81, 641655
Research Article
DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2011.53
AND
HILDEGARD WESTPHAL{
MARUM and Department of Geosciences, Universitat Bremen, Leobener Strae, 28359 Bremen, Germany
e-mail: hildegard.westphal@zmt-bremen.de
ABSTRACT: Heterozoan or foramol production is typical in extratropical carbonate sedimentary systems. However, under
mesotrophic to eutrophic conditions, heterozoan carbonates also form in tropical settings, but such heterozoan tropical
sedimentary systems are poorly understood. Nevertheless, distinction between tropical and extratropical heterozoan carbonates
in ancient successions is crucial for accurate paleoenvironmental and paleoclimate reconstructions. Here, surficial Holocene
and Pleistocene sediments of the northern Mauritanian shelf are studied as an example of a tropical eutrophic carbonate
depositional system (11 mg?L21 Chl-a [chlorophyll-a]). Upwelling nutrient-rich waters push onto the wide Mauritanian shelf,
where they can warm up to in excess of 25uC. This condition favors production of heterozoan carbonates dominated by bivalves
and foraminifers, even in this tropical setting. In addition, sediments are provided by eolian input from the desertic hinterland.
The resulting sediments are carbonate and mixed carbonatesiliciclastic facies, in which the carbonates are characterized by a
mixture of tropical and cosmopolitan taxa. Benthic photosynthetic biota are absent while suspension-feeding organisms are
dominant. This foramol grain association on a shelf scale is reminiscent of cool-water carbonates, therefore recognition of
warm-water heterozoan carbonates relies on key taxa related to tropical waters within the biota assemblages associated with a
highly productive environment.
INTRODUCTION
1993; Freiwald and Henrich 1994; Henrich et al. 1995; Rao 1996).
However, foramol or heterozoan associations not only form in cool to
cold-water settings but occur in all climate belts from the poles to the
tropics (Lees and Buller 1972; Lees 1975; Mutti and Hallock 2003; Wilson
and Vecsei 2005). As a consequence, interpreting heterozoan versus
photozoan or foramol versus chlorozoan occurrences as indicative of
cold or temperate versus tropical conditions can result in misleading
paleoclimatic and paleoenvironmental interpretations (cf. Edinger et al.
2002; Pomar et al. 2004).
An increasing number of ancient examples of tropical heterozoan
carbonates have recently been described (Neogene: Brandano and Corda
2002; Pomar et al. 2004; Triassic: Hornung et al. 2007; Pennsylvanian:
Samankassou 2002). Recognition and interpretation of such occurrences
requires detailed facies description, including taxonomic determination of
the skeletal components. In addition to detailed study of the rock record,
modern analog studies provide a means for better understanding of highnutrient tropical settings.
Modern heterozoan carbonate depositional systems in tropical to
subtropical latitudes in most cases are related to oceanographic upwelling
causing elevated nutrient levels (Hallock and Schlager 1986; James 1997;
cf. Westphal et al. 2010). At the same time, the cool upwelling waters
lower the water temperature in tropical seas so that the effect of high
nutrient concentrations is overshadowed by the effect of colder
temperatures and cannot be studied independently (cf. Halfar et al.
2004). In contrast to this general pattern, on the wide shelf off northern
Mauritania cool, upwelling nutrient-rich waters warm to tropical
temperatures, creating a warm-water eutrophic ecosystem. Whereas in
the southern part of this area (the wide Golfe dArguin), carbonate
sediment is diluted by large amounts (up to 63%) of eolian silt, in the
northern part carbonate content reaches up to 93% (Michel et al. 2009).
1527-1404/11/081-641/$03.00
642
J. MICHEL ET AL.
JSR
In this paper, the facies of this eutrophic tropical sedimentary system are
studied with focus on ecological data to gain a better understanding of
this type of carbonate despositional environment and to improve the
interpretation of ancient counterparts.
