Page 1 of 140
Page 2 of 140
Page 3 of 140
Page 4 of 140
Page 5 of 140
INDEX
SL. NO.
DESCRIPTION
PAGE NO.
1.0
GUWAHATI REFINERY
10
1.1
10
1.1.1
10
1.2
OFFSITE
13
1.2.1
13
2.0
BARAUNI REFINERY
18
2.1
18
2.1.1
18
2.2
22
2.2.1
22
2.3
OFFSITE
25
2.3.1
25
2.4
26
2.4.1
26
3.0
GUJARAT REFINERY
31
3.1
31
3.1.1
31
3.2
33
3.2.1
33
3.3
35
3.3.1
35
4.0
HALDIA REFINERY
39
4.1
39
4.1.1
39
4.2
40
4.2.1
4.2.2
40
42
4.3
43
4.3.1
43
4.4
46
4.4.1
46
4.5
49
4.5.1
4.5.2
49
50
4.6
52
Page 6 of 140
SL. NO.
DESCRIPTION
4.6.1
SHELL FAILURE OF TERTIARY EJECTOR AFTER
CONDENSER (U-82)
PAGE NO.
52
4.7
55
4.7.1
55
4.8
57
4.8.1
57
4.9
DE-
60
4.9.1
60
4.10
OFFSITE
62
4.10.1
62
5.0
MATHURA REFINERY
66
5.1
66
5.1.1
66
5.1.2
5.2
71
5.2.1
71
5.2.2
5.3
75
5.3.1
75
5.4
79
5.4.1
79
5.5
OFFSITE
81
5.5.1
81
6.0
PANIPAT REFINERY
84
6.1
84
6.1.1
84
6.2
MOTOR
SPIRIT
QUALITY
HYDROTREATER (MSQ NHT)
NAPHTHA
87
6.2.1
87
6.3
90
6.3.1
90
4.8.2
4.10.2
Page 7 of 140
(TPS)
&
58
63
69
73
SL. NO.
DESCRIPTION
EFFLUENT EXCHANGER)
6.4
93
6.4.1
93
6.5
96
6.5.1
96
6.5.2
PAGE NO.
101
6.6
104
6.6.1
104
6.7
CONTINUOUS
(CCRU)
UNIT
109
6.7.1
109
6.8
115
6.8.1
115
6.9
OFFSITE
118
6.9.1
CORROSION
LOCATIONS
7.0
120
7.1
UNIT
120
7.1.1
120
8.0
BONGAIGAON REFINERY
128
8.1
128
8.1.1
128
8.2
133
8.2.1
8.3
OFFSITE
135
8.3.1
135
8.4
139
8.4.1
139
8.1.2
8.3.2
CATALYTIC
REFORMING
Page 8 of 140
OF
REFORMER
118
131
133
137
Page 9 of 140
1.0
GUWAHATI REFINERY
1.1
Capacity
Roof type
Shell Courses
Diameter
Height
Plate Thickness
:
:
:
:
:
:
Density of Product
Observations:
Entire fixed roof plate found to have severely corroded and paper thinned, due
to internal corrosion. UT thickness survey on shell courses revealed severe
thinning (Min. thickness - 2.0mm) from 3rd to 8th shell (top shell) courses.
Blackish deposit was noticed on the holes of perforated roof. Subsequent
upon roof plate cutting & access to tank internal, severe deep / dense
grooving with 1- 4 mm depth was observed on internal surface of shell
courses and Deck was found to have heavy deposits of scales & oil
accumulation.
Floating roof sealing system was found completely damaged making through
release of hydrocarbon on the space above the deck level.
One of the 8 Dip hatch pipe and 2 instrument pipe was found to have
deformed and bowed restricting upward movement of deck. Decks of both the
tanks appeared to be sunk, due to this restriction.
Page 10 of 140
Entire top trusses, rafters, angles were found severely corroded, thinned
down and perforated. Vertical / inclined angle supports holding top trusses
and rafters, were also found severely corroded and thinned down.
Page 11 of 140
Reasons of Failure:
Severe corrosion of internal surface of fixed roof, shell courses & roof
structures attributed to H2S vapour in the form of cloud from H2S present in
Coker Gasoline. The damage further accelerated, due to product reaching on
top of the deck that sunk and making evaporation of H2S rich Gasoline at
increased rate.
Repairs Carried Out:
Replacement of top six shell courses, roof along with structures and
deformed dip hatch pipe.
Renewal of internal coating.
Remedial Measures:
Rollers have been added for free movement of the deck along the dip
hatch pipe.
Up-gradation of existing internal painting system for Coker Gasoline and
HSD service from conventional epoxy system to improved system of
Solvent free epoxy coating by Air less spray.
Keeping Nitrogen blanketing system operational.
Page 12 of 140
1.2
OFFSITE
The leaky Riser tube in the roof segment of the fire box was found opened
up over approx. 40 mm length. The failure was found to be a thick lip type
and followed minor localized bulging.
No thickness loss noticed in the leaky tube. However, overheating mark
was noticed on tubes near burner area including the failed tube.
Flaky pieces of hard white internal deposit were visible from the
longitudinal opening of the failed tube. After cutting the failed tube, about
5-6 mm thick hard and adherent white scale like deposit was noticed on
the entire circumference of internal surface. Deposit was found over the
80% length of the roof tube & the bend upstream as highlighted.
Page 13 of 140
To identify presence of such deposit in other roof tubes, RVI was carried
out from the steam drum end and the adjacent tube (Tube # 19) was found
to have similar kind of deposit. Mild and insignificant scaling was observed
on the bend of few more tubes. Remaining roof tubes were found free from
any such deposit. Due to construction of the boiler, RVI could be carried
out up to 1 Meter beyond the 900 bend only.
Internal visual condition of mud drum and steam drum was found
satisfactory. No significant deposition was observed and condition of
internals and pre-heater coils in mud drum was also satisfactory.
In view of the deposition noticed in tube no. 19, this tube was also cut
along with leaky tube number 20 up to the first bend. Due to non
availability of extra long radius bend, these were reused after manual
cleaning. The straight lengths of the tubes were however replaced in both
the cases.
White hard scale on internal surface of tube was collected and found to be
insoluble in water as well as acid. The sample was further analyzed with
the help of XRD & XRF testing carried out R&D centre, Faridabad. The
Page 14 of 140
Si
2
3
Minor
elements
Trace
Fe, Cu, Zn
Table 2
Result of XRD Analysis
SiO2 (quartz mainly with
small amount of Cristobalite)
with significant amorphous
phases. (Amorphous phases
cannot be identified using
powder XRD).
Very small amount of Iron
Oxide (Fe3O4 & FeO)
S, K, P, Ti,
Mg, Zr, Al,
Ca
Silica values of feed water for the past few months since Dec2013 was
analyzed and the same was found mostly in the range 0.2-0.6 ppm - much
above the allowable limit of 0.02 ppm.
Discussion on Causes of Failure:
The lip of the 40 mm split opening is thick and has not suffered any
thickness loss. The tube has 5 mm thick hard deposits along the inner
circumferential length and overheating marks on the tube external surface.
Considering above observations, cause of tube failure is due to long term
overheating rather than short term overheating as the same is
accompanied by thin lipped longitudinal rupture.
Silica in boiler feed water is present in the form of reactive and un-reactive
(colloidal) silica. In boiler drum, colloidal silica is converted into reactive
silica, due to high temperature and pressure conditions. Presence of silica
beyond allowable range in boiler feed water is harmful, as silica tends to
volatilize along with steam and gets deposited as glassy and hard scales.
Silica forms a dense porcelain-like scaling which is insoluble in acid and
has very low thermal conductivity. Build-up of silica on the walls of tube
can significantly reduce thermal transfer leading to overheating and
eventual rupturing of the tube.
Page 15 of 140
Feed water quality shall be strictly monitored w.r.t. silica content at out let
of Strong Acid Cation (SAC), Strong Base Anion (SBA) and Mixed Bed
(MB). Accordingly, change of resin shall be carried out.
Page 16 of 140
Page 17 of 140
2.0
BARAUNI REFINERY
2.1
CRU unit was taken under shutdown for reformer reactor catalyst
regeneration. Along with re-generation S/D, some other jobs were also
planned in the unit. The air fin coolers 03-EA-001 A/B/C (Reactor Effluent
Cooler) were opened for cleaning as per PN requirements. During this
occasion severe fouling of the coolers with Ammonium Chloride (NH4Cl)
deposit was observed at the inlet portion of tube sheet. On visual
inspection, tube end corrosion was noticed in all the coolers. Tubes with
corroded end were plugged followed by seal welding. Seal welding was
also done at corroded existing tube seal weld locations. Coolers were
taken in line after hydrotest @ 17kg/cm2 pressure.
During re-generation leakage was observed near the branch joint of 1 dia.
caustic line to 6 dia. inlet line. Thorough inspection of I/L & O/L lines by
ultrasonic thickness survey and visual inspection was carried out. After
replacement of thinned portion of lines as observed in UT survey, fin
coolers were taken in operation for re-generation activities.
