Departamento de Cincias Biolgicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (DCB/UESC). Rod. Ilhus-Itabuna, km
16. Ilhus, BA, 45662-000, Brazil; 2Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau, Comisso Executiva do Plano da Lavoura Cacaueira
(Cepec/CEPLAC). Rod. Ilhus-Itabuna, km 22, Ilhus, BA, 45650-000, Brazil.
Received 17 November 2009; received in revised form 5 May 2010; accepted 15 May 2010.
Abstract
Six high yielding cacao clones (CCN-10, CP-49, CP-06, CEPEC-2007, CEPEC-2008, and PS-1319) were evaluated for
photosynthetic performance, growth, and leaf nutrient concentration in response to 45 days of root waterlogging. Submergence
reduced net CO2 assimilation (A). The highest A value (6.8 mmol CO2 m2s1) was observed in the control plants of CCN-10 at
15 days after submergence, and CEPEC-2007 and PS-1319 30 at days of submergence. Stomatal conductances (gs) were 115
and 102 mmol H2O m2s1 for CP-49 and CCN-10, respectively. Fifteen days of submergence increased the leaf intercellular
(Ci) to atmospheric CO2 concentration (Ca) ratio (Ci/Ca) and decreased gs with CEPEC-2008 and PS-1319 being the most
sensitive clones. CCN-10, CP-49, and CP-06 had relatively higher mean values of A and gs after waterlogging than other
clones. All CEPEC-2008 and PS-1319 plants died after 35 days of waterlogging. The surviving clones had lower root, leaf and
total plant dry weight, leaf area, leaf biomass ratio, relative growth rate, and leaf number, with the exception of clones CP-06
and CEPEC-2007. Waterlogging also decreased leaf concentrations of N, P, K, and Mg in all clones, except N in CEPEC-2007.
The CCN-10 clone was the most tolerant to waterlogging with the least effects of waterlogging on leaf gas exchange. Clones
CP-49, CP-06, and CEPEC-2007 showed intermediate tolerance, while CEPEC-2008 and PS-1319 were highly sensitive.
Keywords: Cacao, Leaf gas exchange; Macronutrients, Stomatal conductance, Submergence.
Introduction
Waterlogging is common in some cacao growing
regions of southern Bahia, Brazil, due to high rainfall
and poorly drained soils (Almeida and Valle, 2007).
Frequent flooding may reduce the productivity of many
tree crop species, which makes it essential to identify or
develop flood-tolerant cultivars (Schaffer, 1998; Almeida
and Valle, 2007). Plant tolerance to waterlogging,
however, varies depending on species, duration of
inundation, stage of plant development, and
environmental conditions. Continuous flooding often
leads to changes in plant morphology including
adventitious root formation or development of
aerenchyma and hypertrophic stem lenticels, which
*Author for correspondence: Tel +55 73 3680-5105 ; Fax +55 73 3680-5226 ; Email<alexalan@uesc.br>.
18
19
B.C. Rehem, A.A.F. Almeida, M.S. Mielke, F.P. Gomes andR.R. Valle
Table 1. Stomatal conductance to water vapor (gs), net CO2 assimilation (A) and ratio between internal to external CO2
concentrations (Ci/Ca) of six Theobroma cacao clones during different time periods under waterlogged and non-waterlogged
(control) conditions.
ANOVA
Variable
gs (mmol H2O m2s1)
A (mmol CO2 m2s1)
Ci/Ca
(1)
Time (days)
15(1)
30(1)
45(2)
15(1)
30(1)
45(2)
15(1)
30(1)
45(2)
Control
Waterlogged
Waterlogging
Clone
WxC
73.8 5.40
61.7 3.56
51.5 3.35
6.03 0.19
6.44 0.16
5.46 0.26
0.58 0.02
0.50 0.02
0.49 0.02
56.8 7.23
19.3 1.65
13.3 0.97
3.49 0.33
1.58 0.19
1.02 0.10
0.66 0.03
0.65 0.03
0.63 0.03
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
*
ns
**
**
*
**
**
**
**
ns
ns
**
**
ns
**
**
ns
Clones CCN-10, CP-49, CP-06, CEPEC-2007, CEPEC-2008, PS-1319 (df clone = 5; df waterlogging = 1). Means of 30 replications (five
replications per six clones per treatment) SE.
