Dipartimento di Geologia, Paleontologia e Geofisica, Universita` di Padova, Via Giotto 1, 35137 Padova, Italy
b Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita
` di Parma, Viale delle Scienze 78, 43100 Parma, Italy
c Dipartimento di Geologia e Geofisica, Universita
` di Bari, Campus universitario, Via E. Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy
d Centro di Geodinamica, Universita
` della Basilicata, Palazzo Auletta, Via Anzio, 85100 Potenza, Italy
Received 22 June 1998; accepted 18 March 1999
Abstract
A thick Pleistocene shelf and nearshore cyclical succession was deposited in the S. Mauro sub-basin of the Crotone
basin (southern Italy). The regressive units of the cycles are mostly represented by coastal siliciclastic and bioclastic
prograding wedges showing a clinoform geometry. These are separated by blanket-like deposits of high lateral persistence
recording major transgressive episodes. The aim of this paper is (1) to describe facies patterns and depositional setting
of two prograding wedges, particularly focussing on their polycyclic internal architecture, (2) to analyze these units
within a sequence-stratigraphic framework, and (3) to speculate on the possible origin of the small-scale cyclicity.
The two wedges analyzed in this paper consist of a number of shingles. Individual shingles consist of two physically
connected units: (1) a relatively thin package of sigmoid clinoforms, grading into (2) a volumetrically dominant package
of oblique-tangential clinoforms with toplap terminations. The shingles are bounded by seaward-dipping surfaces with
sigmoid clinoform geometry, which are ravinement surfaces updip, passing into conformable flooding surfaces downdip.
The wedges are thus organized into high-frequency, small-scale sequences, each comprising transgressive, highstand and
falling-stage systems tracts. As a whole, individual prograding wedges are interpreted as forced-regressive units, as the
shoreline was subject to an overall shift basinwards and downwards along a low-angle trajectory, in spite of the repeated
minor relative sea-level rises. Tectonic subsidence, and particularly the syndepositional growth of gentle synclines, are
thought to have been the key factors allowing the preservation of these forced-regressive units. Progradation of the
wedges took place in a high-energy wave climate characterized by high frequency of storms and very efficient alongshore
redistribution of sediments. Recurrent, storm-driven, offshore currents led to intense reworking of sediments on the
topset platform and gravity spreading on the foreset slope of the prograding wedges. Well-oxygenated conditions over
the shelf due to intensified storm activity during glacial periods may have enhanced the rate of production of skeletal,
foramol-type carbonates. It can reasonably be assumed that progradation took place from a line source and that the sand
bodies are to be regarded as coastal prograding bodies. In spite of active syndepositional tectonics, the cycles can be
correlated to Pleistocene high-amplitude sea-level oscillations. The older of the two wedges can be correlated, through
bio-magnetostratigraphy, to the major climatic transition which occurred from the marine oxygen-isotope stage 25 to 2422
(Rio et al., 1996). The younger probably developed during the sea-level fall that ended with substage 18.2, as suggested
by sequence- and bio-stratigraphic data. The prograding wedges are thus interpreted to record long-lived sea-level falls
of fourth-order cycles. Due to the particular depositional setting, we are inclined to exclude authigenic mechanisms in
Corresponding
0037-0738/99/$ see front matter 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 0 3 7 - 0 7 3 8 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 0 2 5 - 1
86
the origin of small-scale cyclicity. Although the concomitance and interaction of different controlling factors may be
taken into account, it is tempting to ascribe this cyclicity to minor eustatic changes punctuating long-lived, erratic falling
stages, possibly accompanied by climate-driven fluctuations of sediment supply. Shelf-perched and shelf-edge prograding
units consisting of foramol-type carbonates are apparently a common falling-stage to lowstand depositional feature in the
Mediterranean area during the Late Pliocene and Pleistocene. 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Pleistocene; glacio-eustasy; shallow-water cycles; forced regression; composite prograding wedges; shingles;
high-energy wave climate; oxygen-isotope record; erratic sea-level fall; minor eustatic changes
1. Introduction
Late-Early Pleistocene to Late Pleistocene sealevel cycles, as recorded by the 18 O composition of the calcite in foraminifera (Shackleton,
1987), are characterized by fluctuating, long-lived
glacial buildups, terminated typically by large and
abrupt shifts from glacial to interglacial conditions
(Broecker and van Donk, 1970; Broecker, 1984;
Raymo, 1997). These sea-level fluctuations may
combine with basin subsidence and sediment supply
to produce sedimentary cycles with facies distribution and sequence architecture that differ from those
predicted by current sequence-stratigraphic models
(Piper and Perissoratis, 1990, 1991; Aksu et al.,
1992; Tesson et al., 1993; Naish and Kamp, 1997).