In view of the poor reliability, air fin coolers 03-EA-001 A & C were
replaced with new air fin cooler meant for NSU service after seal welding
of all tubes and hydro testing at 17 kg/cm2 g pressure.
Tube Side
Reactor Effluent
Inlet-115-1200C/
Outlet- 55-600C
14 kg/cm2
SA 179 annealed; Al finned
Tube size: OD 25 mm x thk 3 mm x 276 no. each
Observations:
Page 18 of 140
Thinned section of piping between inlet headers to air fin coolers was
replaced. Portion replaced were:
All 06 no. inlet line (Horizontal section); 6 dia.; SCH 40; A 106 Gr. B
material.
04 no. bends after horizontal portion (03-EA-001A&C); 6 dia.; SCH
40; A234 Gr. WPB
The air fin coolers 03-EA-001 A & C were replaced with available new
coolers meant for 01-EA-01 series.
100% seal welding of the tubes was carried out by TIG process using
ER-70 S2 filler wire.
Dia. 3 O/L nozzles were replaced by 6 dia. SCH 80 nozzles to meet
the process requirement.
After completion of hot jobs Hydrotest of the piping circuit from 03-EE-001
(Packinox) inlet header 03-EA-001 A/B/C Outlet header 03-EE004 was carried out at 17 kg/cm2 and found satisfactory. Hydrotest of the
new coolers 03-EA-001 A & C were also carried out along with the piping
circuit and no leakage was observed.
Reasons of Failure:
Recommendations:
The elements of air fin coolers 03-EA-001 A/B/C shall be replaced at the
earliest with present specification.
To improve the plant availability factor and to ensure uninterrupted unit
operation, metallurgy of all the three air fin coolers to be upgraded to
Super Duplex SS 2507 as a long term measure.
Caustic injection point shall be shifted to new location as advised by
Licensor M/s Axens.
Injection quill shall be provided for caustic injection to ensure proper
mixing & better dispersion.
Steps to be taken to control N content in the feed within the design limit.
Page 20 of 140
Page 21 of 140
2.2
2
3
5
6
7
4
Description
Dimension
Metallurgy
No of tubes
(each unit)
Design pressure
Design temp.
Operating temp.(in/out)
Hydrotest pressure
601-AC-102A/B/C/D
601-AC-101A/B/C/D
OD 25.4 x 2.77 mm
thk (min) x 9150 mm
Length
SA179
230
OD 25.4 x 2.77 mm
thk (min) x 9150 mm
Length
SA179
368
2.0kg/Cm2
163.50C
113.50C/ 650C
3.0 kg/cm2
3.2kg/cm2
172.10C (max.)
122.10C/ 650C
4.8 kg/cm2
Observations:
Internal Rotary Inspection System (IRIS) was carried out on Carbon Steel
SA179 tubes of AC-101A,B,C,D & AC-102 A,B,C,D to find out the wall loss &
remaining wall thickness present in the tubes
Page 22 of 140
AC-101A
AC-101B
AC-101C
AC101D
AC102A
AC-102B
AC102C
Wall loss
(10% to20%)
341
255
190
209
8
157
179
Wall loss
(20% to30%)
20
103
124
113
117
59
47
Wall loss
(30% to40%)
7
10
50
43
49
14
4
Wall loss
(40% to50%)
0
0
4
3
10
0
0
Tubes
plugged
7
10
54
46
59
14
04
AC102D
143
73
14
14
Equpt.
Tube plugging was carried out above 30% of the wall thickness loss as
recommended by IRIS agency.
Corrosion in air fin cooler is primarily due to acid attack (aqueous HCL) at
the initial water condensation point (ICP), resulting in low pH conditions
and the associated aggressive corrosion of the systems metal surfaces.
Water condensation zone forms a small part of a cooler length where
damage is expected to be maximum.
This is attributed to slippage of chloride in the overhead stream and
ineffective corrosion inhibition.
This could be confirmed by observance of low pH and high Fe content in
the boot water.
The root cause of the failure is also attributed to poor desalter
performance. The salt content was observed high against limit of 1 ptb.
Page 23 of 140
Recommendations:
Page 24 of 140
2.3
OFFSITE
Page 25 of 140
Reasons of Failure:
HSD being lighter in nature generates VOC. The vapour thus generated is
accumulated in the space above the liquid level. Presence of abundant
amount of H2S moisture and vapour condense as droplets on the surface
of the tank causing severe pitting of the metal
The top shell course and the roof plate are susceptible to vapour space
corrosion in fixed roof tanks. Internal epoxy painting is usually carried out
to prevent such corrosion.
In this case, the reason of failure may be attributed to damage of internal
painting. Initiation of corrosion seems to be from intersection of shell and
roof where painting is difficult.
Recommendations:
Page 26 of 140
2.4
Steam coil of the sulphur pit comprised of dia. 6 inlet / outlet SS header
inter- connected with dia. 2 SS pipe.
Water accumulation inside the pit covering the whole of steam coil due to
seepage was reported to have very low Ph On laboratory analysis,
different constituents present in water were indicated as below:
Sample
Water inside Sulphur Pit
Water Ex SWS
F
43.4
-
NH4
33.6
46.9
with the help of Spark Spectrometer & PMI machine. The header metallurgy
was found resembling with 201 Grade Austenitic SS.
Composition using PMI machine:
Cr-16.99, Mn 7.67, Ni 3.98,
Cu- 1.04,
Fe 69.86
Metallography:
Metallography was carried out on sample from cross section of the cracked
header portion & viewed under optical microscope. Multiple branched cracks
of transgranular as well as intergranular morphology was observed at both
HAZ and parent metal of the header. The cracks were seen to be propagating
from the external surface towards the header internal surface, indicating
failure mode as Cl-SCC.
Discussion:
As such, 200 series Austenitic grades SS are used to replace SS 304 &
SS 301 materials predominantly for low corrosion applications at room
temperature like furniture, cookware, serving Bowls, Railway rolling stock
etc. With the available literature it is inferred that, SS 201 material
behavior resembles with other Austenitic grade materials in general.
Page 28 of 140
Conclusion
The failure of the steam coil tube header is attributed to the followings:
All five steam coils were replaced with new steam coils of metallurgy SS
316. PMI was done to
confirm the metallurgy of
the coils and header.
All the steam coils were
hydrotested outside sulphur
pit and found satisfactory
without any leakage.
After assembling all the
steam coils inside sulphur
pit, all the five steam coils
were hydrotested and found
satisfactory.
Recommendations:
SS 316L steam coils shall be used both for Train-I & II.
Action shall be taken to prevent water seepage into the sulphur pit.
Page 29 of 140
Page 30 of 140
3.0
GUJARAT REFINERY
3.1
VGO
293.00/216.00
14.533
325.00/293.00
26/FV
19.05 OD X 2.769
THK X 4500 L
1116 U tubes
SA 210 Gr. A-1
Shell Side
BFW
187.00/197.68
15.333
230.00/120
20/FV
Observations:
After channel cover opening, tube ends were found satisfactory and no
traces of corrosion observed at the tube ends.
During water filling and pressurizing for shell test, at around 10kg/cm2
pressure only 24 tube leakages observed.
Analysis:
It was observed that all failed tubes were from top pass. On further
investigation it was observed that level troll, for the shell side liquid level
measurement, was having its top level (100% level) at same level as that
of the tube bundle top.
On measurement of the heights of the top of LT and top of tube bundle
from the ground level, it was observed that the both the heights are same
2.37 meters from ground level.
Page 31 of 140
Hence for tube bundle to remain dipped inside the water LT level shall
always be maintained above 100%, but in normal operation it was
maintained at 50% only.
Reasons of Failure:
Page 32 of 140
3.2
:
:
:
:
:
:
20 nos.
4.5 OD x 237 AW
ASTM A106 Gr. B
08 nos.
4.5 OD x 237 AW
ASTM A335 Gr.P5 (5Cr Mo) as shock tubes
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
4 nos.
8.625 OD x 0.322 AW
ASTM A 335Gr. P9 (9Cr-1Mo)
6 nos.
6.625 OD x 0.28 AW
ASTM A 335Gr. P9 (9Cr-1Mo)
16 nos.
4.5 OD x 0.237 AW
ASTM A 335Gr. P9 (9Cr-1Mo)
34 nos.
4.5 OD x 0.237 AW
ASTM A 335Gr. P5 (5Cr-Mo)
Radiation Section:
No. of tube
Size
Material
No. of tube
Size
Material
No. of tube
Size
Material
No. of tube
Size
Material
Observations:
Page 33 of 140
revealed at least 2% growth in OD of all the eight shock tubes and more
than 3 % at the leaked
location. Sagging of about
1D was observed in all the
shock tubes. Thickness was
carried out on shock and the
radiation tubes including the
failed tube but no significant
loss in thickness was
observed. Approximate 2
mm thick layer of coke was
noticed inside the failed
tube.