(2)
Clones CCN-10, CP-49, CP-06, CEPEC-2007 (df: clone = 3; waterlogging = 1). Means of 20 replications SE.
20
Table 2. Effects of waterlogging on stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation and ratio between internal to external CO2
concentrations in six Theobroma cacao clones of Brazil.
Clone
CCN-10
Treatments
Control
Waterlogged
% of control
CP-49
Control
Waterlogged
% of control
CP-06
Control
Waterlogged
% of control
CEPEC-2007 Control
Waterlogged
% of control
CEPEC-2008 Control
Waterlogged
% of control
PS-1319
Control
Waterlogged
% of control
Day 15
Day 15
Day 30
Day 15
Day 30
1021 6Aac
122 11Aa
140
115 12Aa
75 14Bbc
73
60 9Aab
62 11Abcd
117
51 5Ab
27 5Bd
60
51 4Abd
21 2Bd
60
64 5Abcd
33 3Bcd
50
6.8 0.5Aab
5.1 0.5Bab
76
5.7 0.4Aa
3.5 0.5Bab
62
5.7 0.4Aa
5.4 0.7Aab
98
5.5 0.4Aa
2.9 0.4Bb
54
6.0 0.3Aab
2.3 0.4Bb
35
6.6 0.6Aab
1.6 0.6Bb
24
6.4 0.5Aab
3.0 0.5Bab
47
6.3 0.3Aa
1.8 0.2Bab
28
6.4 0.4Aab
1.8 0.3Bab
29
6.8 0.6Aab
1.8 0.2Bab
26
6.0 0.3Aa
0.4 0.1Bb
7
6.8 0.4Aab
0.7 0.2Bb
10
0.7 0.01Babc
0.8 0.02Aa
117
0.8 0.02Aab
0.7 0.06Aa
96
0.5 0.03Abc
0.6 0.02Ab
105
0.5 0.03Ac
0.5 0.03Ab
98
0.4 0.05Ac
0.6 0.10Ab
145
0.5 0.04Bc
0.8 0.06Aa
151
0.5 0.06Aabc
0.5 0.05Ac
113
0.6 0.04Babc
0.4 0.05Abc
33
0.5 0.05Aac
0.6 0.04Aabc
116
0.6 0.02Aa
0.5 0.06Ac
93
0.5 0.02Ba
0.9 0.10Aabc
183
0.5 0.04Babc
0.7 0.06Aabc
157
1
Means of five replications SE. Means compared using Tukey test (p < 0.05). For each variable lower case letters indicate comparisons
between clones and capital case comparisons between treatments.
The Ci/Ca initially was 117 and 151% more in CCN10 and PS-1319 clones, respectively in the waterlogged
treatment compared to the control (Table 2). On the
30th day of flooding, Ci/Ca of CEPEC-2008 and PS1319 were higher in the waterlogged than in the control
plants (157 to 183% higher). The CP-49 clone had a
significantly lower Ci/Ca ratio (33% of the control
values) than the other waterlogged clones. Low Ci/Ca
values imply high stomatal limitations to photosynthesis
and increased water conservation. Intercellular CO2
concentration in the leaf (Ci), however, was not affected
by waterlogging on the 45th day of flooding, although
all clones had higher Ci/Ca values in the waterlogged
than the control plots. The relatively higher Ci/Ca for
the waterlogged cacao clone PS-1319 may indicate that
this clone is non-conservative in relation to water use,
similar to many other woody species in the humid
tropical forests (Mielke et al., 2003).
21
B.C. Rehem, A.A.F. Almeida, M.S. Mielke, F.P. Gomes andR.R. Valle
Table 3. Growth variables and leaf nutrient contents of six Theobroma cacao clones of Brazil during 45 day period of waterlogged
and non-waterlogged (control) conditions.