STUDY AREA
JSR
643
The samples studied here were collected during two cruises of R/V
Poseidon (Westphal et al. 2007; Zonneveld et al. 2010) Sampling of the
shallow Banc dArguin was not feasible during these cruises because of
the shallow water depth (, 10 m) and migrating bedforms that
prohibited the research vessel from entering this area. Sampling therefore
took place on the off-bank shelf, based on the consideration that in a softbottom bioclastic sedimentary system information on the updip
644
JSR
J. MICHEL ET AL.
RAL
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
GeoB
11511B
11511C
11511D
11511E
11511F
11511G
11513
11514
11515
11516
11522
11524
11525
11526
11527
11528
11529
11530
11531
11532
11533
11534
11535
11540
11547
11549
11591
11593
11594
11595
11597
11601
11602
11603
11604
11606
11607
11613
11614
4.0
2.2
2.7
4.8
3.8
4.5
1.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
11.8
1.2
2.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.7
0.6
0.0
0.3
0.1
32.0
29.8
12.5
2.0
0.0
2.1
0.8
21.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
20.9
9.9
32.5
10.0
25.7
44.7
25.2
15.2
11.2
1.9
0.9
0.2
4.4
7.8
17.0
9.3
13.3
0.8
0.3
5.8
8.6
1.4
4.0
4.3
12.1
35.0
14.1
25.6
1.1
37.5
28.4
33.9
3.8
0.0
0.2
6.7
2.0
10.3
14.1
12.2
20.2
PFOR BFOR
40.3
46.3
32.7
29.1
51.4
47.7
63.1
46.3
71.7
40.8
65.9
47.3
67.6
39.6
19.3
58.2
61.8
69.7
64.6
75.3
59.4
89.7
45.1
19.2
64.1
67.6
34.4
19.5
19.2
19.1
12.7
83.2
78.2
22.3
24.6
11.5
47.7
50.4
45.5
BIV
1.5
5.9
3.5
0.1
2.3
3.4
2.5
1.5
2.7
3.1
2.3
5.4
1.6
1.3
0.6
3.0
2.0
2.9
1.2
4.3
4.0
2.8
1.7
2.2
0.8
1.7
3.3
6.2
5.5
9.9
1.7
1.4
1.8
1.7
1.4
1.2
0.3
2.3
3.2
2.4
0.0
0.0
0.2
3.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.4
0.6
0.1
0.0
0.0
4.9
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
BRY
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
DEC
0.1
5.3
0.4
0.1
0.0
2.9
1.0
4.6
15.1
33.0
0.6
2.6
0.1
0.9
3.2
21.2
13.5
1.4
0.5
5.4
7.7
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.1
1.1
4.1
0.1
10.5
11.0
10.9
12.4
27.5
8.1
10.7
0.1
0.7
BAR
3.6
1.0
3.7
2.1
4.2
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.3
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.6
2.5
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
1.5
0.4
1.9
OST
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
COR
4.9
6.6
6.1
0.3
0.3
5.5
13.5
0.3
1.0
0.2
0.6
13.3
4.9
15.2
2.5
1.0
0.2
11.6
16.7
2.7
8.0
0.8
2.2
0.0
3.3
1.2
1.0
9.2
18.4
2.9
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.6
5.7
5.7
2.2
2.8
1.5
ECH
4.8
0.2
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
ALC
1.2
0.4
4.9
0.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
2.9
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SPO
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.8
0.0
0.6
SER
0.0
5.7
12.5
1.9
0.0
5.8
3.6
0.2
0.2
0.9
0.0
8.3
0.0
2.2
0.0
0.1
0.4
4.2
3.0
0.7
1.3
0.0
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.0
5.2
5.7
2.8
0.1
0.0
0.1
1.2
4.7
0.1
0.0
0.1
1.8
WRM
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
1.2
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.2
1.8
0.3
0.1
8.8
1.1
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.7
0.7
FSH
0.4
0.8
2.3
4.9
1.6
1.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
3.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.0
2.4
1.1
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.5
0.4
0.0
0.2
0.5
1.7
0.0
0.2
0.5
0.1
0.7
8.7
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.9
0.1
2.1
3.6
14.5
5.2
6.9
5.4
11.7
2.5
44.1
7.4
21.5
8.7
8.4
2.2
30.3
60.1
14.5
21.1
1.8
2.6
6.4
10.3
0.4
2.7
1.5
1.1
0.7
29.8
12.1
11.5
0.0
70.1
2.6
6.7
52.9
33.2
61.5
19.4
3.1
7.7
36.5