Specifically, well-developed Pleistocene prograding
units recording sea-level falls, sometimes punctuated
by short-term landward shifts in coastal onlap, have
been illustrated in various settings (Aksu et al., 1992;
Posamentier et al., 1992; Tesson et al., 1993; Trincardi et al., 1996; Trincardi and Correggiari, 1999).
In a recent paper, using bio-magnetostratigraphic
constraints, we documented the correlation with the
standard oxygen-isotope scale of Lower to middle
Pleistocene mixed siliciclasticcarbonate cycles, developing in the small, tectonically active S. Mauro
sub-basin of the Crotone basin, southern Italy (Rio
et al., 1996). The development and preservation of
these deposits resulted from differential tectonic subsidence and high rates of sediment supply. In this paper we illustrate in detail (1) facies patterns and depositional setting of the coastal prograding units which
make up the most part of these cycles, particularly focussing on the composite internal stratal architecture
of two of them, (2) the analysis of these units within
a sequence-stratigraphic conceptual framework, and
(3) the possible origin of the small-scale cyclicity.
2. S. Mauro sub-basin
The Calabrian segment of the Apennines, corresponding to the rear of the Calabrian accretionary wedge (Fig. 1), recently evolved from Early
Pleistocene compression, through middle Pleistocene strike-slip faulting, to Late Pleistocene extension and isostatic adjustments (Scheepers, 1994).
Within this setting, the evolution of the Crotone
basin was controlled by oblique sinistral movements along two confining NW-trending crustal
shear zones (RossanoSan Nicola and PetiliaSostri
Zones, Fig. 1) (Van Dijk, 1991). Small sub-basins
originated within the Crotone basin during the Early
Pleistocene, one of which is located in the S.
Mauro Marchesato area. This sub-basin, bounded
by M. Fuscaldo and Scandale synsedimentary faults
(Fig. 2), evolved in a dextral transtensile bend of an
overall NNE-oriented extensional stress field, which
caused enhanced differential subsidence and displacements of active depositional sites, as recorded
by angular stratal relationships and unconformities.
Syndepositional NE- to NNE-trending folds with
very low amplitude are sub-parallel to boundary faults
and are more accentuated close to them, suggesting
a genetic relationship with fault movements. Their
geometries closely resemble those which developed
in the hanging-wall of listric extensional faults with
staircase trajectory (Gibbs, 1984; Ellis and McClay,
87
Fig. 1. Geological setting of study area (shown by rectangle), with indications of main geological units of southern Italy (adapted from
Van Dijk, 1994). Evolution of the Crotone basin was controlled by two NW-trending crustal shear zones, RossanoSan Nicola and
PetiliaSostri zones.
The infill of the S. Mauro Marchesato subbasin represents a relatively expanded sedimentary
record of the upper-Lower Pleistocene and middle
Pleistocene (we follow Berggren et al., 1995 in
placing the Earlymiddle Pleistocene boundary at
the MatuyamaBrunhes reversal). Five stratigraphic
units are recognized (Fig. 3), informally named
Cutro 1 and Cutro 2 (Cutro group), S. Mauro 1,
S. Mauro 2 and S. Mauro 3 (S. Mauro group) (Rio
et al., 1996). Relatively high rates of subsidence and
sediment supply, combined with deposition in shallow-water environments sensitive to even minor relative sea-level changes, resulted in a stack of high-fre-
88
89
Fig. 2. Simplified geological map of study area. To the west, S. Mauro sub-basin is bounded by the N-directed dextral oblique-slip M.
