To cite this article: Jordi Martnez-Vilalta & Josep Piol (2004) A plumber's-eye view of xylem water transport in woody
plants, Journal of Biological Education, 38:3, 137-141, DOI: 10.1080/00219266.2004.9655923
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2004.9655923
Practical
A plumber's-eye view of
xylem water transport in
woody plants
Introduction
Plants transport enormous amounts of water from the soil to the
atmosphere. Of the water absorbed by roots only about 5% is
used in metabolism and growth, whereas the remaining 95% is
lost through leaves in transpiration. As an example, a single isolated
tree may transpire 200-400 litres of water per day (Kozlowski
and Pallardy, 1997). Transpiration is intimately linked to carbon
acquisition, since both the flow of water out of the leaf and the
flow of carbon dioxide into the leaf occur through the same
pores (i.e. stomata). At the same time, the huge quantity of
water transported from the soil to the leaves is likely to assist the
nutrient supply of above ground tissues. How can plants pull up
these amounts of water to heights up to more than 100 metres?
According to the nearly-hegemonic cohesion-tension theory,
solar radiation provides the energy source for water evaporation
in leaves, which together with the cohesive strength of liquid
water makes the transport along the gradient of water potential
possible (Steudle, 1995).
Inside plants water is transported mainly through the xylem,
a tissue containing a network of conduits (walls of dead cells)
interconnected through porous membranes. A corollary of the
cohesion-tension theory is that water transport in the xylem
should take place at pressures substantially lower than atmos
pheric (i.e. under tension). However, at ambient temperature
(around 20C) liquid water at pressures below +2.3kPa is
thermodynamically unstable. As xylem pressures become
increasingly negative, a point is eventually reached at which
water evaporates (cavitation) and the affected conduit is filled
with air from the surrounding tissue (embolism). Inter-conduit
Journal of Biological Education (2004) 38(3)
Methodology
All sampling and measurements were carried out by 12 groups
(20-25 people each) of second year students of biology at the
Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (Spain) as a part of a one-week
course on practical ecology. The particular practical we present
here lasted for one-two days, depending on the duration of the
subsequent class discussion.
Field
sampling
Hydraulic
properties
water reservoir
tubing
height'pressure
difference
Table 1 Main ecological and wood anatomical attributes of the study species1.
Plant species
Family
Life form
Wood type
Leaf habit
Macroclimate
Abies sp.2
Alnus glutinosa
Castanea sativa
Celtis australis
Cistus salviifolius
Hedera helix
Quercus ilex
Pinaceae
Betulaceae
Fagaceae
Ulmaceae
Cistaceae
Araliaceae
Fagaceae
Tree
Tree
Tree
Tree
Conifer
Semi-ring-porous
Ring-porous
Ring-porous
Diffuse porous
Semi-ring-porous
Diffuse porous
Evergreen
Deciduous
Deciduous
Deciduous
Summer dec.
Evergreen
Evergreen
Temperate
Temperate
Temperate
Mediterranean
Mediterranean
Temperate
Mediterranean
Shrub
Liana
Tree
138
PIC = 100- l j ^ !
\
h, max
Martinez-Vilaltaand Pinol
and between 8.91 x 10"9 m 2 MPa"1 s"1 [Abies sp.] and 1.03 x 10"6
[Castanea sativd) [KA. In both cases hydraulic conductivity was
significantly lower in Abies sp. than in any other species (see
Figures 2a and 2b]. High KL of C. sativa (Figure 2b] is related
with larger AS:AL in this species (Figure 2d), which was starting
to lose leaves at the time of measurement. There was a wide
range of inter-specific variation in estimated loss of conductivi
ty due to xylem embolism (PLC), from around 0% in Abies sp.
to > 80% in Celtis australis. Loss of conductivity was signifi
cantly lower in Abies sp. than in any other species, and larger in
C australis and Q. ilex than in A. glutinosa; the rest of species
showing intermediate values (see Figure 2c).
Equation 1
/
analysis
Results
Typical water flows through measured segments were 0.1-1 mg
s"1 for angiosperms and 0.01-0.1 mg s"1 for Abies sp. (globally 10
- 1000 mg deposited in a 15-minute measurement; enough to
be measured with a 0.001 g-precision balance]. When standard
ised according to cross-sectional area of wood and leaf area,
hydraulic conductivity ranged, respectively, between 1.44 x 10"
5
{Abies sp.] and 9.99 x 10"4 m 2 MPa"1 s"1 [Alnus glutinoso) [Ks),
Journal of Biological Education (2004) 38(3)
Discussion
This practical offers several opportunities for discussion.