44
56
56
56
62.5
84
56
83
74
81
77
82
44
55.5
78
71
71
85
87
82
93
69
53
91
81
50
39
39
50
55
75
85
62
45
51
51
85
62.5
0.0
0.1
0.0
1.3
0.0
0.6
5.7
4.4
22.1
5.5
0.6
13.9
1.3
1.5
1.2
23.2
18.0
1.5
2.6
9.5
4.2
4.1
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.7
5.9
0.1
0.1
5.1
0.9
13.4
21.3
3.2
1.0
0.3
1.9
0.6
2.3
92.1
88.5
61.1
66.7
88.8
94.0
89.5
95.1
77.0
94.3
90.9
84.7
97.2
95.5
98.7
75.7
81.7
78.4
92.9
90.0
93.9
95.7
87.2
78.5
98.0
98.5
94.1
30.9
28.8
69.4
98.9
86.2
78.5
96.0
55.6
99.3
88.2
98.0
88.3
7.9
11.5
38.9
31.9
11.2
5.4
4.8
0.5
1.0
0.2
8.5
1.4
1.5
3.0
0.1
1.1
0.3
20.1
4.5
0.5
1.9
0.3
12.7
21.3
1.6
0.8
0.0
69.0
71.1
25.6
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.7
43.3
0.5
9.9
1.4
9.3
TABLE 1. Data from the 39 component-analyzed samples from the Golfe dArguin used for the cluster analysis showing loose-sediment quantification as percentages (excluding unidentified
bioclasts), carbonate content (dry wt%), and grain-size fractions (gravel, sand, and mud; dry wt%). RAL, red algae; PFOR, planktonic foraminifers; BFOR, benthic foraminifers; BIV, bivalves;
GAST, gastropods, PTER, pteropods; SCAP, scaphopods; BRY, bryozoans; DEC, decapods; BAR, barnacles; OST, ostracods; COR, ahermatypic corals; ECH, echinoderms; ALC, alcyonarian
spicules; SPO, sponge spicules; SER, serpulids; WRM, aggregated worm tubes; FSH, fish remains; FEC, fecal pellets; AGG, aggregates; QUA, quartz grains.
JSR
TROPICAL HETEROZOAN CARBONATE
645
646
JSR
J. MICHEL ET AL.
SEDIMENTARY FACIES
C Ages
TABLE 2.Radiocarbon measurements and age calibration using Marine04 curve and a 400-years reservoir age of highly abraded mollusk shells from
surface samples (mwd 5 meters water depth; Hughen et al. 2004).
Lab No.
Sample
Material
Poz-31069
Poz-31070
Poz-31073
Poz-26879
Poz-26880
Poz-26881
Poz-26882
GeoB11501
GeoB11501
GeoB11513
GeoB11613
GeoB11614
GeoB13018
GeoB13019
16.5
16.5
35.5
103.3
72.3
37.0
53.0
14
1s calibrated
[cal yr BP]
Modern
118238
149290
1512715426
94669565
255310
1117911262
Modern
180 6 60
220 6 70
15275 6 150
9515 6 50
285 6 30
11220 6 40
JSR
647
TABLE 3. Sedimentary facies (F) of the Golfe dArguin (Mauritania) based on a cluster analysis including grain size (dry wt%), carbonate content
(CaCO3; dry wt%), and sediment composition of the samples.
FACIES
SAMPLE
F4
Dust-influenced
F5
Mud-rich
F1
Donax burnupi
F2
Bivalve
F3
Dune-influenced
SEDIMENT COMPOSITION
Quartz and barnacle-rich, bivalve-dominated
Variably fragmented and abraded shells
Clean carbonate sand and gravel
Foraminifer-rich, bivalve-dominated, with variable
amount of echinoderms
Highly fragmented, abraded, and bioeroded shells
Clean carbonate sand
Barnacle-rich, quartz- and bivalve-dominated, with
variable amount of benthic foraminifers and
echinoderms
Variably fragmented and abraded shells
Clean mixed carbonate-siliciclastic sand
Quartz-rich, benthic foraminifer- and bivalve-dominated,
with variable amount of planktonic foraminifers
Mixed abraded-fresh shells
Mixed carbonate-siliciclastic muddy sand to sand
Bivalve- and foraminifer-dominated, with variable
amount of echinoderms and quartz
Mixed abraded-fresh shells
Mixed carbonate-siliciclastic sandy mud to muddy sand
CaCO3
(%)
7193
7191
4462
3769
3956
648
J. MICHEL ET AL.
JSR
depths, three facies (F2, F4, and F5) include deposits from a range of
water depths (i.e., mid and outer shelf; Fig. 6). The facies distribution
thus is not predominantly bathymetrycally defined but rather represents a
facies mosaic (i.e., patches on the shelf). An environmental interpretation
of the facies is based on the detailed taxonomical and ecological analysis
of mollusks and foraminifers.