Fuscaldo fault, which forms a releasing bend in the S. Mauro area; to the east, it is bounded by the dextral oblique-slip Scandale fault,
characterized by major extensional component. Both faults were active during sedimentation, and movements along them took place in a
NNE-oriented extensional stress field. Syndepositional NE- to NNE-trending folds with very low amplitude are sub-parallel to boundary
faults and are more accentuated close to them, suggesting genetic relationship with fault movements. The Cutro group is dated to Early
Pleistocene and S. Mauro group to late-Early Pleistocene and middle Pleistocene. AA0 , BB0 and CC0 : geological sections (traces
in map) illustrating effects of syndepositional tectonics (note vertical exaggeration). Section BB 0 shows that the depocentre active
during deposition of S. Mauro 1 and S. Mauro 2 shifted westwards during deposition of S. Mauro 3. For the sake of clarity internal
unconformities of composite wedges are omitted in section CC0 .
90
Fig. 3. Generalized stratigraphic section of study area, with indication of bio- and magnetostratigraphy, and correlation with standard
oxygen isotopic scale. A and B represent composite wedges studied here.
Fig. 4. Dip-oriented cross-section along the eastern side of the basin fill, from Scandale fault to T.S. Margherita, showing stacked cycles of S. Mauro 1, S. Mauro 2 and
lower part of S. Mauro 3. Note general geometry of wedges A and B and their internal subdivision into a number of shingled units. Flanks of broad gravel-filled incised
valley at the top are not apparent, as section is sub-parallel to palaeoflow direction. Vertical scale is enlarged.
91
92
Fig. 5. Photo and sketch of segment of lower composite wedge in S. Mauro S section (see Fig. 2 for location) showing unconformable
contact (arrow) of two shingled units, draped by coarse shoreface deposits. Section is oblique to depositional dip of clinoforms.
Fig. 6. (a) Sketch from photomosaic showing internal organization of upper composite wedge, as seen in Valle di Manche section, oriented slightly oblique to depositional
dip of clinoforms (see Fig. 2, section CC0 , for location). Note enlarged vertical scale. This wedge is internally subdivided into shingled units by prominent, seaward-dipping
surfaces with sigmoid clinoform geometry, updip portions of which are erosional unconformities mantled by shoreface deposits. Wedge is capped by a regional unconformity,
above which shoreface sands of another cycle are variably eroded by a broad incised valley infilled with braided-river deposits. These in turn are capped by a transgressive
sheet. (b) Wedge segment showing detail of geometry of unconformity surface (arrows) at junction of two shingled units. (c) Detail of unconformity (ravinement surface)
between two shingled units. Contact is marked by erosional gutters and is overlain by three closely spaced coarse fossiliferous bands, interlayered with fine sand. Hoe 67 cm
long for scale.
94
Fig. 7. Vertical facies sequence of upper prograding wedge (reconstructed from a number of partial sections measured in the southern
part of the study area). Note that palaeocurrent pattern in topset beds is comparably much more variable than in foreset beds, where dip
of trough cross-bedded intrasets approximates clinoform dip.
96
Table 1
Facies scheme of composite wedges
Stratal architecture
Light-brown to yellowish,
prograding,
upward-shallowing wedges
up to 45 m thick, with basal
contact changing from
sharp-erosional (locally
marked by intraclast and=or
shell lags) to gradational
basinwards. Grain size from
silt=fine sand to granuleand rarely pebble=cobble
gravel; sand predominates.
Sorting good to moderate,
best in fine sand. Coarsest
deposits (up to pebbles and
cobbles) typically occur in
most basinward located
units. Composition from
purely siliciclastic (arkosic
sands, with clasts of quartz
and granite in the coarser
fractions) to mixed, with
locally high bioclastic
content especially in wedge
A (Fig. 9a,b).
