http://jcm.sagepub.com
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
American Society for Composites
Additional services and information for Journal of Composite Materials can be found at:
Email Alerts: http://jcm.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts
Subscriptions: http://jcm.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations (this article cites 19 articles hosted on the
SAGE Journals Online and HighWire Press platforms):
http://jcm.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/37/20/1839
INTRODUCTION
ETAL MATRIX COMPOSITES (MMCs) especially having light metal matrices such as
Al, Mg, Ti etc., are rapidly becoming the strongest candidates as a structural
material for many high-temperature [1], automotive [2], and aerospace applications [3,4].
In MMCs, aluminum based metal matrix composites have attracted considerable
academic and industrial attention [5]. Relatively low ductility of most metal matrix
composites has rendered conventional metal forming processes impractical and low
formability at high temperatures has restricted the use of their commercial applications.
1839
1840
I. OZDEMIR
AND
M. TOPARLI
So, it is important that their thermal behaviors are well understood and the properties at
elevated temperature need to be investigated. Considerable work has been carried out to
investigate the ductility and behavior of metal matrix composites at different temperatures
under isothermal and thermal cycling conditions [69].
Among various thermal environments, thermal cycling can be considered as one of the
most severe environments. The mismatch of thermal expansion between matrix and
reinforcement due to temperature change results in large internal stresses and mismatch
strain that affect the microstructure and mechanical properties of the composites. It is also
possible that excessive plastic strains are developed [10]. In AlSiCp system, because the
difference of their coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE) values is the factor of about 6,
this difference is sufficient to generate high local stresses during heating and cooling [3].
The matrix deforms plastically to accommodate the smaller volume expansion of the SiC
particles.
The numerical analyses of SiC particles-reinforced aluminum alloys have been
conducted by several researchers [1114]. Geni and Kikuchi [11] studied about the nonuniform distribution of SiC particle volume fraction and the aspect ratio in the matrix.
Meijer et al. [12] investigated on thermal residual stress using unit cell models. They
found that the mechanical properties of the composite strongly depended on the
reinforcement geometry. Tham et al. [13] investigated the influence of processinginduced voids on the deformation behavior of silicon carbide particulate-reinforced
aluminum metal-matrix composites synthesized by the disintegrated melt deposition
technique using axisymmetric finite element model. Also they compared theoretical
with experimental results. Shen et al. [14] discussed about particle shape and thermal
residual stress. These theoretical results show that the stress-strain relationship agree
with the experimental analysis.
The aims of this investigation are to study the stress-strain relationship and thermal
behavior of aluminum composites containing SiC particles, under thermal cycling
conditions by using FEM calculations, and to use this information to produce MMCs with
excellent thermal performance.
Si
Fe
Cu
Mn
Mg
Ni
Zn
Ti
Cr
Pb
Sn
Al
6.62
16.84
0.29
0.29
0.01
0.06
0.02
0.028
0.67
0.56
0.01
0.03
0.08
0.05
0.07
0.09
0.01
0.04
0.04
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.01
0.00
Balance
Balance
1841
Archimedean principle. The calculated densities of the samples were determined from the
chemical analysis. The microstructure of the composite in the extruded state was examined
by optical microscopy (Figure 1).
Firstly, mechanical properties of aluminum matrix material were obtained experimentally. For the determination of the material properties at different temperatures, three
samples of each were prepared for tensile tests. All tests were performed on a computerized
AG-50kNG Shimadzu universal testing machine at ambient and high temperatures, using
cylindrical specimens with a diameter of 6 mm and a gauge length of 20 mm (Figure 2). In
addition, the modulus of elasticity was measured by using extensometer attached to the
tensile test machine. The applied strain rate was 4 104 s1 and the ASTM Standard
E21-92 procedures were used to evaluate the results. Data of mechanical properties are
given in Table 2.
