are held strongly by the audience. In doing so, the theory has the potential to attract interest of
the audience. This approach of presenting alternative realities to the preconceived perceptions of
the current one hook the audience in. But, while nature of the content can be considered as the
sizzle, it will be incomplete without the steak i.e. methodology.
The methodological routes that can be taken towards building theory are again open to subjective
validation. The movement towards creating objectivity in assessing good theory is forwarded
from the scientific method of evaluation and validation. In that regard, methodologies employed
must be such that they can be evaluated along the line of robustness and rigor that are based on
the scientific method. Keeping this in view, certain propositions have been provided which
provide their own methodological versions pertaining to building theory. These approaches either
work up on broad conceptualizations i.e. they provide general guidelines on how to write theory,
or are more focused i.e. they employ strict procedures which have to be undertaken by the
researcher when building theory. Conclusively, writing good theory falls down to dealing with
trade-offs between creativity and structure. Their never seems to be a balance on both ends and
that can be attributed to the demands of the intended audience and that what they are interested
in which sets the direction for the researcher that will be taken in writing theory.