Analysis:
Reasons of Failure:
Form the nature of failure (bowing/ bulging/ scaling & cracking), probable
reason of failure seems to be cracking from bulged area caused due to
localized overheating of internally coked up convection tube.
Jobs Carried Out:
The bottom two rows of shock tubes (8 nos.- P5 metallurgy) of both the
passes & 4nos. sagged studded tubes (bottom row) in both the passes were
replaced due to excessive bowing/ bulging/ scaling.
Page 34 of 140
3.3
Inlet conditions
Outlet conditions
Crude
265
380
245
360
21
7.0
15.2
4.5
Tube Metallurgy:
Heater
No.
F1K2
F1K2
F1K2
F1K2
F1K2
F1K2
FIKI
FIKI
Pass No.
Pass#1
Pass#1
Pass#2
Pass # 2
Pass # 1
Pass-1 & 2
Pass1 & 2
Pass1 & 2
Wall
Tube No.
South wall
South wall
North wall
North wall
North wall
Roof tubes
North & South wall
North & South wall
No 1-12
No 13 &19
No 1-12
No 24
25 - 29
30-34 & 35-39
1-7
Tube 8 -33
Tube
Metallurgy
SS316L
P5
SS316L
P5
P5
P5
SS 316L
P5
Highly scattered and isolated deep pitting/ grooving and corrosion marks
observed on all replaced radiation tubes in F1K2.
Severe grooving along circumferential weld joints was also observed.
Corrosion detected in all radiation tubes by thickness survey.
Severely corroded tubes (based on thickness survey) were replaced (4
nos. tubes in F1K2 pass#1 and 11 nos. tubes in pass#2).
In F1K2 section also severe corrosion was observed in radiation zone
tubes. Minimum thickness observed is in the range of 4.5mm to 4.7mm
against the original thickness of 6.5mm.
Page 35 of 140
Reasons of Failure:
Failure has occurred due to highly localized naphthenic acid corrosion of P5
metallurgy tube nearer to the weld joint.
Page 36 of 140
Limit the TAN value of the mix crude below 0.5 till upgradation of
metallurgy to SS 316L for all tubes in radiation is completed.
Daily analysis of TAN value of NG crude carried out.
Installation of online corrosion monitoring instruments at inlet of radiation
to be explored.
Replacement of all radiation tubes with upgraded SS 316 metallurgy at the
earliest.
Page 37 of 140
Page 38 of 140
4.0
HALDIA REFINERY
4.1
Page 39 of 140
4.2
The drain line of the LPG caustic wash vessel (13B-01) had been choked
and the level gauge had been malfunctioning for some days before the
incident.
Analysis:
Page 40 of 140
In case of any caustic carryover from the L.P.G. caustic wash section the
subsequent equipments (Depropanizer, Depropanizer Reboiler and
connected piping etc.) would get exposed to caustic environment.
Caustic concentrations of 50 to 100 ppm are sufficient to cause cracking
and stresses promote cracking in caustic environment (source: API 571).
Reasons of Failure:
In view of the above facts and obtained data of the QC Lab analysis report of
the obtained sample, it was opined that the subject failure of the Depropanizer
Re-boiler tubes was a case of stress corrosion cracking of the U tubes in
caustic environment.
Jobs Carried Out:
Hydro-test of the equipment was arranged and during shell test total 6 nos.
of tubes leaked.
After plugging the leaky tubes suitably hydro test was carried out
successfully at a pressure of 31.6 kg/cm 2(g) for shell side and at 23.7
kg/cm2(g) for tube side.
As the Depropanizer Column (12C-07) and connected circuit also got
exposed to caustic environment the same was inspected after scaffolding
erection and insulation removal.
However, no significant deterioration was observed.
Page 41 of 140
Remedial Measures:
LINE
FROM
OVERHEAD
Introduction:
Severe localized internal corrosion was observed at dia. 8 line from CDU-I
overhead condensers 11-E-22A/B to overhead accumulator 11-B-01. The
corrosion was predominantly observed at the bottom portion of the piping at
elbows.
Observations:
Reasons of Failure:
The average pH of overhead boot
water had been 7.5 from the period
July to Oct 2013 against desired range of 6.2 to 6.8. This had led to
deposition of loose scales/ salts leading to under deposit corrosion at the
bottom portion of the piping.
Remedial Measures:
It was recommended to monitor the iron content of the overhead boot water.
The monitoring frequency of overhead pH was increased.
Page 42 of 140
4.3
Na2CO3
dosing
Page 43 of 140
Reasons of Failure:
Page 44 of 140
Remedial Measures:
It was recommended that the neutralizer dosing system, rate and injection
location needs to be reviewed by PN/TS to avoid repetition of failures in
future.
Page 45 of 140
4.4
AMINE
ABSORBER
Introduction:
DHDS unit (U-25) was scheduled for catalyst replacement shutdown in
June2013. During the shutdown, the Stripper Gas Amine Absorber Column
(25-C-03) was opened for internal inspection. Severe internal corrosion was
observed predominantly at the liquid level of the column.
Observations:
The operational data of the stripper gas amine absorber column were
analyzed for the period of Jan12 to Apr13.
It was found that the Lean amine strength was maintained at 28 - 30 wt%
against design of 25 wt% during the period of Jan12 to Apr12.
Subsequently, the lean amine strength started to decrease gradually to
average strength of 14 - 17 wt%.
The strength of lean amine was particularly low in the period of June12
Oct12 and was as low as 7 - 8 wt% on some occasions.
The trend of Lean amine strength for the period of Jan12 to Apr13 is as
given below.
Page 46 of 140
28-04-2013
07-04-2013
17-03-2013
24-02-2013
03-02-2013
13-01-2013
23-12-2012
02-12-2012
11-11-2012
21-10-2012
30-09-2012
09-09-2012
19-08-2012
29-07-2012
08-07-2012
17-06-2012
27-05-2012
06-05-2012
15-04-2012
25-03-2012
04-03-2012
12-02-2012
22-01-2012
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
01-01-2012
Page 47 of 140
Page 48 of 140
4.5
Heavy sulfurous deposits were observed near the tail gas entry to the
incinerator.
Green colored water accumulation at the bank tubes bottom was
observed.
The casing drain was found choked.
The pH of the accumulated water was found highly acidic.
Thick greenish sludge accumulation observed at the stack bottom which
was suitably cleaned.
The sludge pH as tested by litmus paper was also found acidic in nature.
Severe corrosion was observed at the tube bottom location near mud
drum especially at the refractory embedded portion.
Reasons of Failure:
The severe thinning of bank tubes at the bottom location near to the mud
drum is attributed to severe acidic corrosion due to accumulation of water and
operation of the boiler at lower temperatures especially during the start-up.
Page 49 of 140
Remedial Measures:
To mitigate the problem of operation of the waste heat boiler at temperatures
lower that its dew point especially during the start-ups, a steam Spurger was
introduced. All the corroded bank tubes were replaced with new tubes.
4.5.2 FAILURE OF REFRACTORY AT THE SHELL OF MCC
Introduction:
SRU-II (U-28) was brought down due to leak at shell of MCC (28-F-02) and
was opened on 22.05.2013. Localized hot spot was observed at the manhole
neck area in thermography (Figure 16).
Observations:
On 22/05/2013, the MCC was opened and internal inspection was carried
out. Holes and gaps between refractory bricks were observed. On removal
of damaged refractory from the affected area, a hole of approx dimensions
60 mm long and 15 mm width was observed at the manhole nozzle
welding location. Adjacent area found oxidized. The MCC burner tip was
found severely damaged. The refractory layout was found not as per the
drawing.
Page 50 of 140
Reasons of Failure:
The refractory failure at the manhole neck location is attributed to localized
overheating due to damaged burner and the improper application of the
refractory during installation.
Remedial Measures & Jobs Carried Out:
The shell was repaired and the refractory was applied as per drawing. The
dry-out of the refractory was carried out. The refractory application was
carried out under supervision of refractory expert.
The damaged burner tip was replaced.
The MCC temperature indication was rectified.
Page 51 of 140
4.6
Fluid
Inlet Temp (0C)
Outlet Temp (0C)
Design Temp (0C)
Design Press (Kg/Cm2)
Hyd. Test Press (Kg/Cm2)
MOC
No of tubes
Shell Side
Gas + steam
184
46
320
3.5 / F.V.
5.3
SA 516 Gr. 60 (NACE)
-
Tube Side
Cooling Water
40
44
65
7.0
12.0
Admiralty Brass
479
Observations:
The shell adjacent to the middle inlet nozzle was found perforated and
thinned down. One tube just below the middle inlet nozzle was found
perforated. The ultrasonic thickness survey of shell and nozzles away from
the middle inlet nozzle found satisfactory. No appreciable loss of wall
thickness could be detected. The localized loss of wall thickness around
the middle inlet nozzle appeared to be due to erosion.
Page 52 of 140
From the visual observations of the deteriorated area, it was evident that
the deterioration has been caused due to impingement of high velocity
inlet vapor and steam.