Faunal=floral elements
Topset beds
Foreset beds
Regularly stratified
decimetre-thick layers
(Fig. 7) ranging in grain size
from fine sand to granule
gravel, locally with thin
muddy interbeds increasing
in thickness and abundance
downdip. Dip angles from
less than 10 to 16 (Fig. 9d)
according to grain size and
gradient of the substrate.
Beds mostly
planar-laminated (Figs. 7
and 8c). Normal grading
may occur in both fine- and
coarse-grained layers,
inverse grading occasionally
in the latter. Typical
rhythmic pattern due to
recurrent physical
emplacement of event beds
and intervening bioturbation
(Fig. 8c). Shells mostly
convex-up, locally
imbricated with low to high
imbrication angles. Local
convolute patterns. Rare sets
of scour-based backset beds
(Fig. 7) recording upslope
migration of hydraulic
jumps (Massari, 1996).
Abundant echinoid
meniscate traces (Fig. 8d)
locally associated with thin
tubes of polychaetes and
escape burrows.
Arctica islandica is
abundant in wedge A.
Skeletal content of highly
bioclastic units consists of
disarticulated, whole or
broken and commonly
abraded molluscan shells,
bryozoa, serpulids, echinoid
fragments, branches of
corallines and rhodoliths, in
a matrix of comminuted
bio-debris (foramol-type
skeletal concentrations)
(Fig. 9b). Skeletal
assemblages are ecologically
mixed, with the imprints of
various taphonomic
processes and evidence of
initial residence above the
fair-weather wave base
before later transport and
redeposition. Elements
exhumed from the substrate
are mixed with
shallow-water coeval
elements. Details on the
faunal and floral elements
can be found in
Appendix A.
98
Sila massif, presumably through short-headed, highgradient streams. However, sedimentary structures
and stratal geometries indicate that coastal processes
played a dominant role in longshore redistribution
of sediments and straightening of the coast, so that
localized and discrete deltaic protuberances of the
shoreline were most probably absent. Progradational
advance of the shoreline across the shelf led to
decreasing shelf width and increasing exposure to
open-water waves, and coastal systems consequently
became more wave-influenced, with maximization of
storm reworking (Einsele, 1993; Galloway and Hobday, 1996). Frictional coupling between the wind
and the water surface during recurrent storms caused
coastal setup and water to be driven offshore, leading
to intense reworking of sediments on the topset platform and gravity spreading of sediment-laden flows
on the foreset slope of the prograding units (cf. Saito,
1991; Laptas, 1992; Tesson et al., 1993; Chiocci and
Orlando, 1996; Hanken et al., 1996; HernandezMolina et al., 1998; Pomar and Tropeano, 1998;
Chiocci and Romagnoli, 1999).
In the case of richly bioclastic units, there is clear
evidence that foramol-type deposits were produced
on a shallow-water platform located in topset position. Wave action reworked and comminuted skeletal
material temporarily resident above the fair-weather
wave base, while redeposition by sediment gravityflows on to the foreset slope below fair-weather wave
base produced amalgamated, densely packed concentrations. The above processes generated a characteristic type of multiple-event skeletal concentrations with
an important lag component (sensu Kidwell, 1991).
Undoubtedly the studied prograding bodies are
quite peculiar units, as they cannot be compared
to the usual coarsening-upwards units resulting from
the progradation of a beach face, nor may they be defined as a sort of deltaic unit. They are significantly
different from typical shoreface prograding units,
which commonly show much lesser dip angles of
clinoforms (on average 0.3 according to Walker and
Plint, 1992). Main differences include the length and
steep inclination of clinoforms, importance of sediment gravity flows on the foreset slopes, and depth
attained by toeset beds, which extend into the offshore zone, well below the fair-weather wave base.