Gari jousseaumeana, both of which have a clear tropical affinity (cf. Cosel
1995). The low number of living organisms is interpreted to indicate that
carbonate production occurs updip of the sampling locations (i.e., on the
outer part of the Banc dArguin), from which the shells are shed and
reworked. Quartz grains are supplied by migrating sand dunes of onshore
Cap Blanc.
Interpretation and Environmental Conditions.This bivalve fragmentdominated sand facies is present in two different settings, on the mid shelf
and on the outer shelf. The main difference between the mid-shelf
(Fig. 7B) and outer-shelf (Fig. 7C) deposits relate to the grade of
abrasion of the grains, which is more intense on the outer shelf, and to the
taxa present. In the mid-shelf deposits, Donax burnupi fragments
dominate. In the outer-shelf sediments, shallow-water-related Ervilia
castanea fragments (cf. Morton 1990) dominate, whereas the betterpreserved mollusk shells are of deep-water origin (e.g., Anodontia
JSR
1615
20 m
50 m
17W
100 m
21N
1000 m
1745
649
Cap
Blanc
foramol-type
sediments
Seagrass
20N
Ooids
)
Cap
Timiris
Component-analyzed sample
1915
F1
Coarse
sand
F2
Bivalve
fragment
sand
F3
Quartz
bivalve
sand
F5
F4
Siliciclastic Siliciclastic
biv-foram biv-foram
muddy
sand
Components
QUA BIV
Other
RAL
ECH
PFOR
BAR
500-1000
125-250
<63
70-95
70-90
45-60
35-70
BFOR
>1000
250-500
63-125
40-55
FIG. 6.Facies distribution in the study area. Interpolation between locations of samples on which detailed component analysis was performed is based on facies
analysis of other samples and on previous sedimentological data from Domain (1985). Average component composition (. 125 mm fraction), grain sizes, and carbonate
content range of facies are given, as well as literature data for inner-shelf sediment.
650
J. MICHEL ET AL.
JSR
JSR
651
r
FIG. 7.Representative bulk sediments of the study area: A) F1, coarse-grained Donax burnupi-dominated sand facies, carbonate sand and gravel, GeoB11515,
21 mwd; B) F2, bivalve fragment-dominated sand facies, carbonate sand, GeoB11547, 30 mwd; C) F2, bivalve fragment-dominated sand facies, relict carbonate sand,
GeoB11613, 103 mwd; D) F3, quartz-rich bivalve sand facies, mixed carbonatesiliciclastic sand, GeoB11603, 25 mwd; E) F3, quartz-rich bivalve sand facies, mixed
carbonatesiliciclastic coarse sand, GeoB11591, 4 mwd; F) F4, fine-grained siliciclasticbivalveforaminifer sand facies, mixed carbonatesiliciclastic muddy sand,
GeoB11511C, 31 mwd; G) F4, fine-grained siliciclasticbivalveforaminifer sand facies, mixed relict carbonatesiliciclastic muddy sand, GeoB11614, 72 mwd; H) F5,
siliciclasticbivalveforaminifer muddy facies, mixed carbonatesiliciclastic sandy mud, GeoB11595, 41 mwd. B, barnacle; Bi, bivalve; Br, bryozoan; D, Donax burnupi; E,
echinoderm; bF, benthic foraminifer; pF, planktonic foraminifer; G, gastropod; Q, quartz; W, aggregated worm tube. Scale is 5 mm for each picture.
652
J. MICHEL ET AL.
SiliciclasticBivalveForaminifer Muddy Facies (F5; Fig. 7H)
JSR
The facies in the study area are dominated by bivalve fragments and
foraminifers and thus are heterozoan carbonates sensu James (1997) and
foramol carbonates sensu Lees and Buller (1972). Whereas this carbonate
depositional system displays facies also typical of nontropical systems
(Tab 4), the oceanographic situation is clearly a warm-water eutrophic
setting. Seawater temperatures on the Banc dArguin (1829uC) are
tropical, and those of the mid and outer shelf (1625uC) correspond to the
boundary of tropical and warm-temperate conditions (cf. Flugel 2004;
Tab 4). The carbonate mineralogy is aragonite-dominated, and ooids are
found in isolated coastal environments (e.g., Baie de Saint-Jean; Stein
1980). The low-latitude conditions on the open shelf of the Golfe
dArguin are indicated throughout the entire shelf by tropical-related taxa
(mollusks and foraminifers) that allow the biota to be distinguished from
temperate counterparts.