Page 53 of 140
Reasons of Failure:
The reason of failure is attributed to improper distribution of the inlet fluid
leading to accelerated erosion of the shell due to high inlet velocity.
Page 54 of 140
4.7
Visual inspection of the piping revealed pinhole leakage from weld joint
between flange and the
pipe at 4O clock position.
PMI was carried out; the
pipe was found to be of
monel metallurgy while the
flange was of carbon steel
(internally
lined
with
monel).
Analysis:
Page 55 of 140
Reasons of Failure:
The failure is attributed to acidic corrosion due to condensation of aqueous
HCl as the electrical tracing is not functional.
Remedial Measures:
Page 56 of 140
4.8
Fluid
Inlet Temp (0C)
Outlet Temp (0C)
Design Temp (0C)
Design Press (Kg/Cm2)
Hyd. Test Press (Kg/Cm2)
MOC
No of tubes
Shell side
Hydrocarbon
70.1
37.8
150
21
31.5
SA516 Gr.60, 16thk.
-
Tube side
Cooling Water
33
45
65
14
21
SB163 N04400
1136 EACH
Observations:
Page 57 of 140
Page 58 of 140
The refractory at the severe channeling locations at the feed nozzles area
was removed and in-situ repair with full refractory thickness by new
casting was carried out followed by dry-out.
The refractory job was carried out under the supervision of refractory
specialist.
The in-situ casting was carried out using Resco cast Sure flow material
with the help of metallic/wooden form for casting.
Remedial Measures:
The cold wall Riser along with the Feed nozzles has been planned for
replacement at the next available opportunity.
Page 59 of 140
4.9
Page 60 of 140
Remedial Measures:
As a long term solution, the complete acid charging circuits including the
mixing points are to be upgraded to a PTFE (Teflon) lined piping to improve
the run length and reliability of lines.
Page 61 of 140
4.10 OFFSITE
4.10.1 SEVERE CORROSION UNDER INSULATION OF SHELL OF TANK NO.
713
Introduction:
Tank-713 (Ser: HFU Feed, cap. 2000m3) was decommissioned & taken for
periodic M&I. Mechanical cleaning and complete insulation removal of shell
and roof was carried out. Severe corrosion under insulation (CUI) was
observed at tank shell.
Observations:
Reason of Failure:
The severe CUI at the tank shell courses is attributed to ingress of water mist
from adjacent cooling tower in to the insulation.
Remedial Measures
All the shell courses of the tank were replaced and external insulation of the
tank was not provided after consultation with Production and Process Dept.
External blasting and painting with PU paint system was carried out to
increase the life of external painting of the tank shell.
Page 62 of 140
The affected portion of the subject line was replaced with material
specification A 106 Gr. B Sch-40, length 6M and the severely corroded
HPV and LPD were also replaced.
External painting was carried out and aluminum foil was provided as
moisture barrier before application of insulation.
Reasons of Failure:
As the subject line lie in the vicinity of the TPS and Process Cooling
Tower, it is subjected to continuous drift from the same.
Thus, in absence of moisture barrier, damaged aluminum cladding and
improper sealing of the insulation cladding, continuous water ingress into
the insulation resulted in severe CUI.
Page 63 of 140
Remedial Measures:
The application of paint followed by moisture barrier (Aluminum foil) is being
enforced in all insulated piping prone to CUI.
Page 64 of 140
Page 65 of 140
5.0
MATHURA REFINERY
5.1
During shutdown heater inspection, it was observed that these high alloy
tube sheets of convection section in all four heaters have developed
through thickness cracking after around 30 years of service life.
Page 66 of 140
Analysis:
The cracking phenomenon after almost 30 years of service life is largely
attributed to the following factors:
Page 67 of 140
General aging of high Alloy Cast 50Cr-50Ni-Nb type tube sheets over the
years.
Thermal cycling during start-up and shutdowns.
Higher thermal gradient across the Cast Tubes sheets, around 350 0C in
place of maximum allowable 2220C, as per API 560. To reduce this
thermal gradient, nowadays, split type tube-sheet design is used in place
of single piece, as was used earlier in the past.
Replacement of high alloy (50 Cr 50 Ni-Nb) tube sheet castings with new
25 Cr 20 Ni and 20 Cr 12 Ni tube-sheets.
In place of seven intermediate tube-sheets, in new design 5 intermediate
Tube-sheets and two end tube-sheets were considered.
New thickness was 25 mm in place of 50 mm earlier. Design was split type
i.e. one tube-sheet consisted of three pieces so as to avoid excessive
thermal gradient across one tube-sheet.
In addition, old convection tubes (64 nos.; 152mm OD; 8mm thickness)
were also replaced with new tubes (80 nos.; 141.3mm OD; 6.55mm
thickness).
Benefits:
Page 68 of 140
In year 2012, during APH efficiency survey, it was observed that flue gas
temperature ex-APH was on the lower side (minimum up to 1600C).
Accordingly, oxygen survey of flue gas at every module outlet was
conducted to detect any possible air ingress in the flue gas.
During the survey, it was observed that oxygen content was very high (up
to 15%) at 3rd and 4th module flue gas outlet of APH 1 and 2. It confirmed
air ingress inside flue gas thru these cast modules. Accordingly these
modules were recommended for replacement.
During 2013 M&I shutdown, APH were taken under maintenance for
inspection and replacement. In line with findings during online oxygen
survey, 3rd and 4th modules (2 nos. bottom most modules) of APH 1 and 2
were found severely perforated.
Modules were also found severely chocked with castable material on top
of them. Perforations were also observed in the insulated part between
two modules.
Flue gas ID fan suction and discharge duct were also inspected during
Shut-down. At some locations, castable refractory was found badly
damaged. Perforations were also seen at many locations.
Page 69 of 140
Analysis:
Due to leakage in flue gas duct, the air kept on coming inside the APH
bottom modules, which resulted in decrease of the flue gas temperature
below the dew point.
This eventually corroded the bottom modules due to dew point corrosion.
3rd and 4th bottom modules of APH 1 and 2 were completely replaced
during Shutdown as per inspection recommendation.
ID fan suction and discharge duct were also partially replaced along with
internal castable refractory.
Flue gas temperature at ID discharge was recommended to maintain
minimum 150C above the calculated dew point.
Steam coil air pre-heater (SCAP) was also recommended to use whenever
the atmospheric air temperature goes down. The same is in practice.
Benefits:
Page 70 of 140
5.2
Parameter
No of tube
Tube size
Tube spec
Fluid Circulated
Design Pressure
Design Temperature
Operating Pressure
Operating Temperature
Value
336
24.94 ODX2.25 thk. X3154 L
SA 334 Gr. 6
HC+H2S+NH3+H2O
7.7 Kg/Cm2g
202 0C
5.7 Kg/Cm2g
1850C
Observations:
The end covers of the air fin cooler were opened during the shutdown for
periodic inspection, cleaning & testing.
On opening the cover, header box was found filled with heaps of sulphide
scale.
Page 71 of 140
Visual observation shows severe tube end thinning and paper thinned tube
end in approx 50-60 nos. of tubes. Tube end thinning was observed
preferentially around both the inlet nozzles. RFET result confirm the same
observation i.e.40 to 50 % wall loss in approx 40% of the tubes.
Reasons of Failure:
Page 72 of 140
Parameter
No of trays
Tray Spec
Fluid handled
Design Pressure
Design Temperature
Operating Pressure
Operating Temperature
Value
28
1-8 SS 410, 9-28 CS
Amine
8
6
3100C
2700C
Observations:
Reasons of Failure:
Page 73 of 140
The matter was taken up with Process Licensor for possible bypassing of
Hot separator (2-V-32)
Following metallurgy up-gradation in the Column may prevent the problem;
however, the corrosion problem will get shifted downstream.
The total tray assembly/internal up to top 08 tray level shall be replaced
with SS 410 material, coated with Hastelloy C by HVOF/HVAF process.
The Column shell up to 08th tray level including top dome shall be coated
with Hastelloy C with HVOF/HVAF coating process.
Page 74 of 140
5.3
Single stage sour water stripper configuration has been adopted for Sour
Water Stripper Unit (SWSU). H2S, ammonia and other light components
present in the raw sour water are stripped off as overhead product from
the sour water stripper column.
Treated water recovered as part of the bottom product of sour water
stripper is sent to the battery limit.
Unit is not designed for processing chloride in sour water.
The acid gases are stripped off from the column bottom by re-boiling in the
re-boiler (303-E-01), a kettle re-boiler operating on LP steam.
Page 75 of 140
Parameters
Service
Design pressure, Kg/Cm2 (g)
Operating pressure Kg/cm2(g)
Temp. Inlet (0C)
Temp. outlet (0C )
Nos of Tubes
Tube Size( ODxThk x length )
Tube Specification
Shell Specification
Details
Shell Side
Tube Side
Sour water
LP steam
4.0
5.0/FV
2.47
3.63
125.9
148.5
125.9
138.92
-331( U Tubes)
-25x2.5x6056(In mm)
-SA 213TP 316L
SA 516 GR 60 --
History:
Observations:
Fine pits and multiple numerous branching type cracks were observed in
tubes of stripper re-boiler,(303-E-01) (Pic-1,2,3,4).The cracks were found
on external surface of tubes. Very thin isolated deposits inside the pits/
cracks were also observed on the tube OD surface.