We will use the term coastal prograding wedges as
they were most probably connected to the shoreline
and shaped by coastal processes. Comparable midshelf and shelf-margin prograding deposits emplaced
during falling and lowstand Pleistocene stages on the
Tyrrhenian Sea margin were interpreted by Trincardi
and Field (1991) to have formed by coastal progradation as beachshoreface complexes. Units with
comparable internal architecture were referred to as
infralittoral prograding wedges=prisms by Pomar
and Tropeano (1998) and Hernandez-Molina et al.
(1998).
3.3. Surfaces bounding the shingled units
The surfaces with sigmoid clinoform geometry
bounding the shingled units (Figs. 5 and 6) are unconformably blanketed updip by fossiliferous sheets
of gravelly sand 13 m thick. These fine progressively
downdip into conformable offshore muds. The coarse
deposits generally consist of sheet-like granule- to
pebble-conglomerates with a sandy matrix, containing sparse to densely packed skeletal remains (pectinids, echinoids) and locally bored pebbles and pedorelics. From the pebble-strewn erosional surfaces,
subvertical burrows (probable Cylindrichnus), sometimes surrounded by thin polychaete burrows, locally
penetrate deeply downwards into the sandy substrate.
The unconformable surfaces are locally marked
by erosional gutters up to 20 cm deep (Fig. 6c),
or shallow scours (Fig. 5) with high width=depth
ratio, up to 2.1 m deep. The gutters sometimes display vertical walls and are infilled with the coarsest
available elements, commonly with normal grading.
The infills of the scours range in grain size from
granule sand with sparse pebbles to medium sand,
and in composition from siliciclastic to richly bioclastic. They consist of a number of scour-based,
bipartite beds, 2040 cm thick. The lower divisions
of the beds are massive or normally graded, poorly
sorted, with chaotic fabric, and contain abundant
mud clasts, well-rounded pebbles (mostly quartz
and granite), sparse pedorelics (small reworked calcrete nodules), and sometimes variably fragmented,
abraded and bio-eroded shells (including pectinids
and Arctica islandica, mostly with concave-up
valves) and rhodoliths. The upper divisions are planar- to low-angle-laminated, better sorted, sandy to
granular, and locally mud-draped. They may show
good imbrication of small bioclasts with a dominant
99
forming during relative sea-level falls, and have discussed the significance of these deposits within a sequence-stratigraphic framework (Plint, 1988, 1991;
Walker and Plint, 1992; Hunt and Tucker, 1992,
1995; Helland-Hansen and Gjelberg, 1994; Naish
and Kamp, 1997, among others).
In our study area, we recognized two different
scales of cyclicity.
(1) On the larger scale, the two composite wedges
are thought to record accretionary forced regressions (sensu Helland-Hansen and Gjelberg, 1994) of
fourth-order sequences. The interpretation in terms
of forced-regressive wedges stems from the evidence
that the shoreline was subject to an overall shift basinwards and downwards along a low-angle trajectory,
in spite of repeated minor relative sea-level rises, and
that coarsest deposits occur within the most distal
parts of the composite wedges (T.S. Litano section).
The major discontinuities bounding the wedges at the
top are interpreted as fourth-order sequence boundaries. These are draped by aggrading blanket-like
deposits showing high lateral persistence and lack of
backstepping patterns, which record major episodes
of relative sea-level rise.
(2) On the scale of individual shingled units
(Fig. 10), the sigmoid packages of clinoforms reflect progradation concomitant with the creation of
accommodation. Oblique, offlapping packages reflect progradation in a setting of slowly decreasing
accommodation. The basinward and downward displacement of the shoreline during this stage is proved
by the physical lowering of the toplap surface and
the fact that subsequent shoreface retreat producing
a ravinement surface starts from a point located significantly downdip along the front of the prograding
body. Blanket deposits covering erosional unconformities between shingled units reflect minor, highfrequency events of relative sea-level rise. The unconformities are ravinement surfaces which removed
any evidence of previous subaerial exposure. Their
correlative downdip conformities, mantled by silty
muds, are marine flooding surfaces in distal position.