Thus, the attributes of the Mauritanian shelf sedimentation do not
simply fit into common carbonate classifications, and demonstrate the
multidimensional ecological control of carbonate sedimentation. The
Golfe dArguin thus might serve as modern analog for ancient carbonate
sedimentary systems such as Paleozoic upwelling ramps (James 1997;
Martindale and Boreen 1997), Cretaceous warm, high-nutrient molluskdominated systems (e.g., Carannante et al. 1995; Allmon 2007) or
JSR
653
TABLE 4. Comparison of environmental and facies attributes characterizing tropical, subtropical, temperate-polar, and eutrophic tropicalsubtropical
(Mauritanian-type) carbonates based on Nelson (1988), James (1997), and results of the present study.
Environmental and facies
parameters
Subtropical carbonates
Carbonate association
Latitude
Depositional setting
Terrigenous supply
Mean water temperature
Trophic conditions
Photic conditions (shallow
water)
Reefs
Carbonate content
photozoan
between 30 u N and 30 u S
rimmed shelves or platforms
low
. 22 uC
oligotrophic
euphotic
photozoan/ heterozoan
between 30 u N and 30 u S
open shelves or ramps
low
1822 uC
oligotrophic to mesotrophic
oligophotic to euphotic
heterozoan
beyond 30 u N and 30 u S
open shelves or ramps
low to high
, 18 uC
mesotrophic to eutrophic
oligophotic to aphotic
heterozoan
between 30 u N and 30 u S
open shelves or ramps
low to high
1822 uC (1629 uC)
eutrophic
aphotic to oligophotic
abundant
very high (. 90%)
rare
very high (. 90%)
absent
moderate to very high (50100%)
Ooids
Major skeletal carbonate
components
common
hermatypic corals, benthic
foraminifers, mollusks,
calcareous green and red
algae
rare or absent
calcareous red algae, large
benthic foraminifers,
bryozoans; few hermatypic
corals
Terrigenous material
Shell preservation
Carbonate mineralogy
rare
generally good
aragonite dominant
Diagenetic regime
constructive (grain
preservation and chemical
precipitation)
rare
poor to good
low- and/or high-Mg calcite
dominant
destructive (grain dissolution
and maceration,
biodegradation)
rare or absent
moderate to very high
(50100%)
absent
bryozoans, bivalves, small
benthic and planktonic
foraminifers, barnacles,
echinoderms, serpulids,
brachiopods, sponges,
calcareous red algae
rare to abundant
poor to good
low- and/or high-Mg calcite
dominant
destructive (grain dissolution
and maceration,
biodegradation)
Temperate-polar carbonates
Eutrophic tropicalsubtropical
carbonates
Tropical carbonates
rare
bivalves, small benthic and
planktonic foraminifers,
barnacles, echinoderms,
serpulids; few calcareous red
algae
rare to abundant
poor to good
aragonite dominant
destructive (grain dissolution and
maceration, biodegradation)
654
J. MICHEL ET AL.
CONCLUSIONS
Thanks are due to the crews and scientists of the R/V Poseidon-346 and R/
V Poseidon-366 cruises and to the authorities of Mauritania for permission to
work in their exclusive economic zone. Karl Gurs, Serge Gofas, and Rudo
von Cosel are thanked for sharing their expertise on mollusk taxonomy. Karl
Gurs did not live to see this study completed. He is sorely missed. We are
grateful to Nereo Preto, John Reijmer, and Ralph Batzel for their support.
This paper greatly benefited from the reviews by Werner Piller, Cam Nelson,
an anonymous reviewer, AE Elias Samankassou, JSR editor Gene Rankey,
and CE John E. Southard. The MARUM (DFG-Research Center/Excellence
Cluster The Ocean in the Earth System) is acknowledged for providing
infrastructure and support for this research. This study was supported by the
German Science Foundation (We-2492/5). Two appendices are available from
JSR Data Archive, URL: http://sepm.org/pages.aspx?pageid5229.
REFERENCES
JSR
JSR
655
SEVRIN-REYSSAC, J., 1993, Hydrology and underwater climate of the Banc dArguin,
Mauritania: a review: Hydrobiologia, v. 258, p. 18.
SHAFFER, G., 1974. On the Northwest African coastal upwelling system [Ph.D. Thesis]:
Universitat Kiel, Kiel, 175 p.