In order to establish the root cause of failure, Eddy current testing of the
tubes were also carried out which indicated 50% loss in thickness in tubes
due to cracks in around 223 tubes out of 662 (U tube bundle; Total tubes
331 X 2).
Failed tube sample was also sent to IOCL R&D center, Faridabad for
carrying out failure analysis. Tube metallurgy & deposits inside the cracks/
pits on the tube OD surface were analyzed using EDAX system of SEM at
IOCL R&D center.
Page 76 of 140
Page 77 of 140
Reasons of Failure:
As per API 581,Cl-SCC susceptibility for SS 316 is considered high in the
temperature range of 93-149 0C & Cl level from 11 ppm to more than 1000
ppm at pH <10. The failure took place due to Chloride carryover in the sour
Water.
Remedial Measures:
The Tube Bundle was plugged as a Short term measure and continued in
service.
Replacement of tube bundle with duplex SS metallurgy has been
recommended.
Page 78 of 140
5.4
Page 79 of 140
Reasons of Failure:
Remedial Measures:
The corroded and blistered portion of the tank bottom plate was replaced.
The complete tank bottom, bottom shell course and floating Roof
underside were blast cleaned to Sa 2 and painted with solvent less
epoxy paint system to prevent scale formation.
Page 80 of 140
5.5
OFFSITE
The water draining holes on the wind girders was found clogged and
blocked with muck deposits.
After removal of insulation in east side, severe scaling and corrosion was
observed along the top wind girder and the shell plate.
The complete insulation of the shell above the wind girders was opened
and sweep blast cleaning was carried out.
After sweep blast cleaning, perforation was observed on the Shell plate in
east direction.
Page 81 of 140
the insulation from the roof to the shell. Also, the water draining holes of
the wind girders were found blocked by foreign materials leading to water
stagnation in this zone which have caused CUI (Corrosion Under
Insulation).
Remedial Measures:
The perforated and corroded shell plates in east direction were replaced
with 8mm Thk. IS 206P2 Gr B plates.
The complete portion of the shell above the wind girders was blast cleaned
and painted with one coat Self Priing Epoxy and two coats HR aluminum.
The water draining holes on the wind girders were made wider to prevent
blocking and allow water draining.
The leaky cooling water line of the tank in the east side was replaced.
Page 82 of 140
Page 83 of 140
6.0
PANIPAT REFINERY
6.1
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
08nos. (75-EA-001 A to H)
Nov2008.
25.0mm ODX3.0 mm thick X 12500mm L
228
KCS (SA179)
1460C
156 kg/cm2
Page 84 of 140
Observations:
Only one tube (20th tube from North, inlet tube) of top most rows was found
leaky.
Leak was localized and was from (4-5) O clock position of tube around 5m
away from the tube-sheet.
No fouling observed in the inlet & outlet nozzles when opened. However,
severe fouling (Blackish color deposits) was observed in both the cut
tubes.
No other tube leaked during hydro-testing.
External surface of the tube found satisfactory after fins removal with no
sign of corrosion/ damage.
Upon splitting of tubes, severe fouling (blackish color) was observed inside
the tubes. The tube fouling had channeling like characteristic.
After the deposits were cleaned, the area of leak revealed channeling/
grooving (with loss of metal) like appearance.
The adjacent tube when split and cleaned did not significant sign of
corrosion.
Page 85 of 140
pH of deposits collected from the tubes was checked and was found to
5.5. The deposits were not completely water soluble.
Sample was sent to IOCL lab for detailed analysis. The results are given
below:
pH
: 5.5
Ammonium bisulphide
: 1653 ppm,
Ammonium chloride
: 1303 ppm
Iron content
: 33.28%
Coke
: 7%
The remaining 65% may be catalyst fines.
Reasons of Failure:
Under deposit corrosion due to severe fouling inside the tubes may be one
of the reasons for tube failure as depicted from the appearance of leaky
tube surface.
Severe fouling inside the tubes indicates inadequate water washing in the
air fin coolers.
Use of DM water as make-up in wash water might also be one of the
reasons for mild uniformly distributed pitting on the tube internal surface. It
is also supported by the fact that thickness loss and pitting has been
observed in wash water line in the past and replacement of piping has
been done twice.
Inferior quality HCGO in the feed from DCU, might also have contributed in
fouling of the tubes. Possibility of coke carryover from inferior quality
HCGO or catalyst and fouling the tubes leading to under deposit
corrosion also cannot be ruled out.
The leaky air-fin cooler was lowered to ground level and kept on stand.
One tube found leaky during water filling.
02 nos. of tubes (01 no. leaky tube and 01 no. adjacent tube) were cut for
detailed inspection.
Both tubes were plugged with CS plugs and hydro-testing of bundle was
carried out at 215 kg/cm2g. No other tube detected leaky.
The air-fin cooler was installed back at position and unit was started.
Recommendations:
In view of low reliability of these air-fin coolers with history of 02 nos. failures
(different coolers) in past two years, it is recommended to replace all the airfin coolers (A-H) with the metallurgy as suggested by the Licensor.
Page 86 of 140
6.2
Feed
Effluent
MOC:
Tube
Shell
:
:
:
:
:
Page 87 of 140
Observations:
Dark brownish color deposit was observed in the channel box & no significant
deposits observed in the shell. Lots of adherent & thick deposit of brown
blackish color was observed inside the tubes. Post cleaning inspection, no
significant corrosion on the tube external surface was observed. Severe tube
end thinning was observed in all the tubes and severe corrosion was seen
inside the tubes. The deposits collected were sent for analysis to the external
Lab.
Chemical analysis results:
Reasons of Failure:
Corrosion in the tubes was not uniform and it was more at bend locations.
Page 88 of 140
Severe Pitting corrosion & perforations of tubes was taken place under
deposits due to deposition of NH4Cl and formation of HCl in the tube
bundle of 301-E-101B.
Recommendations:
Procurement of new tube bundles (301 -E-101 A &B) for both the
exchangers with existing MOC at the earliest.
The licensor recommended to inject wash water upstream of 301-E-101B
tube side I/L only on requirement basis such as increase in pressure drop
or temperature increase instead of doing it weekly once for 24 hrs.
Page 89 of 140
6.3
:
:
:
:
MOC of Shell
Fluid
Operating Pressure
:
:
1999
U Tubes
234 (U-tube)
A&B - SA 179, C- SA 199 Gr T11,
D&E- SA 213 GR321
A,B &C- SA 516 Gr 60,
D&E- SA 387 GR 11 CL2
Shell Feed, Tube Effluent
Shell - 70 Kg/cm2; Tube- 54.3 Kg/cm2
Page 90 of 140
Inspection History:
Inspection & Testing of the Exchangers was carried out during last M&I
S/D in May2011. Condition of Tube bundles of A, B, D & E exchangers
was found satisfactory. No significant deterioration/corrosion was
observed.
Exchanger 52-EE-101 C: During hydro testing, two nos. U tubes were
found leaking in element C. Bundle was taken out, localized damage in
external surface of both the tubes was observed. The leaky tubes were
plugged and one additional tube was cut to examine the internal condition
of tube. The internal surface of the cut tube was found free from corrosion
any other type of damage. All three tubes were plugged and the
exchanger was hydro tested.
Observations:
Reasons of Failure:
Due to time constraints and Production requirement, bundle was not pulled
out for detailed analysis.
However, Minor whitish deposits were observed inside the tubes after
opening of channel covers.
Whitish deposits may indicate deposition ammonium chlorides in the tubes
due to inadequate wash water injection in to the system.
Leaky tube was plugged and exchanger was hydro tested at a pressure of
30 Kg/cm2 to check condition of other tubes. No leak was observed.
Seal welding of plugged tube was done with necessary heat treatment,
condition found satisfactory.
Hydro testing of Exchanger was done at maximum differential pressure
across tube sheet of 31.5 kg/cm2 (Shell side pressure -121.8 kg/cm2, Tube
side pressure - 94.5 kg/cm2). No abnormality observed condition found
satisfactory.
Recommendations:
It was recommended to replace the existing bundle with new one of same
metallurgy in the forth coming shutdown May2014.
Presently, wash water injection is around 4.5% of fresh feed rate is being
done. PS to study if the present wash water injection rate is sufficient to
wash out all the deposits in the circuit.
Page 91 of 140
Page 92 of 140
6.4
Page 93 of 140
Operating temperature
(Design)
Operating pressure
Tubes
:
:
:
:
Tube samples were cut from 2 nos. top row tubes (one leaky tube & other
from the side S-end) to check
internal condition of the tubes.
After cutting, tubes were inspected
and minor deposit was noticed
inside the tubes.
Tube were cut in two halves and
inspected.
No appreciable pitting/ corrosion/
wall thinning was noticed in the
internal surface of the tubes.
