In opposition to high culture is low culture, which refers to the activities of the
nonelite: music videos, game shows, professional wrestling, stock car racing, graffiti
art, TV talk shows, and so on.
Traditionally, low-culture activities have been seen as unworthy of serious studyand
so of little interest to museums or universities.
The cultural values embedded in these activities were considered neither transcendent
nor timeless.
The elitism reflected in the distinction between high and low culture points to the
tensions in Western social systems.
In recent decades, however, this distinction has begun to break down.
Rapid social changes propelled universities to alter their policies and also have
affected how we study intercultural communication.
For example, the turbulent 1960s in USA brought to the university a powerful new
interest in ethnic studies, including African American studies and womens and gay
and lesbian issues.
These areas of study did not rely on the earlier distinctions between high and low
culture.
Rather, they contributed to a new conceptual framework by arguing for the legitimacy
of other cultural forms that traditionally would have been categorized as low culture
but were now framed as popular culture.
Because of this elitist view of culture,
the distinction between high culture
and low culture has led to low culture
being reconceptualized as popular culture.
Popular Culture: A new name for low culture, referring to those cultural
products that most people share and know about, including television, music, videos,
and popular magazines.
According to this definition, television, music videos, YouTube, Disney, advertising,
soap operas, and popular magazines are systems of popular culture.
In contrast, the symphony and the ballet do not qualify as popular culture because
most people cannot identify much about them unless they have studied them.
Culture industries: Industries that produce and sell popular culture as commodities.
Folk culture: Traditional and nonmainstream cultural activities that are not
financially driven.
This Chart highlights some of the distinctions between High Culture, Folk Culture, and
Popular Culture:
Type
Definition
Who Knows
It?
What Does It
Look Like?
High Culture
Elite aristocratic
expressions of culture
Rich members
of the political
establishment
Opera, classic
sculpture,
symphony
performances
Folk Culture
Traditional and
nonmainstream
cultural activities that
are not financially
driven
Most cultural
groups, but
especially
middle-class
groups
Folk music
Popular
Culture
Ever-present cultural
products designed for
profitable consumption
Almost
everyone in a
social group
Mainstream
music, movies,
television,
romance novels
People often are introduced to other cultures through the lens of popular culture.
These introductions can be quite intimate, in ways that tourists may not experience.
For example, movies may portray romance, familial conflict, or a death in the family;
the audience experiences the private lives of people they do not know, in ways that
they never could simply as tourists.
Yet we must also think about how these cultural groups are portrayed through that
lens of popular culture.
Not everyone sees the portrayal in the same way.
For example, you may not think that the TV shows Desperate Housewives and Two and
a Half Men represent quintessential U.S. American values and lifestyles.
But some viewers may see it as their entree into how U.S. Americans (or perhaps
European Americans) live.
In considering popular culture, we need to think about not only how people interpret
and consume popular culture but also how these popular culture texts represent
particular groups in specific ways.
If people largely view other cultural groups through the lens of popular culture, then
we need to think about the power relations that are embedded in these popular
culture dynamics.
Cultural Imperialism
It is difficult to measure the impact of the U.S. and Western media and popular culture
on the rest of the world, but we do know that we cannot ignore this dynamic.
The U.S. government in the 1920s believed that having U.S. movies on foreign screens
would boost the sales of U.S. products because the productions would be furnished
with U.S. goods.
Discussions about media imperialism, electronic colonialism, and cultural
imperialism, which began in the 1920s, continue today.
The interrelationships among economics, nationalism, and culture make it difficult to
determine with much certainty how significant cultural imperialism might be.
Media Imperialism: Dominating or control through media
Electronic Colonialism: Dominating or exploitation utilizing technological forms.