Thermal cycling tests were performed in a special machine designed and constructed for
this purpose (Figure 3). The specimens were heated in an electrical resistance movable
furnace and cooled by a forced air current. The heating and cooling rates were used 0.5
and 0.35 K/s respectively. The temperature in the central portion of the specimen was
continuously measured by thermocouple. The total elongation was measured with a
resolution of 0.01 mm. Temperature cycling was between 373 and 703 K and period for
each cycle was 270 s. The applied external load was 150 N. Figure 4 shows the temperature
1842
I. OZDEMIR
AND
M. TOPARLI
273
71.2
0.33
76
156
373
68.1
0.33
82
124
473
62.2
0.33
82
110
573
42.3
0.33
52
54
703
21.1
0.33
19
22
Movable
Furnace
T2 (oC)
Thermocouple
Cooling Fan
T1 (oC)
Sample
LOAD
Temperature (K)
800
700
600
500
400
300
0
50
100
150
200
Time (s)
250
300
Figure 4. The temperature profile of the sample during the thermal cycling test.
profile of the heating and cooling during the thermal cycling test. As a result, the
deformation of the materials was characterized by measuring the specimens length at a
fixed point. The measured elongation after five cycles was compared with FEM results for
the same test conditions.
1843
1844
I. OZDEMIR
AND
M. TOPARLI
SiC
6
23.6 10
200
900
2670
4 106
100
675
3200
It is assumed that if the specimen was cylindrical, it was possible to take the advantage
of the axisymmetric geometry. The Al matrixSiC interface region was small-modeled
using edge-biased type which gives good results owing to the fine mesh application.
The FEM analyses were done using the mechanical properties obtained at different
temperatures for the AlSi7 matrix as given in Table 2. The modulus of elasticity and
Poisson ratio for SiC particles were taken as 450 GPa and 0.17, respectively. These values
and data of the thermal properties of AlSi7 matrix and SiC particles were taken from the
literature [18] and are given in Table 3.
During the deformation of AlSiC metal matrix composite, aluminium alloy is able to
deform plastically while the SiC particles remain elastically. So, it was assumed that SiC
particles were elastic during this analysis. The Von Mises yield criterion is applied for
determining the occurrence of plastic deformation. The equivalent Mises stress is given by
the expression:
s
1 2 2 2 3 2 3 1 2
m
2
where, 1, 2, and 3 are the three principal stresses. Whenever m reaches the yield
strength, the material begins to plastic deform. The behavior of the aluminum matrix
material was assumed to be due to multilinear kinematic hardening which means that the
real stressstrain curves can be approximated by a series of straight lines. This type of
hardening law allows the Baushinger effect to be represented [19].
1845
Material
Matrix alloy
AlSi7/SiC/10p
Porosity
(%)
Experimental Density
De (g/cm3)
Calculated
Density
Dc (g/cm3)
As-Cast
Extruded
As-Cast
Extruded
2.6917
2.7427
2.6558
2.6162
2.6670
2.7135
1.33
4.61
0.92
1.06
1,6E-05
SiC
AlSi7
1,2E-05
Interface
Displacement, (m)
2,0E-05
8,0E-06
4,0E-06
0,0E+00
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
Interface
Int
rface
Displacement , (m)
1,9E-06
1,6E-06
1,3E-06
SiC
1,0E-06
AlSi7
7,0E-07
4,0E-07
1,0E-07
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
1846
I. OZDEMIR
AND
M. TOPARLI
Figure 8. SEM micrograph of thermally cycled AlSi7/SiC/10p composite (a) and microprobe line profile
(b) of aluminum showing crack in the structure.
100
60
AlSi7
SiC
40
Interface
Stress, (MPa)
80
20
0
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
Figures 9 and 10 show the distribution of Von Mises stress and maximum principal
stress on the composite material, respectively. As seen in Figure 9, maximum Von Mises
stress value occurs on the interface. On the other side, maximum tensile principal stresses
occur on the aluminum matrix and maximum compressive principal stresses occur on the
1847
50
30
-10
00,05
0,1
0,15
AlSi7
-30
-50
SiC
-70
Interface
Int
rface
Stress, (MPa)
10
-90
-110
-130
Distance from the center of SiC particle, (mm)
Figure 10. Maximum principal stress (MPa) distribution of the AlSiCp system at the 270 s of the thermal
cycling.