Tube end near failed location was
also inspected and no corrosion from internal surface of tube was
observed.
External corrosion/ metal loss at external surface of tube were noticed.
Page 94 of 140
Reasons of Failure:
Recommendations:
Page 95 of 140
6.5
:
:
:
:
:
:
286/3500C
83.64/122.4 Kg/cm2
167.9 Kg/cm2
Process Description
Crude Terephthalic Acid (CTA) product (99.7% pure) from the oxidation plant
contains a small quantity of impurities (0.25 to 0.3%). The main impurities are
intermediates from the oxidation of Paraxylene and include 4
carboxybenzaldehyde, paratoluic acid and coloured substances which must
be removed before the material can be used in the manufacture of polyester
products.
The function of the Purification Plant is to reduce the levels of intermediates
and by-products. This is achieved by dissolving the CTA in water at high
pressure/ temperature and reaction of impurities with Hydrogen in the
presence of a catalyst. This reaction effectively converts the impurities into
more soluble or non-coloured forms, which stay dissolved in the water phase
Page 96 of 140
in the subsequent crystallization stage. Both CTA and 4CBA are very
insoluble but p-TA is soluble. The p-TA and other non-coloured forms are
purged from the plant in the mother liquor from the primary solid/ liquid
separation stage.
The main reactions that take place are:
Observations:
On preliminary inspection during leak, slurry was found coming out from
the shell above the middle manhole of the shell.
On removal of the shell insulation, the leak in the shell was noted adjacent
to the shell longitudinal weld joint just above the second manhole.
Ultrasonic thickness gauging of shell from external side was carried out
around the leak location and localized thickness loss in approx. 6 X 8
area around the leak was noted.
Page 97 of 140
Finally, the tank was cut and lifted to expose the damage location from
inside. On lifting of the tank, heap of deposits over the support ring was
observed.
After cleaning of deposits, leak was found to have initiated from top side
weld joint of support ring to shell cladding. After cleaning, corrosion and
pitting of the support ring top side weld joint was observed all around the
circumference.
Page 98 of 140
UT of 1200 m circumferential band (i.e. 600mm above & below the leaky
area) was carried out by to check the condition of cladding & base metal.
Condition was found satisfactory except the failed location.
Thickness survey around the failure location from external side before
lifting of dissolver tank was carried out. No appreciable thickness loss was
noted except near failed location.
Thickness survey of other shell plate was also carried out and no
appreciable thickness loss was noted. All nozzles weld joints and shell
internal side welding joints was also DP tested and found satisfactory.
TOFD inspection in 600mm top & bottom of defect area was also carried
out by M/s L&T. No rejectable indications were observed except for the
area around the leak.
Page 99 of 140
Sample Analysis:
Sample of deposits was collected from the dissolver tank support ring for
chemical analysis. Sample has been submitted to Process, QC lab PR and
R&D, IOCL for further detailed analysis. The results obtained from QC lad
PR as follows:
Fe (3.11%), Cl & Br (ND), Cobalt (10 ppm), Manganese (10 ppm) and 4CBA (65 ppm)
Repair job of failed location was carried out by M/s L&T as per procedure
submitted by M/s L&T. Major steps followed were as below:
Initially PT & UT, TOFD, PMI, Ferrite check, Hardness test on surface
500mm either side of support ring was carried out.
Disbonded portion of clad was removed. Also clad from defect area was
removed.
Inconel ring welding was carried out followed by DP testing. Then Internal
dissolver tank was welded & DP tested.
Reasons of Failure:
Failure occurred at the top side welding of dissolver tank support ring
where heap of deposits were accumulated.
Corrosion and pitting on the top side weld joint of support ring where the
weld joint is under tensile stress due to load of the dissolver tank might
have caused stress corrosion cracking in the SS cladding leading to
exposure of P11 shell to corrosive fluid and subsequent leak.
Recommendations:
As it is not feasible during every turnaround to cut & lift the inner dissolver
tank, necessary changes in the design of internal dissolver tank is required
after due consultation from the process licensor/ manufacturer.
6.5.2 INTERNAL SHELL CORROSION OF 1ST CRYSTALLIZER (21-CR1-1401)
Introduction:
PTA plant was commissioned in June2006. An emergency shutdown of PTA
unit was taken due to dissolver reactor shell failure which was subsequently
declared as M&I SD 2014 of PTA unit considering the repair time for dissolver
reactor. During this opportunity, 1st PTA crystallizer internal inspection was
also carried out.
MOC/ Design/ Operating Parameters of Dissolver Reactor:
MOC:
Shell
Inlet nozzle shroud
Shell thickness
:
:
:
:
:
246/2800C
36.7/51Kg/cm2
Process Description:
This crystallizer is in just downstream of dissolver reactor. Process description
for this circuit has been detailed in 6.1.
Internal visual inspection of shell and connected nozzles was carried out.
Condition of shell and nozzles was found satisfactory except the shell
around inlet nozzle.
Erosion marks on cladding surface of shell near the inlet nozzle was
observed.
Vent holes in the pad plates for inlet nozzle shroud left were observed
unsealed during vessel fabrication stage.
These 2 nos. pads are welded to the shell base plate.
Reactor shell material just below these pads is carbon steel.
Since vent hole were left open, CS shell base plate was in contact with the
corrosive process fluid.
Deep groove observed in the shell plate at the vent hole from inside. Insitu repair of corroded shell carried out followed by NDT. One certain
failure of the equipment could be averted by this inspection.
Both vent holes were ground to smooth finish.
After Hydrogen bake out, welding was carried out using E-7018-1 for base
metal and ER 308L+ER 309L for cladding surfaces followed by NDTs.
6.6
Construction code
:
:
:
In June 2011, first leakage was noticed from tube to Header stub joint
(HAZ). Leaky location was clamped online.
IN Aug2011, leakage from 2 more tubes was observed and pinhole leak
was arrested by providing online clamp.
In May 2013, 2 nos. of coils leaked from the weld joint between stub to
pipe in the newly replaced inlet economizer header.
In Aug.2013, one more leak noticed in the coil portion adjacent to the
stub/ coil welding joint.
The skin temperatures measured for the header and coil is (145 0C and
1600C respectively using thermohunter instrument. These values are well
below the design limits of 2110C and 2220C respectively.
The supports of the BFW line ex-E-217A/B to inlet economizer header was
visually checked, no abnormality was noticed.
The new header was fabricated by M/s. Indcon Projects and Equipments
Ltd, Faridabad. This header design is very similar to the one fabricated by
OEM M/s Thermax limited. The weld joint quality of the existing header
needs further assessment.
The existing stub to header joint in inlet economizer header is a stub out
design with the opening smaller than the tube ID, whereas in the
intermediate/ outlet header the opening ID is full bore. M/s Thermax limited
was contacted to comment on the design of the existing inlet economizer
header. M/s Thermax replied that the inlet header having lesser ID bore at
header is to maintain proper water circulation through each coil. Hence
you cannot make full bore at inlet header. Since both intermediate & outlet
header are having full bore, if you make inlet header also full bore then it
will cause circulation disturbance & hence overheating/ steaming in
economizer. Accordingly, the design is not the root cause of failure.
Moreover, the same design header served since 1998 till Nov 2012.
Revamp of the RFCCU was done to increase the through put of the unit
from 0.7 MMTA to 0.85 MMMTA in 2008.No changes/modifications were
done in the Co-boiler section hardware.
During Sept.12 the inlet economizer header and 3 nos. coils (10, 11, 13)
were replaced. In April 2013 short shutdown, major repairs in casing plate
was undertaken to arrest flue gas leakage. In the economizer section also
top casing plates were cut to identify leakages of flue. After completing
necessary repairs the casing plate was fixed back and welded. The coil
inlet section was also seal welded to plug flue gas leakage. But as per the
drawing of casing plate, the coils should not be welded with casing,
instead they should pass through a sleeve to provide expansion of the
coil/header during operation. This welding might have contributed to
To mitigate the problem, sleeves were provided around the coils for
accommodating free expansion during operation in all coils of inlet,
intermediate and final economizer header during the May14 shutdown.
The same is being monitored on daily basis; so far no problems have been
noticed.
Though the BFW parameters are not within the limits, physical evidence of
the failed header sample shows that there is no apparent corrosion,
erosion signs, thereby ruling out failure due to corrosion or steaming of
economizer.
Neither is the design of header a issue as was confirmed by the OEM M/s
Thermax and also based on our past data.
The quality of the fabrication carried out by M/s Indcon Projects and
Equipments Ltd, Faridabad could be a reason.
The most probable reason appears to be hindrance/ restriction in thermal
expansion of the inlet economizer header/ coil assembly due to the seal
welding carried out between coil and casing plate at top causing
development of stress and subsequent failure.