Measured water flows illustrate very clearly one essential property
of wood: its capacity to transport water longitudinally. Xylem
occupies the main part of the cross sectional area of a typical
stem or root and has a huge hydraulic conductivity compared to
other tissues (e.g. Ks of parenchyma is = 10~9 m 2 MPa"1 s"1
[Raven, 1993], four to six orders of magnitude lower than those
measured in this study for wood segments). Without this high
wood hydraulic conductivity terrestrial plants would never have
reached the heights we currently observe in most forests. Measured
hydraulic conductivities can be scaled up to the tree level to
provide a rough idea of the amount of water that can be trans
ported by a whole individual of the study species. If it is assumed
that measured Ks is representative of above-ground parts, the
flow of water (7) through the trunk can be obtained from:
J = Ks A s VM*
Equation 2
y
*
n
v
11 K,
Equation 3
i 8p
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the students of second year of biology
at the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (academic years
2001 - 2002 and 2002 - 2003], who obtained all the results we
present here and improved the practical with their suggestions.
The comments by two anonymous reviewers substantially
improved the manuscript.
Figure 3 Photographs of representative cross-sections of the xylem of an
angiosperm (left, Quercus ilexj and a conifer (right, Pinus pineaj. Both
photographs are at the same scale (white bar length = 100 fim). Note the
difference in the general structure of the xylem and, particularly, the much
wider conduits in the angiosperm.
140
References
Baas P and Schweingruber F H (1987) Ecological trends in the wood
anatomy of trees, shrubs and climbers from Europe. IAWA Journal, 8,
245-274.
Barker M (1998) Understanding transpiration - more than meets the
eye. Journal of Biological Education, 33, 17 - 20.
Crawley M J (ed.) (1997) Riant Ecology. 2 nd edn. Oxford, UK: Blackwell
Publishing.
Ewers F W and Fisher J B (1989) Techniques for measuring lengths and
diameters in stems of woody plants. American Journal of Botany, 76,
645 - 656.
Hacke U G and Sperry J S (2001) Functional and ecological wood
anatomy. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 4, 97
-115.
Holbrook N M and Zwieniecki M A (1999) Embolism repair and xylem
tension: do we need a miracle? Plant Physiology, 120, 7 - 10.
Lambers H, Chapin III, F S and Pons T L (1998) Plant Physiological
Ecology. New York, USA: Springer.
Kozlowski T T and Pallardy S G (1997) Physiology of Woody Plants. 2 nd
edn. San Diego, USA: Academic Press.
Martinez-Vilalta J, Prat E, Oliveras I and Pinol J (2002) Hydraulic prop
erties of roots and stems of nine woody species from a holm oak for
est in NE Spain. Oecologia, 133, 1 9 - 2 9 .
Martinez-Vilalta J, Sauret M, Duno A and Pinol J (2003) Make your
own transpiring tree. Journal of Biological Education, 38, 32 - 35.
Raven J A (1993) The evolution of vascular plants in relation to quanti
tative functioning of dead-water-conducting cells and stomata.
Biological Review, 68, 337 - 363.
Sperry J S, Donnelly J R and Tyree M T (1988) A method for measur
ing hydraulic conductivity and embolism in xylem. Plant, Cell and
Environment, 11, 35 - 40.
Steudle E (1995) Trees under tension. Nature, 378, 663 - 664.
Zimmermann M H (1983) Xylem Structure and the Ascent of Sap. Berlin,
Germany: Springer-Verlag.
Zimmermann U, Wagner H-J and Schneider H (2000) Water ascent in
plants: the ongoing debate. Trends in Plant Science, 5, 145 - 146.
Appendix
Suppliers
LI-COR, inc., 4421 Superior St., Lincoln, N E 6 8 5 0 4 , USA. Tel:
4 0 2 - 4 6 7 - 3 5 7 6 ; Fax: 4 0 2 - 4 6 7 - 2 8 1 9 ; Email: envsales@licor.com.
Jordi Martinez-Vilalta (corresponding author) is currently Research
Fellow at the School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh,
Edinburgh EH9 3JU, UK. Tel: +44 131 6505427. Fax: +44 131
6620478. Email: jordi.martinez-vilalta@ed.ac.uk
Josep Pinol is Professor of Ecology at the CREAF/ Ecology Unit at the
Universitat Autbnoma de Barcelona. Email: Josep.Pinol@uab.es.
141