150
90
SiC
AlSi7
60
Interface
Int
rface
Stress, (MPa)
120
30
0
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
SiC particle as seen in Figure 10. Maximum tensile and compressive principal stresses
value are 46.5 and 123.0 MPa, respectively. Moreover, the residual Von Mises stress
distributions in the composite were calculated by FEM, and the results are illustrated in
Figure 11. It is noted that the maximum stresses were generated at the interfacial region
during cycling because of the temperature gradients inside the specimen and different
thermal expansion coefficients of SiC particle and the AlSi7 matrix. Ho and Saigal [22]
found that thermal residual stresses strongly affect the mechanical behavior of the
composites. Penn et al. [23] revealed that tensile residual stresses, present within MMCs
before the application of external load, have often been regarded as defects or inherent
flaws, and may initiate and amplify some of the early damage, such as microcracking, that
occurs when MMCs are mechanically loaded. For example, tensile matrix residual stresses
produced by thermal cycling can degrade the composite integrity [24]. Therefore, under
1848
I. OZDEMIR
AND
M. TOPARLI
Interface
Int
rface
Strain
0,06
0,04
SiC
0,02
AlSi7
0
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
CONCLUSION
SiC particulate reinforced AlSi7 matrix base composites are produced under ordinary
foundry conditions, and cast ingots are hot extruded to improve mechanical properties.
The thermal cycling analysis is studied in the extrusion process experimentally and
theoretically. Temperature cycling was between 373 and 703 K and period for each cycle
was 270 s. Theoretical study was confirmed to only one cycle. After the experimental and
theoretical evaluation, the following points are concluded.
1. After thermal cycling tests, maximum displacement was calculated in the direction of
the applied load at the interface of the AlSi7 matrixSiC particle in the composite
system. The values calculated were 0.01672 and 0.00152 mm with and without loading,
respectively. This result indicated that composite samples are easily deformed to have
large elongations as a result of repeated thermal cycling under load.
2. Maximum tensile principal stress values and maximum compressive principal stress
values were found for the aluminum matrix and SiC particles, respectively. The results
calculated by the finite element method indicated that the stresses in the composite were
not uniform.
3. Maximum residual stresses (99 MPa) were calculated at the interfacial region, which
exceeded the yield point and caused plastic flow in the matrix.
4. Experimentally, the composite sample exhibited a fairly high elongation to failure (over
80%) after repeated thermal cycling (100 cycles). In addition, microscopic damage such
as cracking was observed in the matrix.
1849
REFERENCES
1. Gonzalez-Doncel, G. and Sherby, O.D. (1996). Tensile Ductility and Fracture of Superplastic
Aluminum-SiC Composites Under Thermal Cycling Conditions, Metallurgical and Materials
Transactions A, 27: 28372842.
2. Meijer, G., Ellyin, F. and Xia, Z. (2000). Aspects of Residual Thermal Stress/Strain in Particle
Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites, Composites: Part B, 31: 2937.
3. Le Flour, J.C. and Locicero, R. (1987). Influence of Internal-stresses Induced by Thermal
Cycling on the Plastic-deformation Resistance of an Al/SiC Composite-Material, Scripta
Metallurgica, 21: 10711076.
4. Pitcher, P.D., Shakesheff, A.J. and Lord, J.D. (1998). Aluminium Based Metal Matrix
Composites for Improved Elevated Temperature Performance, Materials Science and
Technology, 14: 10151023.
5. Zhang, L.B., Hai, J. and Wang, Y. (1998). Plastic Working and Superplasticity in Aluminiummatrix Composites Reinforced with SiC Particulates, Journal of Materials Processing
Technology, 84: 271273.