6.7
COIL
OF
08-FF-205
DUE
TO
CAUSTIC
Introduction:
CCRU furnace 08-FF-205 is provided with BFW coil in the convection zone for
generation of steam. This coil has been suffering from repeated failure of
BFW inlet tube predominantly due to cracking phenomenon. The recent
failure in BFW coil was noted in Jan 2013 at 6 O clock position however,
continuation of furnace operation using restricted orifice (to avoid dry run in
the coil) resulted in erosion corrosion failure of neighboring HC tube in
Sept2013.
Design/ Operating Conditions of BFW Coil:
Process details:
:
:
:
:
:
Around 1380C
3500C
57- 61 kg/cm2(g)
76 kg/cm2(g)
5040C
BFW Coil: MOC: Studded A210 Gr.A1, Size: 88.9 O/D x 7.62 (12 nos.)
Steam Coil: MOC: Studded A210 Gr.A1, Size: 88.9 O/D x 7.62
Steam Super Heater: A213 Gr.T11,
Size: 88.9 O/D x 7.62
FF-201
FF-205
FF-203
FF-202
RB-201
RB-202
RB-203
EE-201
08-EA-LP-201
LEGENDS
Line MOC
.5Mo
Line size-24"
1.25Cr-
Limit
8.1-9.0
<3
.01- .02
<.02
Observed Range
8.8-8.9
4.0 - 48
0.04 - 0.10
0.05 - 0.07
Limit
Replacement Month
/Year
Nov2009
Dec2011
Sept2013 (Leaked in
Jan2013)
Observed Range
Total no. of tube
replaced
07 Nos.
03 Nos.
12 Nos.
The furnace was not opened immediately after the leakage in BFW coil for
repair/ replacement jobs and operation was continued by reducing BFW
flow inside the coil using restricted orifice.
Leakage in BFW coil occurred in Jan2013 & replacement was taken up in
Sept2013.
Observations:
Visual Observation:
The internal surface of the tube was found fairly clean with adherent
magnetite layer and as such no appreciable corrosion marks except minor
roughening on the ID surface was observed.
Wide, through & through crack like opening was observed on the failed
tube sample at the location of leak without any evidence of appreciable
Slight bowing in the failed tube was also observed during replacement,
however, that may be due to continuation of BFW coil operation after
failure using restricted orifice to reduce flow rate.
Failed tube sample was sent to M/s R&D, Faridabad. The observations
and investigation results are given below:
Laboratory Investigation:
Metallographic Examination:
The deposit inside the crack tip was analyzed using EDAX system of SEM.
This revealed presence of Na to the extent of 1.9 % apart from other
constituents present.
Chemical analysis of failed tube sample received was carried out using
Angstrom V-950 Spark Spectrometer and composition of the tube was
found in line with design metallurgy ASTM A-210 Gr A1.
As we are aware, that liquid/ gaseous hydrocarbon fuel used for furnace
firing, invariably contain sulfur bearing compounds and that was also
indicated by EDAX analysis of deposit on the tube OD surface to the
extent of 2.9%. On burning such fuel in the oxidizing atmosphere, can
result in formation of acidic gases/ acid components like SO 2, H2SO3,
H2SO4 etc. in the flue gas. These on direct condensation or dissolution in
water after steam condensation can form acids, which, on coming in
contact with BFW tubes (CS), can result in external corrosion / immature
failure of BFW tube. However, looking at flue gas temperature of 550
6000C in the vicinity of leaky tube, chances of above mentioned
condensation is not possible. Thus, presence of acidic gases in the flue
gas resulting in localized corrosion / leakage of BFW tube in operation as
a primary reason of failure can be ruled out.
However, such localized external corrosion is possible after BFW tube
leaks in service & water coming out of it dissolves acidic gases in flue gas
creates acidic environment and continue corrosion of tube OD surface in
the leaky region. Such acidic water coming out from leak in jet form, can
also be expected to cause erosion corrosion of nearby Hydro Carbon
convection tube when it comes in contact with it and result in leakage of
the same.
As weld or as bent carbon & low alloy Ferritic steel assemblies are
susceptible to caustic cracking because of high level of residual stress
remaining after fabrication by these methods.
As a matter of fact, the present failure observations was found matching with
caustic embrittlement criterion indicated above as:
High amount of residual tensile stresses are expected in the stud region
due to involvement of resistance welding for joining studs.
From the analysis of deposit on the tube inside surface, indication for
presence of Na in appreciable amount and analysis of deposit at crack tip
showing Na to the extent of 1.9 % on EDAX analysis indicates the
possibility of caustic deposition inside the failed BFW tube & its further
concentration.
Network of cracks observed on tube cross section & tube internal surface
showing inter-granular morphology also resembles with caustic
embrittlement (Caustic Stress Corrosion Cracking) phenomenon.
On looking at the configuration of BFW coil, it is noted that BFW inlet tube
is placed in the high flue gas temperature zone of 550-600 oC than BFW
outlet tube at comparatively lower flue gas temperature zone in the
downstream of flue gas. Therefore, water to tube interface temperature
can be expected high enough particularly at 6 O Clock position with BFW
inlet temperature of 850C to result in deposition of phosphate & release of
free caustic from Tri-Sodium Phosphate. Further concentration of caustic
under the deposit, to the extent to cause caustic embrittlement can also be
expected. Variation in Solubility of Tri-Sodium Phosphate at different
temperature can be seen from Fig 8.
Conclusion:
6.8
Design Load
Steam Pressure at Superheater outlet
Steam temperature at Super heater outlet
Super heater Tube
Feed water inlet temperature
No. of PSH coil
:
:
:
:
:
:
160 Tons / hr
105 kg/cm2
5100C
NB 51.0 mm SS 347
2000C
14
Failed tube sample was sent to R&D center, the results of investigation are as
follows:
Visual Inspection:
The failed sample tube was found free from any deposit on tube ID / OD
surface. However, minor oxidation on tube OD surface was observed.
Failure of the super heater tube took place from HAZ of weld towards
small spool piece of lower thickness side (used during original fabrication).
At the same time multiple circumferential cracks were also observed at the
internal surface of the above failed spool piece.
Thickness Survey:
Thickness variation was noted between the failed SS 347 spool piece &
other tube sections either side of the failed spool piece.
Thickness recorded for failed spool piece was noted 3.45 4.22 mm
compared to thickness values recorded close to 6.0 mm for tube sections
on either side of the failed spool piece (Refer Fig-1).
As per main steam & furnace draft trend graph forwarded by PR, SH outlet
STM temp is noted as 580.330C). Therefore actual tube skin temperature
at failure site may be even higher than 6000C. Considering tube skin
temperature of 6210C the retiring thickness of the tube were calculated to
be 6.2 & 3.62 mm respectively for SS 347 & SS347H Grade tube material.
Hardness Measurement:
Hardness measurement on service exposed SS tube was carried out and
values noted were found within acceptable limit.
Sample
Specification
Tube
Hardness ( BHN)
135/136/135
Chemical Analysis:
Chemical analysis of the failed tube & weld joint was carried out using
Angstrom V-950 Spark Spectrometer & found conforming to SS 347
metallurgy.
Analysis and Discussions:
From the observation, sensitization has been noticed in SS 347 tubes both
in the failed region & beyond and can be expected in the tubes exposed to
sensitization temperature zone of 423 815C. As such, sensitization may
not be expected to impact high temperature properties of the tube material
however, reduction of corrosion resistance and thereby possibility of inter
granular corrosion / cracking in specific environment cannot be ruled out.
At the same time sensitized grain boundary can be expected to have lower
ductility compared to bulk material & thus any failure in such a condition
can have higher tendency to take grain boundary path. Therefore failed
region has shown both Intergranular & transgranular mode of failure.
From the available data, it is noted that, there is fast reduction in allowable
stress values for SS 347 material above 537 oC and thus to withstand the
same amount of pressure much higher thickness will be required at higher
operating temperature .From the observation, it is also noted that failed
spool piece has lower thickness (3.45 4.22) compared to nearby SS 347
Page 116 of 140
The failure of the super heater tube is suspected due to fabrication fault
that is the use of lower thickness spool piece being inadequate to
withstand the temperature & pressure conditions of Boiler.
Sensitization in SS 347 tube material of the Boiler was observed that may
be prone to Polythionic Acid SCC in the environment of flue gas containing
S bearing compounds (can be expected due to the use of S containing
fuel for burner firing.)
6.9
OFFSITE
7.0
7.1
UNIT
Stream
Operating pressure
Operating temp
Inner tube
Cracked gas
70.6 kPa
829/3770C
Page 120 of 140
Outer tube
Water/Steam
12778 kPa
3290C
Designed Pressure
Designed Temperature
Inner tube
448 kPa
5250C
Outer tube
14100 kPa
3700C
TLE Details:
Material Specifications:
Inner tube
Outer Tube
Oval Header
:
:
:
Observations:
All the TLEs were inspected, observation of thickness loss due to severe
corrosion, cracks in tube sheets and tube leaks were observed in bottom
oval header location.
Severe under deposit corrosion (UDC) was observed in boiler feed water
side in oval header and inner tube OD at the inspected locations of the
replaced inner tubes.