The attribution of a sequence-stratigraphic significance to the shape of clinoforms (sigmoid versus
oblique) is shared by Christie-Blick (1991) and Helland-Hansen (1993). The latter regards the clinoform
shape as an indirect criterion for estimating the ratio
of accommodation to supply.
100
Fig. 10. Scheme of development of shingles as component units of prograding composite wedges (terminology is that suggested by
Helland-Hansen and Gjelberg, 1994).
Following the nongenetic, descriptive nomenclature of Helland-Hansen and Gjelberg (1994), the
blanket deposits covering the shingle-bounding sigmoid unconformities should be ascribed to non-accretionary transgression, the packages of sigmoid clinoforms to normal regression and the packages of
oblique-tangential clinoforms to accretionary forcedregression. Thus, the composite wedges are organized
into higher-order, small-scale depositional sequences.
If reference is simply made to the stratal architecture,
without genetic implications, it may be stated that
each small-scale sequence consists of transgressive,
highstand and falling-stage systems tracts (Fig. 11).
A similar partitioning into minor cycles has been
recognized by Somoza et al. (1997) in an Upper Pleistocene major progradational wedge of the Gulf of
Cadiz, Spain, using high-resolution seismic profiles.
The lack of an intervening zone of sediment bypass between sigmoid and oblique packages of the
101
Fig. 11. Reconstructed and partly idealized pattern of stratal architecture of lower composite wedge. Landwards, it pinches out against a
growing structure related to the Scandale boundary fault. Progradation is punctuated by minor transgressive events. Clinoforms rapidly
evolve from sigmoid to oblique-tangential configuration within individual shingled units (TST D transgressive systems tract; HST D
highstand systems tract; FRST D forced regressive systems tract; DWS D downward shift of facies tracts. All labels refer to higher-order
cycles within composite wedge) (approximate scale on left).
Dominguez et al. (1992) in the upper Cenozoic shallow-water depositional systems of Brazil.
The term FRWST (forced-regressive wedge systems tract) was originally attributed to forced-regressive wedges detached from the HST and occurring
as a series of downstepped, disjoined, sharp-based
shoreline wedges (Hunt and Tucker, 1992; see also
Posamentier et al., 1992). Although our architectural setting is different, we do not see good reasons
for using another term (we only would simplify
the acronym into FRST). Naish and Kamp (1997)
suggest regressive systems tract (RST) as a more
appropriate term for describing forced-regressive deposits physically attached to the HST and marked by
gradational lower contact. We agree with them that
this stratal architecture may be a common feature of
PlioPleistocene sequences. However, we actually
share the opinion of Mellere and Steel (1995) that
the nature of the lower contact and the attached or
detached relationship with respect to the HST are
not the sole key features for defining a forced-regressive wedge. Other criteria are regarded as critical,
such as the evidence that the shoreline is driven
basinwards along a downward-directed trajectory
(Helland-Hansen and Gjelberg, 1994), the downward
shift of facies in successive clinoform segments, and
the progressive basinward coarsening of sediments
resulting from the lowering of base level.
102
103
104
Fig. 12. Outline of stratal architecture of lower composite wedge in NE part of study area, illustrating role of oversteepened shelf
gradients generated by syndepositional tectonics and collapse scars in controlling direction of progradation (approximate scale in centre).
clinoform packages, sometimes also changing downlap contacts into contacts of apparent onlap. Tectonic
oversteepening of shelf gradients may have also
favoured gravity detachment processes, leading to
collapse scars on the flanks of growing folds and
near boundary faults (Fig. 12).
