

23

Expected Count

9.5

13.5

23.0

Count

12

16

Expected Count

6.6

9.4

16.0

Count

28

40

68

28.0

40.0

68.0

Count

sedang (50-100 meter)

jauh (>100 meter)

Total

Expected Count

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

Df

sided)

21.849a

.000

Likelihood Ratio

26.078

.000

Linear-by-Linear Association

20.645

.000

Pearson Chi-Square

N of Valid Cases

68

a. 1 cells (12.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is 4.12.

Total

Expected Count
dekat (10-50 meter)

aktif

Symmetric Measures
Asymp. Std.
Errora

Value
Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx. Sig.

Phi

.567

.000

Cramer's V

.567

.000

Contingency Coefficient

.493

.000

Interval by Interval

Pearson's R

-.555

.080

-5.422

.000c

Ordinal by Ordinal

Spearman Correlation

-.559

.084

-5.480

.000c

N of Valid Cases

68

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.


b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Pemberian Makanan Tambahan * Berat Badan Balita


Crosstab
Berat Badan Balita
berkurang
Pemberian Makanan

tidak teratur

Tambahan
Teratur

Total

Count

23

23

Expected Count

8.8

14.2

23.0

42

45

17.2

27.8

45.0

26

42

68

26.0

42.0

68.0

Count
Expected Count

Total

bertambah

Count
Expected Count

Chi-Square Tests

Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

sided)

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

56.144a

.000

Continuity Correctionb

52.261

.000

Likelihood Ratio

68.424

.000

Fisher's Exact Test

.000

Linear-by-Linear Association

55.318

N of Valid Casesb

.000

.000

68

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.79.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures
Asymp. Std.
Errora

Value
Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx. Sig.

Phi

.909

.000

Cramer's V

.909

.000

Contingency Coefficient

.672

.000

Interval by Interval

Pearson's R

.909

.049

17.679

.000c

Ordinal by Ordinal

Spearman Correlation

.909

.049

17.679

.000c

N of Valid Cases

68

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.


b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Keaktifan Ibu * Berat Badan Balita


Crosstab
Berat Badan Balita
berkurang
Keaktifan Ibu

tidak aktif

Count
Expected Count

aktif

Count
Expected Count

Total

Count
Expected Count

bertambah

Total

26

28

10.7

17.3

28.0

40

40

15.3

24.7

40.0

26

42

68

26.0

42.0

68.0

Chi-Square Tests

Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

sided)

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

60.136a

.000

Continuity Correctionb

56.268

.000

Likelihood Ratio

76.058

.000

Fisher's Exact Test


Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Casesb

.000
59.252

.000

68

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.71.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.000

Symmetric Measures
Asymp. Std.
Errora

Value
Nominal by Nominal

Approx. Tb

Approx. Sig.

Phi

.940

.000

Cramer's V

.940

.000

Contingency Coefficient

.685

.000

Interval by Interval

Pearson's R

.940

.040

22.466

.000c

Ordinal by Ordinal

Spearman Correlation

.940

.040

22.466

.000c

N of Valid Cases

68

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.


b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

LAMPIRAN 4
Tabel Nilai Chi Square
DK

TARAF SIGNIFIKAN
20%
10%
1,642
2,706
3,219
3,605
4,642
6,251
5,989
7,779
7,289
9,236

1
2
3
4
5

50%
0,455
0,139
2,366
3,357
4,351

30%
1,074
2,408
3,665
4,878
6,064

5%
3,481
5,591
7,815
9,488
11,070

1%
6,635
9,210
11,341
13,277
15,086

6
7
8
9
10

5,348
6,346
7,344
8,343
9,342

7,231
8,838
9,524
10,656
11,781

8,558
9,803
11,030
12,242
13,442

10,645
12,017
13,362
14,684
15,987

12,592
14,017
15,507
16,919
18,307

16,812
18,475
20,090
21,666
23,209

11
12
13
14
15

10,341
11,340
12,340
13,332
14,339

12,899
14,011
15,19
16,222
17,322

14,631
15,812
16,985
18,151
19,311

17,275
18,549
19,812
21,064
22,307

19,675
21,026
22,368
23,685
24,996

24,725
26,217
27,688
29,141
30,578

16
17
18
19
20

15,338
16,337
17,338
18,338
19,337

18,418
19,551
20,601
21,689
22,775

20,465
21,615
22,760
23,900
25,038

23,542
24,785
26,028
27,271
28,514

26,296
27,587
28,869
30,144
31,410

32,000
33,409
34,805
36,191
37,566

21
22
23
24
25

20,337
21,337
22,337
23,337
24,337

23,858
24,939
26,018
27,096
28,172

26,171
27,301
28,429
29,553
30,675

29,615
30,813
32,007
33,194
34,382

32,671
33,924
35,172
35,415
37,652

38,932
40,289
41,638
42,980
44,314

26
27
28
29
30

25,336
26,336
27,336
28,336
29,336

29,246
30,319
31,391
32,461
33,530

31,795
32,912
34,027
35,139
36,250

35,563
36,741
37,916
39,087
40,256

38,885
40,113
41,337
42,557
43,775

45,642
46,963
48,278
49,588
50,892

LAMPIRAN 5
Tabel Hubungan Keeratan

Anda mungkin juga menyukai