Loose black deposits were observed near both dish ends @ bottom 6
OClock location with corrosion marks in shell throughout the length in
bottom most portions.
Reasons of Failure:
BFW Side Corrosion:
The tubes extracted from the TLE revealed diminished wall thickness of
the inner tube, with degradation mechanism clearly starting from the Outer
side i.e. BFW/steam side. Huge amount of black deposits were observed
in the oval header when the tubes were extracted. The damage was only
present at the bottom, very detrimental in the oval header location (100mm
from the bottom end). Oxides in BFW occur due to insufficient preservation
during shut-down and inadequate treatment. These oxides agglomerate in
the areas of high heat flux, building porous salt layers. These layers stick
to the tube wall and difficult to remove even by mechanical cleaning.
Evidence:
Black deposits along with traces of white phosphate salts were observed
in oval headers when tubes were extracted in TLE-D. Also videoscopy
done in TLE-E revealed black deposits in the oval header.
Parameter control: Drum water parameters (high conductivity and Low
PO4) in H#700 were not maintained within desired limits even after shock
blow-downs and Phosphate based treatments.
UT gauging was carried out in oval headers and weld built-up was done at
thickness loss locations.
Surface grinding & DP was done at all oval header bulge locations.
Cracks in oval header were removed by grinding and weld built-up was
done. Root and final DP were carried out.
Leaky corroded inner tubes were replaced.
Ring welding jobs were carried out in 1 no TLE with severe thickness loss
in oval Header.
Manual cleaning of boiler drum was done for removal of deposits.
Alkali Boil-out and passivation of the steam and water circuit is
recommended as a long term and sustainable remedial measure.
8.0
BONGAIGAON REFINERY
8.1
Process Condition:
22-E-002
Pressure(Kg/cm2g)
Tube side
12.9
Temperature in 0C
In
Out
136
55
Fluid Handled
H2 + HC
Thickness
(mm)
2.77
Length
(mm)
8500
No. of
Tubes
276
MOC
SA 179
22-E-002
Jan09
Sept11
Year of
Installment
1984
Year of Tube
Replacement
Nil
Observations:
Reasons of Failure:
Under deposit corrosion by Ammonium Chloride Salt:
Action Taken:
In CRU-MSQ unit there are two nos. of hot oil furnace (26-F-001 A & B) for
heating of hot oil which is used as a heating medium in the heat
exchangers.
Both the furnaces are fuel oil / gas fired vertical heater.
The APH of the furnaces use heat from flue gas (at around 335 0C) from
radiant section to heat combustion air up to a temperature of around
1300C.
Observations:
During internal inspection of APH of Hot oil Furnace 26-F-001/B of CRU &
MSQ Unit in Nov.13 shutdown, following observations were made:
Severe corrosion & perforation of tubes was observed on cold end side
just near to the tube sheet.
Perforation of tubes on the hot
end side and other portion of
the tubes were not observed.
Thick yellowish deposit was
observed on the top external
side of the tubes.
Deposits of reddish oily layer
were observed on APH tube
surfaces.
External
corrosion
was
observed
on
the
tube
surfaces.
Reasons of Failure:
The fuel used in the Furnace contains sulphur. When sulfur (S) containing fuels, including heavy oil are burnt, sulfur oxides (SOx) are
produced, part of which is turned to SO3.
When flue gas temperature drops to below a dew point or when the gas is
in contact with a low temperature wall (at the cold end of APH), SO 3 and
H2O, contained in the gas, are combined to form highly-concentrated
sulfuric acid that corrodes steel.
This is sulfuric acid dew corrosion, which severely corrodes not only
carbon steel but also stainless steel unlike normal atmospheric corrosion.
The severe corrosion and perforation of the APH tubes may be attributed
to sulfuric acid dew point corrosion caused due to running of the furnace
below the design capacity and idling of the furnace for long time.
Recommendation:
Actions Taken:
Complete APH tubes (153 nos.) of the furnace were replaced in January
2014.
8.2
HGU Reformer burners are having two types of refractory blocks Muffle
Blocks & Primary
Blocks.
The
muffle
block
assembly (consisting
of 4 segments) is
installed/ supported in
the burner windbox.
The muffle block also
houses four tertiary air
ports which effectively
reduces production of
Nitrogen Oxides.
The primary block
(adjustable block) is
housed within the
muffle
block.
It
consists of a profiled
castable
refractory
encased in a metal
container
(casing
plate), supported from
a mounting plate.
The combustion air to
the
burner
is
controlled by the inlet
throat to the primary
block, the air-ports in
the muffle block and the annular gap between the primary block and muffle
block assembly.
The burner windbox is internally lined with removable slabs of pre-cut
mineral wool faced with SS plate to provide thermal as well as acoustic
insulation.
Observations:
Primary block casing plates of Burner # 1, 7, 15, 30, 31, 34, 35 which were
opened for suspected damage, were found to be burnt out.
Scaling of primary block casing plates (in left out portions) of damaged
burners was also observed.
Higher than normal gaps were also observed in-between muffle block
segments of the above mentioned burners.
Igniter Pipe tips of a few burners was also observed to be burnt out.
Gas gun tips of all burners were found OK.
MOC: Gas Gun Tip- SS-310, Primary Block Casing Plate- SS-304, Igniter
Pipe- SS-304
Reasons of Failure:
Improper gap between Primary block assembly and muffler blocks. If the
gap is not maintained, then the flame heat may directly come to the casing
plate which occurred a number of times during operating period as noted
during onstream inspection.
Due to lopsided flame in the burner (due to blocked nozzle jets/ partially
blocked air-way within wind box) plates of primary blocks may also come
under intense Abnormal increase of gaps in-between muffle block
segments also exposes the primary block casing plates to the radiant box
heat (in the range of 980-11700C) which is higher than the threshold limit
of SS-304 (8710C) for sustained operation against High temperature
oxidation.
Sometimes, due to leakage/ puncture in gas gun pipe, combustible mixture
may form inside the burner windbox and reaches its auto-ignition
temperature, burning takes place inside the windbox.
Exposure of casing plates to higher than design heat level seems to have
caused high temperature oxidation of the same in the form of scaling and
ultimately burning-off the plate. Traces of sulfur present in hot flue gas
might have increased the scaling rate.
Recommendations:
To maintain the clearance in between muffle block & primary block as per
the design drawings during re-installation.
Action Taken:
8.3
OFFSITE
Equipment No.
Service
Type
Capacity
Dia
Height
:
:
:
:
:
:
T-1704
Coker Residue
Fixed Cone roof
500 KL
10.0 M
7.5 M
Observations:
Bottom Plate:
The thickness reduction was observed at the tank bottom plate while
carrying
out
thickness
gauging.
The plate material is of IS
226 and thickness is 6mm
only.
Suspecting some defects in
bottom plates adjacent to the
shell
plate,
thickness
scanning was carried out of
all the bottom plates near the
shell and bottom plate joints.
It
was
observed
that
thickness reduction recorded
in almost all the plates
adjacent to the shell towards North East to South East direction.
No corrosion was observed on the internal side of the tank.
The plates were cut and the corrosion was observed on the soil side of the
bottom plate.
Roof Plate:
The perforation was observed on the roof plate after removal of insulation
pockets.
After opening the manhole, the roof condition was accessed from inside.
The perforation was observed throughout the complete roof plate and
thinning down of the structure was observed at few locations.
Reasons of Failure:
Roof:
Tank Bottom:
It was clear indication that the water ingress into the soil side of the bottom
plates.
This ingress of the water has caused the corrosion and thinning of the soil
side of the bottom plates.
Action Taken:
The roof plate and corroded structures were replaced. Underside of the
roof plate including its structure and top course plate were painted from
inside.
The foundation was repaired after cutting the thinned down bottom plate.
The corroded plates were replaced after the repair of the foundation.
The crude passed through the holes of bottom plate and had led to the
damage of the bitumen layer below the plates at few locations.
Reason of Failure:
The reason of corrosion and pitting was attributed to SRB attack which led
to the tank bottom plate failure.
The absence of protective painting/Coating at tank bottom plate since
commissioning.
The complete bottom plate was recommended to be replaced.
The plates fabricated for replacement were painted from soil side before
replacement and internal side to be painted after the completion
replacement job.
The foundation was recommended for repair by filling the bitumen sand
layer at the damage location.
8.4
A pin hole had developed in the pipe portion near the bottom flange of the
stand pipe.
LPG was coming out through the hole.
On closer look another smaller leakage point was observed very close to
the pin hole.
The holes were adjacent to each other in a localized area.
In the localized portion close to pin hole minimum thickness was observed
2 mm. In other area thickness was found in order.
However, in one elbow slight thickness reduction was observed.
Pipe portion where leakage had taken place was observed with multiple
depressions/ denting in the entire length.
This led to undulation/ unevenness in surface area of the pipe.
Reasons of Failure:
Recommendation:
The replace the stand pipe with 80 schedule pipe.
Status of Jobs Carried Out:
The line has been replaced with new piping and pipe fittings of 80 schedules
and hydro tested successfully