6. Taya, M. and Arsenault, R.J. (1987). Comparison Between a Shear Lag Type Model and an
Eshelby Type Model in Predicting the Mechanical Properties of a Short Fiber Composite,
Scripta Metallurgica, 21: 349354.
7. Arsenault, R.J. and Taya, M. (1987). Thermal Residual Stress in Metal Matrix Composite, Acta
Metallurgica, 35, 651659.
8. Zhang, H., Daehn, G.S. and Wagoner, R.H. (1991). Simulation of the Plastic Response of
Whisker Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites Under Thermal Cycling Conditions, Scripta
Metallurgica, 25: 22852290.
9. Daehn, G.S. and Gonzalez-Doncel, G. (1989). Deformation of Whisker-reinforced Metal
Matrix Composites Under Changing Temperature Conditions, Metallurgical and Materials
Transactions A, 20: 23552368.
10. Pickard, S.M. and Derby, B. (1990). The Deformation of Particle Reinforced Metal
Matrix Composites During Temperature Cycling, Acta Metallurgica et Materialia, 38:
25372552.
11. Geni, M. and Kikuchi, M. (1998). Damage Analysis of Aluminum Matrix
Composite Considering Non-uniform Distribution of SiC Particles, Acta Materialia, 46:
31253133.
12. Meijer, G., Ellyin, F. and Xia, Z. (2000). Aspects of Residual Thermal Stress/Strain in Particle
Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites, Composites Part B: Engineering, 31: 2937.
13. Tham, L.M., Su, L., Cheng, L. and Gupta, M. (1999). Micromechanical Modeling of
Processing-induced Damage in AlSiC Metal Matrix Composites Synthesized using
Disintegrated Melt Deposition Technique, Materials Research Bulletin, 34: 7179.
14. Shen, Y.L., Finot, M., Needleman, A. and Suresh, S. (1995). Effective Plastic Response of
2-Phase Composites, Acta Metallurgica et Materialia, 43: 17011722.
15. Cocen, U., Onel, K. and Ozdemir, I_ (1997). Microstructures and Age Hardenability of Al-5%
Si-0.2% Mg Based Composites Reinforced with Particulate SiC, Composite Science and
Technology, 57: 801808.
16. Habbitt, Karlsson and Sorenson (2001). ABAQUS/CAE rel. 6.2.
17. Takao, Y. and Taya, M. (1987). The Effect of Variable Fibre Aspect Ratio on the Stiffness and
Thermal Expansion Coefficient of a Short Fibre Composite, Journal of Composite Materials, 21:
140156.
18. Clyne, T.W. and Withers, P.J. (1993). Appendix II: Matrices and Reinforcements-selected
Thermophysical Properties, An Introduction to Metal Matrix Composites, pp. 479480,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Dieter, G.E. (1988). Mechanical Metallurgy, pp. 7072, McCraw-Hill Book Company, London.
20. Cocen, U. and Onel, K. (2002). Ductility and Strength of Extruded SiCp Aluminium Alloy
Composites, Composite Science and Technology, 62: 275282.
1850
I. OZDEMIR
AND
M. TOPARLI
21. Seo, Y.H. and Kang, C.G. (1999). Effects of Hot Extrusion Through a Curved Die of the
Mechanical Properties of SiCp/Al Composites Fabricated by Melt Stirring, Composite Science
and Technology, 59: 643654.
22. Ho, S. and Saigal, A. (1994). Three-dimensional Modelling of Thermal Residual Stresses and
Mechanical Behaviour of Cast SiC/Al Particulate Composites, Acta Metallurgica et Materialia,
42: 32533262.
23. Penn, L.S., Chou, C.T., Wang, A.S.D. and Binienda, W.K. (1989). The Effect of Matrix
Shrinkage on Damage Accumulation in Composites, Journal of Composite Materials, 23:
570586.
24. Badini, C., La Vecchia, M., Giurcanu, A. and Wenhui, J. (1997). Damage of 6061/SiCw
Composite by Thermal Cycling, Journal of Materials Science, 32: 921930.