The preservation potential of forced-regressive
wedges depends on conditions preventing cannibalization of the deposits which formed in the early
stages of relative sea-level fall and limiting the depth
of erosion due to shoreface retreat during transgressive events. Generally, preservation is regarded as
possible only where depressions, steep gradients or
morphologic steps are present in the shelf surface
and subsidence rate is sufficiently high (Trincardi
and Field, 1991; Field and Trincardi, 1991; Saito,
1991; Chiocci and Orlando, 1996). In our study area,
the preservation of falling-stage units was essentially
due to the creation of sediment sinks as a result of
the growth of gentle synclines, coupled with a relatively high rate of regional subsidence, high rate of
sediment influx, and sediment compaction. Another
critical factor is represented by the high asymmetry of the relative sea-level curve, with long-lasting,
stepwise falls emplacing large volumes of sediment,
and extremely rapid rises (Trincardi and Correggiari,
105
high-angle clinoforms on to a steep-gradient substrate, commonly subject to syndepositional deformation. Skeletal material is copiously produced in
nearby shoreface platforms and then dispersed, essentially by storm-driven offshore-directed flows,
and deposited on the prograding front. The units
may generally be correlated over large areas, even in
settings characterized by high tectonic activity.
Similar observations derive from seismic data
concerning falling-stage and lowstand downlapping
sedimentary units existing along the Mediterranean
Sea margins (Trincardi and Field, 1991; Chiocci,
1994; Chiocci and Orlando, 1996; Chiocci et al.,
1997; Chiocci and Romagnoli, 1999). These units
have consistently offshore-dipping bedding surfaces,
a composition dominated by intrabasinal sediments,
and a good lateral along-slope continuity, pointing to
progradation from a line-source.
It is therefore suggested that, in the presence of
suitable conditions of high rates of subsidence and
sediment supply, prograding units of this kind are a
typical element of the falling and lowstand systems
tracts of PlioPleistocene glacio-eustatic cycles in
the Mediterranean area.
9. Conclusions
A number of conclusions stem from the above
analysis.
(1) The Pleistocene infill of the small S. Mauro
sub-basin (southern Italy) shows a clear cyclicity and
mostly consists of prograding coastal sandgravel
wedges with clinoform geometry, locally highly bioclastic (skeletal, foramol-type carbonates), separated
by major unconformities recording major transgressive episodes. On the basis of bio-magnetostratigraphy the cycles in the lower part of the succession
are correlated to the standard oxygen-isotope record
(Rio et al., 1996), and, in spite of active syndepositional tectonics, they can be demonstrated to
be genetically related to Pleistocene fourth-order
high-amplitude sea-level oscillations. Two of the
prograding wedges show composite internal architecture. The older one built out during the major
climatic transition and related sea-level fall which
occurred from MIS 25 to MIS 22 (Rio et al., 1996).
The younger wedge most probably developed dur-
106
Acknowledgements
Helpful critical suggestions concerning some aspects of the manuscript were provided by F. Chiocci.
To Tim Naish, Fabio Trincardi and an anonymous
referee I owe important reviews of the manuscript.
I am particularly indebted to A. Miall for his positive comments, editing work, and kind support. S.
Castelli is acknowledged for careful photographic
work, N. Michelon and F. Todesco for accurate execution of drawings, and Gabriel Walton for revision
of the English text. Financial support was provided
by the Italian Ministry of University and Scientific Research, grant 40%. This is contribution 1 of
the National MURST Project Interazioni clima, eustatismo e tettonica nella sedimentazione: il caso del
Quaternario italiano e confronti con altri intervalli ed
aree (principal investigator D. Rio).
Appendix A
A.1. Bioclastic units of the lower composite wedge
The macrobenthic material of richly bioclastic units in the
lower composite wedge consists of three types of components.
(i) Mud-related or mixed-related faunal elements predominantly disarticulated, broken (commonly with smoothed fractures), abraded, and partly bioeroded (Entobia, Maeandropolydora, algal borings) or encrusted by celleporiform or laminar
bryozoa, red algae or tubeworms. The following species have
been recognized: Dentalium rectum, Nucula nucleus, Pecten
jacobaeus, Glans aculeata, Cerithium varicosum, Xenophora
crispa, Nassarius prismaticus, N. cabrierensis, N. serraticosta,
Caryophyllia sp., Pseudamussium septemradiatum, Pododesmus
glaucus, Neopycnodonte sp., Astarte sulcata, Glossus humanus,
Aporrhais serresianus, Phalium laevigatum, Ranella olearia,
Fusinus rostratus, Arca tetragona, Limopsis, Turritella tricarinata pliorecens, Turritella turbona, Alvania cimicoides, Galeodea echinophora, Trophon muricatus, Flabellum sp. Biocoenotic characters indicate circalittoral and sometimes also
epibathyal (Aporrhais serresianus, Ranella olearia) biotopes.