SMITH, A.M., AND NELSON, C.S., 2003, Effects of early sea-floor processes on the
taphonomy of temperate shelf skeletal carbonate deposits: Earth-Science Reviews,
v. 63, p. 131.
STEIN, R., 1980. Sedimentationsverhaltnisse in der Baie de St.-Jean, Mauretanien
[Unpublished Diploma Thesis]: Kiel University, Kiel, 74 p.
STUIVER, M., AND REIMER, P.J., 1993, Extended 14C data base and revised CALIB 3.0
14
C age calibration program: Radiocarbon, v. 35, p. 215230.
STUUT, J.-B., ZABEL, M., RATMEYER, V., HELMKE, P., SCHEFUSS, E., LAVIK, G., AND
SCHNEIDER, R., 2005, Provenance of present-day eolian dust collected off NW Africa:
Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 110D04202, doi:10.1029/2004JD005161.
SUMMERHAYES, C.P., MILLIMAN, J.D., BRIGGS, S.R., BEE, A.G., AND HOGAN, C., 1976,
Northwest African shelf sediments: influence of climate and sedimentary processes:
Journal of Geology, v. 84, p. 277300.
TAYLOR, J.D., 1997, Diversity and structure of tropical Indo-Pacific benthic
communities: relation to regimes of nutrient input, in Ormond, R.F.G., Gage, J.D.,
and Angel, M.V., eds., Marine Biodiversity; Patterns and Processes: Cambridge, UK,
Cambridge University Press, p. 178200.
THIEDE, J., 1975a, Distribution of foraminifera in surface waters of a coastal upwelling
area: Nature, v. 253, p. 712714.
THIEDE, J., 1975b, Shell- and skeleton-producing plankton and nekton in the eastern
North Atlantic Ocean: Meteor Forschungsergebnisse, Reihe C, v. 20, p. 3379.
VAN CAMP, L., NYKJAER, L., MITTELSTAEDT, E., AND SCHLITTENHARDT, P., 1991,
Upwelling and boundary circulation off Northwest Africa as depicted by infrared and
visible satellite observations: Progress in Oceanography, v. 26, p. 357402.
vON COSEL, R., 1995, Fifty-one new species of marine bivalves from tropical West
Africa: Iberus, v. 13, p. 1115.
WESTPHAL, H., AND CRUISE PARTICIPANTS, 2007, Report and preliminary results of
Poseidon cruise 346, MACUMA. Las Palmas (Spain)Las Palmas (Spain),
28.12.2006-15.1.2007: Universitat Bremen, Fachbereich Geowissenschaften, Berichte,
v. 260, 49 p.
WESTPHAL, H., HALFAR, J., AND FREIWALD, A., 2010, Heterozoan carbonates in
subtropical to tropical settings in the present and in the past: International Journal of
Earth Sciences, v. 99, p. 153159.
WILSON, M.E.J., AND VECSEI, A., 2005, The apparent paradox of abundant foramol
facies in low latitudes: their environmental significance and effect on platform
development: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 69, p. 133168.
WOLFF, W.J., AND SMIT, C.J., 1990, The Banc dArguin, Mauritania, as an environment
for coastal birds: Ardea, v. 78, p. 1738.
WOLFF, W.J., VAN DER LAND, J., NIENHUIS, P.H., AND DE WILDE, P.A.W.J., 1993, The
functioning of the ecosystem of the Banc dArguin, Mauritania: a review:
Hydrobiologia, v. 258, p. 211222.
WOOD, R., 1993, Nutrients, predation and history of reefs: Palaios, v. 8, p. 526543.
WRIGHT, V.P., AND BURGESS, P.M., 2005, The carbonate factory continuum, facies
mosaics and microfacies: an appraisal of some of the key concepts underpinning
carbonate sedimentology: Facies, v. 51, p. 1723.
WRIGHT, V.P., AND CHERNS, L., 2008, The subtle thief: selective dissolution of aragonite
during shallow burial and the implications for carbonate sedimentology, in Lukasik,
J., and Simo, A., eds., Controls on Carbonate Platform and Reef Development:
SEPM, Special Publication, v. 89, p. 4754.
ZONNEVELD, K., AND CRUISE PARTICIPANTS, 2010, Report and preliminary results of
Poseidon cruise 366-1, PERGAMOM. Las Palmas (Spain)Las Palmas (Spain),
3.05.200819.05.2008: Universitat Bremen, Fachbereich Geowissenschaften,Berichte,
v. 274, 47 p.