ANOVA
Variable
Control
Waterlogged
Waterlogging
Clone
WxC
RDW (gplant1)
SDW (gplant1)
LDW (gplant1)
TDW (gplant1)
TLA (cm2plant1)
LN
RDWR
SDWR
LDWR
LAR (cm2g1)
RGR (mgg-1day1)
N (gkg1)
P (gkg1)
K (gkg1)
Mg (gkg1)
4.28 0.29
5.66 0.33
11.5 0.79
21.4 1.28
22.9 1.52
33.0 2.57
0.21 0.01
0.27 0.01
0.53 0.01
1.06 0.03
15.4 1.23
23.7 0.84
4.02 0.16
26.5 0.76
5.56 0.09
2.36 0.20
5.20 0.25
5.93 0.47
13.5 0.82
9.96 0.76
13.7 1.16
0.18 0.01
0.40 0.01
0.42 0.01
0.72 0.02
5.16 1.21
20.0 0.41
3.28 0.13
22.6 0.79
4.60 0.23
**
Ns
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
ns
**
**
**
**
**
**
ns
**
**
**
**
**
ns
**
ns
**
**
**
**
**
ns
ns
ns
ns
*
**
ns
ns
**
Root (RDW), stem (SDW), leaf (LDW) and total dry weight (TDW), total leaf area (TLA), leaf number (LN), root (RDWR), stem (SDWR)
and leaf (LDWR) dry weight ratios, leaf area ratio (LAR) relative growth ratio (RGR) and nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and
magnesium (Mg) concentrations of leaves (df: clone = 3; waterlogging = 1). Means of 20 replications (five replications per treatment per four
clones) SE.
Means of five replications SE. Means comparison were done using the Tukeys studentized range test (p < 0.05). For each variable lower case letters indicate comparisons between
clones and capital letters indicate differences between treatments.
74
39
29
33
35
24
101
72
5.1 0.41Ba
5.7 0.88Ba
9.1 0.31Ba
9.4 1.43Ba
11.9 1.72Ba
5.3 2.28Bac
20.4 0.66Aa
3.7 0.10Bb
6.9 0.61Aa
14.6 1.19Aa
31.2 14.25Aa
28.5 1.73Aa
33.7 3.35Abc
21,9 1.90Aab
20.2 1.12Ab
5.2 0.09Aa
78
51
60
43
37
36
85
67
5.6 0.64Ba
8.1 1.31Ba
16.4 2.22Ba
13.7 2.08Ba
18.8 3.26Bac
7.0 3.10
18.5 0.52Ba
3.9 0.11Bb
7.2 0.59Aa
15.9 1.51Aa
27.4 2.40Aa
31.8 3.09Aa
51.3 5.24Aa
19.6 2.08
21.9 1.55Ab
5.9 0.07Aa
5.2 0.26Aa
108
5.2 0.42Ba
56
12.4 0.68Ba 71
9.0 0.66Ba
51
10.4 0.91Bac 50
4.9 1.18Babc 39
21.5 0.33Ba 83
5.5 0.20Aa
95
3.71 0.18Ab 4.8 0.63Aa 130
6.2 0.44Aab 4.7 0.62Aa 76
13.8 1.00Ab 12.3 1.77Aa 89
13.8 1.34Ab 7.7 1.01Ba
56
26.2 2.55Abc 13.5 2.14Ba 52
7.4 1.49Ac 3.4 2.93Aab 46
26.8 0.40Aa 19.6 1.03Ba 73
5.5 0.10Aa 5.3 0.48Aa 96
SDW (gplant1)
LDW (gplant1)
TDW (gplant1)
TLA (cm2plant1)
LN
RGR (mgg1day1)
N (gkg1)
Mg (gkg1)
4.8 0.35Ab
9.3 0.48Ab
17.5 0.87Ab
17.6 0.97Ab
20.9 3.32Ac
12.7 1.18Abc
25.8 0.69Aa
5.8 0.15Aa
% of
control
Waterlogged
Control
Variable
Waterlogged % of Control
control
Waterlogged
% of
control
Control
Waterlogged
% of Control
control
CEPEC-2007
CP-06
CP-49
CCN-10
Table 4. Effect of waterlogging on stem (SDW), leaf (LDW), and total plant (TDW) dry weights, leaf area, leaf number, relative growth rate (RGR), and leaf
nitrogen (N) and magnesium (Mg) concentrations in six Theobroma cacao clones of Brazil.
22