107
bimaculata, Modiola sericea, Aequipecten opercularis and Arctica islandica all with valves unworn, partly still articulated and
closed, was followed by exhumation. Later, the exhumed shells
were encrusted by epibionts like Anomia ephippium and Pododesmus patelliformis.
References
Abbott, S.T., 1997. Foraminiferal paleobathymetry and mid-cycle
architecture of Mid-Pleistocene depositional sequences, Wanganui Basin, New Zealand. Palaios 12, 267281.
Abbott, S.T., Carter, R.M., 1994. The sequence architecture
of mid-Pleistocene (0.350.95 Ma) cyclothems from New
Zealand: facies development during a period of orbital control
on sea-level cyclicity. In: de Boer, P.L., Smith, D.G. (Eds.),
Orbital Forcing and Cyclic Sequences. Int. Assoc. Sedimentol., Spec. Publ. 19, 367394.
Abbott, S.T., Carter, R.M., 1997. Macrofossil associations from
Mid-Pleistocene cyclothems, Castlecliff section, New Zealand:
implications for sequence stratigraphy. Palaios 12, 188210.
Ainsworth, R.B., Pattinson, S.A.J., 1994. Where have all the
lowstands gone? Evidence for attached systems tracts in the
Western Interior of North America. Geology 22, 415418.
Aksu, A.E., Ulug, A., Piper, D.J.W., Konuk, Y.T., Turgut, S.,
1992. Quaternary sedimentary history of Adana, Cilicia and
Iskenderun Basins: northeast Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Geol.
104, 5571.
Bassinot, F.C., Labeyrie, L.D., Vincent, E., Quidelleur, X.,
Shackleton, N.J., Lancelot, Y., 1994. The astronomical theory
of climate and the age of the BrunhesMatuyama magnetic
reversal. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 126, 91108.
Berggren, W.A., Hilgen, F.J., Langereis, C.G., Kent, D.V.,
Obradovich, J.D., Raffi, I., Raymo, M.E., Shackleton, N.J.,
1995. Late Neogene chronology: new perspectives in high-resolution stratigraphy. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 107, 12721287.
Bloom, A.L., Broecker, W.S., Chappell, J.M.A., Matthews, R.K.,
Mesolella, K.J., 1974. Quaternary sea-level fluctuations on a
tectonic coast: new 230 Th=234 U dates from the Huon Peninsula, New Guinea. Quat. Res. 4, 185205.
Broecker, W.S., 1984. Terminations. In: Berger, A.L., Imbrie, J.,
Hays, J., Kukla, G., Saltzman, B. (Eds.), Milankovitch and
Climate, Part 2. Plenum Reidel, Norwell, MA, pp. 687698.
Broecker, W.S., van Donk, J., 1970. Insolation changes, ice
volumes and the 18 O record in deep-sea cores. Rev. Geophys.
8, 169198.
Carter, R.M., Abbott, S.T., Fulthorpe, C.S., Haywick, D.W.,
Henderson, R.A., 1991. Application of global sea-level and
sequence-stratigraphic models in southern hemisphere Neogene strata from New Zealand. In: Macdonald, D.I.M. (Ed.)
Sedimentation, Tectonics and Eustasy: Sea Level Changes at
Active Margins. Int. Assoc. Sedimentol., Spec. Publ. 12, 41
65.
Catalano, R., Di Stefano, E., Lo Cicero, G., Vail, P.R., Vitale,
F.P., 1992. Pliocene sequence stratigraphy of the Caltanissetta
Basin (Capodarso section, Sicily). Sequence stratigraphy of
European Basins, Int. Congr., Dijon, Abstr. Volume, p. 438.
108
109
110