World View:
1. the Red Army Faction or Baader Meinhof Gang in the former West Germany
2. the Red Brigades in Italy,
3. the 17 November Movement in Greece,
4. the Shining Path of Peru,
5. Peoples Revolutionary Army and the Motoneros of Argentina.
6. The Maoist groups in India and Nepal
Overview:
1. PM calls it as "India's single largest internal security Problem"
2. 8,000 people have been killed between 2001 and 2012.
3. Govt estimates of Maoist forces : 15000-20000 army, atleast 40% of them are
women; avg age in high teens and low twenties.
4. Various estimates suggest Maoist rebels could number up to 40,000. Of
these, thousands may be armed with weapons ranging from AK-47s to light
machine-guns raided from police stations or bought from dealers in Nepal.
The cadre mostly comprises farmers, landless labourers, tribals and the
extremely poor, including women and children.
5. The Indian government, led by the United Progressive Alliance, banned the
CPI (Maoist) under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) as a
terrorist organisation
6. Naxalites have been charged by the government with running an extortion
economy in the guise of a popular revolution, extorting vast amounts of
money from local branches of mining companies and other businesses
Origin:
1. The peasant movement in Andhra Pradesh just after Indias independence
was a precursor to the rise of Maoist thought. But it was an attack on a tribal
man in the Naxalbari village of West Bengal on March 2, 1967 that sparked
the violent, extremist left-wing movement.The Communist Party of China
hailed the movement as the Spring Thunder of India.
which is not the case of Tribals. This has affected the nature of
political mobilization of political parties. Sankaran
Cmt. condemns Maoist violence for its focus on military actions
rather than on the mobilization of people for social
transformation.
2. Mining contributed to misery of Tribals. Tribal areas to the policy
makers are simply mineral rich areas. (Ecological
unsustainability & Social devastation has contributed to their
discontent). Poor regions in the world are invariably mineral rich
regions(Eg: Applachian mountains, Russia, Australia, China). The
way extraction industry operates environmentally or socially
doesn't lead to prosperity of the locals but it certainly leads to
prosperity of outsiders. 40% of the total population displaced
post-independence due to development have been tribals ie
nearly 10-15 Million. At times they are subjected to not just one
displacement but to multiple displacements.Our track record of
land acquisition, Rehabilitation is pathetic.
3. Insensitive Forest Administration : First symbol of Government in
Forest Areas is Forest Guard. Forest Guard is armed with Indian
Forest Act of 1927. 1000s of tribals in Jharkhand, Chattisgarh are
jailed on flimsy charges of collecting items of daily existence.
2006 : Forest Rights Act was enacted. But Forest Bureaucracy
continued its hostility towards it.
6. What are we doing to deal with this?
1. our first and instinctive response was to expand our security
operations; Today 70000 para-military forces in 88 districts, 30000
local police
2. Lately from Security only approach(Security Response) to Security Plus
approach (+Development Response)
3. Some security successes to integrate these areas with mainstream
societies.
7. Missing pieces of our strategy and what needs to be done?
1. We end up having Half-hearted responses if we don't recognize this as
an ideological challenge & Development Challenge
2. Fundamental requirement is Political response(Where Political parties
are weak, Maoists are strong and vice-versa). There is a political
impasse (classic case of "immovable object" meeting "irresistable
force")
repression and hate will always ultimately be brutal and unjust, even if the
violence is undertaken for lofty ideals.
Recent initiatives and case studies:
1. central government has a Naxal Management Division that provides funds,
additional security forces, logistics and coordinates between states.
2. Integrated Action Plan(IAP) - to increase inter-state coordination
1. in 88 identified districts.
2. All the resources like planning, intelligence, etc., should integrate [to
fight Naxalism].
3. There should be one centre from where all information regarding
Naxalism should be disseminated to the States.
4. There should be some long-term strategy, which will be decided
together. So far, there is no success in this coordination
5. Extension for 4 more years.
6. Physical Infra facilities like school buildings, anganwadi centers, rural
roads, panchayat buildings, community halls and irrigation works were
given priority where as social investment in health care, Sanitation and
water supplies is very less
7. now under consideration for merging into BRGF
8. Is CAP part of IAP?
9. Payment of MGNREGA wages in cash has been allowed under IAP for
selected tribal and backward districts to obviate payment delays where
outreach of banks/post-offices is inadequate.
3. Implementation of IAP.
1. Rural Development Min. wants to do that through local bodies where as
Home Min. wants to carry it through District admin which will help in
increasing the credibility of Govt. in tribal areas.
2. Existing model : 30 crore/district through a 3-membered district-level
cmt(District Magistrate, SP, District Forest Officer).
3. Home and Finance ministries are in favour of existing model while PC
and Rural Development ministry are advocating to spend atleast half of
the amount through local bodies and representatives. Home ministry
pointed out that in most villages local bodies are either missing or lying